On 1/29/15, Ric Moore wrote:
> On 01/29/2015 02:08 PM, Sven Hartge wrote:
>> Stephen wrote:
>>
>>> I wouldn't mind building it by hand, I'm trying to get more 'hands on'
>>> (pun completely intended) with Debian. I am just a novice user though
>>> so I have a very faint clue what your talking abo
Hi.
On Sat, 31 Jan 2015 11:35:54 +0100
Håkon Alstadheim wrote:
> On 29. jan. 2015 20:12, Stephen wrote:
> > On 01/29/2015 11:08 AM, Sven Hartge wrote:
> >> If you are a novice user, the glibc is the _last_ thing you want to mess
> >> with.
> >>
> >> Grüße,
> >> Sven.
> >>
> > Hmm, that is scary
On 29. jan. 2015 20:12, Stephen wrote:
On 01/29/2015 11:08 AM, Sven Hartge wrote:
If you are a novice user, the glibc is the _last_ thing you want to mess
with.
Grüße,
Sven.
Hmm, that is scary. I don't want to break anything. I am quite
adventurous but I can handle not playing VV until Je
Stephen wrote:
> I don't want to break anything. I am quite adventurous but I can
> handle not playing VV until Jessie releases
I just tried the Windows demo with this command:
$ wine ./vv_demo.exe
No need to install anything, it seems to run fine.
So, until Jessie releases, running
On 01/29/2015 02:08 PM, Sven Hartge wrote:
Stephen wrote:
On 01/29/2015 10:46 AM, Florent Peterschmitt wrote:
Or a custom glibc installed in an isolated prefix, then playing with
LD_LIBRARY_PATH to load the new glibc.
Or if you don't want to build it by hand, you may do something
tricky:
Stephen wrote:
> On 01/29/2015 11:08 AM, Sven Hartge wrote:
>> If you are a novice user, the glibc is the _last_ thing you want to
>> mess with.
> Hmm, that is scary. I don't want to break anything. I am quite
> adventurous but I can handle not playing VV until Jessie releases
> if that is t
On 01/29/2015 11:08 AM, Sven Hartge wrote:
If you are a novice user, the glibc is the _last_ thing you want to mess
with.
Grüße,
Sven.
Hmm, that is scary. I don't want to break anything. I am quite
adventurous but I can handle not playing VV until Jessie releases if
that is the case.
-
Stephen wrote:
> On 01/29/2015 10:46 AM, Florent Peterschmitt wrote:
>> Or a custom glibc installed in an isolated prefix, then playing with
>> LD_LIBRARY_PATH to load the new glibc.
>> Or if you don't want to build it by hand, you may do something
>> tricky: extracting the Jessie package by han
On 01/29/2015 07:59 PM, Stephen wrote:
>
> On 01/29/2015 10:46 AM, Florent Peterschmitt wrote:
>> Or a custom glibc installed in an isolated prefix, then playing with
>> LD_LIBRARY_PATH to load the new glibc.
>
>> Or if you don't want to build it by hand, you may do something tricky:
>> extractin
On 01/29/2015 10:46 AM, Florent Peterschmitt wrote:
Or a custom glibc installed in an isolated prefix, then playing with
LD_LIBRARY_PATH to load the new glibc.
Or if you don't want to build it by hand, you may do something tricky:
extracting the Jessie package by hand in, again, an isolated p
On 01/29/2015 07:31 PM, Sven Hartge wrote:
> Stephen wrote:
>
>> I'm trying to run the game VV on my system but whenever I try and
>> launch it I get the following error: "./x86/vv.x86:
>> /lib/i386-linux-gnu/i686/cmov/libc.so.6: version `GLIBC_2.15' not
>> found (required by ./x86/libSDL
Stephen wrote:
> I'm trying to run the game VV on my system but whenever I try and
> launch it I get the following error: "./x86/vv.x86:
> /lib/i386-linux-gnu/i686/cmov/libc.so.6: version `GLIBC_2.15' not
> found (required by ./x86/libSDL2-2.0.so.0)"
> I tried looking for glibc 2.15 in t
On Wednesday 28 January 2015 09:29:42 Lisi Reisz did opine
And Gene did reply:
> On Wednesday 28 January 2015 14:27:18 Lisi Reisz wrote:
> > On Wednesday 28 January 2015 13:25:20 i...@thargoid.co.uk wrote:
> > > On 2015-01-28 12:27, Peter Viskup wrote:
> > > > before considering downtimes and patch
On Wednesday 28 January 2015 14:31:23 Jochen Spieker wrote:
> Lisi Reisz:
> > On Wednesday 28 January 2015 13:25:20 i...@thargoid.co.uk wrote:
> >>> https://www.debian.org/security/2015/dsa-3142
> >>> http://seclists.org/oss-sec/2015/q1/283
> >>>
> >>> especially the second link mention network-fac
Lisi Reisz:
> On Wednesday 28 January 2015 13:25:20 i...@thargoid.co.uk wrote:
>>>
>>> https://www.debian.org/security/2015/dsa-3142
>>> http://seclists.org/oss-sec/2015/q1/283
>>>
>>> especially the second link mention network-facing software which is not
>>> vulnerable due to proper sanitizatio
On Wednesday 28 January 2015 14:27:18 Lisi Reisz wrote:
> On Wednesday 28 January 2015 13:25:20 i...@thargoid.co.uk wrote:
> > On 2015-01-28 12:27, Peter Viskup wrote:
> > > before considering downtimes and patching activities on production
> > > servers
> > > read these:
> > >
> > > http://secli
On Wednesday 28 January 2015 13:25:20 i...@thargoid.co.uk wrote:
> On 2015-01-28 12:27, Peter Viskup wrote:
> > before considering downtimes and patching activities on production
> > servers
> > read these:
> >
> > https://www.debian.org/security/2015/dsa-3142
> > http://seclists.org/oss-sec/2015/q
On 2015-01-28 12:27, Peter Viskup wrote:
before considering downtimes and patching activities on production
servers
read these:
https://www.debian.org/security/2015/dsa-3142
http://seclists.org/oss-sec/2015/q1/283
especially the second link mention network-facing software which is not
vulnerab
before considering downtimes and patching activities on production servers
read these:
https://www.debian.org/security/2015/dsa-3142
http://seclists.org/oss-sec/2015/q1/283
especially the second link mention network-facing software which is not
vulnerable due to proper sanitization out of glibc.
On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 12:06 PM, Kelly Clowers wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 9, 2012 at 6:23 PM, Carl Fink wrote:
>> On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 12:50:36AM +0100, Brian wrote:
>>> On Sun 09 Sep 2012 at 19:00:33 -0400, Carl Fink wrote:
>>>
Never mind, I just checked and Sid is also running 2.13. Apparent
On Lu, 10 sep 12, 09:06:56, Kelly Clowers wrote:
>
> I can't speak for others, but if I really needed a newer glibc that
> bad, I wold probably add Ubuntu to my sources.list, and make
> a hybrid. For glibc, you might end up pulling in a lot of packages...
>
> Later, when Debian gets it you can ro
On Sun, Sep 9, 2012 at 6:23 PM, Carl Fink wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 12:50:36AM +0100, Brian wrote:
>> On Sun 09 Sep 2012 at 19:00:33 -0400, Carl Fink wrote:
>>
>> > Never mind, I just checked and Sid is also running 2.13. Apparently I'd
>> > have
>> > to use ANOTHER DISTRO to get a glibc l
On Sun, 09 Sep 2012 19:00:33 -0400, Carl Fink wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 09, 2012 at 05:12:35PM -0400, Carl Fink wrote:
>> Some non-packaged software, e.g. the BOINC client, requires a
>> relatively recent version of glibc.
There always be some package that requires some version for some library.
This
On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 09:27:00AM +0100, Brian wrote:
> On Sun 09 Sep 2012 at 21:23:16 -0400, Carl Fink wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 12:50:36AM +0100, Brian wrote:
> > >
> > > Maybe first read the thread starting at
> > >
> > >http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2012/07/msg00466.h
On Sun 09 Sep 2012 at 21:23:16 -0400, Carl Fink wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 12:50:36AM +0100, Brian wrote:
> >
> > Maybe first read the thread starting at
> >
> >http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2012/07/msg00466.html
>
> A thread in which someone says the only way to proceed is to
On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 12:50:36AM +0100, Brian wrote:
> On Sun 09 Sep 2012 at 19:00:33 -0400, Carl Fink wrote:
>
> > Never mind, I just checked and Sid is also running 2.13. Apparently I'd have
> > to use ANOTHER DISTRO to get a glibc less than 18 months old.
> >
> > Really?
> >
> > Developers:
On 09/09/2012 02:12 PM, Carl Fink wrote:
> Some non-packaged software, e.g. the BOINC client, requires a relatively
> recent version of glibc.
BOINC 7.0.27 migrated to wheezy about a month ago (and is thus listed on
http://packages.debian.org/search?keywords=boinc ). Before then, I was
using the p
On Sun 09 Sep 2012 at 19:00:33 -0400, Carl Fink wrote:
> Never mind, I just checked and Sid is also running 2.13. Apparently I'd have
> to use ANOTHER DISTRO to get a glibc less than 18 months old.
>
> Really?
>
> Developers: really?
>
> I gauess the only way to get an answer to the above rheto
On Sun, Sep 09, 2012 at 05:12:35PM -0400, Carl Fink wrote:
> Some non-packaged software, e.g. the BOINC client, requires a relatively
> recent version of glibc.
>
> Wheezy, the latest non-unstable version of Debian, is stuck at 2.13,
> released 1.5 years ago, and since it is frozen there won't be
JoeHill ha scritto:
What?
I've definitely never seen this before. I'm running a Testing system myself and
Flash works fine (well, to the extent that Flash can ever be said to work
'fine').
On a Testing system I just installed, however, I'm getting an error that:
ERROR: Your glibc library is ol
On Wed, Jul 01, 2009 at 19:29:26 -0400, JoeHill wrote:
>
> What?
>
> I've definitely never seen this before. I'm running a Testing system myself
> and
> Flash works fine (well, to the extent that Flash can ever be said to work
> 'fine').
>
> On a Testing system I just installed, however, I'm ge
Sven Joachim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On 2008-01-11 23:37 +0100, David Fox wrote:
>
>> On 1/11/08, Kum Gabor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>> Does somebody know something easy method of upgrading GLIBC to version 2.4
>>> from 2.3.6 without upgrading Etch to Lenny?
>>
>> I don't see it - and
On 2008-01-11 23:37 +0100, David Fox wrote:
> On 1/11/08, Kum Gabor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Does somebody know something easy method of upgrading GLIBC to version 2.4
>> from 2.3.6 without upgrading Etch to Lenny?
>
> I don't see it - and likely there would be too many breakages.
Um, coul
On 1/11/08, Kum Gabor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Does somebody know something easy method of upgrading GLIBC to version 2.4
> from 2.3.6 without upgrading Etch to Lenny?
I don't see it - and likely there would be too many breakages. You're
better off doing a dist-upgrade to lenny.
--
To UNSU
On Thursday 10 January 2008 22:04, Ron Johnson wrote:
> On 01/10/08 12:56, Kum Gabor wrote:
> > Hello All!
> >
> > I tried to set up my SiS672 video on my Fujitsu-Siemens Esprimo v5515
> > notebook. I found a driver for Ubuntu, but I have the following problem:
> >
> > dlopen: /lib/tls/i686/cmov/li
On 01/10/08 12:56, Kum Gabor wrote:
Hello All!
I tried to set up my SiS672 video on my Fujitsu-Siemens Esprimo v5515
notebook. I found a driver for Ubuntu, but I have the following problem:
dlopen: /lib/tls/i686/cmov/libc.so.6: version 'GLIBC_2.4' not found (required
by /usr/lib/xorg/modules/
On Tue, May 01, 2007 at 12:59:02AM +0200, csanyipal wrote:
>
> I find these with aptitude:
> $ aptitude search glibc
> v glibc-2.3.6-2 -
> v glibc-2.3.6.ds1-1 -
> p glibc-doc - GNU C Library: Documentation
> p glibc-doc-reference- GNU C Library: Documentation
Yesterday I discovered that I can also build it on a stable distro, but I get
the previously mentioned errors when I try to build on a testing distro.
I am asssuming something about the build system has fundamentally changed
between revisions.
Can anyone shed more light on this?
thx,
NZG
On T
NZG wrote:
> I'm trying to build
> glibc_2.3.2.ds1-22sarge3
> from source, but it's failing
>
> I do this:
> wget
> http://ftp.debian.org/debian/pool/main/g/glibc/glibc_2.3.2.ds1-22sarge3.dsc
> wget
> http://ftp.debian.org/debian/pool/main/g/glibc/glibc_2.3.2.ds1-22sarge3.diff$
> wget
> http://
On Mon, Sep 20, 2004 at 07:50:53PM +0200, Sven Hoexter wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 19, 2004 at 05:30:24PM -0700, Stefan O'Rear wrote:
> > On Sun, Sep 19, 2004 at 05:20:50PM -0700, Cole S. Ashcraft wrote:
> > > Is there an updated version of glibc (2.3) and gcc for woody?
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Cole
>
On Sun, Sep 19, 2004 at 05:30:24PM -0700, Stefan O'Rear wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 19, 2004 at 05:20:50PM -0700, Cole S. Ashcraft wrote:
> > Is there an updated version of glibc (2.3) and gcc for woody?
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Cole
>
> There is no updated anything for woody.
>
> But, you can install the l
On Sun, Sep 19, 2004 at 05:20:50PM -0700, Cole S. Ashcraft wrote:
> Is there an updated version of glibc (2.3) and gcc for woody?
>
> Thanks,
> Cole
There is no updated anything for woody.
But, you can install the libc6, libdb1_compat, gcc-3.3, etc from woody:
~/homework/2004/09 %% dpkg -s libc
Jeff Elkins wrote:
> I set up a script to swap the libs, run the converter, then swap
> them back so as not to leave my system in an unstable state. Goodbye
> Windows!
A slightly easier method would be to install the shared library in a
private location, say $HOME/rh-libs, and then use LD_LIBRARY_
On Monday 07 June 2004 12:06 pm, Bob Proulx wrote:
>Jeff Elkins wrote:
>> Bob Proulx wrote:
>> > Jeff Elkins wrote:
>> > > pvconv: relocation error: pvconv: undefined symbol: __dynamic_cast_2
>> >
>> > I was curious enough to download the application and try it. I can
>> > get a usage string out o
Jeff Elkins wrote:
> Bob Proulx wrote:
> > Jeff Elkins wrote:
> > > pvconv: relocation error: pvconv: undefined symbol: __dynamic_cast_2
> >
> > I was curious enough to download the application and try it. I can
> > get a usage string out of it so I think I have all of the libraries on
> > my wood
On Sunday 06 June 2004 11:06 pm, Bob Proulx wrote:
>Jeff Elkins wrote:
>> Bob Proulx wrote:
>> >This following is probably the magic package you need to meet binary
>> >compatibility with Red Hat packages.
>> >
>> > apt-get install libstdc++2.9-glibc2.1
>> >
>> >You can get it from here.
>> >
>> >
Jeff Elkins wrote:
> Bob Proulx wrote:
> >This following is probably the magic package you need to meet binary
> >compatibility with Red Hat packages.
> >
> > apt-get install libstdc++2.9-glibc2.1
> >
> >You can get it from here.
> >
> > http://packages.debian.org/stable/oldlibs/libstdc++2.9-glib
On Sunday 06 June 2004 10:11 pm, Bob Proulx wrote:
>Pardon me for missing the start of this thread.
>
>Adam Aube wrote:
>> Jeff Elkins wrote:
>> > To use PureVoice Converter, you must have the following:
>> >
>> > - Linux for x86 (any distribution or build should work)
>> > - GLIBC 2.2 (e.g. RedH
Pardon me for missing the start of this thread.
Adam Aube wrote:
> Jeff Elkins wrote:
> > To use PureVoice Converter, you must have the following:
> >
> > - Linux for x86 (any distribution or build should work)
> > - GLIBC 2.2 (e.g. RedHat RPM "glibc2.2.4-19.3")
> > - LIBSTDC++ 2.96 (e.g. RedH
Jeff Elkins wrote:
> To use PureVoice Converter, you must have the following:
>
> - Linux for x86 (any distribution or build should work)
> - GLIBC 2.2 (e.g. RedHat RPM "glibc2.2.4-19.3")
> - LIBSTDC++ 2.96 (e.g. RedHat RPM "libstdc++-2.96-54")
>
> I'm running sid. What should I apt-get?
Try
On Wed, Sep 18, 2002 at 12:46:12PM +0200, Paul Bakker wrote:
> I have an alpha processor and distribution installed of debian 2.1.
You should really do a full upgrade through 2.2 to 3.0 - picking out
just glibc and upgrading that is possibly doable, but risky. I doubt
anyone has ever tested woody
On Fri, Jun 14, 2002 at 04:02:02PM -0700, ian wrote:
> i upgraded to XFree86 4.1 and now when i try to run emacs, vi, etc. i
> keep getting this error:
>
> /lib/libc.so.6: version 'GLIBC_2.2' not found required by
> /user/X11R6/libX11.so.6
How did you upgrade? It sounds like you've forced depend
On Mon, Mar 18, 2002 at 12:23:13PM -0500, Bodnyk, Bruce W wrote:
> Does anyone know where I can get the latest version of glibc (2.2) which
> apparently is needed for the latest version of XFree86?
You should get the version of XFree86 4 which is built for Debian stable
instead. You can find it at
You should install this package : libc6
apt-cache show libc6 -->
[...]
Version: 2.2.5-3
Provides: glibc-2.2.5-3
[...]
See you
--
R.Pac
>> I want to install Oracle 8i on my woody box.
>> The Oracle installation requires glibc 2.1.3 version.
>> I was looking for glibc package, but i didn't found
>> it.
>> The only package that names glibc is libstdc++
>>
>> What package should I install to satisfy the glibc
>> 2.1.3
>> requirement?
On Tue, Aug 21, 2001 at 11:01:12PM -0700, John L. Fjellstad wrote:
> Are there different versions of libc available? What if you are using
> Woody (glibc 2.2), and need support for glibc2.1?
> I know you can do both libc5 and libc6 (glibc2.x), but can you do
> different versions of glibc? My unders
On Tue, Aug 21, 2001 at 05:56:58PM -0700, Jason Majors wrote:
> but anyway...your answers:
> glibc == libc6
> Woody meets that requirement.
> You might need libc6-dev too for headers and such.
Are there different versions of libc available? What if you are using
Woody (glibc 2.2), and need suppo
On Tuesday 21 August 2001 04:28 pm, Eduardo Gargiulo wrote:
> Hi all.
>
> I want to install Oracle 8i on my woody box.
> The Oracle installation requires glibc 2.1.3 version.
> I was looking for glibc package, but i didn't found
> it.
> The only package that names glibc is libstdc++
>
> What packag
On Tue, Aug 21, 2001 at 05:56:58PM -0700, Jason Majors wrote:
| You might need libc6-dev too for headers and such.
Not likely -- I doubt Oracle gave him the source :-).
-D
RMS would be very disappointed if he knew you wanted to install Oracle...
but anyway...your answers:
glibc == libc6
Woody meets that requirement.
You might need libc6-dev too for headers and such.
On Tue, Aug 21, 2001 at 05:28:25PM -0700, Eduardo Gargiulo scribbled...
> Hi all.
>
> I want to
On Tue, Aug 21, 2001 at 05:28:25PM -0700, Eduardo Gargiulo wrote:
| Hi all.
|
| I want to install Oracle 8i on my woody box.
| The Oracle installation requires glibc 2.1.3 version.
| I was looking for glibc package, but i didn't found
| it.
| The only package that names glibc is libstdc++
It's ca
On Tuesday 14 August 2001 13:12, Eduard Bloch wrote:
> Speak after me:
> Unstable is unstable is unstable is unstable...
I know :-)
> I have to read debian-devel, I have to read debian-devel...
OK I will do this!
> http://auric.debian.org/~bcollins/libc6_2.2.3-10.0.1_i386.deb or wait
> for a fi
#include
Severin Olloz wrote on Tue Aug 14, 2001 um 12:58:01PM:
> I have update my debian server and there's a problem with the glibc 2.2.3-10
> package!
Speak after me:
Unstable is unstable is unstable is unstable...
I have to read debian-devel, I have to read debian-devel...
> Somebody kno
> From: Joost Kooij <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
> > Subject: Re: Glibc
> > Resent-Date: Sun, 15 Jul 2001 14:56:04 -0700
> > Resent-From: debian-user@lists.debian.org
> >
> > On Sun, Jul 15, 2001 at 02:31:20PM -0700, Brian Bal
Brian Ballsun-Stanton wrote on Sun Jul 15, 2001 at 03:04:25PM:
>
> while I'm upgrading, and the libc6 package was already included
potato is based on glibc-2.1 -- woody is based on glibc-2.2
So although a "libc6 package" is installed it may be the case that it
is not the one from woody. As alread
while I'm upgrading, and the libc6 package was already included
On Mon, 16 Jul 2001, Joost Kooij wrote:
> Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2001 06:55:16 +0200
> From: Joost Kooij <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
> Subject: Re: Glibc
> Resent-Date: Sun, 15 Jul 20
On Sun, Jul 15, 2001 at 09:41:05PM -0700, Bob Nielsen wrote:
> The easiest way to upgrade to woody is with 'apt-get dist-upgrade'.
Also note that the most durable way is to use dselect.
Cheers,
Joost
On Sun, Jul 15, 2001 at 02:31:20PM -0700, Brian Ballsun-Stanton wrote:
> When trying to dselect upgrade to woody, I keep running into errors that
> say that GLIBC_2.2 is required, I tried adding things that say they have
> glibc, but it doesn't seem to fix it. Any recommendations?
Do you mean that
On Sun, Jul 15, 2001 at 02:31:20PM -0700, Brian Ballsun-Stanton wrote:
> When trying to dselect upgrade to woody, I keep running into errors that
> say that GLIBC_2.2 is required, I tried adding things that say they have
> glibc, but it doesn't seem to fix it. Any recommendations?
glibc = libc6
T
DW> STIL MORE
DW> Well I suppose my stupidity might help someone else, so I may as well
DW> document it.
DW> The libc_nonshared.a is in the libc-dev package.
DW> If someone is reading this while trying to follow the instructions
DW> from the discussion list on the Oracle site...
DW> The libc_no
STIL MORE
Well I suppose my stupidity might help someone else, so I may as well
document it.
The libc_nonshared.a is in the libc-dev package.
If someone is reading this while trying to follow the instructions
from the discussion list on the Oracle site...
The libc_nonshared is in the usr/lib di
MORE...
Further to my previous message. I saw the "obvious" solution,
downloaded the glibc.2.1.3 deb file, and used
dpkg-deb -x package directory
to extract its contents.
This has given me the libraries i neded, however it seems that I also
need a file
libc_nonshared.a
Is this a special generat
>
> Hi debian-user readers,
>
> I'm running testing, which I believe is based on glibc2.2. Is this
> backwards compatible with glibc2.1? If a program says it requires 2.1,
> should I expect that it will work?
most of the time..sometimes it wont..depends how the program
was coded, and compiled
On Wed, Apr 25, 2001 at 06:20:02PM -0700, David Steinberg wrote:
>
> Hi debian-user readers,
>
> Something I've been wondering for a while, and now I really need to
> know: how do glibc versions relate?
>
> I'm running testing, which I believe is based on glibc2.2. Is this
> backwards compatibl
Lo, on Wednesday, January 3, Ben Collins did write:
> On Wed, Jan 03, 2001 at 04:37:44PM +1100, Brian May wrote:
> > > "Ben" == Ben Collins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> > Ben> By default, __USE_GNU is defined. If you want to define it
> >
> > (perhaps you meant "...is undefined"???)
On Wed, Jan 03, 2001 at 04:47:55PM +1100, Brian May wrote:
> #include
> #include
> #include
> #include
>
> but still get a warning:
>
> gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I.. -I../include-g -O2 -Wall -c -o main.o
> `test -f main.c || echo './'`main.c
> main.c: In function `xmlparse_file':
> ma
> "Ben" == Ben Collins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Ben> No, __USE_GNU is defined, unless one of the other _XXX_SOURCE
Ben> macros are also defined (like _SVID_SOURCE or _XOPEN_SOURCE,
Ben> or similar). Most likely the program you are compiling is
Ben> defining one of these aswe
On Wed, Jan 03, 2001 at 04:37:44PM +1100, Brian May wrote:
> > "Ben" == Ben Collins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Ben> By default, __USE_GNU is defined. If you want to define it
>
> (perhaps you meant "...is undefined"???)
>
> Ben> explicitly, then use -D_GNU_SOURCE in your CFLAGS.
> "Mike" == Mike <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Mike> So for vasprintf you would need stdarg.h Or am I reading
Mike> this incorrectly? Going on the presumption that I'm reading
Mike> this right, I take it this is not working for you? If not,
Mike> have you got the manpages-dev p
> "Ben" == Ben Collins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Ben> By default, __USE_GNU is defined. If you want to define it
(perhaps you meant "...is undefined"???)
Ben> explicitly, then use -D_GNU_SOURCE in your CFLAGS.
It doesn't seem to be the case here:
> gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I.
%% David Purton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
dp> On Tue, 2 Jan 2001, Mike wrote:
>>
>> hal9000:~$ man vasprintf
dp> useful
dp> what package provides these man pages?
My system sez:
$ dpkg -S vasprintf
manpages-dev: /usr/share/man/man3/vasprintf.3.gz
So, use:
# apt-get install
On Tue, 2 Jan 2001, Mike wrote:
>
> hal9000:~$ man vasprintf
> Reformatting vasprintf(3), please wait...
>
> PRINTF(3) Linux Programmer's Manual PRINTF(3)
>
> NAME
>printf, fprintf, sprintf, snprintf, vprintf, vfprintf,
>vsprintf, vsnprintf - formatted ou
On Wed, Jan 03, 2001 at 01:56:23PM +1100, Brian May wrote:
>
> #ifdef __USE_GNU
> /* Write formatted output to a string dynamically allocated with `malloc'.
>Store the address of the string in *PTR. */
> extern int vasprintf __P ((char **__restrict __ptr,
>__const
Brian May wrote:
> Hello,
>
> What is the quickest way to look up a include file required
> for a given function in glibc?
>
> Before, with the man page system, I would be able to type in "man
> vasprintf" and all the information I ever required would be presented
> on the screen right in front o
On Sun, Dec 10, 2000 at 06:06:53PM +0100, Preben Randhol wrote:
> Some of the package I use are now updated in the woody distrobution, and
> unfortunately they require a newer glibc than the current potato version
> has. I am vary of upgrading (g)libc as I'm afraid it will break my
> system. Does a
Thanks, that did the trick
> I just had this problem, it's a pain but you don't have to rebuild your
> entire system.
> I think it's a bug but it is too low level for me to characterise very well.
>
> Anyway, this should help (it saved me from having to reinstall):
>
> http://lists.debian.org/d
I just had this problem, it's a pain but you don't have to rebuild your entire
system.
I think it's a bug but it is too low level for me to characterize very well.
Anyway, this should help (it saved me from having to reinstall):
http://lists.debian.org/debian-user-0009/msg04260.html
krafty
P
Gregory,
It was all my fault. I pulled the plug out of the wall when the lamp was
still on.
Regrets,
montefin
"Gregory T. Norris" wrote:
>
> On Sat, Sep 30, 2000 at 09:33:55AM -0400, Ben Collins wrote:
> > [1] Debian Chaos Events are scheduled on a haphazard basis. We make no
> > gurantees abo
On Sat, Sep 30, 2000 at 09:33:55AM -0400, Ben Collins wrote:
> [1] Debian Chaos Events are scheduled on a haphazard basis. We make no
> gurantees about show times.
Hey, don't drag me into this! I didn't do it!!! :-)
Sorry, couldn't resist.
>
> Ladies and Gentlemen, Welcome to another televised Major League Baseball
> game. In an effort to match the viewership of Monday Night Football, now
> that Dennis Miller is part of it, we looked long and hard for someone,
> someone with a great personality, wonderful people skills, and above a
On Sat, 30 Sep 2000, Ben Collins wrote:
> [1] Debian Chaos Events are scheduled on a haphazard basis. We make no
> guarantees about show times.
Coming soon, Watch the Amazing Horse that dives into a Package Pool!!
See the unstable freaks who apt-get update every 10 minutes!!!
Hear the weird wild
On Sat, Sep 30, 2000 at 01:56:33PM -0400, Greg Stark wrote:
>
> Ben Collins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > For those bitten by The Great Glibc Update of 2000, welcome to our annual
> > ritual. Please stay tuned during the next few months where we install a new
> > gcc. This will be followed by
On Sat, Sep 30, 2000 at 09:33:55AM -0400, Ben Collins wrote:
> If you had problems with the last few 2.1.94 packages (and even if you
> didn't), get these. They are currently in incoming (to be installed later
> this afternoon, then mirrors will get it some hours later). Make sure you
> get the lib
On Sat, Sep 30, 2000 at 07:00:59PM +0200, Marcelo E. Magallon wrote:
> I thought this was chance, but Christian Kurz said the same happened
> to him.
It didn't happen to me. FYI, I am using postfix and not exim...
Roland
--
Roland Bauerschmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
On Sat, Sep 30, 2000 at 01:56:33PM -0400, Greg Stark wrote:
>
> Ben Collins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > For those bitten by The Great Glibc Update of 2000, welcome to our annual
> > ritual. Please stay tuned during the next few months where we install a new
> > gcc. This will be followed by
Ben Collins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> For those bitten by The Great Glibc Update of 2000, welcome to our annual
> ritual. Please stay tuned during the next few months where we install a new
> gcc. This will be followed by self inflicted pain of stricter C++ syntax,
> macro collisions, binary
>> Ben Collins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> If you had problems with the last few 2.1.94 packages (and even if you
> didn't), get these. They are currently in incoming (to be installed later
> this afternoon, then mirrors will get it some hours later). Make sure you
> get the libdb2 that goes
Ben Collins writes:
> I don't have time to list everything it fixes, but I can tell you that it
> fixes EVERY issue that EVERYONE was having.
Indeed, it's working perfectly here. Cheers! (I will no longer have to
bug anyone about recompiling Perl...)
> For those bitten by The Great Glibc Update
On Mon, Jun 19, 2000 at 02:42:18PM -0400, Wesley A. Wannemacher wrote:
>
> I am trying to compile and install the glibc libraries
> on my Linux machine. I am including threads and crypt
> libs. I get past the configure script w/o problems, but
> when compiling i get the following:
>
> connections
On Mon, Jun 19, 2000 at 14:42:18 -0400, Wesley A. Wannemacher wrote:
> I am trying to compile and install the glibc libraries on my Linux
> machine. I am including threads and crypt libs. I get past the configure
> script w/o problems, but when compiling i get the following:
> I am installing it s
1 - 100 of 145 matches
Mail list logo
