Re: gimp 1.2/unstable

On 13 Dec 2001, Jens Gecius wrote: > Hi folks! > > I just started scanning a couple of negatives at 1600dpi and am trying > to work with them in the gimp. I also do high resolution film scans with linux. If you want to just tranform them a little bit, for example to scale, crop, rotate, adjust

Re: gimp 1.2/unstable

Jens Gecius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Can't I somehow say "Well, take up to 700M from RAM, then file"? That > would be decent. Or something like "take 70% of available ram". Yeah, found it - tile cache size seems to be the setting I need. Now it works. Thanks for the hints. -- Tschoe,

Re: gimp 1.2/unstable

dman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Thu, Dec 13, 2001 at 08:28:37PM -0500, Jens Gecius wrote: > | Hi folks! > | > | I just started scanning a couple of negatives at 1600dpi and am trying > | to work with them in the gimp. > | > | Unfortunately, I don't see the gimp being nice to memory. I have

Re: gimp 1.2/unstable

On Thu, Dec 13, 2001 at 08:28:37PM -0500, Jens Gecius wrote: | Hi folks! | | I just started scanning a couple of negatives at 1600dpi and am trying | to work with them in the gimp. | | Unfortunately, I don't see the gimp being nice to memory. I have 1G on | board, a 768M swap partition, and /tmp