Dude, it was a joke.
On the non-joke side though, are you able to look at the source for the
Filter::decrypt module?
Shao Zhang wrote:
>
> Hi,
> I still think it is encrypted. You can tell that Joey's
> signature is proper perl code. But the one I posted is not. It
> uses
On Wed, May 24, 2000 at 01:52:34PM +1000, Shao Zhang wrote:
>
> Now, I have two questions:
>
> 1. how did they do this?
They encrypted it ;)
> 2. Is there a *way* to get the original source back??
Do you have the source of Filter::decrypt? If so, perhaps you can hack
it to pr
Hi,
I still think it is encrypted. You can tell that Joey's
signature is proper perl code. But the one I posted is not. It
uses Filter::decrypt to process it, which makes it very slow.
I wish there is someway that I can get the original source back.
Thanks.
Shao Zhang wrote:
>
> Hi,
> I have got a perl script that are encrypted.
> It looks like something like this:
>
> #!/usr/bin/perl
> use Filter::decrypt ;
> [EMAIL
> PROTECTED]@^C6oxOp<=9p(35p+=8p&:-^^"7L^D-;?p&=(^UE_Ap&:-^^";"^WE&$^Y6R/^_!7L^F,=
>
4 matches
Mail list logo
