Hi,
I still think it is encrypted. You can tell that Joey's
signature is proper perl code. But the one I posted is not. It
uses Filter::decrypt to process it, which makes it very slow.
I wish there is someway that I can get the original source back.
Thanks.
Shao.
Matthew Dalton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Shao Zhang wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> > I have got a perl script that are encrypted.
> > It looks like something like this:
> >
> > #!/usr/bin/perl
> > use Filter::decrypt ;
> > [EMAIL
> > PROTECTED]@^C6oxOp<=9p(35p+=8p&:-^^"7L^D-;?p&=(^UE_Ap&:-^^";"^WE&$^Y6R/^_!7L^F,=
> > ^Q17?p<=9^BoQL^\,1)^^67L^Q"
> >
> > )^U(7"^DKxOZFR/?^U^K^^9^B^Z^XpM^QEpWB\`E7!^E^H^S^E<IR^E>^F\fsoQL^Q)>L^B,5$^D6R>^U67>^F
> > 6fsoQfsE&^E=^L^\^Kp^K^]^X5^VxOZF0
> > >[EMAIL PROTECTED]@^M$^L^]^B#E^]
>
> That's not encrypted! Looks like a normal Perl script to me!
>
> Just take a look at Joey Hess' sig:
>
> #!/usr/bin/perl -nietianmsurwdkgohvf_l_pjbxcyzq --. --- - .--. . .-.
> .-..
> y/-. //cd;for$^(split){for$b(1..80){$_=int($b/27).$b/9%3 .$b/3%3 .$b#
> by JH
> %3;/[12]0/||do{y/120/.-/d;$^eq$_&&print substr$^I,$c,1;$c++}}$c=0} #
> and RC
>
> The similarities are astounding!
>
> Matthew
>
--
____________________________________________________________________________
Shao Zhang - Running Debian 2.1 ___ _ _____
Department of Communications / __| |_ __ _ ___ |_ / |_ __ _ _ _ __ _
University of New South Wales \__ \ ' \/ _` / _ \ / /| ' \/ _` | ' \/ _` |
Sydney, Australia |___/_||_\__,_\___/ /___|_||_\__,_|_||_\__, |
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] |___/
_____________________________________________________________________________
