On Mon 29 Jul 2019 at 06:15:42 (-0700), pe...@easthope.ca wrote:
> From: Reco
> Date: Tue, 23 Jul 2019 19:26:13 +0300
> > In short, please consider using another e-mail client.
>
> I compose the reply from the debian-user Web page. I don't know of a
> MUA capable of reading a page and composing
Hi,
* Day Brown wrote (2004-01-31 18:50):
>Thorsten Haude wrote:
>> * Day Brown wrote (2004-01-31 06:00):
>> >Well, now thatcha mention it, I am somewhat bemused by the loss of email
>> >functionality since I quit using QWKMAIL and the BBS nets, and went on
>> >the internet.
>>
>> I had similar t
Thorsten Haude wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> * Day Brown wrote (2004-01-31 06:00):
> >Well, now thatcha mention it, I am somewhat bemused by the loss of email
> >functionality since I quit using QWKMAIL and the BBS nets, and went on
> >the internet.
>
> I had similar thoughts. I used Crosspoint on Fido, an
Hi,
* Day Brown wrote (2004-01-31 06:00):
>Well, now thatcha mention it, I am somewhat bemused by the loss of email
>functionality since I quit using QWKMAIL and the BBS nets, and went on
>the internet.
I had similar thoughts. I used Crosspoint on Fido, and still miss some
features from both.
>
On Friday, Jan 30, 2004, at 22:00 America/Denver, Day Brown wrote:
I see where people in email now continually complain of being
misquoted,
how attribution with the system of single, double, triple,.. angle
brackets is often misleading. But my QWKMAIL put my words up here in
amber, and before cit
On Fri, Jan 30, 2004 at 09:00:00PM -0800, Day Brown wrote:
> Perhaps I have not expressed myself well, but the point is, that it is
> more difficult to use email now than it used to be; given the reputation
> of the computer business for 'progress', that's odd.
So are you looking for a solution? Be
Well, now thatcha mention it, I am somewhat bemused by the loss of email
functionality since I quit using QWKMAIL and the BBS nets, and went on
the internet.
The BBS posts were 8 bit. You had the entire 256 IBM CMOS bitmaps.
The BBS posts offered ANSI color. It's not just mono like this. HTML
giv
Derrick writes:
> One possibility is uuMail. It is a commercial mail tool (and protocol)
> that does really high compression to minimize the bandwidth needed to
> transfer messages.
A proprietary version of UUCP. Why not use the real thing?
--
John Hasler
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Dancing Horse Hill
El
On Fri, Jan 30, 2004 at 05:27:42PM -0500, Derrick 'dman' Hudson wrote:
[...]
| It's not IMAP, alone, that provides this. It is the IMAP clients
| (such as isync or
Oops, I forgot to come back and fill this in after the apt-cache
search in the other window finished. I meant to say "such as isync
On Tue, Jan 27, 2004 at 10:59:15PM -0800, Curtis Vaughan wrote:
| >
| >hi ya curtis
| >
| >On Tue, 27 Jan 2004, Curtis Vaughan wrote:
| >
| >>But doesn't IMAP have more traffic involved than POP3? I mean each
| >>time you connect, it has to check to see what's on the server and
| >>what's on your
> -Original Message-
> From: Ben Yau [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Nate Duehr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >
> > Neither POP3 nor IMAP nor anything else will fix a problem at the
> > network level. This seems obvious. Either the network works well,
Hi,
> On Wed, 28 Jan 2004, Ben Yau wrote:
>
> > True, but you can do your best to workaround the network issue. In this
> > case, a mail client that would actually do something akin to
> >
> > retr 1
> > del 1
> > retr 2
> > del 2
> > retr 3
> > del 3
> >
> > Instead of retrieving all message
On Tue, Jan 27, 2004 at 09:44:47PM -0800, Curtis Vaughan wrote:
> I know this is not a windows list and I have never yet asked a question
> like this on here before, but perhaps there is someone who knows the
> answer to this question.
>
> Because our vessels have to get mail over lines that are
On Wed, 28 Jan 2004, Ben Yau wrote:
> True, but you can do your best to workaround the network issue. In this
> case, a mail client that would actually do something akin to
>
> retr 1
> del 1
> retr 2
> del 2
> retr 3
> del 3
>
> Instead of retrieving all messages _and then_ deleting which is
> -Original Message-
> From: Alvin Oga [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, January 28, 2004 10:50 AM
> To: Ben Yau
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: Email client programs
> On Wed, 28 Jan 2004, Ben Yau wrote:
>
> > True, but you can do your
Incoming from Erich Waelde:
>
> > I don't think everyone is fully appreciating the problem.
> That makes 2 of us ;)
>
> What comes to my mind:
> a. (has been mentioned) use fetchmail to download the messages. Example
>listing here:
>
># fetchmail -d0 -a -f /etc/fetchmailrc
>4 messag
> -Original Message-
> From: Nate Duehr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, January 28, 2004 8:00 AM
> To: Curtis Vaughan
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Email client programs
>
> >
> Neither POP3 nor IMAP nor anything else will fix a problem
Curtis Vaughan wrote:
I know this is not a windows list and I have never yet asked a question
like this on here before, but perhaps there is someone who knows the
answer to this question.
Netscape and Mozilla support "offline" modes where a user can sync
themselves to the server and then be offl
Hello Curtis,
> I don't think everyone is fully appreciating the problem.
That makes 2 of us ;)
What comes to my mind:
a. (has been mentioned) use fetchmail to download the messages. Example
listing here:
# fetchmail -d0 -a -f /etc/fetchmailrc
4 messages for myname at my.provider.co
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, Jan 27, 2004 at 09:44:47PM -0800, Curtis Vaughan wrote:
> Because our vessels have to get mail over lines that are rather shaky,
> we would like them to pull mail in a way whereby once they've received
> a message it is considered downloaded.
hi ya curtis
On Tue, 27 Jan 2004, Curtis Vaughan wrote:
> But doesn't IMAP have more traffic involved than POP3? I mean each
> time you connect, it has to check to see what's on the server and
> what's on your computer. What would be best is a solution that just
w/ imap ... NOTHING is on
Hi,
* Curtis Vaughan wrote (2004-01-28 06:44):
>I know this is not a windows list and I have never yet asked a question
>like this on here before, but perhaps there is someone who knows the
>answer to this question.
How about asking Microsoft support about it?
Thorsten
--
Jede Glorifizierung
hi ya curtis
On Tue, 27 Jan 2004, Curtis Vaughan wrote:
> I know this is not a windows list and I have never yet asked a question
> like this on here before, but perhaps there is someone who knows the
> answer to this question.
>
> Because our vessels have to get mail over lines that are rath
hi ya curtis
On Tue, 27 Jan 2004, Curtis Vaughan wrote:
But doesn't IMAP have more traffic involved than POP3? I mean each
time you connect, it has to check to see what's on the server and
what's on your computer. What would be best is a solution that just
w/ imap ... NOTHING is on your pc ...
On Tue, Jan 27, 2004 at 10:16:20PM -0800, Curtis Vaughan wrote:
> But doesn't IMAP have more traffic involved than POP3? I mean each
> time you connect, it has to check to see what's on the server and
> what's on your computer. What would be best is a solution that just
> says, "I don't care
But doesn't IMAP have more traffic involved than POP3? I mean each
time you connect, it has to check to see what's on the server and
what's on your computer. What would be best is a solution that just
says, "I don't care what you have or don't have, here are some new
messages. Take them. "
On Wed, 2003-12-17 at 23:06, Paul Johnson wrote:
> I guess only some time for you to gain experience living in a gift
> culture before you realize why you're wrong there. Good luck getting
> help when you need it, I hope that goes well for you.
I was never asking for your help, so I don't know w
On Wed, Dec 17, 2003 at 08:06:33PM -0800, Paul Johnson wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 17, 2003 at 09:26:17AM -0500, Mark Roach wrote:
> > > http://www.linuxmafia.com/~rick/faq/#offlist
> > > (You sent a private-mail reply to my attempt to help you on a mailing
> > > list, and failed to mention having done so
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, Dec 17, 2003 at 09:26:17AM -0500, Mark Roach wrote:
> > http://www.linuxmafia.com/~rick/faq/#offlist
> > (You sent a private-mail reply to my attempt to help you on a mailing
> > list, and failed to mention having done so.)
>
> No, I sent you
On Tue, 2003-12-16 at 19:47, Paul Johnson wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> http://www.linuxmafia.com/~rick/faq/#offlist
> (You sent a private-mail reply to my attempt to help you on a mailing
> list, and failed to mention having done so.)
No, I sent you a private messa
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, Dec 16, 2003 at 10:26:41AM -0800, Nunya wrote:
> If I hit "e" to edit headers, and add these headers in the right place:
> In-Reply-To:
>
Yeah, just add the message you're replying to to the end of whatever
reference header there may be.
Th
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
http://www.linuxmafia.com/~rick/faq/#offlist
(You sent a private-mail reply to my attempt to help you on a mailing
list, and failed to mention having done so.)
On Tue, Dec 16, 2003 at 02:32:07PM -0500, Mark Roach wrote:
> > kmail or mutt are the de-fa
on Tue, Dec 16, 2003 at 10:26:41AM -0800, Nunya ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 16, 2003 at 10:18:43AM -0800, Karsten M. Self wrote:
> > Alternatively: deleting any "In-Reply-To:" and "References:" headers,
> > if your MUA supports header editing.
>
> Question: sometimes I delete a messa
On Tue, Dec 16, 2003 at 10:18:43AM -0800, Karsten M. Self wrote:
> Alternatively: deleting any "In-Reply-To:" and "References:" headers,
> if your MUA supports header editing.
Question: sometimes I delete a message and empty my trash, and later
decide to reply to a thread. The mailto: in my cvs
on Mon, Dec 15, 2003 at 08:33:23PM -0600, Damon L. Chesser ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> >Here I like to thank Andreas Janssen for letting me know that replacing
> >the subject line on an email does not start a new thread
> Opps, I did not know this, what does start a new thread?
Composing an em
On Mon, 15 Dec 2003 20:33:23 -0600,
"Damon L. Chesser" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Gruessle wrote:
>
> >Here I like to thank Andreas Janssen for letting me know that
> >replacing the subject line on an email does not start a new thread
> >
> Opps, I did not know
Gruessle wrote:
I have some problems and what I have learned so far is that I need to send you guys more info so you can help me.
First think I should do I guess is setup an email client on the Debian box otherwise I
will have to type all the errors in to my
email.
How do I do that and which ema
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mon, Dec 15, 2003 at 04:32:22AM -0500, Kevin Mark wrote:
> When I started, I used the email client Pine. It is a basic text-based
> mail client. Some people do not like it because it is not Free Software.
Not to mention pine lacks important basic f
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Please turn on your line wraps to around 72 columns.
On Mon, Dec 15, 2003 at 01:17:40AM -0800, Gruessle wrote:
> How do I do that and which email client is easy to use?
kmail or mutt are the de-facto MUAs. I use mutt, myself, but Windows
addicts may
On Mon, Dec 15, 2003 at 01:17:40AM -0800, Gruessle wrote:
>
> I have some problems and what I have learned so far is that I need to send you guys
> more info so you can help me.
>
> First think I should do I guess is setup an email client on the Debian box otherwise
> I will have to type all th
On Mon, Dec 15, 2003 at 01:17:40AM -0800, Gruessle wrote:
>
> I have some problems and what I have learned so far is that I need to send you guys
> more info so you can help me.
>
> First think I should do I guess is setup an email client on the Debian box otherwise
> I will have to type all th
Hello
Gruessle (<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>) wrote:
> I have some problems and what I have learned so far is that I need to
> send you guys more info so you can help me.
>
> First think I should do I guess is setup an email client on the Debian
> box otherwise I will have to type all the errors in to my
on Mon, Dec 15, 2003 at 01:17:40AM -0800, Gruessle ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
>
> I have some problems and what I have learned so far is that I need to
> send you guys more info so you can help me.
...and wrap your mail at 72 characters.
> First think I should do I guess is setup an email clien
on Fri, 28 Dec 2001 01:40:09PM +0530, Sridhar M.A. insinuated:
> On Thu, Dec 27, 2001 at 09:11:48AM -0600, Drew Raines wrote:
>> You can with mutt. Set pager_index_lines to a number greater than 0.
>>
> Nice feature. How does one switch between the panes?
not sure what you mean by panes
On Thu, Dec 27, 2001 at 09:11:48AM -0600, Drew Raines wrote:
>
> You can with mutt. Set pager_index_lines to a number greater than 0.
>
Nice feature. How does one switch between the panes?
--
Sridhar M.A. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Don't look now, but there is a multi-
Erik Steffl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> the problem with text based MUAs is that you cannot see
> folders/index/message at the same time... (AFAIK, haven't found it in mutt
> or pine)
You can with mutt. Set pager_index_lines to a number greater than 0.
--
Drew
Craig Dickson wrote:
...
> If good IMAP support was common in mail clients, I'd probably be more
> inclined to explore it, but in my experience many clients either don't
> support IMAP, or the support is limited and/or buggy.
it's getting better, IMO it's a lot simler than file storage support
(
Craig Dickson wrote:
>
> Erik Steffl wrote:
>
> > > Also, with fetchmail, you don't have to bother telling your mail client
> > > about your POP or IMAP server -- it's one less thing to configure if you
> >
> > provided that you want to download emails from IMAP which is not a
> > very good way
Carel Fellinger wrote:
>
> On Wed, Dec 26, 2001 at 05:32:31PM -0800, Erik Steffl wrote:
> > Craig Dickson wrote:
> ...
> > I guess, I still like to see it all at once... I guess I can open few
> > windows, each with it's own view:-)
> >
> > BTW the other annoying thing is that it requires pass
On Wed, Dec 26, 2001 at 05:32:31PM -0800, Erik Steffl wrote:
> Craig Dickson wrote:
...
> I guess, I still like to see it all at once... I guess I can open few
> windows, each with it's own view:-)
>
> BTW the other annoying thing is that it requires password to IMAP
> everytime I start it - i
On Wed, Dec 26, 2001 at 11:46:44AM -0800, Vaughan, Curtis wrote:
| I am wondering what other Debian Users recommend for an email client
| program.
I like mutt the best. It is good, makes good use of screen
real-estate, has good threading and list support, and is light, fast,
and stable. The one
On Wed, Dec 26, 2001 at 05:36:15PM -0800, Lev Lvovsky wrote:
| On Thu, 27 Dec 2001, martin f krafft wrote:
|
| > > why the insistence on fetchmail?
| >
| > it's the unix philosophy -- let one program do its job and do it well,
| > let other programs use that...
|
| hehe, really? I guess you can
Erik Steffl wrote:
> > Also, with fetchmail, you don't have to bother telling your mail client
> > about your POP or IMAP server -- it's one less thing to configure if you
>
> provided that you want to download emails from IMAP which is not a
> very good way to use IMAP. I guess it's desirable
Erik Steffl wrote:
> mail retrieval is indeed separate issue (and it can be both job of
> fetchamil (active retrieval) and MTA (accepting delivery))
>
> then there's mail storage - IMO the task for IMAP server
>
> only then the MUA comes in - in between user and IMAP, the actual
> email ma
On Wed, 26 Dec 2001, Craig Dickson wrote:
> Lev Lvovsky wrote:
>
> > why the insistence on fetchmail?
>
> Without fetchmail or something like it, if your network is down when you
> decide to run your mail client, you can't check your mail server for new
> messages. Even if the network is up, you h
Craig Dickson wrote:
>
> Lev Lvovsky wrote:
>
> > why the insistence on fetchmail?
...
> Also, with fetchmail, you don't have to bother telling your mail client
> about your POP or IMAP server -- it's one less thing to configure if you
provided that you want to download emails from IMAP which
On Thu, 27 Dec 2001, martin f krafft wrote:
> > why the insistence on fetchmail?
>
> it's the unix philosophy -- let one program do its job and do it well,
> let other programs use that...
hehe, really? I guess you can count mozilla out ;)
while I like the concept of modularity, I can't imagine
Craig Dickson wrote:
>
> Erik Steffl wrote:
>
> > IMO the MUA should not handle storage of email, so this is a non an
> > issue:-) [the real causality goes in the other way]
>
> Well, the MUA should not have to worry about retrieval from POP servers.
> That's fetchmail's job. But certainly the
Lev Lvovsky wrote:
> why the insistence on fetchmail?
Without fetchmail or something like it, if your network is down when you
decide to run your mail client, you can't check your mail server for new
messages. Even if the network is up, you have to wait while the client
connects to the server and
also sprach Lev Lvovsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2001.12.27.0144 +0100]:
> > Well, the MUA should not have to worry about retrieval from POP servers.
> > That's fetchmail's job. But certainly the MUA is the thing for
> > interactively moving mails from one folder to another.
>
> why the insistence on
On Wed, 26 Dec 2001, Craig Dickson wrote:
> > the problem with text based MUAs is that you cannot see
> > folders/index/message at the same time... (AFAIK, haven't found it in
> > mutt or pine)
>
> Right, AFAIK you can't do that in mutt. On the other hand, I don't find
> that essential. GKrellM sh
On Wed, 26 Dec 2001, Craig Dickson wrote:
> Well, the MUA should not have to worry about retrieval from POP servers.
> That's fetchmail's job. But certainly the MUA is the thing for
> interactively moving mails from one folder to another.
why the insistence on fetchmail?
-lev
Erik Steffl wrote:
> IMO the MUA should not handle storage of email, so this is a non an
> issue:-) [the real causality goes in the other way]
Well, the MUA should not have to worry about retrieval from POP servers.
That's fetchmail's job. But certainly the MUA is the thing for
interactively mo
David Z Maze wrote:
>
> Erik Steffl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> ES> what's this netscpae 4.x bashing I see repeatedly? IMO it's a fairly
> ES> good email client, stable (well, as stable as browser and it's really
> ES> only stable when you disable java), has the main MUA features...
>
> Issues
Erik Steffl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
ES> what's this netscpae 4.x bashing I see repeatedly? IMO it's a fairly
ES> good email client, stable (well, as stable as browser and it's really
ES> only stable when you disable java), has the main MUA features...
Issues with netscape mail at MIT:
-- It h
On Wed, 26 Dec 2001, Craig Dickson wrote:
> Brian Nelson wrote:
>
> > > ... but I don't think I could get our users to go over to a non-GUI
> > > program.
> >
> > Why is that? Because they've bought into the marketing pitch that
> > pretty graphics == better software? That's bullshit. There's n
Brian Nelson wrote:
> > ... but I don't think I could get our users to go over to a non-GUI
> > program.
>
> Why is that? Because they've bought into the marketing pitch that
> pretty graphics == better software? That's bullshit. There's no good
> reason any user couldn't become more proficien
Vaughan, Curtis wrote:
> I am wondering what other Debian Users recommend for an email client
> program.
>
> First, let me state the needs of our company. We are currently very MS
> based at present. The goal has been set to slowly move over to Linux.
> Debian has been chosen, as it is the mos
Lev Lvovsky wrote:
>
> On Wed, 26 Dec 2001, Erik Steffl wrote:
>
> > imo it's very useful to have the eamil delivery&storage separate from
> > email clients.
> >
> > from this point of view the ideal situation is to use IMAP, server
> > side filtering (like sieve with cyrus) and let them use
Brian Nelson wrote:
...
Sylpheed is supposed to be a nice GUI mailer, though I haven't tried
it.
> Evolution is supposedly out of beta, though I wouldn't be surprised if
> it crashed a lot, as you mentioned. KMail has weak IMAP support.
> Mozilla Mail is still too buggy, as is Balsa. Netscape 4.
Erik Steffl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> imo it's very useful to have the eamil delivery&storage separate from
> email clients.
>
> from this point of view the ideal situation is to use IMAP, server
> side filtering (like sieve with cyrus) and let them use any clients they
> want...
>
> n
On Wed, 26 Dec 2001, Erik Steffl wrote:
> imo it's very useful to have the eamil delivery&storage separate from
> email clients.
>
> from this point of view the ideal situation is to use IMAP, server
> side filtering (like sieve with cyrus) and let them use any clients they
> want...
from a m
imo it's very useful to have the eamil delivery&storage separate from
email clients.
from this point of view the ideal situation is to use IMAP, server
side filtering (like sieve with cyrus) and let them use any clients they
want...
not sure how to get there from exchange, does exchange off
On Wed, 26 Dec 2001, Vaughan, Curtis wrote:
> One of the reasons is monetary. Why pay MS for what is already out there,
> and works just as well?
> The other reason is example. We know of another company that is totally
> Linux-based and has no problems. They can work not just at work, but als
"Vaughan, Curtis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I am wondering what other Debian Users recommend for an email client
> program.
Ooooh, I like a flamewar.
> First, let me state the needs of our company. We are currently very MS
> based at present. The goal has been set to slowly move over to Li
One of the reasons is monetary. Why pay MS for what is already out there,
and works just as well?
The other reason is example. We know of another company that is totally
Linux-based and has no problems. They can work not just at work, but also
from home or from any computer anywhere through a
On Wed, 26 Dec 2001, Vaughan, Curtis wrote:
> I am wondering what other Debian Users recommend for an email client
> program.
>
> First, let me state the needs of our company. We are currently very MS
> based at present. The goal has been set to slowly move over to Linux.
> Debian has been chose
Mike Fedyk wrote:
[...]
> I'm going to keep my search to a text based email client, because I
> don't like to have to use vnc to view my email from home... Mutt is
> great in an Xterm, and picture viewing is good too. I wonder if mutt
> can use links or netscape for html viewing... Anyone know?
Mike Fedyk wrote:
> I'm going to keep my search to a text based email client, because I
> don't like to have to use vnc to view my email from home... Mutt is
> great in an Xterm, and picture viewing is good too. I wonder if mutt
> can use links or netscape for html viewing... Anyone know? It's
* Colin Walters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, 20010311 02:25 +0100:
> Andre Berger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > * Colin Walters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, 20010309 10:25 +0100:
> > > Gnus 5.8 has the "nnmbox" backend, so which I assume reads and writes
> > > mbox files.
> >
> > Theoretically yes. But it
Andre Berger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> * Colin Walters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, 20010309 10:25 +0100:
> > Gnus 5.8 has the "nnmbox" backend, so which I assume reads and writes
> > mbox files.
>
> Theoretically yes. But it doesn't work with anything else but ML (here),
> and I can't find example
on Fri, Mar 09, 2001 at 12:48:46PM -0800, MikeF ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 09, 2001 at 12:33:40PM -0800, Mike Fedyk wrote:
> > I'm switching to mutt right now. I've got to get off netscape, because
> > it has crashed a couple times, and once just before I was going to reply
> > to a
On Fri, Mar 09, 2001 at 04:41:38PM -0800, Michael Epting wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 09, 2001 at 06:21:32PM -0500, MaD dUCK wrote:
> >
> > abook package where?
>
> In unstable, at least, it's in main/Mail. Just apt-get install abook.
>
> I took my Outlook Express (sorry!) address book and pulled it in
On Fri, Mar 09, 2001 at 06:21:32PM -0500, MaD dUCK wrote:
>
> abook package where?
In unstable, at least, it's in main/Mail. Just apt-get install abook.
I took my Outlook Express (sorry!) address book and pulled it into
(Windows) Netscape 4.76, then copied it over here to Debian. I think
there
> > Believing this to be true, I installed the abook package a while back.
> > However, I have been unable to locate a shred of documentation on how
> > mutt and abook work together. Any hints on where to look?
abook package where?
martin; (greetings from the heart of the sun.)
\_
On Fri, Mar 09, 2001 at 02:48:04PM -0800, Michael Epting wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 09, 2001 at 02:22:37PM -0800, brian moore wrote:
> > On Fri, Mar 09, 2001 at 02:17:06PM -0800, Mike Fedyk wrote:
> > > Does mutt have any address book support? Autocompletion would be really
> >
> > yes. either the int
On Fri, Mar 09, 2001 at 02:22:37PM -0800, brian moore wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 09, 2001 at 02:17:06PM -0800, Mike Fedyk wrote:
> > Does mutt have any address book support? Autocompletion would be really
>
> yes. either the internal one, or using an external database.
Believing this to be true, I in
On Fri, Mar 09, 2001 at 02:17:06PM -0800, Mike Fedyk wrote:
> Does mutt have any address book support? Autocompletion would be really
yes. either the internal one, or using an external database.
> nice too. Does mutt or gnus have that?
depends on what you mean. auto address completion? sure
Does mutt have any address book support? Autocompletion would be really
nice too. Does mutt or gnus have that?
Mike
NOTE: please remove "mikef-linux-x86" from the last couple email messages
from me to reply.
On Fri, Mar 09, 2001 at 04:42:28PM -0500, Peter Kovacs wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 09, 2001 at 12:48:46PM -0800, MikeF wrote:
> > Back to mutt and friends:
> > Are there any utilities that will scan a mbox and delete messages older than
> > a relative date in the past? Say, 30, 14 or 7 days? Maybe it ca
On Fri, Mar 09, 2001 at 12:48:46PM -0800, MikeF wrote:
> Back to mutt and friends:
> Are there any utilities that will scan a mbox and delete messages older than
> a relative date in the past? Say, 30, 14 or 7 days? Maybe it can move them
> over to another mbox hierarchy for archive... Any ideas
On Fri, Mar 09, 2001 at 12:33:40PM -0800, Mike Fedyk wrote:
> I'm switching to mutt right now. I've got to get off netscape, because
> it has crashed a couple times, and once just before I was going to reply
> to a long message. THAT scared me, that's for sure!
Oh, BTW. I've already switched fr
Sven LUTHER wrote:
>
> On Tue, Mar 06, 2001 at 05:33:34PM -0800, Mike Fedyk wrote:
> > mutt: didn't look very much, so don't know.
>
> It is very nice, let's you do a lot of things, and is compatible with balsa
> (which is just a frontend to libmutt anyway).
>
> That said, use procmail for mail
On Thu, Mar 08, 2001 at 04:22:59PM -0500, Josh Huber wrote:
> > "Mike" == Mike Fedyk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> [...]
>
> What format does netscape use to store mail? Is it mbox-like, or
> something else?
I think it is an mbox + some index file. You would have to check first, then
just
* Colin Walters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, 20010309 10:25 +0100:
> Andre Berger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Could you perhaps tell how to make Gnus use mbox format by default?
> > (serious question of course)
>
> Gnus 5.8 has the "nnmbox" backend, so which I assume reads and writes
> mbox files.
Andre Berger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Could you perhaps tell how to make Gnus use mbox format by default?
> (serious question of course)
Gnus 5.8 has the "nnmbox" backend, so which I assume reads and writes
mbox files. Using nnml is a lot nicer though. I hear mutt even groks
nnml folders n
On Thu, Mar 08, 2001 at 04:22:59PM -0500, Josh Huber wrote:
>
> What format does netscape use to store mail? Is it mbox-like, or
> something else?
Netscape uses the mbox format. I made the switch from netscape to mutt
just last year, and it goes pretty smoothly. You can pretty easily just
use
On 20010308 22:54 +0100, Josh Huber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > "Mike" == Mike Fedyk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I've recently switched from using Mutt to Gnus, mostly because I
> started to get frustrated with the mutt config file format and the
> lack of a programming language to customi
> "Mike" == Mike Fedyk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
[...]
What format does netscape use to store mail? Is it mbox-like, or
something else?
What another person suggested about transferring your mail to an IMAP
server might be a good idea if you can't just transfer the spool
files.
Mike> mutt
on Tue, Mar 06, 2001 at 05:33:34PM -0800, Mike Fedyk ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am not on the debian-user list, so please cc me as well as the
> list...
>
> I have been using netscape mail for several years on winblows, and
> have over 50 folders and even more filters. I have been ge
1 - 100 of 108 matches
Mail list logo
