On 12/10/2021 6:45 PM, Bonno Bloksma wrote:
Hi,
I want to move my DHCP servers to my datacenter as I am going to shut down the
hypervisor hosts on some locations.
[...]
And as that is the only interface for the VM the dhcp software wil fail to
start.
So my solution was to add a few lines t
Hi,
> I want to move my DHCP servers to my datacenter as I am going to shut down
> the hypervisor hosts on some locations.
[...]
> And as that is the only interface for the VM the dhcp software wil fail to
> start.
> So my solution was to add a few lines to the config
> shared-network datacent
On Fri, Aug 25, 2017 at 10:12:07PM +0900, Mark Fletcher wrote:
> However, now, based on your response I am thinking the AirStation is
> just forwarding the DNS queries on to the nameservers it is given in
> response to its DHCP query, and not actually caching anything...
Very likely, yes.
> wou
On Fri, Aug 25, 2017 at 08:14:29AM -0400, Greg Wooledge wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 25, 2017 at 07:34:16AM +0900, Mark Fletcher wrote:
> > On Thu, Aug 24, 2017 at 04:39:13PM -0400, Greg Wooledge wrote:
> > > I strongly recommend just running your own caching DNS resolver on the
> > > DHCP server host. IS
On Fri, Aug 25, 2017 at 07:28:00AM +0900, Mark Fletcher wrote:
> And, is dhclient a separate piece of software from systemd.networkd?
Yes.
On Fri, Aug 25, 2017 at 07:34:16AM +0900, Mark Fletcher wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 24, 2017 at 04:39:13PM -0400, Greg Wooledge wrote:
> > I strongly recommend just running your own caching DNS resolver on the
> > DHCP server host. ISP nameservers are often slow and unreliable.
>
> OK, thanks for the ad
Hi.
On Fri, 25 Aug 2017 07:28:00 +0900
Mark Fletcher wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 24, 2017 at 11:35:25PM +0300, Reco wrote:
> > On Thu, 24 Aug 2017 22:21:04 +0200
> > Pascal Hambourg wrote:
> >
> > > Le 24/08/2017 à 11:30, Reco a écrit :
> > > >
> > > > Somewhat hackish, but straightforward w
On Thu, Aug 24, 2017 at 04:39:13PM -0400, Greg Wooledge wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 24, 2017 at 10:21:04PM +0200, Pascal Hambourg wrote:
> > Le 24/08/2017 à 11:30, Reco a écrit :
> > >
> > > Somewhat hackish, but straightforward way to achieve this is to redirect
> > > DNS requests from your LAN to corre
On Thu, Aug 24, 2017 at 11:35:25PM +0300, Reco wrote:
> On Thu, 24 Aug 2017 22:21:04 +0200
> Pascal Hambourg wrote:
>
> > Le 24/08/2017 à 11:30, Reco a écrit :
> > >
> > > Somewhat hackish, but straightforward way to achieve this is to redirect
> > > DNS requests from your LAN to correct DNS. So
On Thu, Aug 24, 2017 at 10:21:04PM +0200, Pascal Hambourg wrote:
> Le 24/08/2017 à 11:30, Reco a écrit :
> >
> > Somewhat hackish, but straightforward way to achieve this is to redirect
> > DNS requests from your LAN to correct DNS. Something like this should do
> > the trick:
>
> Not so straight
Hi.
On Thu, 24 Aug 2017 22:21:04 +0200
Pascal Hambourg wrote:
> Le 24/08/2017 à 11:30, Reco a écrit :
> >
> > Somewhat hackish, but straightforward way to achieve this is to redirect
> > DNS requests from your LAN to correct DNS. Something like this should do
> > the trick:
>
> Not so
Le 24/08/2017 à 11:30, Reco a écrit :
Somewhat hackish, but straightforward way to achieve this is to redirect
DNS requests from your LAN to correct DNS. Something like this should do
the trick:
Not so straightforward because you still need to get the ISP's DNS and
update the iptables rules w
Hi.
On Thu, 24 Aug 2017 08:25:16 -0500
David Wright wrote:
> On Thu 24 Aug 2017 at 12:30:35 (+0300), Reco wrote:
> > Hi.
> >
> > In-Reply-To: <20170824074515.y4z2ummdigk2fcbn@kazuki.local>
> >
> [...]
>
> If you type:
>
> :
> set edit_headers
>
> you should get the heade
On 8/24/17 3:45 AM, Mark Fletcher wrote:
> Hello the list!
>
> [I suppose this is a little bit OT -- but you guys are the best
> concentration of experts I know, so here goes anyway...]
>
> My local network consists of a bunch of Debian machines of various ages,
> various iDevices, and the odd Wi
On Thu 24 Aug 2017 at 12:30:35 (+0300), Reco wrote:
> Hi.
>
> In-Reply-To: <20170824074515.y4z2ummdigk2fcbn@kazuki.local>
>
[...]
If you type:
:
set edit_headers
you should get the headers included in your composition window,
and you can then stick the In-Reply-To: amongst its pe
Hi.
In-Reply-To: <20170824074515.y4z2ummdigk2fcbn@kazuki.local>
On Thu, Aug 24, 2017 at 04:45:15PM +0900, Mark Fletcher wrote:
> Is there any clever way to pass through the name server settings
> the DHCP server provides, so that if the ISP should change its name
> server IP addresses i
Thanks Pascal!
Thats it.
On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 9:45 AM, Pascal Hambourg wrote:
> Hello,
>
> ml ml a écrit :
>>
>> i set up a DHCP Server. Here are my installed packages:
>> --
>> ii dhcp3-server 4.1.1-P1-15+squeeze2
>> ISC DHCP server (
Hello,
ml ml a écrit :
>
> i set up a DHCP Server. Here are my installed packages:
> --
> ii dhcp3-server 4.1.1-P1-15+squeeze2
> ISC DHCP server (transitional package)
> ii isc-dhcp-server 4.1.1-P1-15+squeeze2
> ISC DH
On Wed, 23 Nov 2011 22:09:40 +0200, Victor Nitu wrote:
> On 11/23/2011 08:53 PM, Camaleón wrote:
>
>> Not sure if this thread will give you any hint:
>>
>> ***
>> DHCP server (version 4) with an alias IP address
>> https://lists.isc.org/pipermail/dhcp-users/2010-September/012052.html
>> ***
>>
2011/11/24 Victor Nitu :
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> <..>
>
> How can I start the dhcp server *after* booting the system, to avoid
> manual interaction? Tried a (re) update-rc.d , putting it in rc.local,
> making a separate script, any more ideas?
>
>
> TIA,
>
> Victor
Tr
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 11/23/2011 10:18 PM, Christofer C. Bell wrote:
>
> While you may have thought of this already, your subject line does ask
> for a "workaround" -- have you considered simply assigning an IP
> address to eth0?
>
Well, the current setup won't permi
On Wed, Nov 23, 2011 at 2:09 PM, Victor Nitu wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 11/23/2011 08:53 PM, Camaleón wrote:
>
>> Not sure if this thread will give you any hint:
>>
>> ***
>> DHCP server (version 4) with an alias IP address
>> https://lists.isc.org/pipermail/dh
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 11/23/2011 08:53 PM, Camaleón wrote:
> Not sure if this thread will give you any hint:
>
> ***
> DHCP server (version 4) with an alias IP address
> https://lists.isc.org/pipermail/dhcp-users/2010-September/012052.html
> ***
>
Thanks for the repl
On Wed, 23 Nov 2011 01:16:01 +0200, Victor Nitu wrote:
> I wonder if anybody here has a workaround for issue #605657 [1], the
> DHCP server not starting when only alias interfaces have an address.
>
> [1] http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=605657
>
> This issue is hanging around fo
Victor Nitu wrote:
> I wonder if anybody here has a workaround for issue #605657 [1],
> the DHCP server not starting when only alias interfaces have an address.
>
> [1] http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=605657
>
> This issue is hanging around for a while, and maybe it's the right t
Erik Persson wrote:
> Scott Reese wrote:
>> Erik Persson wrote:
> [snip]
>> Greetings Erik:
>>
>>> From your description, it sounds like you have multiple subnets on the
>> same physical network (a multihomed server). While isc dhcpd can be set
>> up to handle this situation, it won't do what you
Scott Reese wrote:
Erik Persson wrote:
[snip]
Greetings Erik:
From your description, it sounds like you have multiple subnets on the
same physical network (a multihomed server). While isc dhcpd can be set
up to handle this situation, it won't do what you want it to do. (from
the man page...
Erik Persson wrote:
> Hello!
>
> We have a dhcp-server (isc dhcpd v 2.0p15) that is responsible for
> multiple subnets. This is the standard debian sarge version of the
> server (not version 3 though).
> Between the subnets and the dhcp-server we have a router which is doing
> dhcp-relaying.
>
>
On Tue, 8 Nov 2005, Anthony Walters wrote:
Otherwise you could use dhcpdump to see what is being sent and recieved from
the server
This worked -- I found a rogue server on the network NACKing the XP
REQUEST before the real server could ACK it. Thanks Anthony
Don
Don Hayward ISDIV
Hi Anthony,
On Tue, 8 Nov 2005, Anthony Walters wrote:
Hi don,
I have a new Dell Optiplex XP system (Broadcom NetXtreme NIC) I set up
as a DHCP client. When I enable the LAN interface on it, hundreds of
lines of the following show up in the server syslog.
A BIOS upgrade on the offending PC
Hi don,
I have a new Dell Optiplex XP system (Broadcom NetXtreme NIC) I set up
as a DHCP client. When I enable the LAN interface on it, hundreds of
lines of the following show up in the server syslog.
A BIOS upgrade on the offending PC could fix your problem - it has
helped us in the past wi
On Mon, 7 Nov 2005, Dave Ewart wrote:
On Monday, 07.11.2005 at 12:10 -0500, Don Hayward wrote:
This is probably more of a Windows question (apologies for any
offense), but I'm running a Sarge system with dhcp3-server, and maybe
someone out there has seen this or has an idea.
I have a new Dell
On Mon, Nov 07, 2005 at 10:10:21PM +, Dave Ewart wrote:
> On Monday, 07.11.2005 at 12:10 -0500, Don Hayward wrote:
>
> > This is probably more of a Windows question (apologies for any
> > offense), but I'm running a Sarge system with dhcp3-server, and maybe
> > someone out there has seen this
On Monday, 07.11.2005 at 12:10 -0500, Don Hayward wrote:
> This is probably more of a Windows question (apologies for any
> offense), but I'm running a Sarge system with dhcp3-server, and maybe
> someone out there has seen this or has an idea.
>
> I have a new Dell Optiplex XP system (Broadcom Ne
On Mon, Nov 07, 2005 at 04:42:07PM -0500, Don Hayward wrote:
> On Mon, 7 Nov 2005, Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
>
> >>
> >
> >What if you configure dhcpd to give it a fixed address?
> >
>
> An interesting question. That works. But what does it mean?
>
It basically means that the DHCP server will a
On Mon, 7 Nov 2005, Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
On Mon, Nov 07, 2005 at 12:10:16PM -0500, Don Hayward wrote:
This is probably more of a Windows question (apologies for any
offense), but I'm running a Sarge system with dhcp3-server, and maybe
someone out there has seen this or has an idea.
I have
On Mon, Nov 07, 2005 at 12:10:16PM -0500, Don Hayward wrote:
> This is probably more of a Windows question (apologies for any
> offense), but I'm running a Sarge system with dhcp3-server, and maybe
> someone out there has seen this or has an idea.
>
> I have a new Dell Optiplex XP system (Broadcom
Not really.. But ISC does evreythng you could possibly want. Why do you want
an alternative?
Because I don't care for ISC.
Daniel
!DSPAM:40f315256061401763848!
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Are there any other alternatives for a DHCP server besides ISC and
dnsmasq?
Not really.. But ISC does evreythng you could possibly want. Why do you want
an alternative?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Colin Watson écrivait :
> It's possible to do that, sure, but if you ever try to connect your
> machine to a VPN where other people are using RFC 1918 addresses then
> you'll run into problems if you've been excessively greedy. It's better
> practice to use a more reasonably-sized subnet.
You are
> You may like to know that 10.0.0.0 is a class A network, so
> you can legally
> use a netmask of 255.0.0.0 and a broadcast of 10.255.255.255
> without any
Nope, 10.0.0.0 is not a class A network anymore! 10.0.0.0 is just a
single address out of for example 8.0.0.0/6. CIDR has been around since
On Sat, Sep 28, 2002 at 12:25:55AM +0700, Jean Christophe ANDR?? wrote:
> Mike Egglestone ?crivait :
> > Basically, is it OK networking practise to setup my eth1 as follows?:
> > Network 10.0.0.0
> > IP address 10.0.0.1
> > Netmask 255.255.254
> > broadcast 10.0.1.255
>
> You may like to know tha
Hi,
Mike Egglestone écrivait :
> Basically, is it OK networking practise to setup my eth1 as follows?:
> Network 10.0.0.0
> IP address 10.0.0.1
> Netmask 255.255.254
> broadcast 10.0.1.255
You may like to know that 10.0.0.0 is a class A network, so you can legally
use a netmask of 255.0.
> Im trying to run dhcp3-server, but the computer Im running it on is
> NATing for a couple other computers, so it gets a lease of its own from a
> cable modem. Im trying to get dhcpd up and running, but I cant get it to
> run. For one I forget how to determine the dns servers that Im getting
>
Well, a quick search on freshmeat returned these:
http://freshmeat.net/projects/dhcplst.pl/
http://freshmeat.net/projects/dhcpstatus/
http://freshmeat.net/projects/lanlord/
On Thu, 14 Feb 2002, Fran?ois Chenais wrote:
> Is there any console/graphic tools to check the currents active's lea
Hello,
Is there any console/graphic tools to check the currents active's leases
with all informations about it.
instead of cat cat /var/dhcp/dhcpd.leases ;-)
François
On Wed, 13 Feb 2002 10:54:45 -0500 (EST)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Yeah, dhcpd m
Yeah, dhcpd must've gotten killed at that perfect moment twice for me. The
last few restarts haven't caused a problem so that must be it. That's my
luck. :(
On Wed, 13 Feb 2002, Martin Wuertele wrote:
> > > default-lease-time 600;
> > > max-lease-time 7200;
> >
> > I am also using those default
Hi debian!
On Tue, 12 Feb 2002, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Tue, 12 Feb 2002, Martin Wuertele wrote:
> > default-lease-time 600;
> > max-lease-time 7200;
>
> I am also using those default values. The problem does not arise when the
> dhcp server goes down, but when it comes back up. Some machi
On Tue, 12 Feb 2002, Martin Wuertele wrote:
> > When I restart the dhcp server all machines lose connectivity and need to
> > grab another lease. Is there any way to prevent this?
>
> what are your values for default-lease-time and max-lease-time? i use
>
> default-lease-time 600;
> max-lease-time
Hi debian!
On Tue, 12 Feb 2002, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> When I restart the dhcp server all machines lose connectivity and need to
> grab another lease. Is there any way to prevent this?
what are your values for default-lease-time and max-lease-time? i use
default-lease-time 600;
max-lease-ti
OK, I just figured this one out. (With the help of the list archives at
www.isc.org)
Each router on the other subnets must contain an "ip helper-address
xxx.xxx.xxx.xx" statement on their ethernet port which points back to my new
backup Debian DHCP Server.
Thank you for your help
Dave Bacon - O
> On Tue, 10 Apr 2001 14:16:39 -0500
Dave Bacon writes:
DB> I must be very close, but may be missing a small piece of the puzzle.
DB> Can anyone help?
Can you get information from `/var/log/daemon.log' and
something?
Susumu Takuwa
Perfect answer. Thank you.
Robert
Thus spake Nate Amsden ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> "Robert L. Harris" wrote:
> >
> > Just got a new laptop from work. I have to decide if I want to make the
> > laptop work dhcp at the office and static at home or put a dhcp server up
> > at home. Knowing Window
"Robert L. Harris" wrote:
>
> Just got a new laptop from work. I have to decide if I want to make the
> laptop work dhcp at the office and static at home or put a dhcp server up
> at home. Knowing Windows/Debian I figure putting up the dhcp server would
> be faster and easier.
>
> Anyone know a
to assign static addresses vie dhcpd, add blocks like the following to your
dhcpd.conf file.
host caseybox.meathouse.trifocus.net {
fixed-address 192.168.1.192;
hardware ethernet 00:A0:C9:5F:C8:48;
option host-name "caseybox";
}
as for getting an address to nic in the dhcpd box, you are
On Fri, 13 Aug 1999, Marc Dubrowski wrote:
> On Wed, 11 Aug 1999, Mario Olimpio de Menezes wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I need to set a slink box running 2.2.10 to serve dhcp for one of
> > its network cards. It'll be a masquerade box.
> > Where can I get a working dhcpd package for slink+2.2.1
On Wed, 11 Aug 1999, Mario Olimpio de Menezes wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I need to set a slink box running 2.2.10 to serve dhcp for one of
> its network cards. It'll be a masquerade box.
> Where can I get a working dhcpd package for slink+2.2.10?
> Can someone help me sending some config s
Mario Olimpio de Menezes wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I tried to setup the dhcp-beta (server) under slink. The machine
> has two interfaces. I would like to serve only one, say eth1.
> I edited the dhcp.conf file, the server was started but the
> clients couldn't get dynamic IPs. Both, Win98 a
On Fri, 25 Jun 1999, Mario Olimpio de Menezes wrote:
> Under your 'some other options', make sure you include:
>
> option routers xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx; # This default gateway passed to clients
> option subnet-mask xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx # The subnet mask passed to clients
Yes, I did this.
On Fri, 25 Jun 1999, Dpk wrote:
> On Fri, 25 Jun 1999, Mario Olimpio de Menezes wrote:
>
>Hi,
>
> I tried to setup the dhcp-beta (server) under slink. The machine
>has two interfaces. I would like to serve only one, say eth1.
> I edited the dhcp.conf file, the server w
On Fri, 25 Jun 1999, Mario Olimpio de Menezes wrote:
Hi,
I tried to setup the dhcp-beta (server) under slink. The machine
has two interfaces. I would like to serve only one, say eth1.
I edited the dhcp.conf file, the server was started but the
clients couldn't get
use the noneBETA i have not had any probs with that one
On 14-May-99 Randy Edwards wrote:
> I've noticed several dhcp servers in potato. I was curious if anyone had any
> recommendations for one to use with a 2.2.x kernel in your typical network of
> Windows machines and Linux boxes. TIA.
>
> -
On Thu, 11 Sep 1997, Jim Pick wrote:
> There might be a way to configure Win95 (via the registry) to require a
> valid password when logging in at the "console". But I'm not sure how.
> I would never use a Windows 95 machine as a "public access" terminal.
> I've seen somebody build a super-secu
>> Win95 provides no "authentication" by itself. It needs to belong to an
NT
>> Domain or NDS for this. So, without third party support, you're out of
>> luck.
>
>Not so. Win95 provides "share level" authentication of any local
>filesystems you share. That qualifies as authentication.
I *hat
> > Win95 provides no "authentication" by itself. It needs to belong to an NT
> > Domain or NDS for this. So, without third party support, you're out of
> > luck.
>
> Not so. Win95 provides "share level" authentication of any local
> filesystems you share. That qualifies as authentication.
B
> A DHCP server provides an IP address to a DHCP client when the DHCP client
> boots (and requests) and address. This happens before a "login" screen ever
> appears.
>
> Win95 provides no "authentication" by itself. It needs to belong to an NT
> Domain or NDS for this. So, without third party s
Hi!
> A DHCP server provides an IP address to a DHCP client when the DHCP client
> boots (and requests) and address. This happens before a "login" screen ever
> appears.
>
> Win95 provides no "authentication" by itself. It needs to belong to an NT
> Domain or NDS for this. So, without
A DHCP server will not do this for you. These are two totally unrelated
issues.
A DHCP server provides an IP address to a DHCP client when the DHCP client
boots (and requests) and address. This happens before a "login" screen ever
appears.
Win95 provides no "authentication" by itself. It needs
On Thu, 11 Sep 1997, Tony Koehn wrote:
> Does anyone know how I can setup a DHCP server?
>
> I need a small crash course on how a DHCP server works
>
> Heres what I need. Will a DHCP server do this?
>
> I have W95 computers on a networks. These machines are accessable to the
> public. I
69 matches
Mail list logo
