On Mon, 05 Jan 2004 15:35:12 -0800, ope wrote:
>> If devfsd is a debian install ("dpkg -l devfsd" will
>> tell you), it should
>> be set up fine.
>>
>> And, if you can see your devices as /dev/ide/...
>> then it is all fine.
>>
> Yes, devfsd is installed and I can see the devices via
> the full d
> If devfsd is a debian install ("dpkg -l devfsd" will
> tell you), it should
> be set up fine.
>
> And, if you can see your devices as /dev/ide/...
> then it is all fine.
>
Yes, devfsd is installed and I can see the devices via
the full devfs path.
> You are correct that you need to use the
> /d
On Mon, 05 Jan 2004 11:38:43 -0800, ope wrote:
> Thanks for the response. I will try lvm10 again (I am
> avoiding lvm2 for the same reason you are). I think
> the problem may that I don't quite understand what I
> need to do to set up LVM. When lvm10 is installed
> this message is displayed:
>
Thanks for the response. I will try lvm10 again (I am
avoiding lvm2 for the same reason you are). I think
the problem may that I don't quite understand what I
need to do to set up LVM. When lvm10 is installed
this message is displayed:
--
if devfs is compiled into the kernel then it MUS
On Sat, 03 Jan 2004 13:30:06 -0800, ope wrote:
I am running sarge (testing) and have been using devfs and lvm10 for
nearly 2 years with no problems, either with stock or custom-compiled
kernels. However, I don't mix distros, and your problem may be related to
that, particularly as it once worked a
On Sat, Jan 03, 2004 at 01:30:06PM -0800, ope <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> From what I can tell, it really won't matter much if I
> get rid of devfs. I wanted to check with everyone
> here to see if there were any issues with getting rid
> of devfs. Is there anything I need to look out for or
> c
6 matches
Mail list logo
