On Sat, Jan 03, 2004 at 01:30:06PM -0800, ope <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > From what I can tell, it really won't matter much if I > get rid of devfs. I wanted to check with everyone > here to see if there were any issues with getting rid > of devfs. Is there anything I need to look out for or > check before I do this? I don't really know, but it should not be a big deal. Try it, as I think you can disable devfs with 'devfs=nomount' or something like that appending to your kernel boot line.
> Does lvm2 fix this problem? I don't know this problem, but devfs is obsolated in 2.6, so it worth a try. As I dislike devfs, never used it, and running LVM1 for years (later I changed to LVM2 ofcourse). Please note that as soon as you upgrade your _metadata_, you can't go back to LVM1. It's not a problem to have only the LVM2 tools installed, they can read your LVM1 vg-s. Hope this helps, GCS -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
