Re: debian vs redhat -fair

2006-04-06 Thread Curt Howland
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 However, Woody (which was released analogous to RH9) was just as rock solid stable as Sarge. I agree completely that we must compare relatively equal systems, but doing so does not change the outcome: Debian Stable lives up to its name. I was using

Re: debian vs redhat -fair

2006-04-05 Thread Alvin Oga
On Wed, 5 Apr 2006, Roberto C. Sanchez wrote: > To be fair, RH9 was released 03/31/2003, while Sarge was released > 06/06/2005. I would say that a difference of 2+ years would be quite > significant in terms of hardware support and general application > stability. bingo ... some folks like