-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 However, Woody (which was released analogous to RH9) was just as rock solid stable as Sarge. I agree completely that we must compare relatively equal systems, but doing so does not change the outcome: Debian Stable lives up to its name.
I was using RH in 2000-2001, and couldn't figure out why the company stayed with it. I put Debian on my own system, and wow-ed them with dselect and apt. Oh well, Management was inflexible. And, that company is long gone. Maybe there's a connection there.... Curt- On Thursday 06 April 2006 05:10, Alvin Oga wrote: > On Wed, 5 Apr 2006, Roberto C. Sanchez wrote: > > To be fair, RH9 was released 03/31/2003, while Sarge was released > > 06/06/2005. I would say that a difference of 2+ years would be > > quite significant in terms of hardware support and general > > application stability. > > bingo ... > > some folks like to compare oranges to dogs ... vs a fair comparison > of like systems from the same era .. > > 2 yrs is way way too long ... it'd be like comparing p4-1G vs p4-3G > w/ hyperthread or something similar and yet vastly different > > c ya > alvin - -- September 11th, 2001 The proudest day for gun control and central planning advocates in American history -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (GNU/Linux) iQEVAwUBRDUayC9Y35yItIgBAQJgkQf+JqBNIzwKEmpVm8iZCPLzd08zAVMOMMgt FMgiqYut1SAVIJLuek0tx6XYL2q1k1mpmk7kn8WjEhprYrH2IBRP9p/MhyYoaId1 I/a5im+4coBcVj0GKlNokbeWT7XnWm23HfGYi32F7ONcdrQ3B5pzXaXtjxEC2bsz xi2BbgXHCe301tCV/1mYgc6v6iaCp3MVH2pEHZyGw5Kr2NLxk2o+EngCRfNHxy/c MDKGHfW+6ysQ6NlEur9UmlQOimyLas2RFmwMwSPAnZTBsqyQGs9kzX43WrLDmO4Q b50evbj+FIIu0yBYl9xUISZBFKXcoqC/lvpxxKYA57FSkBfpne2mXg== =lCrh -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
