On Tue, 20 Jan 1998, Gregory Guthrie wrote:
These issues are being addressed. For instance, developers are
considering various , "typical" installations. The next version of debian
should see improvements in installation.
> 1) Recently someone said regarding all the setup dif
On Tue, 20 Jan 1998, Stephen Gregory wrote:
> packages. There are a bunch of packages (in 1.2) that were listed as
> "required" but weren't really. There are also some dependecies that
> bug me. Some of the mime stuff complains if you don't install a
I've been installing and reinstalling debian o
> 2) It was also noted that:
>"Newbies also tend to install too much in the initial dselect menu
> causing a lot of time in conflict resolution."
The first time I installed debian I installed way to much. I am hardly
a Linux newbie. I found that it was a problem with the individual
packages.
On Tue, 20 Jan 1998 09:58:21 -0600, you wrote:
>1) Recently someone said regarding all the setup differences: "after all,
>linux is linux". I disagree, the networking files, setup files, PPP files,
>etc... are all notably different; similar but different.
>
> This is like the differences between
1) Recently someone said regarding all the setup differences: "after all,
linux is linux". I disagree, the networking files, setup files, PPP files,
etc... are all notably different; similar but different.
This is like the differences between AT&T/UCB unix. Yes, they are/were
both Unix, but...
5 matches
Mail list logo
