Re: debian bug reporting

On Fri, Sep 26, 2003 at 02:30:32AM -0700, Paul Johnson wrote: > On Wed, Sep 24, 2003 at 08:11:02PM +1200, Paul William wrote: > > If there is a bug in a debian package and you are 90% sure its the > > upstream developers fault should you still report it and let the > > packager forward it upstream?

Re: debian bug reporting

Arnt Karlsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Fri, 26 Sep 2003 10:30:07 -0500, > John Hasler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > Peter writes: > > > You're not likely to piss off a DD by submitting a real bug > > > (speaking as a DD). > > > > I prefer that all bugs

Re: debian bug reporting

On Fri, 26 Sep 2003 10:30:07 -0500, John Hasler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Peter writes: > > You're not likely to piss off a DD by submitting a real bug > > (speaking as a DD). > > I prefer that all bugs in my packages, upstream or not, be reported > via the BTS

Re: debian bug reporting

Peter writes: > You're not likely to piss off a DD by submitting a real bug (speaking as > a DD). I prefer that all bugs in my packages, upstream or not, be reported via the BTS. -- John Hasler [EMAIL PROTECTED] (John Hasler) Dancing Horse Hill Elmwood, WI -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PR

Re: debian bug reporting

Paul William <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > If there is a bug in a debian package and you are 90% sure its the > upstream developers fault should you still report it and let the > packager forward it upstream? I dont want to piss of debian packagers. You're not likely to piss off a DD by submitting

Re: debian bug reporting

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Wed, Sep 24, 2003 at 08:11:02PM +1200, Paul William wrote: > If there is a bug in a debian package and you are 90% sure its the > upstream developers fault should you still report it and let the > packager forward it upstream? I dont want to piss of