On Sat, 16 Jun 2012 15:05:50 -0400, Gilbert Sullivan wrote:
> On 06/16/2012 02:04 PM, Camaleón wrote:
>> You have to ask yourself if you really need that package in your
>> system. I never heard of it before nor read about it is needed for
>> running VB nor any other virtual machine :-?
>>
>>
On 06/16/2012 02:04 PM, Camaleón wrote:
> On Sat, 16 Jun 2012 13:47:38 -0400, Gilbert Sullivan wrote:
>
>> On 06/16/2012 01:28 PM, Camaleón wrote:
>
Matthew pointed out that my use of netscript 2.4 is sort of
non-standard for a regular Debian desktop.
>>>
>>> (...)
>>>
>>> And he is rig
On 06/16/2012 01:24 PM, Tom H wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 16, 2012 at 10:42 AM, Camaleón wrote:
>> On Fri, 15 Jun 2012 19:56:59 -0400, Gilbert Sullivan wrote:
>>> On 06/15/2012 12:58 PM, Camaleón wrote:
>>
> Thank you for your ideas, and I'll return to this thread when I have
> any kind of inform
On Sat, 16 Jun 2012 13:47:38 -0400, Gilbert Sullivan wrote:
> On 06/16/2012 01:28 PM, Camaleón wrote:
>>> Matthew pointed out that my use of netscript 2.4 is sort of
>>> non-standard for a regular Debian desktop.
>>
>> (...)
>>
>> And he is right.
>>
>> The first thing I would do is removing t
On 06/16/2012 01:28 PM, Camaleón wrote:
> On Sat, 16 Jun 2012 13:06:11 -0400, Gilbert Sullivan wrote:
>
>> On 06/16/2012 10:42 AM, Camaleón wrote:
>>> If you are using the "resolvconf" package I bet you have to trust what
>>> the "/etc/revolv.conf" file warning says in uppercase about do not
>>> e
On Sat, 16 Jun 2012 13:06:11 -0400, Gilbert Sullivan wrote:
> On 06/16/2012 10:42 AM, Camaleón wrote:
>> If you are using the "resolvconf" package I bet you have to trust what
>> the "/etc/revolv.conf" file warning says in uppercase about do not
>> editing the file because is dynamically changed ;
On Sat, Jun 16, 2012 at 10:42 AM, Camaleón wrote:
> On Fri, 15 Jun 2012 19:56:59 -0400, Gilbert Sullivan wrote:
>> On 06/15/2012 12:58 PM, Camaleón wrote:
>
Thank you for your ideas, and I'll return to this thread when I have
any kind of information.
>>>
>>> Ok, keep us informed. I feel
On 06/16/2012 10:42 AM, Camaleón wrote:
> If you are using the "resolvconf" package I bet you have to trust what
> the "/etc/revolv.conf" file warning says in uppercase about do not
> editing the file because is dynamically changed ;-)
>
> http://wiki.debian.org/NetworkConfiguration#The_resolvco
On Fri, 15 Jun 2012 19:56:59 -0400, Gilbert Sullivan wrote:
> On 06/15/2012 12:58 PM, Camaleón wrote:
(...)
>>> Thank you for your ideas, and I'll return to this thread when I have
>>> any kind of information.
>>
>> Ok, keep us informed. I feel curious about what's going on here :-)
>>
>>
> J
On 06/15/2012 12:58 PM, Camaleón wrote:
> On Fri, 15 Jun 2012 12:18:03 -0400, Gilbert Sullivan wrote:
>
>> On 06/15/2012 10:35 AM, Camaleón wrote:
>
>>> Anyway, I'd also run the following tests:
>>>
>>> 1/ Just for testing purposes, you can momentary disable wicd and test
>>> with a static IP con
On Fri, 15 Jun 2012 12:18:03 -0400, Gilbert Sullivan wrote:
> On 06/15/2012 10:35 AM, Camaleón wrote:
>> Anyway, I'd also run the following tests:
>>
>> 1/ Just for testing purposes, you can momentary disable wicd and test
>> with a static IP configuration defined at "/etc/network/interfaces". I
Hi, Camaleón.
FYI I filed a bug against netscript package -- 677...@bugs.debian.org
Best,
Gilbert
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4fdb6728.1030...@co
On 06/15/2012 10:35 AM, Camaleón wrote:
> On Thu, 14 Jun 2012 14:44:57 -0400, Gilbert Sullivan wrote:
>
>> On 06/14/2012 01:34 PM, Camaleón wrote:
>
>>> To be sincere, I don't know what's originating the problem. If you say
>>> the network settings are properly configured, why Exim4 is that lazy?
On Thu, 14 Jun 2012 14:44:57 -0400, Gilbert Sullivan wrote:
> On 06/14/2012 01:34 PM, Camaleón wrote:
>> To be sincere, I don't know what's originating the problem. If you say
>> the network settings are properly configured, why Exim4 is that lazy?
>> :-?
>>
>> Searching for "exim boot speed up"
On 06/14/2012 01:34 PM, Camaleón wrote:
> On Thu, 14 Jun 2012 13:07:17 -0400, Gilbert Sullivan wrote:
>
>> On 06/14/2012 10:21 AM, Camaleón wrote:
>
> (...)
>
>>> I ask this to have an idea on where to put the focus in either a) long
>>> delay -timeout- but NIC settings are finally okay or b) lo
On Thu, 14 Jun 2012 13:07:17 -0400, Gilbert Sullivan wrote:
> On 06/14/2012 10:21 AM, Camaleón wrote:
(...)
>> I ask this to have an idea on where to put the focus in either a) long
>> delay -timeout- but NIC settings are finally okay or b) long delay -
>> timeout- with NIC settings unconfigured
On 06/14/2012 10:21 AM, Camaleón wrote:
...
> Not a corner case at all, it was just me who was a bit dense O:-)
>
> Your setup is crystal-clear now and I guess is used by many road-warrior-
> alike users.
>
I suppose so, but most places do use DHCP. I just have some clients who
are stuck with w
On Wed, 13 Jun 2012 13:44:44 -0400, Gilbert Sullivan wrote:
> On 06/13/2012 12:54 PM, Camaleón wrote:
(...)
>> Okay, I think I see now the problem (thanks for clarifying!):
>> networking service timeouts -or takes too much time- because no DHCP
>> server is in place and then "it does something"
On 06/13/2012 03:01 PM, Gilbert Sullivan wrote:
> On 06/13/2012 02:28 PM, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
>> On Mi, 13 iun 12, 13:44:44, Gilbert Sullivan wrote:
>>>
>>> Yup, I'm using Wicd. When I'm ready to leave one location to trave to
>>> the next, I choose the next network's configuration from within Wi
On 06/13/2012 02:28 PM, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
> On Mi, 13 iun 12, 13:44:44, Gilbert Sullivan wrote:
>>
>> Yup, I'm using Wicd. When I'm ready to leave one location to trave to
>> the next, I choose the next network's configuration from within Wicd.
>> With the aforementioned /etc/network/interfaces
On Mi, 13 iun 12, 13:44:44, Gilbert Sullivan wrote:
>
> Yup, I'm using Wicd. When I'm ready to leave one location to trave to
> the next, I choose the next network's configuration from within Wicd.
> With the aforementioned /etc/network/interfaces file (set to use DHCP)
> Wicd always has me set up
On 06/13/2012 12:54 PM, Camaleón wrote:
> On Wed, 13 Jun 2012 12:32:55 -0400, Gilbert Sullivan wrote:
>
>> On 06/13/2012 10:43 AM, Camaleón wrote:
>>> On Mon, 11 Jun 2012 13:44:22 -0400, Gilbert Sullivan wrote:
>>>
>>> (...)
>>>
Until the recent update (a couple of weeks ago) of netscript w
On Wed, 13 Jun 2012 12:32:55 -0400, Gilbert Sullivan wrote:
> On 06/13/2012 10:43 AM, Camaleón wrote:
>> On Mon, 11 Jun 2012 13:44:22 -0400, Gilbert Sullivan wrote:
>>
>> (...)
>>
>>> Until the recent update (a couple of weeks ago) of netscript which
>>> removed ifupdown, the system just always
On 06/13/2012 10:43 AM, Camaleón wrote:
> On Mon, 11 Jun 2012 13:44:22 -0400, Gilbert Sullivan wrote:
>
> (...)
>
>> Until the recent update (a couple of weeks ago) of netscript which
>> removed ifupdown, the system just always booted quickly on any of its
>> various network locations. Since the
On Mon, 11 Jun 2012 13:44:22 -0400, Gilbert Sullivan wrote:
(...)
> Until the recent update (a couple of weeks ago) of netscript which
> removed ifupdown, the system just always booted quickly on any of its
> various network locations. Since then, when I have set Wicd to connect
> to one of the
25 matches
Mail list logo
