On Wed, Oct 21 2009, Gregor Galwas wrote:
> The only problem to be solved was the initrd. it has NOT been
> generated by dpkg during the installation.
> so I generated it using mkinitramfs -c -k 2.6.32-rc5. worked
> fine. update-grub - worked fine as well.
,[ Manual page make-kpkg(1) ]
| --i
Gregor Galwas wrote:
> Hey,
>
> Thx everybody for your quick answers and friendly help.
>
> You were right. I removed all Xen options from the kernel config and
>
> linux-image-2.6.32-rc5_20091016-2_amd64.deb
>
> has been built.
> Installing it with "dpkg -i ..." worked fine.
> The only problem
Hey,
Thx everybody for your quick answers and friendly help.
You were right. I removed all Xen options from the kernel config and
linux-image-2.6.32-rc5_20091016-2_amd64.deb
has been built.
Installing it with "dpkg -i ..." worked fine.
The only problem to be solved was the initrd. it has NOT b
Hi,
Well, firstly, if you are going to be using the buildpackage
target, instead of the far faster kernel_image target, you should
either configure /etc/kernel-pkg.conf, adding your name and email, and
have that in a keyring your gpg knows about, or pass the --us and --uc
arguments on
On Wed October 25 2006 06:39, David Baron wrote:
> On Wednesday 25 October 2006 13:29, Chris Bannister wrote:
> > On Mon, Oct 23, 2006 at 11:31:46PM -0500, cothrige wrote:
> > > With this install of Debian I decided to stick to what I know, and
> > > grabbed the binary installer direct from NVidia.
On Wednesday 25 October 2006 13:29, Chris Bannister wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 23, 2006 at 11:31:46PM -0500, cothrige wrote:
> > With this install of Debian I decided to stick to what I know, and
> > grabbed the binary installer direct from NVidia. I ran that, and in
> > less than two minutes I was up a
* Chris Bannister ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
>
> Apparently the binary installer from NVidia messes with the libraries on
> the system and is not the recommended method for installing.
>
> Read http://home.comcast.net/~andrex/Debian-nVidia/
>
> The Debian way is certainly a lot easier. Now where
On Mon, Oct 23, 2006 at 11:31:46PM -0500, cothrige wrote:
> With this install of Debian I decided to stick to what I know, and
> grabbed the binary installer direct from NVidia. I ran that, and in
> less than two minutes I was up and running. No complaints from Debian
> and no complaints from NVi
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>You have gotten a couple DIFFERENT approaches to installing a kernel on
Debian.
>At least one comment should send up a warning:
Yes, a level-minded user.
>On compiling with --initrd, I finally drank the coolade last year.
Before I tried to have no
>modules, compiling n
* Jameson C. Burt ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> You have gotten a couple DIFFERENT approaches to installing a kernel on
> Debian.
> At least one comment should send up a warning:
> if the approach becomes too intricate, or requires specialization,
> very likely you read minute details that you shoul
I look here when I compile my own kernel:
http://kernel-handbook.alioth.debian.org/
/David.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
You have gotten a couple DIFFERENT approaches to installing a kernel on
Debian.
At least one comment should send up a warning:
if the approach becomes too intricate, or requires specialization,
very likely you read minute details that you should never need learn
(unless you're creating Debian packa
John O'Hagan wrote:
On Sunday 22 October 2006 18:02, cothrige wrote:
[...]
In the past, as a Slackware user, I never installed an OS where I
didn't immediately compile a new kernel. Slack uses a 2.4 kernel, and
I use some peripheral items which seem to require, or at least greatly
prefer a 2
* Andrei Popescu ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
>
> initrd's are especially useful for distros, because a kernel with all
> stuff compiled in is not an option (too big), but you still need some
> of the modules very early in the boot process, when the root filesystem
> is not accessible yet. For your
cothrige wrote:
* Tim Post ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
depmod should be called by the makefile upon make modules_install after
a successful build. Its really as easy as make, make modules_install ,
make install and a mkinitrd (if you need one).
If using GRUB, remember by default the selecti
cothrige <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have never used initrd, at least not when I have compiled a kernel.
> To be entirely honest I have never fully understood just what it
> does. I was under the impression it was for things like booting from
> reiser fs and having to load modules to do it. H
* John O'Hagan ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
>
> Installing the kernel-package generated by make-kpkg will automatically
> detect
> and update grub, and add itself to menu.list. How easy is that?
Now that it is a nifty feature. I suppose there is certainly
something to be said for the Debian appr
* Gilles Mocellin ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
>
> This modprobe.conf is modularized in several files (you can add one)
> in /etc/modprobe.d/.
Ahh yes, I see that. I would think I could run
'generate-modprobe.conf > ~/modprobe.conf' and then split the info up
as I need it. Shouldn't be too impos
* Tim Post ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> depmod should be called by the makefile upon make modules_install after
> a successful build. Its really as easy as make, make modules_install ,
> make install and a mkinitrd (if you need one).
>
> If using GRUB, remember by default the selection menu is hi
depmod should be called by the makefile upon make modules_install after
a successful build. Its really as easy as make, make modules_install ,
make install and a mkinitrd (if you need one).
If using GRUB, remember by default the selection menu is hidden. You'll
need to comment out the "hiddenmenu
On Monday 23 October 2006 00:36, cothrige wrote:
> * John O'Hagan ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
>>[snip summary of Debian kernel compilation]
> Will I still have to configure grub? And will update-grub work or
> will I have to manually edit menu.lst?
[...]
Installing the kernel-package generated
Le dimanche 22 octobre 2006 16:43, cothrige a écrit :
> * Tim Post ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
>
> Hello Tim,
>
> [snip]
>
> > Then make your initrd if needed and tweak as needed, verify /etc/modules
> > is what you want it to be and you should be good to go. Cross your
> > fingers and reboot.
>
> T
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 10/22/06 09:36, cothrige wrote:
> * John O'Hagan ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
>> Hi Patrick,
>
> Hello John,
>
[snip]
>> If you are recompiling a kernel with the same version name, you must
>> move /lib/modules/[$KERNEL_VERSION] out of the way (yo
* Tim Post ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Hello Tim,
[snip]
> Then make your initrd if needed and tweak as needed, verify /etc/modules
> is what you want it to be and you should be good to go. Cross your
> fingers and reboot.
This makes me think. Recently I have gotten in the habit, after
installi
* John O'Hagan ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Hi Patrick,
Hello John,
> I always compile my own kernels the Debian (testing) way like this:
>
> -Install the latest Debian linux-source package (currently
> linux-source-2.6.17); or you can use vanilla source as you describe
> -Make a symlink /usr/
On Sunday 22 October 2006 18:02, cothrige wrote:
[...]
> In the past, as a Slackware user, I never installed an OS where I
> didn't immediately compile a new kernel. Slack uses a 2.4 kernel, and
> I use some peripheral items which seem to require, or at least greatly
> prefer a 2.6 kernel. The pr
Patrick,
Its relatively easy .. and you can make it a bit easier on yourself.
Untar from kernel.org in /usr/src
be sure ncurses-dev and ncurses are present
make menuconfig and configure your kernel
now make (or make -j xx, where xx = # of cpu's if > 1) [ fancy gcc hacks
go here if your brave
For more than a year I compile my kernels the way you described
(universal vay) and I have no problems. Of course there is a debian
way but it's not a must.
Regards,
Seweryn
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cothrige <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I am sure this is a really stupid question, but having read through
> the reference and searched online (some searches involve such common
> terms they never return anything useful) I have really been unable to
> find a clear answer. I hope someone here can h
On Wed, Dec 10, 2003 at 10:02:28AM -0600, John Foster wrote:
> Joseph Jones wrote:
>
> >I can compile a kernel into a .deb package as described in the
> >newbiedoc, but I need to compile a kernel with drivers for my laptop's
> >NIC so I can make a rescue disc to do a network install from. Could
On Wed, 10 Dec 2003 22:16:25 -0800,
"Scarletdown" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> I am once again giving a whirl at compiling a 2.4.22 kernel; this
> time on my test box which I am telnetted into so I don't have to
> keep switching back and forth via the KV switch.
On Fri, 12 Dec 2003 at 03:00 GMT, Paul Stolp penned:
> * Monique Y. Herman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-12-11 05:43]:
>>
>> Btw, I just discovered that lilo bug #222098 appears to still be live
>> in 1:22.5.8-6. It prevents me from running lilo successfully. So
>> caveat emptor and all that ...
>
* Monique Y. Herman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-12-11 05:43]:
>
> Btw, I just discovered that lilo bug #222098 appears to still be live in
> 1:22.5.8-6. It prevents me from running lilo successfully. So caveat
> emptor and all that ...
Hmm, same problem here. looked for a bug report, didn't see i
On Thursday 11 Dec 2003 6:16 am, Scarletdown wrote:
> I am once again giving a whirl at compiling a 2.4.22 kernel; this
> time on my test box which I am telnetted into so I don't have to
> keep switching back and forth via the KV switch.
>
> Anyway, I managed to unpack the tarball and create the sy
try using libncurses5 and libncurses5-dev
On Thu, 2003-12-11 at 00:16, Scarletdown wrote:
> I am once again giving a whirl at compiling a 2.4.22 kernel; this time
> on my test box which I am telnetted into so I don't have to keep
> switching back and forth via the KV switch.
>
> Anyway, I manage
Monique Y. Herman wrote:
On Wed, 10 Dec 2003 at 16:02 GMT, John Foster penned:
Joseph Jones wrote:
I can compile a kernel into a .deb package as described in the
newbiedoc, but I need to compile a kernel with drivers for my
laptop's NIC so I can make a rescue disc to do a network install
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wednesday 10 December 2003 20:35, H. S. wrote:
> So now if I use mrproper, I *always* save my .config to some other
> directory, in my case in a tmp in a user's home.
> ->HS
That's what I am doing for every kernel I compile, for every one of my
mac
On Wed, 10 Dec 2003 at 19:35 GMT, H. S. penned:
> Monique Y. Herman wrote:
>
>>
>> dselect #get latest kernel src package cd
>> /usr/src/kernel-source- make mrproper #clean any leftover
>> compile stuff
>
> I tried this a few days ago, but I hadn't read the makefile to know
> what mrproper was d
Monique Y. Herman wrote:
dselect #get latest kernel src package
cd /usr/src/kernel-source-
make mrproper #clean any leftover compile stuff
I tried this a few days ago, but I hadn't read the makefile to know what
mrproper was doing and I lost my old config file which I had renamed,
IIRC, as .conf
On Wed, 10 Dec 2003 at 16:02 GMT, John Foster penned:
> Joseph Jones wrote:
>
>> I can compile a kernel into a .deb package as described in the
>> newbiedoc, but I need to compile a kernel with drivers for my
>> laptop's NIC so I can make a rescue disc to do a network install
>> from. Could anyone
Joseph Jones wrote:
I can compile a kernel into a .deb package as described in the
newbiedoc, but I need to compile a kernel with drivers for my laptop's
NIC so I can make a rescue disc to do a network install from. Could
anyone advise me as to how I do this, if possible in relation to the
ins
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, Dec 09, 2003 at 11:00:16PM +, Joseph Jones wrote:
> I can compile a kernel into a .deb package as described in the
> newbiedoc, but I need to compile a kernel with drivers for my laptop's
> NIC so I can make a rescue disc to do a network
On Thu, 3 Apr 2003 23:25:04 -0800 (PST)
Joris Huizer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I think I might need to set " Advanced partition
> selection " on and select some
> partition types there - but I'm not at all sure (I'm
> just curious why it's off)
You don't need any "Advanced partition" types en
Hello,
Thanks for your reply, Elizabeth !
I checked - but the Second extended fs support was
allready on.
I attached the current filesystem supports.
I think I might need to set " Advanced partition
selection " on and select some
partition types there - but I'm not at all sure (I'm
just curious
Joris writes:
> In case you allready received this question (or even answered ??) I
> apologise, but I have seen no reactions, or my own question, so I
> guess something has gone wrong
>
> The thing is, I can't figure out what's option I should choose which
> is currently off. As I thought I migh
Hello everybody,
In case you allready received this question (or even
answered ??) I apologise, but I have seen no
reactions, or my own question, so I guess something
has gone wrong
The thing is, I can't figure out what's option I
should choose which is currently off. As I thought I
might have ch
On Wed, 2 Apr 2003 12:53:43 -0800 (PST)
Joris Huizer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> request_module[block_major-3]: Root fs not mounted
> UFS Cannot open root device "341" or 03:41
> Please append a correct "root" boot option
> kernel panic: UFS: Unable to mount root fs on 03.41
It looks like you di
Thanks everybody for the suggestions on a succesfull
kernel compilation
I now compiled it but it won't boot.
I get this error stuff - and I don't know what it
means :
--
request_module[block_major-3]: Root fs not mounted
UFS Cannot open root device "341" or 03:41
Please append a correct
Am Wed, 02 Apr 2003 10:10:08 +0200 schrieb Joris Huizer:
> Hello everybody,
>
> As I want scsi emulation, and I'm missing the sr_mod module, I think
> I'll have to compile a new kernel.
>
> What do I need to do for this, exactly? I'll have to get the source,
> ofcourse, but next to that ?
http:
On Tue, 1 Apr 2003 23:35:10 -0800 (PST)
Joris Huizer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello everybody,
>
> As I want scsi emulation, and I'm missing the sr_mod
> module, I think I'll have to compile a new kernel.
>
> What do I need to do for this, exactly? I'll have to
> get the source, ofcourse, bu
In linux.debian.user, you wrote:
> Hello everybody,
>
> As I want scsi emulation, and I'm missing the sr_mod
> module, I think I'll have to compile a new kernel.
>
> What do I need to do for this, exactly? I'll have to
> get the source, ofcourse, but next to that ?
>
> I know allready before the
hey joris,
here's the first three steps i recommend:
# apt-get install kernel-source-2.4.20
# apt-get install kernel-package
$ cd /usr/share/doc/kernel-package
(if you're running woody, you want kernel-source-2.4.18 i believe)
debian really treats you well with kernel-compiling utilities and
do
On Sat, Dec 21, 2002 at 01:36:53PM -0600, Gerald V. Livingston II wrote:
> Where did you see text regarding 2.4.20 problems with ext3? The box
> has ext2 right now but I was going to convert some time after the
> kernel upgrade.
See Herbert Xu's reply to my earlier post; 2.4.20 only barfs if you
a
On Sun, Dec 22, 2002 at 11:40:27AM +1100, Herbert Xu wrote:
> Nathan E Norman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > BTW, 2.4.20 is not the kernel you want if you run ext3 filesystems.
> > OTOH, 2.4.19 seems to not want to provide DRM support for the Creator.
>
> 2.4.20 ext3 is OK as long as you don'
Nathan E Norman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> BTW, 2.4.20 is not the kernel you want if you run ext3 filesystems.
> OTOH, 2.4.19 seems to not want to provide DRM support for the Creator.
2.4.20 ext3 is OK as long as you don't enable data=journal (the default
is data=ordered).
--
Debian GNU/Linu
Nathan E Norman said:
> On Sat, Dec 21, 2002 at 01:40:51AM -0600, Gerald V. Livingston II
> wrote:
>> Is there any special info on getting a 2.4.20 kernel to compile
>> under
>> woody on a Sun UltraSparc-1 Creator.
>>
>> Yes, the Debian Way (tm) -- or not, I don't care. Right now it fails
>> at th
On Sat, Dec 21, 2002 at 12:02:33AM -0800, nate wrote:
> I don't have personal experience with linux on sparc yet, Downloading
> the woody ISOs for it now and plan to install it on my ultra 1 probably
> tomorrow though.
Don't waste time with the ISOs. Set up a RARP server and TFTP server
on an exi
On Sat, Dec 21, 2002 at 01:40:51AM -0600, Gerald V. Livingston II wrote:
> Is there any special info on getting a 2.4.20 kernel to compile under
> woody on a Sun UltraSparc-1 Creator.
>
> Yes, the Debian Way (tm) -- or not, I don't care. Right now it fails
> at the "make dep" stage using either me
nate said:
> Gerald V. Livingston II said:
>> Is there any special info on getting a 2.4.20 kernel to compile
>> under
>> woody on a Sun UltraSparc-1 Creator.
>
>
> I'm not sure how closely you track the kernel but I've read several
> places that the "generic" kernel is rarely the choice for anyt
Gerald V. Livingston II said:
> Is there any special info on getting a 2.4.20 kernel to compile under
> woody on a Sun UltraSparc-1 Creator.
I'm not sure how closely you track the kernel but I've read several
places that the "generic" kernel is rarely the choice for anything
other then x86. the n
On Tue, Oct 15, 2002 at 04:07:04PM -0500, Alex Malinovich wrote:
> I've got an Athlon XP 2000 system running as my desktop machine. I've
> also got a PIII 850 laptop and a p133 mail server. While recompiling the
> kernel on the laptop isn't too time consuming it still takes almost
> twice as long
Alex Malinovich, 2002-Oct-15 16:07 -0500:
> I've got an Athlon XP 2000 system running as my desktop machine. I've
> also got a PIII 850 laptop and a p133 mail server. While recompiling the
> kernel on the laptop isn't too time consuming it still takes almost
> twice as long as it does on my deskto
On Tuesday 15 October 2002 14:07, Alex Malinovich wrote:
> I've got an Athlon XP 2000 system running as my desktop machine. I've
> also got a PIII 850 laptop and a p133 mail server. While recompiling the
> kernel on the laptop isn't too time consuming it still takes almost
> twice as long as it do
On Sat, May 04, 2002 at 03:08:13PM +0300, Tuomo Karhu wrote:
> Could you give me main commands and short help/explanation howto compile
> debian kernel?
I prefere to use make-kpkg the Debian-Kernel-Package-Manager. I think
you have to install the kernel-package. It produces Kernel-.deb
packages a
On Sat May 04, 2002 at 03:45:42PM -0400, Kapil Khosla wrote:
>
> If you want it really really short
> apt-cache search kernel-image
>
> You will get a variety of hits
> Choose 1
>
> apt-get install kernel-image...
>
> You dont need anything else, It will modify lilo.conf, etc etc, and you j
On Sat, 2002-05-04 at 08:08, Tuomo Karhu wrote:
> Could you give me main commands and short help/explanation howto compile
> debian kernel?
>
> Thanks.
>
> Tuomo Karhu
Check out chapter 9 of the Debian FAQ:
http://www.debian.org/doc/FAQ/ch-kernel.html
Nick
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMA
If you want it really really short
apt-cache search kernel-image
You will get a variety of hits
Choose 1
apt-get install kernel-image...
You dont need anything else, It will modify lilo.conf, etc etc, and you just
reboot :)
If you wanna really compile a kernel, In debian you can use some
Use the guide on this site http://newbiedoc.sourceforge.net/tutorials/kernel-pkg.en/intro-kernel-pkg.html
Cheers.
Jonas
-Original Message-
From: Tuomo Karhu
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: den 4 maj 2002 14:08
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: compiling a kern
I did it!!!
As root I checked disk space, and did: make-kpkg --revision=3:custom.1.0
kernel_image (with an underscore).
And it works, I get the image.deb and after dpkg -i it is installed.
After rebooting it's a bit dissapointing that my new kernel will not work, but
I'm going to start to find
On Sat, Oct 06, 2001 at 12:30:33AM +, Hans Steinraht wrote:
>
> - make-kpkg --revision Custum.1 kernel-image
>
This has never failed me:
make-kpkg --revision=3:custom.1.0 kernel_image
John
--
-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-
Using [Debian] Linux
_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_
pgpjm8INeNUQs.pgp
Descripti
On Sat, Oct 06, 2001 at 12:30:49AM +0200, Eduard Bloch wrote:
> > - make-kpkg clean
> > - make menuconfig
> > - make-kpkg --revision Custum.1 kernel-image
>
> It is called kernel_image, an underscore, not -.
Yes but reading make-kpkg perl script, it seems to accept both as same
target as undocume
#include
Hans Steinraht wrote on Sat Oct 06, 2001 um 12:30:33AM:
>
> --
Hehe, never put -- at the beginning, it is a sign for beginning a
signature and some software cuts everything below.
> - make-kpkg clean
> - make menuconfig
> - make-kpkg --revision Custum.1 kernel-image
It is called kern
On Mon, Sep 17, 2001 at 12:52:20AM +, Rajesh Fowkar wrote:
> This is at one of my clients place. He has got an athlon machine. Are there
> any issues in compiling the kernel on a different machine with a different
> processor ? Now I am thinking of compiling the kernel for this Celerone
> machi
Sebastiaan wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> has anyone an idea how to cross compile a kernel, so to compile a kernel
> for a ppc on an i386?
>
> Just curius.
>
> Greetz,
> Sebastiaan
Hi,
you'll have to set up gcc as a cross compiler and look at the patches
in the kernel sources for ppc.
regards
Albrecht
Hi,
has anyone an idea how to cross compile a kernel, so to compile a kernel
for a ppc on an i386?
Just curius.
Greetz,
Sebastiaan
On Tue, 30 Jan 2001, Sean 'Shaleh' Perry wrote:
>
> On 30-Jan-2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > I know this is possible (I even vaguely remember seeing it menti
On 30 Jan 2001, "Hall Stevenson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I have this worry about all those bits I marked as Modules,
> > though. I guess I have to copy those too, hmm? From where
> > to where? Is there anything else I should worry about?
>
> I think most people will suggest you use the "ma
> I know this is possible (I even vaguely remember seeing
> it mentioned somewhere).
>
> What I want to do is compile a kernel on my desktop
> PC for my laptop. Just build it, copy the new kernel image
> across the network, rejig the laptop's lilo, reboot it, and
> Roberta's your crossdressing Aunt
On 30-Jan-2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I know this is possible (I even vaguely remember seeing it mentioned
> somewhere).
>
> What I want to do is compile a kernel on my desktop PC for my laptop.
> Just build it, copy the new kernel image across the network, rejig
> the laptop's lilo, rebo
When you install Linux it comes with a stock kernel and
a ton of device drivers. You want to compile a kernel to
cut down to the device drivers you need. If you'd like
pointers to documentation, send me an email.
Paul
On Tue, 05 Sep 2000, Mark Simos wrote:
> I am a newbie, and am curious as to what exactly compiling a kernel does
> for me.
>
> I have some vague impression that it does something like make your OS
> run better on your machine or allow you to add in and remove support for
> stuff.
>
> Simply put,
Quoting [EMAIL PROTECTED] ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> In a message dated 1/7/99 3:41:51 PM Central Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> treff.uni-koeln.de writes:
>
> > M> Is there a way to find out what options the current kernel has been
> > M> compiled with? I don't want to miss anything or add anyt
>> "DBT" == David B Teague <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
DBT> So how do I determine the various configuration details? As you
DBT> suggest, I intend to use my current configuration and make some
DBT> guesses as to necessary changes.
If you have build your kernel with kernel-package, you will find
Martin Bialasinski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >> "M" == MallarJ <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> M> Is there a way to find out what options the current kernel has been
> M> compiled with? I don't want to miss anything or add anything that
> M> I don't already have and won't need.
>
> If you
On Thu, Jan 07, 1999 at 07:17:18PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> thanks, but I didn't compile my Kernel, so I don't have the src files to look
> at - no config file there either.
>
Do You have installed the kernel-package.
Maybe You can create a configuration about Your current installed
Hi Jay,
Have a look at Your
'usr/src/linux/.config' file
it contains the Configuration about Your actual kernel.
note:
the /usr/src/linux is a link, maybe
/usr/src/kernel-source-2.0.36
--
Peter
In a message dated 1/7/99 3:41:51 PM Central Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
treff.uni-koeln.de writes:
> M> Is there a way to find out what options the current kernel has been
> M> compiled with? I don't want to miss anything or add anything that
> M> I don't already have and won't need.
>
>> "M" == MallarJ <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
M> Is there a way to find out what options the current kernel has been
M> compiled with? I don't want to miss anything or add anything that
M> I don't already have and won't need.
If you use a kernel made with kernel-package or one of the
kernel-bi
On Sat, 6 Jun 1998, Bob Nielsen wrote:
> kernel-package does this, including putting System.map- in
> /boot. It also gives you an option for creating a boot-floppy with the
> new kernel.
>
> What does system.map do? I've compiled kernels before without
> kernel-package and never had problems.
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
: avail. Who is Manjo?
Manoj Srivastava. Maintainer of kernel-package (and perhaps other
things as well).
Right,
MartinS
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscri
On Sun, 7 Jun 1998, Ralph Winslow wrote:
> Chris wrote:
> >
> >
> > /vmlinuz is a symlink to /vmlinuz-2.0.33. This kernel and the file
> > /boot/System.map were installed by the kernel package.
opps.your right - but I meant that /vmlinuz is a symlink to
/boot/vmlinuz-2.0.33.
I've tried
Chris wrote:
>
> Hi again,
>
> Thanks to Ralph for his instructions (below). However, after packaging
> the kernel, then installing I still get the following message when I run
> lsof:
>
> mort:~# lsof
> lsof: kernel symbol address mismatch: el3_probe
> get_kernel_syms() value is 0x282500
Hi again,
Thanks to Ralph for his instructions (below). However, after packaging
the kernel, then installing I still get the following message when I run
lsof:
mort:~# lsof
lsof: kernel symbol address mismatch: el3_probe
get_kernel_syms() value is 0x2825004; /boot/System.map-2.0.33 value
kernel-package does this, including putting System.map- in
/boot. It also gives you an option for creating a boot-floppy with the
new kernel.
What does system.map do? I've compiled kernels before without
kernel-package and never had problems. Likewise, what about boot.,
boot.b, etc.?
Bob
Get the kernel-package package (in misc I think). This is a wrapper for
kernel compilation process that will allow you to produce a custom
kernel-image package that may be installed with dpkg.
On Sun, 7 Jun 1998, Chris wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> There was some discussion a while ago about installing a
94 matches
Mail list logo
