> > BTW: When will 1.1 be released?
>
> I am uploading yet another pass at the installation floppies today.
> We're also dealing with some FTP site problems. I'm going to make a new
> "stable" archive this week, and will let that propogate out to all of
> the FTP mirrors. We then will give it a fe
Syrus Nemat-Nasser wrote:
> My 0.93R6 system at home is the most stable linux system I have ever seen.
> Now that 1.1 is nearly ready for release, I agree that it is approaching
> the same level of stability. It is true that 0.93 probably is not
> compatible with some of the newer hardware and sof
On Sun, 2 Jun 1996, Amos Shapira wrote:
> Then maybe the warning signs in the ftp sites should be updated? Back when
> I went for Debian I saw lots of them lying around (and so I went to 0.93R6,
> which indeed prooved less stable than "unstable"), as well as when I mirrored
> unstable 1.1.
My 0.
On Sun, 2 Jun 1996, Bruce Perens wrote:
> Yes, it's time for us to remove 0.93 from the FTP site. I'll think about
> this for a while before I do it, though.
Lets be kind to our mirrors.. :)
We also need to move the 1.1 into place when this happens.
Then we need to create the next gener
On Sun, 2 Jun 1996, Bruce Perens wrote:
> Yes, it's time for us to remove 0.93 from the FTP site. I'll think about
> this for a while before I do it, though.
I vote for not deleting it but for renaming to obsolete or old.
We should not remove the last stable version before 1.1 is released and
pr
Yes, it's time for us to remove 0.93 from the FTP site. I'll think about
this for a while before I do it, though.
Bruce
--
Pixar's Toy Story: Over 1/3 Billion dollars world box office so far.
Bruce Perens AB6YM [EMAIL PROTECTED]http://www.hams.com/
Martin Konold wrote:
> > Why don't you try installing Debian 1.1 beta instead of 0.93R6? It's
> > located in the unstable directory of your friendly Debian mirror site.
> > but don't be misled by the 'unstable' name... 1.1 is now in late beta and
> > is quite stable now. And the installation proces
> > I do agree. You really should go for 1.1 beta. This version is supposed
>
> Then maybe the warning signs in the ftp sites should be updated? Back when
> I went for Debian I saw lots of them lying around (and so I went to 0.93R6,
> which indeed prooved less stable than "unstable"), as well as
> BTW: When will 1.1 be released?
I am uploading yet another pass at the installation floppies today.
We're also dealing with some FTP site problems. I'm going to make a new
"stable" archive this week, and will let that propogate out to all of
the FTP mirrors. We then will give it a few more days
> > Hello,
> > I have an old AMD' 80386 40MHz with 4MB of RAM and I really like
> > to install Linux on it. I spent some time looking around and
> > then I decided to proceed with the Debian distribution.
> > Got the five disks of the 0.93R6 version I started the installation
> > but with no su
On Fri, 31 May 1996, Alberto Brizio wrote:
> Hello,
> I have an old AMD' 80386 40MHz with 4MB of RAM and I really like
> to install Linux on it. I spent some time looking around and
> then I decided to proceed with the Debian distribution.
> Got the five disks of the 0.93R6 version I started the
11 matches
Mail list logo
