Martin Konold wrote:
> > Why don't you try installing Debian 1.1 beta instead of 0.93R6? It's
> > located in the unstable directory of your friendly Debian mirror site.
> > but don't be misled by the 'unstable' name... 1.1 is now in late beta and
> > is quite stable now. And the installation process has been improved quite
> > a bit in 1.1.
>
> I do agree. You really should go for 1.1 beta. This version is supposed
> YOurs,
> martin
Then maybe the warning signs in the ftp sites should be updated? Back when
I went for Debian I saw lots of them lying around (and so I went to 0.93R6,
which indeed prooved less stable than "unstable"), as well as when I mirrored
unstable 1.1.
Cheers.
--
--Amos Shapira | "Of course Australia was marked for
| glory, for its people had been chosen
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | by the finest judges in England."
| -- Anonymous
