%% "Chris F.A. Johnson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
cfaj> On 2005-07-06, Paul Smith wrote:
>> The disadvantage of the pipe-to-while method is that each element
>> in the pipeline is run in a subshell, so variables set inside the
>> while loop (for example) won't be set after the loop is
On 2005-07-06, Paul Smith wrote:
>
> The disadvantage of the pipe-to-while method is that each element in the
> pipeline is run in a subshell, so variables set inside the while loop
> (for example) won't be set after the loop is complete[*].
find . | {
while read line
do
: whatever
w
%% Dexter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> find . | while read file; do ; done
d> I tried before something like:
d> F=$(find .);for I in $F;do ; done
Besides breaking on filenames with embedded whitespace, this method has
the other major disadvantage that it collects the entire output into
On Tue, 2005-07-05 at 18:53 -0400, Paul Smith wrote:
> %% Dexter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> d> But I want to use bash function instead of command.
>
> You can't.
>
> d> Problem is not, that command "find" runs in different environment, and
> d> doesn't know variables and functions fro
%% Dexter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
d> But I want to use bash function instead of command.
You can't.
d> Problem is not, that command "find" runs in different environment, and
d> doesn't know variables and functions from parent shell.
Yes it is.
d> Because i tried:
d> A="XXX"
d>
On Wed, Jul 06, 2005 at 12:44:25AM +0200, Dexter wrote:
} Hi,
} bash command "find" let's you execute other commands like this:
[...]
This is where your problem comes up. The find command is a standalone
program, and unrelated to bash.
} Somebody has a idea how to run function there?
This is wha
6 matches
Mail list logo
