Re: apt-get galeon q

2001-08-24 Thread christophe barbé
Yes if you want uptodate (sometimes called bleeding-edge) softwares, it's better to upgrade to sid. I would be easier for you and in the same time you contribute to the early testing effort. IMHO testing (woody) is for woody testing. If you polute too much your woody with sid package, you are not r

Re: apt-get galeon q

2001-08-24 Thread Karsten M. Self
on Thu, Aug 23, 2001 at 10:14:00PM -0400, Jeff Maxson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > > ok, the hoopla about galeon has got me wanting to try it. I'm running > woody, so I commented out my woody lines in my sources.list and put in > > deb ftp://ftp.us.debian.org/debian unstable main contrib non-fre

Re: apt-get galeon q

2001-08-23 Thread Michael Heldebrant
On 23 Aug 2001 22:14:00 -0400, Jeff Maxson wrote: > > ok, the hoopla about galeon has got me wanting to try it. I'm running > woody, so I commented out my woody lines in my sources.list and put in > > deb ftp://ftp.us.debian.org/debian unstable main contrib non-free > > so that is the only thin

Re: apt-get galeon q

2001-08-23 Thread Bob Nielsen
On Thu, Aug 23, 2001 at 10:14:00PM -0400, Jeff Maxson wrote: > > ok, the hoopla about galeon has got me wanting to try it. I'm running > woody, so I commented out my woody lines in my sources.list and put in > > deb ftp://ftp.us.debian.org/debian unstable main contrib non-free > > so that is th