Dave Wilk wrote:
>
> Howdy folks,
>
> I compiled AfterStep 1.6.10 on a slink machine a while back and really
> enjoyed the 'saved state' feature that would return all my apps the way
> they were before I quit X after loggin out via aftersteps script (the
> button in the wharf).
>
> Now I have a
I'd suggest submitting a wishlist "bug" to the maintainer about turning
that option on by default (he/she may disagree). Immediate solution is,
of course, to compile it yourself.
--
Eric G. Miller
On Thu, Sep 07, 2000 at 08:53:47PM -0700, Dale Morris wrote:
> After upgrading all my packages to woody I no longer have afterstep
> window manager available to me. When I select the window managers
> button, I only have fvvm, gnome-icewm, wmaker, fvvm2. Somehow one of
> the scripts changed things
1.7-1.8 Afterstep has a builtin theme support.
You can use that engine, or do it by hand, just untar the tarball, and put
files into appropriate directories (manually).
If you will use the theme engine, go to GNUstep/Library/Afterstep/themes
directory, and put your tarball there. Next update all, a
Hi Cormac,
I'm glad to see the problem was discovered by other user
as well. For days, I thought that I was the only dude uses
afterstep and the only dude imagined thing :). And thank
you very much for filling the bug report because I have yet
to learned how to fill the bug report...
Hi there
Sorry! I didnt notice this topic on debian-user.
I had the exact same problem and found the same solution as you and
I filed a bug report for the afterstep package last week.
Cormac
On Fri, Feb 18, 2000 at 11:25:36AM -0600, Timothy C. Phan wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I finally figure what was
Hi,
I finally figure what was the problem with unable to
click on the xterm icon on the desktop to bring up
the xterm.
The problem was in the /usr/share/afterstep/wharf where
the line that contains the xterm information. It
should end with an & intead of the $ which was
installed
On Tue, Feb 15, 2000 at 07:38:31PM -0600, Gregory T. Norris wrote:
> Possibly a stupid question, but are you sure that you have xterm
> installed? If I remember correctly it used to be included in one of
> the main X packages (xbase?), but now has it's own package.
>
> On Tue, Feb 15, 2000 at 08:
Possibly a stupid question, but are you sure that you have xterm
installed? If I remember correctly it used to be included in one of
the main X packages (xbase?), but now has it's own package.
On Tue, Feb 15, 2000 at 08:17:12AM -0600, Timothy C. Phan wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I got the x to run and I s
> Hallo
>
> my name is Ingo.
Hi.
> I have installed the GNU/Debian version 2.0.
> Now i have a problem with the X-windows system.
Which card and monitor do you have? 640x480 seems like either a pretty old
ISA card, or a very old monitor, or both.
Make sure you have the right settingsif you
Hallo
my name is Ingo.
I have installed the GNU/Debian version 2.0.
Now i have a problem with the X-windows system.
I have running the x-server but X didn´t start.
There is only an error message on the textmode that call :
no valid mode "480x640" installed
But I have config the XF86Setup and I
On Wed, 27 Jan 1999, Andrew Ivanov wrote:
>I got a 14" monitor, and even with 1024x764 Wharf buttons in AfterStep do
>look kinda big. WHich file holds the size of buttons in AS?
>I realize that .xpm's will neen to be replaced as well to indicate new
>size or button, but it will not be a problem.
I
On Thu, 6 Aug 1998, Ana Graca Silva wrote:
>
> To everyone who was thinking respond to my previous mail:
>
> About how to configure afterstep, i've solved my mistery :
>
> Copied all the files from /usr/share/afterstep to the directory AfterStep
> on my home. Played with some files, and now I h
To everyone who was thinking respond to my previous mail:
About how to configure afterstep, i've solved my mistery :
Copied all the files from /usr/share/afterstep to the directory AfterStep
on my home. Played with some files, and now I have configured it to
fullfill all my needs (by now).
Tha
On Wed, 5 Aug 1998, Ana Graca Silva wrote:
>My new problem is the window manager - afterstep 1.4.5.3-1 .
>
>I was trying to configure my desktop when i found in afterstep home page
>some perturbing information - the AS Directory Strutcture in that page is
>much bigger then the mine in my home ...
On Sun, 21 Jun 1998 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > Also, is there a way to allow xterm to add utmp entries? At this point,
> > knowing who is logged onto the machine is much more important than the
> > machines security for me.
>
> (as root)
> chmod u+s /usr/X11R6/bin/xterm
>
xterm was allready
> Also, is there a way to allow xterm to add utmp entries? At this point,
> knowing who is logged onto the machine is much more important than the
> machines security for me.
(as root)
chmod u+s /usr/X11R6/bin/xterm
and uncomment
XTerm*utmpInhibit: false
line in /etc/X11/Xresources
Alex Y.
--
On Mon, Jun 22, 1998 at 04:22:55AM +1000, Chris wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> What happened to afterstep? I just installed afterstep for my newly
> upgraded hamm box, expecting to see my setup just as normal, however it
> appears that afterstep has been replaced with something else - GNUStep.
> To be h
On Sun, 7 Jun 1998, Rev. Joseph Carter wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 07, 1998 at 06:30:55PM +1200, Michael Beattie wrote:
> > I read on the list a while ago (I may have misinterpreted) that there was
> > a configuration utility written in tk or tcl for afterstep. is this true?
> > where can i get it?
>
>
On Sun, Jun 07, 1998 at 06:30:55PM +1200, Michael Beattie wrote:
> I read on the list a while ago (I may have misinterpreted) that there was
> a configuration utility written in tk or tcl for afterstep. is this true?
> where can i get it?
For 1.0, yes.
For 1.4, not yet. =<
pgpf32IdMH2rK.pgp
De
On Sun, May 17, 1998 at 02:29:28PM +, Rev. Joseph Carter wrote:
> On Sun, May 17, 1998 at 01:01:50PM +0400, Alexey Vyskubov wrote:
> >
> > Where is configuration files for afterstep_1.4.5.3-1???
> >
> > My ~/GNUstep doesn't work now.
> > Moreover, there is no /usr/share/GNUstep.
> >
> > In /
On Sun, May 17, 1998 at 01:01:50PM +0400, Alexey Vyskubov wrote:
>
> Where is configuration files for afterstep_1.4.5.3-1???
>
> My ~/GNUstep doesn't work now.
> Moreover, there is no /usr/share/GNUstep.
>
> In /usr/doc/afterstep/README.debian :
>
[..]
mkdir ~/GNUstep
mkdir ~/GNUstep/Library
c
> I have just installed and configured AfterStep to the letter, but now
> when I try startx I get the following message.
>
> /root/.xinitrc: afterstep: command not found:
>
> Why can't it find afterstep. Should there be something in my PATH
> statement pointing where AfterStep is installed. After
On Fri, Apr 17, 1998 at 07:54:40PM +0200, Maarten Boekhold wrote:
> Does anybody still have an afterstep_1.0 package lying around? I
> accidentally installed 1.4, and I hate it. Completely new configuration,
> which I don't want to learn right now (other than that it looks very
> nice, though I
>I upgraded afterstep to 1.4, but I had to downgrade it back to 1.0,
>cuz the new one did not get any of my old confs, and looked horrible!
>
>Did I do anything wrong?
Yeah, you didn't configure it to your own tastes!Give it another try!
The conf files and structure have totally changed betw
On Tue, 03 Mar 1998 14:16:41 PST, "Luiz Otavio L. Zorzella" wrote:
>
> I upgraded afterstep to 1.4, but I had to downgrade it back to 1.0,
> cuz the new one did not get any of my old confs, and looked horrible!
>
> Did I do anything wrong?
You need to follow the instructions in:
/usr/doc/afters
On 13 Feb 1998, Gilbert Laycock wrote:
> Does anybody have any idea what causes the steprc not to be deleted
> for some users? I suspect something in the personal setup files (this is
> a student lab, and once somebody gets a nice looking setup it tends to
> be copied around), but since I am n
On 26 Jan 1998, Sten Anderson wrote:
> Maarten Boekhold <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Difference between the computers: I use xdm, he doesn't,
>
> When using xdm, the relevent file is ~/.xsession
>
> When using startx, the relevant file is ~/.xinitrc
Not on my system it is startx use
Maarten Boekhold <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Difference between the computers: I use xdm, he doesn't,
When using xdm, the relevent file is ~/.xsession
When using startx, the relevant file is ~/.xinitrc
- Sten Anderson
--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe"
/etc/X11/afterstep/system.steprc
-Paul
On Fri, 31 Oct 1997, Ian Keith Setford wrote:
>
> Hi-
>
> I am running afterstep and I would like to take advantage of some of what
> it has to offer by modifying the .steprc. Where is the "global"/default
> .steprc file located? I would like to copy th
Thanks to all those who tried to help me.
Afterstep was running in 16bpp, not 8.
If I modified the .steprc file I could make the AFstep.xpm icon appear
elsewhere on the wharf bar.
The fix was to install xproc_1.12.2_i386.deb from the /debian/updates
directory. This made xload work again and fixed
> "lc29b50" == lc29b50 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
lc29b50> On Sun, 7 Sep 1997, David wrote:
>> I have had the same problem...but I have installed both Xload,
>> and Xproc. I still am mising the top icon also. Maybe we both
>> have something messed up?...or maybe it is a bug
Thank you...
But... Where would I change that in the XF86config?
Where could I change it from 8bpp to 16bpp or even higher?
I want 800x600 resolution though.
Thanx-
David U.
On Sat, 7 Sep 1996, Viorel ANGHEL wrote:
>
> the icon on the top of the warf bar (afterstep and X windows) is missing.
> On Sun, 7 Sep 1997 17:00:40 -0600 (MDT), lc29b50 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
Lei> On Sun, 7 Sep 1997, David wrote:
>> i all.
>> I've just installed debian 1.3.1 on 2 seperate machines. On both machine
>> the icon on the top of the warf bar (afterstep and X windows) is missing.
>> The AFstep.xp
On Sat, 7 Sep 1996, Viorel ANGHEL wrote:
>
> That's because you have a 8bpp (256 colors on screen) and Afterstep
> use a lot of them. When AS doesn't have colors, it simply don't
> put the icon! So, use a resolution with 16bpp or search for
> icons with less colors (I know that exist something l
On Sun, 7 Sep 1997, David wrote:
> I have had the same problem...but I have installed both Xload, and
> Xproc. I still am mising the top icon also. Maybe we both have
> something messed up?...or maybe it is a bug? I don't know. If anyone
> knows how to solve this problem, please help me out.
I have had the same problem...but I have installed both Xload, and
Xproc. I still am mising the top icon also. Maybe we both have
something messed up?...or maybe it is a bug? I don't know. If anyone
knows how to solve this problem, please help me out.
Thank you,
David
On Sun, 7 Sep 1997, lc
On Sun, 7 Sep 1997, David wrote:
> i all.
> I've just installed debian 1.3.1 on 2 seperate machines. On both machine
> the icon on the top of the warf bar (afterstep and X windows) is missing.
> The AFstep.xpm file exists and is viewable using xv, but it won't appear.
> Also, xload won't run becau
On Sun, 7 Sep 1997, David wrote:
> I have had the same problem...but I have installed both Xload, and
> Xproc. I still am mising the top icon also. Maybe we both have
> something messed up?...or maybe it is a bug? I don't know. If anyone
> knows how to solve this problem, please help me out.
On Mon, 07 Jul 1997 23:56:01 EDT "Kevin M. Bealer" ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
wrote:
> Speaking of xload, where did it go? I'm sure I saw it is still
> available somewhere, but why doesn't it come standard with the rest of
> X anymore?
It used to be in xcontrib and now is in xproc.
Phil.
--
TO UN
"Christian Hudon" wrote:
>
>On Jul 7, Jason Westervelt wrote
>
>> nah.. that only gets a few other icons to pop up... don't ask why, but
>> the TOP button (the one that has the lock buttons, shutdown, etc) will
>> ** NOT ** have an icon until you install procps and xproc.. very
>> weird..
>
>Even
On Jul 7, Jason Westervelt wrote
> nah.. that only gets a few other icons to pop up... don't ask why, but
> the TOP button (the one that has the lock buttons, shutdown, etc) will
> ** NOT ** have an icon until you install procps and xproc.. very
> weird..
Even if you don't "swallow" an xload in
> It did the same thing for me when my desktop was configured
> with 256
> colors. Using, 65000 colors, the icon appeared. I don't know why but
> maybe it
> could help you.
nah.. that only gets a few other icons to pop up... don't ask why, but
the TOP button (the one that has the lock butt
-> This is a very minor problem, but I got a nice new computer. I've got
-> afterstep 1.0-4 running. The Afterstep icon doesn't appear in the
-> top icon. Here's the relevent section of my .steprc:
->
-> *Wharf AfterStep AFstep.xpm Folder
->
-> Any ideas?
->
-> thanks,
-> joe
It did
Joe Lillibridge wrote:
> This is a very minor problem, but I got a nice new computer. I've got
>
> afterstep 1.0-4 running. The Afterstep icon doesn't appear in the
> top icon. Here's the relevent section of my .steprc:
>
> *Wharf AfterStep AFstep.xpm Folder
Yeah, me too... I noticed that as w
Dick Arnold wrote:
>
> Joe Lillibridge wrote:
> >
> > On Jul 6, dpk wrote
> > > I had this problem also I suggest:
> > > 1. make sure that the icon exists in one of the directories set in your
> > > PixmapPath, which is set in your .steprc
> > >
> > > 2. also make sure there are no errors
On Jul 6, dpk wrote
> I had this problem also I suggest:
> 1. make sure that the icon exists in one of the directories set in your
> PixmapPath, which is set in your .steprc
>
> 2. also make sure there are no errors in your .steprc, you can view the
> errors by wixh xconsole. I have
I had this problem also I suggest:
1. make sure that the icon exists in one of the directories set in your
PixmapPath, which is set in your .steprc
2. also make sure there are no errors in your .steprc, you can view the
errors by wixh xconsole. I have xconsole start up in my .xinitr
On Tue, 17 Jun 1997, Alberto Ruiz wrote:
> Date: Tue, 17 Jun 1997 01:53:56 -0600 (MDT)
> From: Alberto Ruiz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
> Subject: Afterstep color problem
> Resent-Date: 17 Jun 1997 16:41:17 -
> Resent-From: debian-user@lists.debian.org
> Resent-cc: r
lt;[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: Alberto Ruiz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Cc: debian-user@lists.debian.org
> Subject: Re: Afterstep color problem
> Resent-Date: 17 Jun 1997 17:17:50 -
> Resent-From: debian-user@lists.debian.org
> Resent-cc: recipient.list.not.shown:;@lists.debia
> This is the first time that I use afterstep. When I run Netscape in fvwm,
> fvwm95, or almost every other wm, it works fine. But when I run it in
> afterstep I get the following message:
>
> Warning: Cannot allocate colormap entry for default background.
>
> I also get a error window messag
On Jun 17, Alberto Ruiz wrote
> This is the first time that I use afterstep. When I run Netscape in fvwm,
> fvwm95, or almost every other wm, it works fine. But when I run it in
> afterstep I get the following message:
>
> Warning: Cannot allocate colormap entry for default background.
>
> I
Brad Bell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> well, i found the problem. i'm not surprised nobody suggested it, because
> it was so blazingly obvious... i changed the permissions on /tmp to 777,
> and it works fine. so now i guess what i want to know is, what are the
> default permissions on /tmp? i
well, i found the problem. i'm not surprised nobody suggested it, because
it was so blazingly obvious... i changed the permissions on /tmp to 777,
and it works fine. so now i guess what i want to know is, what are the
default permissions on /tmp? i don't remember ever changing them.
-brad
On
On Fri, 6 Jun 1997, W Paul Mills wrote:
> I believe that /usr/X11R6/bin/X needs to be suid root.
no, that wasn't the problem. note that there are no problems with any
other wm i've tried (fvwm/2/95, olvwm, twm)
i should also note that X is killed when i start up afterstep.
-brad
> On Thu, 5 J
I believe that /usr/X11R6/bin/X needs to be suid root.
On Thu, 5 Jun 1997, Brad Bell wrote:
> hi, i am having some trouble (with permissions?) starting up afterstep.
> if i start it as root, there are no problems.
> if i start as a normal user, i get this:
>
> velcro# cat /home/brad/.xsession-
I must apologize that I have not replied to this earlier, but I only
read debian-user occasionally and have been busy lately. I am the
maintainer of the AfterStep package, and must say that my 1.0pre6
package (with debian version .99pre6 to work with the dpkg version
ordering scheme) was uploaded
On Thu, 3 Apr 1997, Paul McDermott wrote:
What i did was get the AfterStep-1.0pre6 as an rpm from www.redhat.com.
I then installed it in my debian box using alien, and... it worked
perfectly. You have to edit some configurations to suit your needs.
I'm really impressed with dpkg and alien...
a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
It doesn't seem to be on the debian.org site.
http://afterstep.edoc.com is the home page. You can get the current version the
re.
SIDE NOTE:
I recv'd a msg that said my email is "broken" i.e. lines broken and doub
le spaced etc...
If anybody
Hello you can get a package called afterstep_0.98a16-2.deb in the
ftp.debian.org/debian/stable/X11 directory. I hope this will help, if
does not I am sorry.
Paul
On Thu, 3 Apr 1997, Magic wrote:
> me have only one - maybe dumb ;) - question... Where is
> AfterStep-1.0pre6 ???
> Thx!
>
On 24 Mar, Christian Hudon wrote:
> On Mon, 24 Mar 1997, Paul Chau wrote:
>
>> Could anyone tell me if the afterstep 1.0pre5 been debianised yet or
>> not?
>
> Don't think so. The Debian package is still at 1.0pre4. If you want, email
> the maintainer (Neil A. Rubin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>) and tell
On Mon, 24 Mar 1997, Paul Chau wrote:
> Could anyone tell me if the afterstep 1.0pre5 been debianised yet or
> not?
Don't think so. The Debian package is still at 1.0pre4. If you want, email
the maintainer (Neil A. Rubin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>) and tell him that
1.0pre5 is out.
Christian
> It appears that the site hosting the AfterStep pages is down-- AfterStep
> being the NeXTSTEP like window manager taken one step beyond bowman.
Check out:
http://mango.sfasu.edu/~frank/afterstep/
> Anyway; anyone have a mirror of the site available? Or the source to the
> latest
63 matches
Mail list logo
