Re: Xaralx on testing (solved)

2006-12-01 Thread Sridhar M.A.
On Fri, Dec 01, 2006 at 08:40:15PM +0530, Sridhar M.A. wrote: > On Wed, Nov 29, 2006 at 05:17:43PM +0100, Florian Kulzer wrote: >> >> I assume you noticed the remark on the webpage regarding >> libstdc++5 compatibility; maybe the necessary package is not installed >>

Re: Xaralx on testing

2006-12-01 Thread Sridhar M.A.
On Wed, Nov 29, 2006 at 05:17:43PM +0100, Florian Kulzer wrote: > > I assume you noticed the remark on the webpage regarding > libstdc++5 compatibility; maybe the necessary package is not installed > by default on a standard Etch system. > It was installed and is even in Etch. $

Re: Xaralx on testing

2006-11-29 Thread Florian Kulzer
On Wed, Nov 29, 2006 at 07:42:22 +0530, Sridhar M.A. wrote: > On Tue, Nov 28, 2006 at 07:50:52PM +0100, Florian Kulzer wrote: >> >> Do you really need to have rev. 1764? The xaralx package 0.7r1692-2 from >> the testing/non-free repository works fine for me. >> > That works here.

Re: Xaralx on testing

2006-11-28 Thread Sridhar M.A.
On Tue, Nov 28, 2006 at 07:50:52PM +0100, Florian Kulzer wrote: > > Do you really need to have rev. 1764? The xaralx package 0.7r1692-2 from > the testing/non-free repository works fine for me. > That works here. Regarding your observation whether I _really_ need it, I can just say I

Re: Xaralx on testing

2006-11-28 Thread Florian Kulzer
On Tue, Nov 28, 2006 at 21:36:24 +0530, Sridhar M.A. wrote: > Hi, > > Recently, I upgraded my machine to testing from sarge. On sarge, xaralx > (version 0.7 rev. 1764) would run without any issues. But after the upgrade, > it segfaults. Removed ~/..XARA-XTREME-WX-xaralx-mas and > ~/.XaraLXFilters