On Wed, Nov 29, 2006 at 07:42:22 +0530, Sridhar M.A. wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 28, 2006 at 07:50:52PM +0100, Florian Kulzer wrote:
> >
> > Do you really need to have rev. 1764? The xaralx package 0.7r1692-2 from
> > the testing/non-free repository works fine for me.
> >
> That works here. Regarding your observation whether I _really_ need it,
> I can just say I am curious to try new version for the new features,
> etc.
Acknowledged. I justed wanted to make sure you knew that there is a
ready-to-go package (slightly older) available in testing/non-free.
> But, the question is more about a software that ran perfectly not
> running on an upgraded system. The particular version which ran under
> sarge no longer runs under etch. FWIW, I was using the xorg packages
> from backports under sarge.
>
> > How did you install the newer version? If you compiled it yourself then
> > you might simply have to recompile it for Etch.
> >
> Running the tarball. Tried the 1692 tarball from xaraxtreme.org; that
> also segfaults :-(
I think this means that the binaries in the tarballs have been compiled
for the Sarge versions of certain libraries and do not work with the
newer versions of those libraries on Etch. You might have to compile
from source yourself if you want the latest xaralx release to run on
Etch. I assume you noticed the remark on the webpage regarding
libstdc++5 compatibility; maybe the necessary package is not installed
by default on a standard Etch system.
--
Regards,
Florian
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
