Re: WordPerfect 8.0 (Installation)

2006-02-10 Thread steef
Ken Heard wrote: <.> well ken, have a good time out there. happens to be good for relationships. good luck, steef -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: WordPerfect 8.0 (Installation)

2006-02-09 Thread Ken Heard
Inspired by the comments and suggestions made by several people on the list, and by Rick Moen's article "WordPerfect on Linux FAQ" (http://linuxmafia.com/wpfaq/), I was able to install the version of WP8 I had inquired in 2000. Essentially what I did was to use the Debian equivs package to cr

Re: WordPerfect 8.0 (installation)

2005-12-17 Thread Andrew M.A. Cater
On Fri, Dec 16, 2005 at 03:53:58AM -0600, Hugo Vanwoerkom wrote: > Ken Heard wrote: > >Herewith is the latest update on my attempts to install WordPerfect > >8.0 on my Debian 'sarge' GNU/linux distribution. > > > Debian _is_ about choice. Corel isn't - they tied their product to one specifi

Re: WordPerfect 8.0 (installation)

2005-12-16 Thread Almut Behrens
On Thu, Dec 15, 2005 at 06:04:59PM -0500, Ken Heard wrote: > So it would appear that packages xlibs and xlibs-data supercede > xlib6g. In fact, the properties list of xlibs_4.3.0dfsg.1-14sarge1 says > that it replaces xlib6g(<< 4.0). The xlib6g I was trying to install was > 3.3.5-1.0.

Re: WordPerfect 8.0 (installation)

2005-12-16 Thread Hugo Vanwoerkom
Ken Heard wrote: Herewith is the latest update on my attempts to install WordPerfect 8.0 on my Debian 'sarge' GNU/linux distribution. There is now another possible option: WINE. Now that a beta version of WINE is out, I may be able to install WP 12 using it. Good luck. Let us kn

Re: WordPerfect 8.0 (installation)

2005-12-15 Thread hendrik
On Thu, Dec 15, 2005 at 06:04:59PM -0500, Ken Heard wrote: > Herewith is the latest update on my attempts to install WordPerfect > 8.0 on my Debian 'sarge' GNU/linux distribution. ... > It is very much of a disappointment that I cannot seem to be able to > use WP8.0 It makes t

Re: WordPerfect 8.0 (installation)

2005-12-15 Thread Ken Heard
Herewith is the latest update on my attempts to install WordPerfect 8.0 on my Debian 'sarge' GNU/linux distribution. First, I discovered that in my original post of 17 November 2005, I gave the wrong paths for the files which would be installed by xlib6g. I only discovered my mistake when I

RE: WordPerfect 8.0

2005-11-24 Thread arlen
Someone who still uses WP8--yeah!!! Join the club...my install of WP8 still runs rings around OO. I've actually found OO to be crashable (often) on my system, but it may have something to do with some of my own tweaks. Anyway, I use WP8 for all my serious documents...never did get fileconversion

Re: WordPerfect 8.0 considered harmful

2005-11-20 Thread John Hasler
James Vahn writes: > Novell, SuSE, TrollTech (KDE's Qt), SCO, Caldera. They (and more) are > all tied together though the Canopy Group. Canopy has never had any influence over Novell. Canopy once had a small interest in Troll Tech. They sold it quite a while ago. Canopy fired Yarro and severed

Re: WordPerfect 8.0 considered harmful

2005-11-20 Thread James Vahn
Marc Shapiro wrote: > Caldera purchased some of the assets of SCO, including the SCO name. Novell, SuSE, TrollTech (KDE's Qt), SCO, Caldera. They (and more) are all tied together though the Canopy Group. I wouldn't be suprised to see Corel as another one. > SCO then renamed itself Tarantella. > C

Re: WordPerfect 8.0

2005-11-19 Thread Almut Behrens
(having nothing to contribute to that Corel/SCO/whoever issue, I'll try to answer the original question...;) On Thu, Nov 17, 2005 at 06:33:25PM +, Ken Heard wrote: > (...) > Debian being Debian, surely there is a way to install xlib6g without > having to remove all 175 of those other pa

Re: WordPerfect 8.0

2005-11-19 Thread Steve Lamb
Almut Behrens wrote: > On the positive side is, though, > that when the next vim vs. emacs thread comes up (and I have no clear > preference as to those two), I can simply lean back, relax and watch > them argue from the distance ;) Ha, I could never approach that level of editor zen. Several

Re: WordPerfect 8.0 considered harmful

2005-11-19 Thread Greg Madden
On Saturday 19 November 2005 17:23, Nate Bargmann wrote: > * Patrick Wiseman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005 Nov 19 18:39 -0600]: > >On 11/19/05, Paul Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Ken Heard wrote: > > > Herewith is my follow-up to the the only two responses elicited by > >

Re: WordPerfect 8.0 considered harmful

2005-11-19 Thread Marc Shapiro
Paul Johnson wrote: Patrick Wiseman wrote: On 11/19/05, Paul Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Ken Heard wrote: Herewith is my follow-up to the the only two responses elicited by my request for help in installing WordPerfect 8.0 which contained suggestions as to how to solve my problem -

Re: WordPerfect 8.0 considered harmful

2005-11-19 Thread John Hasler
Patrick writes: > I can find no evidence that SCO owns Corel. The SCO Group (formerly Caldera), the company that now calls itself SCO, owns neither Corel nor WordPerfect. -- John Hasler -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROT

Re: WordPerfect 8.0 considered harmful

2005-11-19 Thread Patrick Wiseman
On 11/19/05, Paul Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Patrick Wiseman wrote:> On 11/19/05, Paul Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Ken Heard wrote: > Herewith is my follow-up to the the only two responses elicited by my >> > request for help in installing WordPerfect 8.0 which contained>> >

Re: WordPerfect 8.0 considered harmful

2005-11-19 Thread Paul Johnson
Patrick Wiseman wrote: > On 11/19/05, Paul Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> Ken Heard wrote: >> >> > Herewith is my follow-up to the the only two responses elicited by my >> > request for help in installing WordPerfect 8.0 which contained >> > suggestions as to how to solve my problem -- t

Re: WordPerfect 8.0 considered harmful

2005-11-19 Thread Nate Bargmann
* Patrick Wiseman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005 Nov 19 18:39 -0600]: >On 11/19/05, Paul Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Ken Heard wrote: > > > Herewith is my follow-up to the the only two responses elicited by my > > request for help in installing WordPerfect 8.0 which conta

Re: WordPerfect 8.0 considered harmful

2005-11-19 Thread Patrick Wiseman
On 11/19/05, Paul Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Ken Heard wrote:> Herewith is my follow-up to the the only two responses elicited by my> request for help in installing WordPerfect 8.0 which contained> suggestions as to how to solve my problem -- those from Kent West and > Patrick Wiseman.WordP

Re: WordPerfect 8.0 considered harmful

2005-11-19 Thread Nate Bargmann
* Paul Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005 Nov 19 17:58 -0600]: > Ken Heard wrote: > > > Herewith is my follow-up to the the only two responses elicited by my > > request for help in installing WordPerfect 8.0 which contained > > suggestions as to how to solve my problem -- those from Kent West and

Re: WordPerfect 8.0 considered harmful

2005-11-19 Thread Rodney D. Myers
On Sat, 19 Nov 2005 15:10:43 -0800 Paul Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Ken Heard wrote: > > > Herewith is my follow-up to the the only two responses elicited by > > my request for help in installing WordPerfect 8.0 which contained > > suggestions as to how to solve my problem -- those from

Re: WordPerfect 8.0

2005-11-19 Thread Patrick Wiseman
On 11/19/05, Ken Heard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:     I was curious about the need to install xlib6, because the wpx-freepackage, which is WordPerfect 8.0, depends not on it but on xlib6g.However, I discovered that the book with which the Corel Linux CDROM I have was shipped -- Corel Linux OS

Re: WordPerfect 8.0

2005-11-19 Thread Nate Bargmann
* Almut Behrens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005 Nov 19 08:55 -0600]: > On Sat, Nov 19, 2005 at 07:58:00AM -0600, Nate Bargmann wrote: > > > If you want Reveal Codes, you could always edit the XML in Vim... > > > > Ugggh! I'll use FTE instead. ;-) > > Heh! another fte user -- unbelievable :) > > (Tha

Re: WordPerfect 8.0

2005-11-19 Thread Almut Behrens
On Sat, Nov 19, 2005 at 07:58:00AM -0600, Nate Bargmann wrote: > > If you want Reveal Codes, you could always edit the XML in Vim... > > Ugggh! I'll use FTE instead. ;-) Heh! another fte user -- unbelievable :) (That's my secret love, too, but so far I got the impression I'm the only one in th

Re: WordPerfect 8.0

2005-11-19 Thread Nate Bargmann
* Ron Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005 Nov 18 23:37 -0600]: > On Fri, 2005-11-18 at 18:49 -0600, Nate Bargmann wrote: > > * Carl Fink <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005 Nov 18 13:24 -0600]: > > > On Fri, Nov 18, 2005 at 09:02:47AM -0800, Marc Shapiro wrote: > > > > > > > I won't give you any arguments. I

Re: WordPerfect 8.0

2005-11-18 Thread Ron Johnson
On Fri, 2005-11-18 at 18:49 -0600, Nate Bargmann wrote: > * Carl Fink <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005 Nov 18 13:24 -0600]: > > On Fri, Nov 18, 2005 at 09:02:47AM -0800, Marc Shapiro wrote: > > > > > I won't give you any arguments. If it is the software that you like and > > > not a need for the format

Re: WordPerfect 8.0

2005-11-18 Thread Nate Bargmann
* Carl Fink <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005 Nov 18 13:24 -0600]: > On Fri, Nov 18, 2005 at 09:02:47AM -0800, Marc Shapiro wrote: > > > I won't give you any arguments. If it is the software that you like and > > not a need for the format, then that is your choice and your right. > > That's what linux

Re: WordPerfect 8.0

2005-11-18 Thread Carl Fink
On Fri, Nov 18, 2005 at 09:02:47AM -0800, Marc Shapiro wrote: > I won't give you any arguments. If it is the software that you like and > not a need for the format, then that is your choice and your right. > That's what linux is all about -- choice! I will also admit that the > reveal codes o

Re: WordPerfect 8.0

2005-11-18 Thread Roberto C. Sanchez
On Fri, Nov 18, 2005 at 09:47:47AM -0500, Patrick Wiseman wrote: > > I don't use WP8 for its file format! I use it because it remains the best > word processor out there, especially because of its "Reveal Codes" function > which no other word processor does as well, that I've seen anyway. And if

Re: WordPerfect 8.0

2005-11-18 Thread Marc Shapiro
Patrick Wiseman wrote: I don't use WP8 for its file format! I use it because it remains the best word processor out there, especially because of its "Reveal Codes" function which no other word processor does as well, that I've seen anyway. And if OO.o2 is anything like OO.o, it's bloatware.

Re: WordPerfect 8.0

2005-11-18 Thread Patrick Wiseman
On 11/18/05, Marc Shapiro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Even before I noticed that my WP* was broken, however, I was thinking of removing it since there is another option if you have a fast internetconnection.  Openoffice.org2 now handles WordPerfect files.  I tried iton a document that I got from so

Re: WordPerfect 8.0

2005-11-17 Thread Marc Shapiro
Ken Heard wrote: Those of you who go back to before the earth's crust hardened, may remember Corel WordPrefect 8.0 (and 8.1). WP 8.0 was released by Corel about 2000. It (and 8.1) were the only versions of WP which were native to Linux. (WP 10 was ported from Windows to Linux through Cor

Re: WordPerfect 8.0

2005-11-17 Thread Ron Johnson
On Thu, 2005-11-17 at 18:33 +, Ken Heard wrote: > Those of you who go back to before the earth's crust hardened, may > remember Corel WordPrefect 8.0 (and 8.1). WP 8.0 was released by Corel > about 2000. It (and 8.1) were the only versions of WP which were native > to Linux. (WP 10

Re: WordPerfect 8.0

2005-11-17 Thread Nate Bargmann
I recall WP 8.0 as I had it installed way back when. But then I go back to WP 5.1 on DOS way back when the Earth had no form and was void--1990 to mid-1996 when I made a wrong turn and swerved into MS Word 6.0. Before that I used VIP Writer on my TRS-80 CoCo 2. Somewhere in 2000 (I think) I downl

Re: WordPerfect 8.0

2005-11-17 Thread Patrick Wiseman
On 11/17/05, Ken Heard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:     I have the Corel CDROM which has on it the WP 8.0. .deb package. Thereis however a dependency problem on which I would like some advice. You might find my page at http://ul451.gsu.edu/~pwiseman/WP8_and_Debian_GNU_Linux.html useful. Patrick

Re: WordPerfect 8.0

2005-11-17 Thread Kent West
Ken Heard wrote: I have the Corel CDROM which has on it the WP 8.0. .deb package. There is however a dependency problem on which I would like some advice. The WP 8.0 package depends on only two other packages, libc5 and xlib6g. The former is still available from the Debian archive; s

Re: WordPerfect 8.0 or WordPerfect Office 2000

2002-11-11 Thread Rob Weir
On Mon, Nov 11, 2002 at 01:04:20AM +1300, Haralambos Geortgilakis wrote: > anyone hereabouts have joy getting either or both of these old beasts of > verbal burden up & running on Debian 3.0? Install the 'wperfect' package. It's only job is to depend on the old old libraries needed to run WordPe

Re: WordPerfect 8.0 or WordPerfect Office 2000

2002-11-10 Thread Haralambos Geortgilakis
Hi All & Karsten, who responded to my call for help. Thanx guys :-) H :-) "Our products just aren't engineered for security."-- Brian Valentine, senior vice president in charge of Microsoft's Windows development team -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "

Re: WordPerfect 8.0 or WordPerfect Office 2000

2002-11-10 Thread Karsten M. Self
on Mon, Nov 11, 2002, Haralambos Geortgilakis ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > > > Hi All, > > anyone hereabouts have joy getting either or both of these old beasts of > verbal burden up & running on Debian 3.0? > > If so, any trix for one new to Debian & whose old Tux trix fail Possibly at R

Re: WordPerfect 8.0 or WordPerfect Office 2000

2002-11-10 Thread Patrick Wiseman
On Mon, 11 Nov 2002 at 1:04am, Haralambos Geortgilakis wrote: :anyone hereabouts have joy getting either or both of these old beasts of :verbal burden up & running on Debian 3.0? I have both running on a Woody box, but without some clue as to what your problems might be, I can't help much, excep

Re: Wordperfect 8.0?

2000-12-28 Thread cjm2
Andre & Bob: As you both advised, the problem turned out to be a missing xpm4.7 -- Wordperfect now works fine after adding this. Thanks, Colin Andre Berger wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > > > Hi: > > > > Sorry if this has been addressed before, I didn't find it in the > > archives... >

Re: Wordperfect 8.0?

2000-12-28 Thread Andre Berger
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > Hi: > > Sorry if this has been addressed before, I didn't find it in the > archives... > > What additional packages are required for Corel Wordperfect 8 to install > and run on potato? During installation, the Corel installer reports 2 > segmentation faults, too quic

Re: Wordperfect 8.0?

2000-12-28 Thread cjm2
Bob Nielsen wrote: > I have version 8.1-12 (from the Corel Linux CD) and > 'apt-cache show wp-full' indicates: > > Depends: libc5 (>= 5.4.0-0), libc6, xlib6g, type1inst > > As I recall, the downloadable (non-.deb) version of 8.0 requires libc5, > xlib6 and xpm4.7. > > hth, > Bob > Thanks, Bob, I'

Re: Wordperfect 8.0?

2000-12-28 Thread Bob Nielsen
I have version 8.1-12 (from the Corel Linux CD) and 'apt-cache show wp-full' indicates: Depends: libc5 (>= 5.4.0-0), libc6, xlib6g, type1inst As I recall, the downloadable (non-.deb) version of 8.0 requires libc5, xlib6 and xpm4.7. hth, Bob On Thu, Dec 28, 2000 at 06:00:26AM -0800, [EMAIL PRO

Re: Wordperfect 8.0 install

1999-02-02 Thread virtanen
On Mon, 1 Feb 1999, Syrus Nemat-Nasser wrote: > On Mon, 1 Feb 1999, Brian Morgan wrote: > > > Could someone walk me through how to install the new wp8 suite? I've > > downloaded the guilg00.gz file, and now I'm not sure what to do. I tried > > installing this on another machine before, with no

Re: Wordperfect 8.0 install

1999-02-01 Thread Syrus Nemat-Nasser
On Mon, 1 Feb 1999, Brian Morgan wrote: > Could someone walk me through how to install the new wp8 suite? I've > downloaded the guilg00.gz file, and now I'm not sure what to do. I tried > installing this on another machine before, with no luck. I seem to remember > a flood of questions about th