On Wed, Nov 07, 2001 at 22:16, Michael Heldebrant wrote:
> Host should not look at your /etc/hosts file. It's one line description
> puts it quite succinctly:
I got several private mails about that and knwo I think there is a
problem with looking up loca host, but it has nothing to do with the
'ho
On Mon, 2001-11-05 at 17:57, Steffen Evers wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I have some problems with the DNS service on my woody system and I think
> I have experienced the same problems on my sid installation:
>
> Maybe I have misunderstood something, but I think this behavior is not
> correct:
>
> When I
On Thu, 2001-08-30 at 21:55, der.hans wrote:
> Am 29. Aug, 2001 schwäzte Paul D. Smith so:
>
> > I don't really understand some of these messages; for example
> > libgtk-perl says it depends on libgtk1.2 >= 1.2.0 but 1.2.10-1 is to be
> > installed... well, 1.2.10-1 _is_ >= 1.2.0, isn't it?
Perha
Am 29. Aug, 2001 schwäzte Paul D. Smith so:
> I don't really understand some of these messages; for example
> libgtk-perl says it depends on libgtk1.2 >= 1.2.0 but 1.2.10-1 is to be
> installed... well, 1.2.10-1 _is_ >= 1.2.0, isn't it?
I've been getting a lot of that the last few days as well. H
On 29 Aug 2001 21:28:00 -0400, Paul D. Smith wrote:
> %% Bill Wohler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> bw> No problems here. If you already have a woody system, you don't
> bw> need apt-get dist-upgrade. Just apt-get upgrade.
>
> Neither them work. Sorry, I should have said that.
>
> Since I'
%% Bill Wohler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
bw> No problems here. If you already have a woody system, you don't
bw> need apt-get dist-upgrade. Just apt-get upgrade.
Neither them work. Sorry, I should have said that.
Since I've updated last, now if I try "apt-get upgrade" I get:
# apt-get
No problems here. If you already have a woody system, you don't
need apt-get dist-upgrade. Just apt-get upgrade.
--
Bill Wohler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://www.newt.com/wohler/ GnuPG ID:610BD9AD
Maintainer of comp.mail.mh FAQ and mh-e. Vote Libertarian!
If you're passed on the right, you're
I seem to recall seeing a recommendation to install the testing version
of debconf and then rerun the dist-upgrade.
On Mon, Jul 30, 2001 at 11:13:59PM +0100, Stephen J. Thompson wrote:
> Thanks for that,
>
> Any idea when the updates could be ready?
>
> Regards,
>
> Stephen.
>
>
> On Monday 3
On Mon, Jul 30, 2001 at 11:13:59PM +0100, Stephen J . Thompson wrote:
> On Monday 30 July 2001 10:56 pm, Colin Watson wrote:
> > It's OK - that one's been noticed, Joey tracked it down, and is being
> > fixed. The problem was that some packages were using a syntax in their
> > debconf template file
Thanks for that,
Any idea when the updates could be ready?
Regards,
Stephen.
On Monday 30 July 2001 10:56 pm, Colin Watson wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 30, 2001 at 10:48:15PM +0100, Stephen J . Thompson wrote:
> > Hello all,
> >
> > I have just attempted to upgrade from stable to testing and I have
>
On Mon, Jul 30, 2001 at 10:48:15PM +0100, Stephen J . Thompson wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> I have just attempted to upgrade from stable to testing and I have received
> the following error:
>
> [Scanning packages]Template parse error near "" at
> /usr/lib/perl5/Debian/DebConf/Template.pm line 60,
11 matches
Mail list logo