Re: wireless LAN problems with recent kernels

2008-08-02 Thread Ansgar Burchardt
Hi, Robin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > 2008/8/1 Ansgar Burchardt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: [problems with RT2500 and newer kernel version] > > I'm not sure if you mean the rt2500 drivers as in the debian > packages. Also I have a rt73 so what follows may not apply. > I think the rt* series have been

Re: wireless LAN problems with recent kernels

2008-08-02 Thread Ansgar Burchardt
Hi, Shachar Or <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Friday 01 August 2008 21:26, Ansgar Burchardt wrote: >> I admit having sometimes connection problems running the older kernel as >> well, but the network works again after a few moments (and without any >> manual intervention). The link quality giv

Re: wireless LAN problems with recent kernels

2008-08-01 Thread Shachar Or
On Friday 01 August 2008 21:26, Ansgar Burchardt wrote: > Hi, > > I'm using a RaLink RT2500 (PCI) wireless NIC. It works without problems > with a 2.6.20.1 kernel and the rt2500 drivers. > > I did try to update to the Debian 2.6.25 kernel, but there the WLAN > connection makes problems: Sometimes

Re: wireless LAN problems with recent kernels

2008-08-01 Thread Robin
2008/8/1 Ansgar Burchardt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Hi, > > I'm using a RaLink RT2500 (PCI) wireless NIC. It works without problems > with a 2.6.20.1 kernel and the rt2500 drivers. > > I did try to update to the Debian 2.6.25 kernel, but there the WLAN > connection makes problems: Sometimes the conne

Re: wireless LAN problems with recent kernels

2008-08-01 Thread Houou Rinne
--- On Fri, 8/1/08, Ansgar Burchardt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > From: Ansgar Burchardt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: wireless LAN problems with recent kernels > To: debian-user@lists.debian.org > Date: Friday, August 1, 2008, 11:26 AM > Hi, > > I'm using a RaLink RT2500 (PCI) wireless NIC.

Re: wireless lan

2004-09-11 Thread john gennard
Karl E. Jorgensen wrote: Hi! On Wed, Sep 08, 2004 at 05:26:46PM +0100, john gennard wrote: I want to connect to a neighbour's network to use his adsl connection for large downloads. Presumably he knows that ;-) Yes, it was his idea! I have a Usb Belkin Adaptor

Re: wireless lan

2004-09-10 Thread Karl E. Jorgensen
Hi! On Wed, Sep 08, 2004 at 05:26:46PM +0100, john gennard wrote: > I want to connect to a neighbour's network to use his adsl connection > for large downloads. Presumably he knows that ;-) > I have a Usb Belkin Adaptor (F5D6050) which works fine in W2000, > but I need it in Sarge with a 2.4 ker

Re: wireless LAN in place of existing cabled one

2003-11-14 Thread Paul Johnson
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Thu, Nov 13, 2003 at 10:49:28PM -0600, Ron Johnson wrote: > > I thought the insides of walls existed as a repository for empty > > cigarette packets, food wrappers, bent nails, odd lumps of plaster and > > other miscellaneous small building debris..

Re: wireless LAN in place of existing cabled one

2003-11-14 Thread Benedict Verheyen
- Original Message - From: "BruceG" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, November 14, 2003 1:06 PM Subject: Re: wireless LAN in place of existing cabled one > On Thursday 13 November 2003 20:15, Benedict Verheyen wrote: > > Op do 13-1

Re: wireless LAN in place of existing cabled one

2003-11-14 Thread Pigeon
On Thu, Nov 13, 2003 at 10:49:28PM -0600, Ron Johnson wrote: > On Thu, 2003-11-13 at 12:45, Pigeon wrote: > > On Wed, Nov 12, 2003 at 08:42:02PM -0600, Ron Johnson wrote: > > > On Wed, 2003-11-12 at 18:21, Benedict Verheyen wrote: > > > > Still a bit confused on what hardware components i need but

Re: wireless LAN in place of existing cabled one

2003-11-14 Thread BruceG
On Thursday 13 November 2003 20:15, Benedict Verheyen wrote: > Op do 13-11-2003, om 02:12 schreef BruceG: > > > > > For the wireless bridge to work, it would need to connect to a WAP > > (wireless access point). Since your Server is upstairs, you could do > > something like this (assuming your cab

Re: wireless LAN in place of existing cabled one

2003-11-13 Thread Ron Johnson
t; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > Sent: Wednesday, November 12, 2003 5:39 PM > > > > Subject: Re: wireless LAN in place of existing cabled one > > [snip] > > > > > > Still a bit confused on what hardware

Re: wireless LAN in place of existing cabled one

2003-11-13 Thread Roberto Sanchez
Pigeon wrote: On Wed, Nov 12, 2003 at 08:42:02PM -0600, Ron Johnson wrote: On Wed, 2003-11-12 at 18:21, Benedict Verheyen wrote: BruceG wrote: - Original Message - From: "BruceG" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, November 12, 2003 5:39 PM

Re: wireless LAN in place of existing cabled one

2003-11-13 Thread Pigeon
CTED]> > > > Sent: Wednesday, November 12, 2003 5:39 PM > > > Subject: Re: wireless LAN in place of existing cabled one > [snip] > > > > Still a bit confused on what hardware components i need but > > the wife is getting really tired of the cable. > > I th

Re: wireless LAN in place of existing cabled one

2003-11-13 Thread Benedict Verheyen
Op do 13-11-2003, om 02:12 schreef BruceG: > For the wireless bridge to work, it would need to connect to a WAP (wireless > access point). Since your Server is upstairs, you could do something like > this (assuming your cable or DSL is dropped off with an Ethernet connection, > not USB): > > DS

Re: wireless LAN in place of existing cabled one

2003-11-13 Thread Benedict Verheyen
;> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> >> > Sent: Wednesday, November 12, 2003 5:39 PM >> >> > Subject: Re: wireless LAN in place of existing cabled one >> > [snip] >> >> >> >> Still a bit confused on what hardware components i n

Re: wireless LAN in place of existing cabled one

2003-11-13 Thread Ron Johnson
t;[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >> > Sent: Wednesday, November 12, 2003 5:39 PM > >> > Subject: Re: wireless LAN in place of existing cabled one > > [snip] > >> > >> Still a bit confused on what hardware components i need but > >> the wife is getting really

Re: wireless LAN in place of existing cabled one

2003-11-13 Thread Benedict Verheyen
> On Wed, 2003-11-12 at 18:21, Benedict Verheyen wrote: >> BruceG wrote: >> > - Original Message - >> > From: "BruceG" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> > Sent: Wednesday, November 12, 2003 5:39 PM >

Re: wireless LAN in place of existing cabled one

2003-11-12 Thread Ron Johnson
On Wed, 2003-11-12 at 18:21, Benedict Verheyen wrote: > BruceG wrote: > > - Original Message - > > From: "BruceG" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Sent: Wednesday, November 12, 2003 5:39 PM > > Subject: Re: wireless

Re: wireless LAN in place of existing cabled one

2003-11-12 Thread BruceG
> 802.11B is 10 MBPS. 802.11G can go to 54MBPS. You may be limited by > distance. I figure since my DSL connection is 256Meg or so - 10 Meg is okay > on the LAN side, although it can get slow doing backups over wireless. > Wow! That 256Meg is a FAST DSL connection! I should have said 256K. I just

Re: wireless LAN in place of existing cabled one

2003-11-12 Thread BruceG
- Original Message - From: "Benedict Verheyen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, November 12, 2003 7:21 PM Subject: Re: wireless LAN in place of existing cabled one > > BruceG wrote: > > - Original Message - &g

Re: wireless LAN in place of existing cabled one

2003-11-12 Thread Benedict Verheyen
BruceG wrote: > - Original Message - > From: "BruceG" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Wednesday, November 12, 2003 5:39 PM > Subject: Re: wireless LAN in place of existing cabled one > > >> >> - Orig

Re: wireless LAN in place of existing cabled one

2003-11-12 Thread BruceG
- Original Message - From: "BruceG" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, November 12, 2003 5:39 PM Subject: Re: wireless LAN in place of existing cabled one > > - Original Message - > From: "Benedict Verheyen" &l

Re: wireless LAN in place of existing cabled one

2003-11-12 Thread BruceG
- Original Message - From: "Benedict Verheyen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, November 12, 2003 3:16 PM Subject: wireless LAN in place of existing cabled one > Hi, > > my current LAN looks like this: > > cable - eth0 (public ip) -server > modem

Re: wireless LAN in place of existing cabled one

2003-11-12 Thread David Z Maze
"Benedict Verheyen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > my current LAN looks like this: > > cable - eth0 (public ip) -server > modemeth1 (192.168.0.1) > | >hub >

Re: wireless lan broken after booting windows

2003-03-16 Thread Paul Lewis
On 2003.03.16 10:28 Michael Zech wrote: Hi everyone! Till today my wireless lan worked fine. Yesterday I had to boot windows (what happens about 3 times a year ;) and now the wireless interface won't come up anymore. cardctl ident 0 product info: "NETGEAR MA401RA Wireless PC", "Card", "ISL373

Re: wireless lan broken after booting windows

2003-03-16 Thread Michael Zech
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Sun, 16 Mar 2003 11:28:12 +0100 Michael Zech <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi everyone! Till today my wireless lan worked fine. Yesterday I had to boot windows (what happens about 3 times a year ;) and now the wireless interface won't come up anymore. Have you tried tur

Re: wireless lan broken after booting windows

2003-03-16 Thread Craig Genner
On Sun, Mar 16, 2003 at 06:01:03AM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > On Sun, 16 Mar 2003 11:28:12 +0100 > Michael Zech <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Hi everyone! > > > > Till today my wireless lan worked fine. Yesterday I had to boot > > windows (what happens about 3 times a year ;) and now th

Re: wireless lan broken after booting windows

2003-03-16 Thread ronin2
On Sun, 16 Mar 2003 11:28:12 +0100 Michael Zech <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi everyone! > > Till today my wireless lan worked fine. Yesterday I had to boot > windows (what happens about 3 times a year ;) and now the wireless > interface won't come up anymore. Have you tried turning the compute

Re: Wireless LAN

2002-11-22 Thread Jeffrey Taylor
Avoid anything with the Raytheon chip (WebGear Aviator 2.4, among others). The ray_cs driver does not work in Woody. HTH, Jeffrey Quoting Jeff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Rusty Minden, 2002-Nov-20 22:30 -0800: > > I am going to be getting a wireless LAN 802.11b for my home > > network. I would lik

Re: Wireless LAN

2002-11-22 Thread Jeff
Rusty Minden, 2002-Nov-20 22:30 -0800: > I am going to be getting a wireless LAN 802.11b for my home > network. I would like to get one that is supported by GNU/Linux. > Does anyone have any suggestions? > > I have two desktop computers and a laptop computer I will be > setting up. The Laptop a

RE: Wireless LAN

2002-11-21 Thread Tan, Stephen
PROTECTED]] Sent: 21 November 2002 15:46 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Wireless LAN Rusty Minden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I am going to be getting a wireless LAN 802.11b for my home > network. I would like to get one that is supported by GNU/Linux. > Does anyone have a

Re: Wireless LAN

2002-11-21 Thread Hugh Saunders
On Thu, Nov 21, 2002 at 10:43:33AM -0500, David Z Maze wrote: > When I've looked at this before, wireless cards for PCs are hard to > come by and expensive. http://www.linksys.com/products/product.asp?grid=22&prid=196 [wmp 11] Circa 72 GBP mine works better under linux than XP :-) hugh -- To U

Re: Wireless LAN

2002-11-21 Thread Thomas Kallenberg
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello! For you laptop I recommend you a Cisco Aironet Card. I use a Aironet 350 series card with a 2.4.18 kernel and it woks great. For a Pci Card you should look at anyone with Prism2 chipset. Then you can use the linux-wlan-ng driver (less debian u

Re: Wireless LAN

2002-11-21 Thread David Z Maze
Rusty Minden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I am going to be getting a wireless LAN 802.11b for my home > network. I would like to get one that is supported by GNU/Linux. > Does anyone have any suggestions? Any card built with an Orinoco chipset should work fine; this turns out to be "most of the

Re: wireless lan

2002-06-09 Thread Bruce
I am using the pcmcia card SMC2632 as I write this (on my HP Omnibook 500 subnotebook, running current Debian Sid). It is, I believe, the PCMCIA-only version of the 2602. (PLX, for those of you who don't know, is essentially a PCI adaptor that has a PCMCIA slot on it. The SMC 2602 is this adapto

Re: wireless lan

2002-06-09 Thread Dave Price
On Sat, Jun 08, 2002 at 10:59:26AM +0200, Baan Zoltan wrote: > Hi, i have an SMC 2602 Wireless pci card. I would like to use it, i have > succes in compiling the linux-wlan driver, but i can't set up this > interface. It's using prism2_plx modul. > > Please let me know if one has succes of using a