On Friday 03 November 2006 00:14, Andrew Ritchie wrote:
> I had the need to set FD with mii-tool too. It had to do with the
> network card and the switch not playing nicely.
>
> The permanent fix was put the line
>
> eepro100 options=2100
>
> in the /etc/modules file.
>
> Depending on your network
I had the need to set FD with mii-tool too. It had to do with the
network card and the switch not playing nicely.
The permanent fix was put the line
eepro100 options=2100
in the /etc/modules file.
Depending on your network card and how the driver is installed, that
might be your best option.
On 11/2/06, David Goodenough <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Thursday 02 November 2006 18:52, Rodrigo Paes wrote:
> Hi...
>
>Did u try using ethtool ? how about putting "spanning-tree
> portfast" on the switch port ?
I have not tried ethtool, why do you believe it might work differently?
I do n
On Thursday 02 November 2006 18:52, Rodrigo Paes wrote:
> Hi...
>
>Did u try using ethtool ? how about putting "spanning-tree
> portfast" on the switch port ?
I have not tried ethtool, why do you believe it might work differently?
I do not have control of the switch, so I can not change that.
On Thu, 2006-11-02 at 03:30 -0800, Tyler MacDonald wrote:
> David Goodenough <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > If I issue a mii-tool -F 100baseTx-FD eth1 manually it seems to accept
> > > > the FD, but if I put it in the /etc/network/interfaces file in a pre-up
> > > > or up I end up with HD.
> >
Hi...
Did u try using ethtool ? how about putting "spanning-tree
portfast" on the switch port ?
[]s
rodrigo
On 11/2/06, George Borisov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
David Goodenough wrote:
>
> Unfortunately post-up does not help, it is still marked as HD after an ifup.
Hmm, that's pretty weird
David Goodenough wrote:
>
> Unfortunately post-up does not help, it is still marked as HD after an ifup.
Hmm, that's pretty weird.
I only have one box where I have to force the media type option
(to 10baseT-FD) and there I have it in a script that runs at S41
and it works just fine. :-/
--
Geo
On Thursday 02 November 2006 11:30, Tyler MacDonald wrote:
> David Goodenough <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > If I issue a mii-tool -F 100baseTx-FD eth1 manually it seems to
> > > > accept the FD, but if I put it in the /etc/network/interfaces file in
> > > > a pre-up or up I end up with HD.
> >
David Goodenough <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > If I issue a mii-tool -F 100baseTx-FD eth1 manually it seems to accept
> > > the FD, but if I put it in the /etc/network/interfaces file in a pre-up
> > > or up I end up with HD.
> >
> > I think maybe post-up would be more appropriate here.
> Unfort
On Thursday 02 November 2006 10:25, George Borisov wrote:
> David Goodenough wrote:
> > If I issue a mii-tool -F 100baseTx-FD eth1 manually it seems to accept
> > the FD, but if I put it in the /etc/network/interfaces file in a pre-up
> > or up I end up with HD.
>
> I think maybe post-up would be m
David Goodenough wrote:
>
> If I issue a mii-tool -F 100baseTx-FD eth1 manually it seems to accept
> the FD, but if I put it in the /etc/network/interfaces file in a pre-up
> or up I end up with HD.
I think maybe post-up would be more appropriate here.
Hope this helps,
--
George Borisov
DXSo
11 matches
Mail list logo
