On 31/3/25 03:23, Marc Shapiro wrote:
I was looking into Brave the other day, but what stopped me was the lack
of anything to replace Video Download Helper. Am I missing something?
Is there a way to download YouTube videos in Brave, or do I stick with
Firefox?
Marc
To download youtube vide
On Tue, 1 Apr 2025 15:16:52 -0400
Eben King wrote:
Hello Eben,
>On 4/1/25 14:02, Brad Rogers wrote:
>>
>> The error message that now displays, is thus;
I wrote none of that.
You do Bret Busby, who is far more knowledgeable than I with regard to
this matter, a disservice.
Please take more care
On 4/1/25 14:02, Brad Rogers wrote:
The error message that now displays, is thus;
"
Ad blockers violate YouTube's Terms of Service
It looks like you may be using an ad blocker. Video playback is blocked
unless YouTube is allowlisted or the ad blocker is disabled.
Ads allow YouTube to be used
On Mon, 31 Mar 2025 21:14:18 -0700
Marc Shapiro wrote:
Hello Marc,
>Yes, but that version does not download from YouTube. I have yt-dlp,
Ah; I have no interest in yt.
--
Regards _ "Valid sig separator is {dash}{dash}{space}"
/ ) "The blindingly obvious is never immedia
On 1/4/25 12:14, Marc Shapiro wrote:
On 3/30/25 12:30 PM, Brad Rogers wrote:
On Sun, 30 Mar 2025 12:23:04 -0700
Marc Shapiro wrote:
Hello Marc,
I was looking into Brave the other day, but what stopped me was the
lack of anything to replace Video Download Helper.
I've got VDH installed in B
On 3/30/25 12:30 PM, Brad Rogers wrote:
On Sun, 30 Mar 2025 12:23:04 -0700
Marc Shapiro wrote:
Hello Marc,
I was looking into Brave the other day, but what stopped me was the
lack of anything to replace Video Download Helper.
I've got VDH installed in Brave.
https://chromewebstore.google.
I was looking into Brave the other day, but what stopped me was the lack
of anything to replace Video Download Helper. Am I missing something?
Is there a way to download YouTube videos in Brave, or do I stick with
Firefox?
Marc
On 3/6/25 1:25 PM, Greg Wooledge wrote:
On Thu, Mar 06, 2025
On Sun, Mar 30, 2025 at 7:02 PM Marc Shapiro wrote:
> I was looking into Brave the other day, but what stopped me was the lack
> of anything to replace Video Download Helper. Am I missing something?
> Is there a way to download YouTube videos in Brave, or do I stick with
> Firefox?
>
You may wa
On Sun, 30 Mar 2025 12:23:04 -0700
Marc Shapiro wrote:
Hello Marc,
>I was looking into Brave the other day, but what stopped me was the
>lack of anything to replace Video Download Helper.
I've got VDH installed in Brave.
https://chromewebstore.google.com/detail/video-downloadhelper/lmjnegcaekl
On 3/9/25 1:05 AM, Christopher David Howie wrote:
On 3/6/25 4:25 PM, Greg Wooledge wrote:
I ended up installing Brave. Sure, it's Chromium-based, and it will
eventually drop support for Manifest v2 extensions, including uBlock
Origin (even though it's supported right now). But it has its own
b
On 7/3/25 01:57, Bret Busby wrote:
On 7/3/25 01:32, songbird wrote:
i currently use firefox and have mostly been ok with it.
would like to try something else.
currently running testing.
any that have any filtering capabilities? yt and a few
other sites are intolerable without a d
On 3/6/25 12:32, songbird wrote:
any that have any filtering capabilities? yt and a few
other sites are intolerable without a decent blocker.
If you're talking about ads, Noscript and Ghostery on FF take care of
them for me.
is anyone using opera
On 3/9/25 08:35, debian-u...@howorth.org.uk wrote:
D MacDougall wrote: > On 3/8/25 12: 34,
debian-user@ howorth. org. uk wrote: > > That's just a blank page
except for a picture of a duck, the word > > DuckDuckGo and a search
box. No explanation of anything
D MacDougall wrote:
> On 3/8/2
On Sun, 9 Mar 2025 11:15:12 -0400
Ken Burns wrote:
> Key point: "(if the user opts-in to them)". If the user (myself
> included) clicks the readily displayed option to opt out, then you
> get very effective ad blocking, combined with exceptional privacy.
>
Yes, and since privacy is a huge field
D MacDougall wrote:
> On 3/8/25 12:34, debian-u...@howorth.org.uk wrote:
> > That's just a blank page except for a picture of a duck, the word
> > DuckDuckGo and a search box. No explanation of anything at any
> > length?
>
>
> Very odd. On my phone I see exactly what you see plus several
Greg Wooledge wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 08, 2025 at 13:39:18 -0800, Charlie Gibbs wrote:
> > On Sat Mar 8 13:29:36 2025 debian-u...@howorth.org.uk wrote:
> > > D MacDougall wrote:
> > >> https://duckduckgo.com
> > >
> > > That's just a blank page except for a picture of a duck, the word
> > > D
On Sun, Mar 09, 2025 at 11:34:41 -0400, deb...@kcburns.com wrote:
> On 3/9/25 1:05 AM, Christopher David Howie wrote:
> > Many of my friends keep recommending Brave, but I cannot get past the
> > fact that their business model is to strip ads from sites and insert
> > their own ads instead (if the
On 3/9/25 1:05 AM, Christopher David Howie wrote:
On 3/6/25 4:25 PM, Greg Wooledge wrote:
I ended up installing Brave. Sure, it's Chromium-based, and it will
eventually drop support for Manifest v2 extensions, including uBlock
Origin (even though it's supported right now). But it has its own
b
On 08/03/2025 22:56, Greg Wooledge wrote:
On Sat, Mar 08, 2025 at 13:39:18 -0800, Charlie Gibbs wrote:
On Sat Mar 8 13:29:36 2025 debian-u...@howorth.org.uk wrote:
D MacDougall wrote:
https://duckduckgo.com
That's just a blank page except for a picture of a duck, the word
DuckDuckGo and a
On Sun, Mar 9, 2025 at 4:22 AM Christopher David Howie
wrote:
>
> On 3/6/25 4:25 PM, Greg Wooledge wrote:
> > I ended up installing Brave. Sure, it's Chromium-based, and it will
> > eventually drop support for Manifest v2 extensions, including uBlock
> > Origin (even though it's supported right n
On 3/8/25 12:34, debian-u...@howorth.org.uk wrote:
> That's just a blank page except for a picture of a duck, the word
> DuckDuckGo and a search box. No explanation of anything at any length?
Very odd. On my phone I see exactly what you see plus several other
things on the page. One other thin
On Sat, Mar 8, 2025 at 10:02 PM John Hasler wrote:
>
> Greg writes:
> > looking at the HTML source with Ctrl-U, it's all one line. Seriously,
> > who does that?
>
> "Website builders" and "content management systems". Modern Web
> designers never deal with HTML.
There are also server-side compo
On 3/6/25 4:25 PM, Greg Wooledge wrote:
I ended up installing Brave. Sure, it's Chromium-based, and it will
eventually drop support for Manifest v2 extensions, including uBlock
Origin (even though it's supported right now). But it has its own
built-in ad blocking*by default*, so you don't actua
On 3/7/25 11:49 AM, Jeffrey Walton wrote:
I believe all the major browsers are using Manifest v3 nowadays.
Most support Mv3 now, but AFAIK only Chrome has actually disabled Mv2
support. All of my Mv2 extensions continue to work on Firefox.
--
Chris Howie
http://www.chrishowie.com
http://en.
On 9/3/25 06:56, Greg Wooledge wrote:
P.S. looking at the HTML source with Ctrl-U, it's all one line. Seriously,
who does that?
hobbit:~$ xclip -o | wc
02960 44363
44 kilobytes of HTML/CSS/Javascript, all in one. stupid. line. Well,
they found a way to make me stop trying to re
On Sun, Mar 09, 2025 at 07:04:30 +0800, Bret Busby wrote:
> That long line of code, might not be completely stupid. It might have some
> hidden AI thing (that they figure no member of the public would find, due to
> the length of the line), that starts playing "Rubber Ducky, you're the one",
> in a
Greg writes:
> looking at the HTML source with Ctrl-U, it's all one line. Seriously,
> who does that?
"Website builders" and "content management systems". Modern Web
designers never deal with HTML.
--
John Hasler
j...@sugarbit.com
Elmwood, WI USA
On Sat, Mar 08, 2025 at 13:39:18 -0800, Charlie Gibbs wrote:
> On Sat Mar 8 13:29:36 2025 debian-u...@howorth.org.uk wrote:
> > D MacDougall wrote:
> >> https://duckduckgo.com
> >
> > That's just a blank page except for a picture of a duck, the word
> > DuckDuckGo and a search box. No explanation
On Sat Mar 8 13:29:36 2025 debian-u...@howorth.org.uk wrote:
> D MacDougall wrote:
>
>> On 2025-03-08, D MacDougall wrote: =20
> ...
>>> I've been using DuckDuckGo as my primary search engine for
>>> years and have found that it's gradually been improving to the
>>> point that I seldom have ca
D MacDougall wrote:
> > On 2025-03-08, D MacDougall wrote:
> ...
> > > I've been using DuckDuckGo as my primary search engine for
> > > years and have found that it's gradually been improving to the
> > > point that I seldom have cause to use any other. Along the way I
> > > discovered that th
On 2025-03-08, D MacDougall wrote:
...
> I've been using DuckDuckGo as my primary search engine for
> years and have found that it's gradually been improving to the point that
> I seldom have cause to use any other. Along the way I discovered that
> they also make a browser.
...
In the Play
On 2025-03-08, D MacDougall wrote:
>>
>> >I use a "DNS privé" that's effective in blocking ads on my Android phone.
>>
> Since the subject of browsers on phones has come up I thought I'd put in
> my 2 bits. I've been using DuckDuckGo as my primary search engine for
> years and have found that it'
On Sat, 8 Mar 2025, poc...@homemail.com wrote:
> Pi-hole is your friend https://pi-hole.net/
Interesting, but for the moment I don't fancy pi-hole as my DNS server. Roger
On Sat, 8 Mar 2025, Chris Green wrote:
> > > ... some humongous hosts file to block ads
> >
> wget https://raw.githubusercontent.com/StevenBlack/hosts/master/hosts
>
131425 ad servers. Fantastic! Thanks, Roger
On 3/6/25 12:32 PM, songbird wrote:
i currently use firefox and have mostly been ok with it.
would like to try something else.
currently running testing.
any that have any filtering capabilities? yt and a few
other sites are intolerable without a decent blocker.
songbird
h
Roger Price wrote:
> On Fri, 7 Mar 2025, Greg wrote:
>
> > On 2025-03-07, Stefan Monnier wrote:
> > I believe David Wright uses some humongous hosts file to block ads on
> > his computer rather than a brower add-on (if I'm remembering and
> > understanding
> > correctly).
>
> I do something si
On Fri, 7 Mar 2025, Greg wrote:
> On 2025-03-07, Stefan Monnier wrote:
> I believe David Wright uses some humongous hosts file to block ads on
> his computer rather than a brower add-on (if I'm remembering and understanding
> correctly).
I do something similar but it's limited. What's the best w
On 2025-03-07, Stefan Monnier wrote:
>>> I do have uBlock Origin installed and working in the browsers as well.
>>> Getting used to this and then using my phone on mobile data is a jarring
>>> experience!
>>
>>I don't understand. Why don't you install uBlock Origin on your phone?
>I use a "DNS
* On 2025 07 Mar 08:09 -0600, fxkl4...@protonmail.com wrote:
> On Thu, 6 Mar 2025, Nate Bargmann wrote:
>
> > My answer is to block as much as possible at my router. As I run
> > OpenWrt for my router, I have the Adblock package installed and running.
> > This way I get blocking applied for other
Hello,
from what I understand, the point is not if a web browser implements
Manifest V3, but how it does so.
Chrome disables certain features (blocking WebRequest) used by adblockers.
Chromium still allows to install Ublock Origin (normal version, not Lite
version) but warns that perhaps in
On Thu, Mar 6, 2025 at 4:25 PM Greg Wooledge wrote:
>
> On Thu, Mar 06, 2025 at 21:50:27 +0100, KISER JD wrote:
> > The Chromium-based browsers will soon lose many adblock capabilities due to
> > Manifest V3.
> >
>
> When I updated google-chrome-stable the other day, it informed me
> that it was
On 2025-03-07, Stefan Monnier wrote:
>> I do have uBlock Origin installed and working in the browsers as well.
>> Getting used to this and then using my phone on mobile data is a jarring
>> experience!
>
> I don't understand. Why don't you install uBlock Origin on your phone?
I use a "DNS privé"
On Thu, 6 Mar 2025, Nate Bargmann wrote:
> My answer is to block as much as possible at my router. As I run
> OpenWrt for my router, I have the Adblock package installed and running.
> This way I get blocking applied for other devices such as our phones and
> Chromium when it disables uBlock orig
* On 2025 06 Mar 21:57 -0600, Stefan Monnier wrote:
> > I do have uBlock Origin installed and working in the browsers as well.
> > Getting used to this and then using my phone on mobile data is a jarring
> > experience!
>
> I don't understand. Why don't you install uBlock Origin on your phone?
O
Greg Wooledge wrote:
...
> One of the possible answers was to switch to "uBlock Origin Lite",
> which is less capable (it can't "phone home" to update its block lists
> because Manifest v3 doesn't permit that), but may still be good enough
> for most people.
>
> Another answer is to use Firefox. I
On 07/03/2025 04:25, Greg Wooledge wrote:
One of the possible answers was to switch to "uBlock Origin Lite",
which is less capable (it can't "phone home" to update its block lists
because Manifest v3 doesn't permit that), but may still be good enough
for most people.
I believed that main limita
> I do have uBlock Origin installed and working in the browsers as well.
> Getting used to this and then using my phone on mobile data is a jarring
> experience!
I don't understand. Why don't you install uBlock Origin on your phone?
Stefan "using uMatrix on his phone"
My answer is to block as much as possible at my router. As I run
OpenWrt for my router, I have the Adblock package installed and running.
This way I get blocking applied for other devices such as our phones and
Chromium when it disables uBlock origin.
There are other options I'm aware of but have
songbird writes:
> i currently use firefox and have mostly been ok with it.
>
> would like to try something else.
>
> currently running testing.
>
> any that have any filtering capabilities? yt and a few
> other sites are intolerable without a decent blocker.
>
>
> songbird
If you wer
Hi,
On Thu, Mar 06, 2025 at 12:32:33PM -0500, songbird wrote:
> i currently use firefox and have mostly been ok with it.
>
> would like to try something else.
As far as I'm aware every alternative to Firefox is one or more of:
- Chromium, so strictly worse
- Based on Chromium, so strictly
On Thu, Mar 06, 2025 at 21:50:27 +0100, KISER JD wrote:
> The Chromium-based browsers will soon lose many adblock capabilities due to
> Manifest V3.
>
When I updated google-chrome-stable the other day, it informed me
that it was disabling uBlock Origin. Thus began my own search for
some answers
On Thu, Mar 6, 2025, at 18:32, songbird wrote:
> i currently use firefox and have mostly been ok with it.
>
> would like to try something else.
>
> currently running testing.
>
> any that have any filtering capabilities? yt and a few
> other sites are intolerable without a decent blocker.
>
Bret Busby wrote:
> On 7/3/25 01:32, songbird wrote:
> >i currently use firefox and have mostly been ok with it.
> >
> >would like to try something else.
> >
> >currently running testing.
> >
> >any that have any filtering capabilities? yt and a few
> > other sites are intolera
On 2025-03-06 12:32, songbird wrote:
i currently use firefox and have mostly been ok with it.
would like to try something else.
currently running testing.
any that have any filtering capabilities? yt and a few
other sites are intolerable without a decent blocker.
songbird
On 7/3/25 01:32, songbird wrote:
i currently use firefox and have mostly been ok with it.
would like to try something else.
currently running testing.
any that have any filtering capabilities? yt and a few
other sites are intolerable without a decent blocker.
songbird
Try t
Camaleón writes:
> Glad to hear you have somehow alleviated your memory problems but
> remember that when your system makes use of the swap space it usually
> means that you need more physical RAM on that computer. Just keep an eye
> on it ;-)
I will, thanks. But for now, the most important
On Tue, 05 Jun 2012 10:18:09 +, Rodolfo Medina wrote:
> On Sun, 27 May 2012 10:28:27 +, Rodolfo Medina wrote:
(...)
> Camaleón writes:
>
>> Having swap can help but in your case, with as little as 216 MB of RAM
>> I don't know if that would be enough.
>
>
> Well, the cause of the pr
On Sun, 27 May 2012 10:28:27 +, Rodolfo Medina wrote:
>> Recently I've been having a problem with my web browser: it gets slow,
>> the mouse and the keyboard don't respond any more and I have to unplug
>> the machine. Can anybody suggest how I can detect why this happen and
>> provide a remedy
On Sat, 02 Jun 2012 10:58:27 -0700, Kelly Clowers wrote:
> On Wed, May 30, 2012 at 1:17 PM, Camaleón wrote:
(...)
>> Just for you to get the idea, in my system (64-bits with 8 GiB of RAM),
>> Firefox takes "99 MiB" of real memory (now 101 MiB)... go figure.
>
> Wow, that isn't much! I have 8GB
On Wed, May 30, 2012 at 1:17 PM, Camaleón wrote:
> On Wed, 30 May 2012 18:58:23 +, Rodolfo Medina wrote:
>> Rodolfo Medina writes:
>>
>>> Camaleón writes:
>
> (...)
> But why didn't the problem occur before in the past? It has become
> heavy only recently, and the machine is always
On 05/30/2012 01:17 PM, Camaleón wrote:
On Wed, 30 May 2012 18:58:23 +, Rodolfo Medina wrote:
Rodolfo Medina writes:
Camaleón writes:
(...)
But why didn't the problem occur before in the past? It has become
heavy only recently, and the machine is always the same.
I can't tell but y
On Wed, 30 May 2012 18:58:23 +, Rodolfo Medina wrote:
> Rodolfo Medina writes:
>
>> Camaleón writes:
(...)
But why didn't the problem occur before in the past? It has become
heavy only recently, and the machine is always the same.
>>>
>>> I can't tell but your system can't be h
On Wed, 30 May 2012 18:34:42 +, Rodolfo Medina wrote:
> Camaleón writes:
>
>> The "/swap" partition has to be mounted. Put here the content of your
>> "/etc/ fstab".
>
> Effectively, swap is not in fstab:
(...)
> # /dev/hda5 none
Rodolfo Medina writes:
>>> Recently I've been having a problem with my web browser: it gets slow,
>>> the mouse and the keyboard don't respond any more and I have to unplug
>>> the machine. Can anybody suggest how I can detect why this happen and
>>> provide a remedy?
>
>
> Camaleón writes:
>
>>
On Sun, 27 May 2012 10:28:27 +, Rodolfo Medina wrote:
>> Recently I've been having a problem with my web browser: it gets slow,
>> the mouse and the keyboard don't respond any more and I have to unplug
>> the machine. Can anybody suggest how I can detect why this happen and
>> provide a remedy
On Wed, 30 May 2012 17:43:31 +, Rodolfo Medina wrote:
> Camaleón writes:
(...)
>> Wow... 216 MB of ram and you have _no swap_? That's suicide...
>
> When I parted the hard disk, I remeber leaving about 1 gigabite swap,
> and in fact here it is from `parted':
>
> # parted
(...)
> Number Sta
On Sun, 27 May 2012 10:28:27 +, Rodolfo Medina wrote:
>> Recently I've been having a problem with my web browser: it gets slow,
>> the mouse and the keyboard don't respond any more and I have to unplug
>> the machine. Can anybody suggest how I can detect why this happen and
>> provide a remedy
On Wed, 30 May 2012 16:45:15 +, Rodolfo Medina wrote:
> Camaleón writes:
>> 1/ Have you experienced the problem when running another applications
>> (different than the browser)
>
> No, never: it only happens with the web browser.
Okay.
>> 2/ Can you still login to the system when it free
On Sun, 27 May 2012 10:28:27 +, Rodolfo Medina wrote:
>> Recently I've been having a problem with my web browser: it gets slow,
>> the mouse and the keyboard don't respond any more and I have to unplug
>> the machine. Can anybody suggest how I can detect why this happen and
>> provide a remedy
On Sun, 27 May 2012 14:52:43 -0700, Rodolfo Medina wrote:
> On May 27, 9:30 pm, Rodolfo Medina wrote:
(...)
>> Unfortunately, there's nothing I can do but unplugging it off. But the
>> worse is, that also Epiphany has the same problem: so, since another PC
>> of mine (a faster one) does not ha
On Sun, 2012-05-27 at 23:23 +, Rodolfo Medina wrote:
> On Sun, 27 May 2012 10:28:27 +, Rodolfo Medina wrote:
>
> Recently I've been having a problem with my web browser: it gets slow,
> the mouse and the keyboard don't respond any more and I have to unplug
> the machine. Ca
On May 27, 9:30 pm, Rodolfo Medina wrote:
> On Sun, 27 May 2012 10:28:27 +, Rodolfo Medina wrote:
> Recently I've been having a problem with my web browser: it gets slow,
> the mouse and the keyboard don't respond any more and I have to unplug
> the machine. Can anybody suggest
On May 27, 9:30 pm, Rodolfo Medina wrote:
> On Sun, 27 May 2012 10:28:27 +, Rodolfo Medina wrote:
> Recently I've been having a problem with my web browser: it gets slow,
> the mouse and the keyboard don't respond any more and I have to unplug
> the machine. Can anybody suggest
On Sun, 27 May 2012 10:28:27 +, Rodolfo Medina wrote:
Recently I've been having a problem with my web browser: it gets slow,
the mouse and the keyboard don't respond any more and I have to unplug
the machine. Can anybody suggest how I can detect why this happen and
provide
On Sun, 27 May 2012 17:29:53 +
Rodolfo Medina wrote:
> Camaleón writes:
>
> > On Sun, 27 May 2012 10:28:27 +, Rodolfo Medina wrote:
> > Err... would be of much help if you say what browser is and what
> > Debian release :-). Also, does it happen with a different browser?
>
>
> It i
On Sunday 27 May 2012 18:29:53 Rodolfo Medina wrote:
> Camaleón writes:
> > On Sun, 27 May 2012 10:28:27 +, Rodolfo Medina wrote:
> >> Recently I've been having a problem with my web browser: it gets slow,
> >> the mouse and the keyboard don't respond any more and I have to unplug
> >> the mac
On Sun, 2012-05-27 at 16:01 +, Camaleón wrote:
> In the meantime, you can try with Epiphany (if running GNOME) or
> Konqueror (for KDE)
or http://wiki.debian.org/Opera if you don't wish to install GNOME or
KDE related packages.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
On Sun, 27 May 2012 17:29:53 +, Rodolfo Medina wrote:
> Camaleón writes:
>
>> On Sun, 27 May 2012 10:28:27 +, Rodolfo Medina wrote:
>>
>>> Recently I've been having a problem with my web browser: it gets slow,
>>> the mouse and the keyboard don't respond any more and I have to unplug
>>>
http://linux.about.com/od/softbrowser/Linux_Software_Web_Browsers.htm
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1338134398.2298.68.camel@precise
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_web_browsers_for_Unix_and_Unix-like_operating_systems
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1338134199.2298.67.camel@pre
Camaleón writes:
> On Sun, 27 May 2012 10:28:27 +, Rodolfo Medina wrote:
>
>> Recently I've been having a problem with my web browser: it gets slow,
>> the mouse and the keyboard don't respond any more and I have to unplug
>> the machine. Can anybody suggest how I can detect why this happen a
On Sun, 27 May 2012 10:28:27 +, Rodolfo Medina wrote:
> Recently I've been having a problem with my web browser: it gets slow,
> the mouse and the keyboard don't respond any more and I have to unplug
> the machine. Can anybody suggest how I can detect why this happen and
> provide a remedy?
E
W dniu 2010-01-20 17:22, Rodolfo Medina pisze:
I'm new to Lenny. In Etch I've been using the package mozilla-browser. What's
the corispondent package in Lenny?
Thanks for any help.
Rodolfo
Hi,
In Lenny it's Iceweasel.
Chris
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
Kamaraju S Kusumanchi wrote:
Andrei Popescu wrote:
The magic incantation (as root) is
Excellent choice of words! All 'root users' are wizards and Linux
is 'magic'! All the new students have to come through the platform 9 3/4,
take Hogwarts express to reach the Hogwart School of Witchcr
Andrei Popescu wrote:
> The magic incantation (as root) is
>
Excellent choice of words! All 'root users' are wizards and Linux
is 'magic'! All the new students have to come through the platform 9 3/4,
take Hogwarts express to reach the Hogwart School of Witchcraft and
Wizardry (mailing lists). H
Andrei Popescu wrote:
On Tue, May 27, 2008 at 07:44:52AM -0300, Marcelo Chiapparini wrote:
I checked and changed the values of
network.protocol-handler.app.http(s)
form "x-www-browser" to "iceweasel". Now icedove opens urls with iceweasel,
as I want. Thank you very much for the help.
IMO y
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 05/25/08 17:01, Marcelo Chiapparini wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I am using etch + gnome desktop, icedove for mail and iceweasel as the
> default web browser. Icedove is using epiphany as the web browser for
> open urls inside emails. I want to set icewease
On Thu, Jan 24, 2008 at 16:26:32 -0800, wathavy wathavy wrote:
> Hi,
> I have Debian set up and run. I can ping to any address and get
> replies. And I also set up proxy server name and port number exactly
> same as Windows which I am writing this mail, now. But any browser
> reject saying 'proxy
Am 2007-03-19 21:08:27, schrieb Ron Johnson:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 03/19/07 18:20, Jorge Peixoto de Morais Neto wrote:
> [snip]
> >
> > By the way, you can use Swiftfox. It is an optimized build of Firefox
> > with machine-specific optimizations, aggressive opti
On Fri, Mar 23, 2007 at 16:00:16 -0300, Cassiano Leal wrote:
[...]
> Yes, it is in the video card, but it's accessed through the /dev/fb*
> 'files', in the same way that /dev/hda1 is in my HDD and yet it is accessed
> through that 'file'.
Which video card is it? (see the output of "lspci")
Wh
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
s. keeling wrote:
> Joe Hart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>> framebuffer is not a device in that respect. /dev/fb* is reffering to a
>> floppy drive.
>
> You likely mean /dev/fd* is referring to floppy drives, which is just
> confusing the issue. :-)
>
>
Joe Hart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> framebuffer is not a device in that respect. /dev/fb* is reffering to a
> floppy drive.
You likely mean /dev/fd* is referring to floppy drives, which is just
confusing the issue. :-)
--
Any technology distinguishable from magic is insufficiently advanced.
(
Joe Hart wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 23 Mar, Joe Hart wrote:
...
Well, i have no clue how udev is working. i remember in some old days
i had to do some mknod with some magic numbers, but now it really
should be handled by some udev. i have
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On 23 Mar, Joe Hart wrote:
>
>> ...
>
>>> Well, i have no clue how udev is working. i remember in some old days
>>> i had to do some mknod with some magic numbers, but now it really
>>> should be handled by some udev. i hav
framebuffer is not a device in that respect. /dev/fb* is reffering to a
floppy drive. What links is telling you is it can't find the
framebuffer in your video card. I don't know how to fix that issue, but
I thought I would clarify for you that it isn't the floppy that it's
looking for.
No, lin
On 23 Mar, Joe Hart wrote:
> ...
>> Well, i have no clue how udev is working. i remember in some old days
>> i had to do some mknod with some magic numbers, but now it really
>> should be handled by some udev. i have it running, even restarted it,
>> but still no signs of /dev/fb*
>
> framebuffe
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Atis wrote:
>>>I knew that a long time ago, but just now tried. It says that can't
>>>find framebuffer device, and its true - i don't have /dev/fb0. Any
>>>clue what kernel module i need for that? I tried loading intelfb, but
>>>i guess just loading wo
> I'm sure you can do it without recompiling, through some 'mknod' kind of
> magic. Can't help you there, though. If you need help compiling your own
> kernel, I can give you some hints.
But nowadays, with things like udev, it its perfectly possible that the
device will be created simply by loadin
I'm sure you can do it without recompiling, through some 'mknod' kind of
magic. Can't help you there, though. If you need help compiling your own
kernel, I can give you some hints.
But nowadays, with things like udev, it its perfectly possible that the
device will be created simply by loading
1 - 100 of 147 matches
Mail list logo
