On 2010-09-06 19:40 +0200, Andrei Popescu wrote:
> On Lu, 06 sep 10, 10:31:13, Jimmy Johnson wrote:
>>
>> On Squeeze it now looks like apt-listchanges is a default install, I
>> removed it and aptitude is trying to install it again, we'll
>> probably be seeing a lot of WTF questions.
>
> $ apt-ca
On Lu, 06 sep 10, 10:31:13, Jimmy Johnson wrote:
>
> On Squeeze it now looks like apt-listchanges is a default install, I
> removed it and aptitude is trying to install it again, we'll
> probably be seeing a lot of WTF questions.
$ apt-cache rdepends apt-listchanges
apt-listchanges
Reverse Depend
Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote:
In <87tym48l1e@teufel.historicalmaterialism.info>, brownh wrote:
With a brand new installation of squeeze, one of my first steps was to
do a package update and a safe-upgrade. The former went well, but when
I tried to upgrade the 22 updated packages, the upgrade
In <87tym48l1e@teufel.historicalmaterialism.info>, brownh wrote:
>With a brand new installation of squeeze, one of my first steps was to
>do a package update and a safe-upgrade. The former went well, but when
>I tried to upgrade the 22 updated packages, the upgrade proceedure
>terminated with:
> On Sun, 5 Sep 2010 07:52:29 -0400 wrote:
>
> With a brand new installation of squeeze, one of my first steps was to
> do a package update and a safe-upgrade. The former went well, but when
> I tried to upgrade the 22 updated packages, the upgrade proceedure
> terminated with:
>
> Reading ch
5 matches
Mail list logo