Hendrik Boom wrote:
> This one has annoyed me, too. Perhaps a technical solution is appropriate
> here? Some way of creating a reply from the mailing-list archive?
Already done. Just read the list archive and use the operations
provided there to reply.
http://lists.debian.org/debian-user/200
On Mon, Jul 18, 2005 at 07:51:27PM -0500, Kent West wrote:
>
> btw Benjamin, when wanting to reply to a thread and you no longer have a
> message from that thread, you can do so from the archives. Find the
> message (such as
> http://lists.debian.org/debian-user/2005/07/msg02273.html), and near th
On Mon, Jul 18, 2005 at 07:27:44PM -0700, Steve Lamb wrote:
>
> It also reflects poorly on the person who couldn't be bothered to take the
> time to see how the locals do things. Isn't that something that Americans are
> always blasted about in good ol' Europe? Going over expecting everyone
On Mon, Jul 18, 2005 at 07:55:26PM -0400, Lorenzo Taylor wrote:
> (when a previous post is required to continue the same thread and they
> don't have one)
This one has annoyed me, too. Perhaps a technical solution is appropriate
here? Some way of creating a reply from the mailing-list archive?
On Tue, Jul 19, 2005 at 12:46:17AM -0400, Hal Vaughan wrote:
> I don't know what groups you're on, but my experience is I see more here, and
> I see a lot of people here that are too busy being right to listen or ever
> consider that *they* are the ones being rude.
Try debian-devel.
--
Chris
Tony Godshall wrote:
> I would think a collaboration of people around the world is
> more likely to survive than a corporation.
Ubuntu is not Canonical. Canonical is the originator and sponsor
of Ubuntu, but Ubuntu itself is, like Debian, free software.
--
Thomas Hood
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, ema
On Tuesday 19 July 2005 12:30 am, kamaraju kusumanchi wrote:
> Hal Vaughan wrote:
> >On Monday 18 July 2005 10:27 pm, Steve Lamb wrote:
> >>Hal Vaughan wrote:
> >>>People do things like that because they have the illusion they can
> >>>control others. It's a nasty habit, and it says more negative
Hal Vaughan wrote:
On Monday 18 July 2005 10:27 pm, Steve Lamb wrote:
Hal Vaughan wrote:
People do things like that because they have the illusion they can
control others. It's a nasty habit, and it says more negative about the
person doing it than the person they are jumping on.
On Monday 18 July 2005 10:27 pm, Steve Lamb wrote:
> Hal Vaughan wrote:
> > People do things like that because they have the illusion they can
> > control others. It's a nasty habit, and it says more negative about the
> > person doing it than the person they are jumping on.
>
> No. It's call
Hal Vaughan wrote:
> People do things like that because they have the illusion they can control
> others. It's a nasty habit, and it says more negative about the person doing
> it than the person they are jumping on.
No. It's called letting people know they're being rude. Don't like the
l
According to Thomas Hood,
> On Sun, 17 Jul 2005 18:51:57 -0500, Benjamin Sher wrote:
> > My point was simple: If you are going to get a derivative of Debian
> > or Red Hat or whatever, you will never have the perfect
> > compatibility that is often promised but cannot be delivered. You
> > will
Lorenzo Taylor wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Benjamin Sher's comments on Re: Ubunto vs. Debian were as follows:
# > Please use the same thread. Please do not open different threads for the
# > same topic that is still active. Your reply could as well
Lorenzo Taylor wrote:
> Benjamin Sher's comments on Re: Ubunto vs. Debian were as follows:
> # > Please use the same thread. Please do not open different threads
> for the
> # > same topic that is still active. Your reply could as well go into the
> # > thread tit
On Monday 18 July 2005 07:55 pm, Lorenzo Taylor wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Benjamin Sher's comments on Re: Ubunto vs. Debian were as follows:
> # > Please use the same thread. Please do not open different threads for
> the # > same top
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Benjamin Sher's comments on Re: Ubunto vs. Debian were as follows:
# > Please use the same thread. Please do not open different threads for the
# > same topic that is still active. Your reply could as well go into the
# > thread tit
On Sun, 17 Jul 2005 18:51:57 -0500, Benjamin Sher wrote:
> My point was simple: If you are going to get a derivative of Debian
> or Red Hat or whatever, you will never have the perfect
> compatibility that is often promised but cannot be delivered. You
> will have it only with the original distr
On 17 Jul 2005 at 12:29, Colin wrote:
> Benjamin Sher wrote:
>
> > There are two main Linux distros: Red Hat and Debian. Each have many
> > derivates. Xandros is one of at least 25 distros based on Debian.
>
> Please, please, please don't speak on things you know nothing about.
> There are wa
On Sun, Jul 17, 2005 at 04:30:07PM -0400, hell0 un1verse wrote:
> Client desktop: Ubuntu, server side: Debian stable.
>
> Choice makes sense?:)
Seems sensible to me. I don't have much experience with large
deployments, so there may very well be good reasons to use Debian
unstable in server instal
On 7/17/05, Stephen R Laniel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 17, 2005 at 12:26:07PM -0500, Mr Mike wrote:
> > Also, lets not forget the french... Mandrake is a fine linux.
>
> It's also a Red Hat derivative, so it fits into the (false)
> statement that the original poster made to the eff
On Sun, Jul 17, 2005 at 12:26:07PM -0500, Mr Mike wrote:
> Also, lets not forget the french... Mandrake is a fine linux.
It's also a Red Hat derivative, so it fits into the (false)
statement that the original poster made to the effect that
every Linux distribution is either a Red Hat or a Debian
Just want to make two observations:
On Sun, 2005-07-17 at 09:57 -0500, Benjamin Sher wrote:
> There are two main Linux distros: Red Hat and Debian.
> Each have many derivates.
While it is true that Red Hat and debian both have many derivatives, it
goes deeper on the Red Hat side, where some distr
On Sun, 17 Jul 2005 10:41:19 -0500, Nate Bargmann wrote:
> * Benjamin Sher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005 Jul 17 10:02 -0500]:
>
>> There are two main Linux distros: Red Hat and Debian. Each have many
>> derivates. Xandros is one of at least 25 distros based on Debian.
>
> That statement might get
Benjamin Sher wrote:
There are two main Linux distros: Red Hat and Debian. Each have many
derivates. Xandros is one of at least 25 distros based on Debian.
Please, please, please don't speak on things you know nothing about.
There are way more than just two main Linux distributions.
Also,
* Benjamin Sher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005 Jul 17 10:02 -0500]:
> There are two main Linux distros: Red Hat and Debian. Each have many
> derivates. Xandros is one of at least 25 distros based on Debian.
That statement might get our Slackware friends in an uproar. ;-)
Not so long ago Slackwar
On Sunday 17 July 2005 10:10 am, kamaraju kusumanchi wrote:
> Benjamin Sher wrote:
> >Dear friends:
> >
> >To the person who asked about Ubunto vs. Debian:
>
> Please use the same thread. Please do not open different threads for the
> same topic that is still active. Your reply could as well go int
Benjamin Sher wrote:
Dear friends:
To the person who asked about Ubunto vs. Debian:
Please use the same thread. Please do not open different threads for the
same topic that is still active. Your reply could as well go into the
thread titled "Debian or Ubuntu Dilemma".
raju
--
Kamaraju
26 matches
Mail list logo
