>> Is any USB camera working in Debian 9?
* From: Reco recovery...@gmail.com
* Date: Fri, 3 Nov 2017 18:11:57 +0300
> This one does, at least right now it did with mpv.
> lsusb tells me that it's:
>
> 058f:5608 Alcor Micro Corp
* From: deloptes delop...@gmail.com
* Da
* From: Reco
* Date: Fri, 3 Nov 2017 18:11:57 +0300
> This one does, at least right now it did with mpv.
> lsusb tells me that it's:
>
> 058f:5608 Alcor Micro Corp
* From: deloptes
* Date: Fri, 03 Nov 2017 18:04:40 +0100
> ID 0471:2036 Philips (or NXP) Webcam SPC1030NC
>
pe...@easthope.ca wrote:
> * From: Reco
> * Date: Mon, 2 Oct 2017 18:50:58 +0300
>> I suggest you to file a bug report unless you did it already.
>
> https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=877558
>
> A Labtec/Vivitar camera has a similar failure. Is any USB camera
> working i
On Fri, Nov 03, 2017 at 06:54:29AM -0700, pe...@easthope.ca wrote:
> * From: Reco
> * Date: Mon, 2 Oct 2017 18:50:58 +0300
> > I suggest you to file a bug report unless you did it already.
>
> https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=877558
>
> A Labtec/Vivitar camera has a simi
* From: Reco
* Date: Mon, 2 Oct 2017 18:50:58 +0300
> I suggest you to file a bug report unless you did it already.
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=877558
A Labtec/Vivitar camera has a similar failure. Is any USB camera
working in Debian 9?
Many packages in 9 ar
Hi.
On Mon, Oct 02, 2017 at 07:28:58AM -0700, pe...@easthope.ca wrote:
> From: Reco
> Date: Mon, 2 Oct 2017 10:16:20 +0300
> > Try (assuming that you have appropriate device permissions):
> >
> > mpv tv:// --tv-device=/dev/video0
>
> peter@dalton:~$ mpv tv:// --tv-device=/dev/video0
> P
From: Reco
Date: Mon, 2 Oct 2017 10:16:20 +0300
> Try (assuming that you have appropriate device permissions):
>
> mpv tv:// --tv-device=/dev/video0
peter@dalton:~$ mpv tv:// --tv-device=/dev/video0
Playing: tv://
[tv] Selected driver: v4l2
[tv] name: Video 4 Linux 2 input
[tv] your device driv
On Sun, Oct 01, 2017 at 04:12:19PM -0700, pe...@easthope.ca wrote:
> * From: Reco
> * Date: Thu, 21 Sep 2017 14:10:35 +0300
> > reportbug is teasing you.
> > Today's kernel update bumped the kernel to 4.9.30-2+deb9u5.
> > Update the kernel, disregard reportbug warning and file a bugreport.
* From: Curt
* Date: Thu, 21 Sep 2017 13:22:48 + (UTC)
> I'm reading that this material requires a tweak:
> options uvcvideo quirks=0x100
> in
> /etc/modprobe.d/uvcvideo.conf
I was using quirks=0x80 but can try 100 also.
Thanks,... Peter E.
--
123456789 123456
* From: Reco
* Date: Thu, 21 Sep 2017 14:10:35 +0300
> reportbug is teasing you.
> Today's kernel update bumped the kernel to 4.9.30-2+deb9u5.
> Update the kernel, disregard reportbug warning and file a bugreport.
Now I have the kernel you mention and a /dev/video0. A little
progres
Hi.
On Thu, Sep 21, 2017 at 01:22:48PM +, Curt wrote:
> On 2017-09-20, Reco wrote:
> > Hi.
> >
> > On Wed, Sep 20, 2017 at 05:56:22AM -0700, pe...@easthope.ca wrote:
> >> * From: Reco
> >> * Date: Wed, 20 Sep 2017 09:20:18 +0300
> >> > What does 'lsusb' and 'lsusb -t' show for
On 2017-09-20, Reco wrote:
> Hi.
>
> On Wed, Sep 20, 2017 at 05:56:22AM -0700, pe...@easthope.ca wrote:
>> *From: Reco
>> *Date: Wed, 20 Sep 2017 09:20:18 +0300
>> > What does 'lsusb' and 'lsusb -t' show for you?
>>
>> peter@dalton:~$ lsusb
>> Bus 001 Device 006: ID 045e:00f8 Micro
Hi.
On Wed, Sep 20, 2017 at 02:49:21PM -0700, pe...@easthope.ca wrote:
> * From: Reco
> * Date: Wed, 20 Sep 2017 17:03:39 +0300
> > If the trick does not work I suggest to try the kernel from the
> > backports.
>
> Began to create a bug report and found this.
> "Your version of l
* From: Reco
* Date: Wed, 20 Sep 2017 17:03:39 +0300
> If the trick does not work I suggest to try the kernel from the
> backports.
Began to create a bug report and found this.
"Your version of linux-image-4.9.0-3-686-pae (4.9.30-2+deb9u3) is newer than
that in Debian! Do you still w
Hi.
On Wed, Sep 20, 2017 at 05:56:22AM -0700, pe...@easthope.ca wrote:
> * From: Reco
> * Date: Wed, 20 Sep 2017 09:20:18 +0300
> > What does 'lsusb' and 'lsusb -t' show for you?
>
> peter@dalton:~$ lsusb
> Bus 001 Device 006: ID 045e:00f8 Microsoft Corp. LifeCam NX-6000
I got t
On Sun, 04 Jan 2015, Renaud (Ron) OLGIATI wrote:
> I am looking for a prog that will display on screen, and save,
> pictures taken with a USB camera connected to the box.
>
> Better obviously with a GUI; but I do not care to install a load of
> Gnome or KDE bloat.
>
> Any idea, advice, etc ?
Ge
On Sunday 04 January 2015 22:01:53 Renaud OLGIATI wrote:
> On Sun, 4 Jan 2015 17:15:17 -0300
>
> Marcos Toro Oyarzo wrote:
> > > I am looking for a prog that will display on screen, and save, pictures
> > > taken with a USB camera connected to the box. Better obviously with a
> > > GUI; but I do
On Sun, 04 Jan 2015 21:19:46 +0100
Hans wrote:
> Maybe Camorama or GUVCView is what you are looking for. Maybe, there are some
> commandline tools, too.
Many thanks, Camorama is exactly what I was hoping for.
Cheers,
Ron.
--
King Herod has been greatly misunderstood.
On Sun, 4 Jan 2015 17:15:17 -0300
Marcos Toro Oyarzo wrote:
> > I am looking for a prog that will display on screen, and save, pictures
> > taken with a USB camera connected to the box.
> > Better obviously with a GUI; but I do not care to install a load of Gnome
> > or KDE bloat.
> > Any idea,
On Sun, Jan 4, 2015 at 2:37 PM, Javier Vasquez wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 4, 2015 at 2:10 PM, Renaud OLGIATI
> wrote:
>> I am looking for a prog that will display on screen, and save, pictures
>> taken with a USB camera connected to the box.
>>
>> Better obviously with a GUI; but I do not care to ins
On Sun, Jan 4, 2015 at 2:10 PM, Renaud OLGIATI
wrote:
> I am looking for a prog that will display on screen, and save, pictures taken
> with a USB camera connected to the box.
>
> Better obviously with a GUI; but I do not care to install a load of Gnome or
> KDE bloat.
>
> Any idea, advice, etc
Am Sonntag, 4. Januar 2015, 17:10:04 schrieb Renaud OLGIATI:
> I am looking for a prog that will display on screen, and save, pictures
> taken with a USB camera connected to the box.
>
> Better obviously with a GUI; but I do not care to install a load of Gnome or
> KDE bloat.
>
> Any idea, advice
you should try cheese https://wiki.gnome.org/Apps/Cheese
cheers,
2015-01-04 17:10 GMT-03:00 Renaud OLGIATI :
> I am looking for a prog that will display on screen, and save, pictures taken
> with a USB camera connected to the box.
>
> Better obviously with a GUI; but I do not care to install a
Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso wrote:
On 18/06/2008, Bob <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I used Skype video conferencing yesterday and the quality was nowhere near
as good as SIP, though in all fairness it is a bit easier to setup.
Yuck, Skype. I've been earnestly looking for free alternatives.
w
On 18/06/2008, Bob <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I used Skype video conferencing yesterday and the quality was nowhere near
> as good as SIP, though in all fairness it is a bit easier to setup.
Yuck, Skype. I've been earnestly looking for free alternatives.
wengophone was good before it was abando
PETER EASTHOPE wrote:
Folk,
Video in Skype works well for friends using Imacs
and MS-Win. I'm thinking of buying a camera.
USB webcams must use USB 2 by now. So does
a Firewire camera retain any advantage over
current USB cameras.
Some, they're apparently better supported and better qualit
On 18/06/2008, PETER EASTHOPE <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Can a digital still camera with a USB cable be
> used for this purpose?
Some can, yes. But check first: don't assume that every model is capable of
this. I have used a Fujifilm 6900Z as a web cam.
gothicdoom wrote:
> Hi there.
>
> I'm trying to read the flash memory from my digital camera without
> success.
>
> This is the scenario:
> linux-2.6.11.7
> 100% SCSI machine (4 discs - sda, sdb, sdc, sdd)
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~# cat /proc/bus/usb/devices
> S: Manufacturer=Eastman Kodak Comp
Ron Johnson, Jr. wrote:
|>> To use a Sony digital camera with my Debian laptop, all I had to do
|>> was to include this line in /etc/udev/udev.rules:
|>>
|>>BUS="scsi", SYSFS_vendor="Sony", NAME="camera"
|>
|> If you ever get another hot-pluggable Sony device, your rule
|> will fail. Be
On Mon, 2004-11-29 at 14:52 -0800, Jim McCloskey wrote:
> Christian Convey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> |> I'm curious about the way a USB camera gets set up when plugged into
> |> a Sarge / 2.6.9 system. I'm also using 'udev'. Anyone know the
> |> following?
> |>
> |> When I plug in the camera
Christian Convey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
|> I'm curious about the way a USB camera gets set up when plugged into
|> a Sarge / 2.6.9 system. I'm also using 'udev'. Anyone know the
|> following?
|>
|> When I plug in the camera, I assume there are three devices that must
|> be created in the /dev
On Fri, 2004-11-26 at 21:35 -0500, Christian Convey wrote:
> Hi guys,
>
> I'm curious about the way a USB camera gets set up when plugged into a
> Sarge / 2.6.9 system. I'm also using 'udev'. Anyone know the following?
>
> When I plug in the camera, I assume there are three devices that must be
Tom Peters wrote:
Following the HOWTO's I try to mount my digital USB camera in the
following way:
sudo mount -t vfat /dev/sda1 /camera
mount: /dev/sda1 is not a valid block device
May I ask what type of media your digital camera is using, and is it
removable? I ask this because I has trouble m
From: "Tom Peters" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> I don't get the proper name for the valid device from that.
> If I am not misguided by the manuals, there is a vfat filesystem on the
> memory card, and we are supposed to use the ide-scsi driver, so access it
> as a SCSI disk. As I said, that is how it w
On Wed, 21 Apr 2004, Kevin Mark wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 21, 2004 at 12:22:11AM +0200, Tom Peters wrote:
> > Following the HOWTO's I try to mount my digital USB camera in the
> > following way:
> >
> > sudo mount -t vfat /dev/sda1 /camera
> > mount: /dev/sda1 is not a valid block device
> > This work
On Wed, Apr 21, 2004 at 12:22:11AM +0200, Tom Peters wrote:
> Following the HOWTO's I try to mount my digital USB camera in the
> following way:
>
> sudo mount -t vfat /dev/sda1 /camera
> mount: /dev/sda1 is not a valid block device
>
> The mount table has:
> none on /proc/bus/usb type usbdevfs (
Thomas H. George wrote:
I have a Sony with a memory stick which stores the images in jpeg
format. I had no trouble in configuring a 2.4.18 kernel to support usb
mass storage and adding /dev/sdb1 /sony vfat ro,users,noauto 0 0 to my fstab.
I already had append="hdd=ide-scsi" in lilo.conf under im
Craig Dickson wrote:
Tim wrote:
Is it the case that unless there is individual support for a model built
into the kernel, it won't be recognised? From this do I deduce that I
will be unable to mount my Nikon Coolpix E4300? And thus will need to
buy a CF card reader?
Well, a quick web searc
On Sat, Apr 05, 2003 at 10:10:19AM +0100, Tim wrote:
> Tim wrote:
> >Olivier wrote:
> >
> >>scsi1 means it's /dev/sdb1 ?
> >
> >
> >mount: /dev/sdb1 is not a valid block device
> >
I have a Sony with a memory stick which stores the images in jpeg
format. I had no trouble in configuring a 2.4.18 k
Tim wrote:
> Is it the case that unless there is individual support for a model built
> into the kernel, it won't be recognised? From this do I deduce that I
> will be unable to mount my Nikon Coolpix E4300? And thus will need to
> buy a CF card reader?
Well, a quick web search turns up the
Tim wrote:
Olivier wrote:
scsi1 means it's /dev/sdb1 ?
mount: /dev/sdb1 is not a valid block device
Is it the case that unless there is individual support for a model built
into the kernel, it won't be recognised? From this do I deduce that I
will be unable to mount my Nikon Coolpix E4300?
Antonio Gutiérrez Mayoral wrote:
I have a cam too and when I want to connect it to the computer, I use
the /dev/sda1 device (scsi) like a vfat file system
I think you should have scsi support on kernel
I do believe that is set in my kernel config.
mount: /dev/sda1 is not a valid block device
#
Olivier wrote:
scsi1 means it's /dev/sdb1 ?
mount: /dev/sdb1 is not a valid block device
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I have a cam too and when I want to connect it to the computer, I use
the /dev/sda1 device (scsi) like a vfat file system.
I think you should have scsi support on kernel.
Regards.
El jue, 03 de 04 de 2003 a las 09:13, Tim escribió:
> Hi,
>
> I've compiled my kernel, mass storage as a module, an
44 matches
Mail list logo
