michael-spree-michael wrote:
> It used to be that one can use two network cards at the same time, after
> configuring /etc/network/interfaces and making the networks static.
Yes. This is a standard and widely used feature.
> This I did.
>
> The results; the wifi card won't connect and the wired
On 2015-05-29, michael-spree-michael wrote:
> Hello,
>
> It used to be that one can use two network cards at the same time, after
> configuring /etc/network/interfaces and making the networks static.
>
> This I did.
>
> The results; the wifi card won't connect and the wired connected.
>
> Is this
On Thu, Apr 19, 2007 at 06:12:24PM -0400, Faheem Mitha wrote:
>
>
> On Fri, 20 Apr 2007, Alex Samad wrote:
>
> >On Thu, Apr 19, 2007 at 05:15:25PM -0400, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote:
> >>On Thu, Apr 19, 2007 at 05:06:47PM -0400, Faheem Mitha wrote:
> >>>
> >>>/sbin/route -n
> >>>
> >>>Kernel IP rou
On Fri, 20 Apr 2007, Alex Samad wrote:
On Thu, Apr 19, 2007 at 05:15:25PM -0400, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote:
On Thu, Apr 19, 2007 at 05:06:47PM -0400, Faheem Mitha wrote:
/sbin/route -n
Kernel IP routing table
Destination Gateway Genmask Flags Metric RefUse
Iface
152.
On Thu, Apr 19, 2007 at 06:12:24PM -0400, Faheem Mitha wrote:
>
> On Fri, 20 Apr 2007, Alex Samad wrote:
>
> >
> >have a look for ip (it part of the iproute package)
> >
> >Usage: ip addr {add|del} IFADDR dev STRING
> > ip addr {show|flush} [ dev STRING ] [ scope SCOPE-ID ]
> >
On Thu, Apr 19, 2007 at 05:15:25PM -0400, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 19, 2007 at 05:06:47PM -0400, Faheem Mitha wrote:
> >
> > /sbin/route -n
> >
> > Kernel IP routing table
> > Destination Gateway Genmask Flags Metric RefUse
> > Iface
> > 152.3.172.0 0.0
On Thu, 19 Apr 2007, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote:
On Wed, Apr 18, 2007 at 09:18:10PM -0400, Faheem Mitha wrote:
eth0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:E0:81:31:33:8C
inet addr:152.3.172.111 Bcast:152.3.173.255 Mask:255.255.254.0
eth1 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:E0:81:31:3
On Thu, Apr 19, 2007 at 05:06:47PM -0400, Faheem Mitha wrote:
>
> /sbin/route -n
>
> Kernel IP routing table
> Destination Gateway Genmask Flags Metric RefUse
> Iface
> 152.3.172.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.254.0 U 0 00 eth1
> 152.3.172.0 0.0.0.0
On Wed, Apr 18, 2007 at 09:18:10PM -0400, Faheem Mitha wrote:
>
> eth0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:E0:81:31:33:8C
> inet addr:152.3.172.111 Bcast:152.3.173.255 Mask:255.255.254.0
>
> eth1 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:E0:81:31:33:64
> inet addr:152.3.172.60 Bc
On Wed, 18 Apr 2007, Faheem Mitha wrote:
Hi everyone,
I've got a server on which there are two network cards. One of the network
cards has been configured, and has been running satisfactorily for a while. I
recently plugged in the other network card and started using it for a
different IP a
On Wed, 18 Apr 2007, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote:
On Wed, Apr 18, 2007 at 06:28:29PM -0400, Faheem Mitha wrote:
Just to be clear, the interfaces are both of the form 152.3.172.*.
If for example they were reconfigured so that one was of the form
152.3.171.* and the other was of the form 152.3.1
On Wed, Apr 18, 2007 at 06:28:29PM -0400, Faheem Mitha wrote:
>
> Just to be clear, the interfaces are both of the form 152.3.172.*.
>
> If for example they were reconfigured so that one was of the form
> 152.3.171.* and the other was of the form 152.3.172.& (say) then would the
> problem just
On Wed, 18 Apr 2007, Faheem Mitha wrote:
On Wed, 18 Apr 2007, Roberto C. S?nchez wrote:
Well, there is your problem.
Having two physical interfaces on the same subnet is generally a bad
idea:
http://lists.debian.org/debian-user/2007/01/msg01633.html
http://lists.debian.org/debian-firewall/
On Wed, 18 Apr 2007, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote:
Well, there is your problem.
Having two physical interfaces on the same subnet is generally a bad
idea:
http://lists.debian.org/debian-user/2007/01/msg01633.html
http://lists.debian.org/debian-firewall/2005/03/msg00073.html
You have to really k
On Wed, 18 Apr 2007, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote:
Well, there is your problem.
Having two physical interfaces on the same subnet is generally a bad
idea:
http://lists.debian.org/debian-user/2007/01/msg01633.html
http://lists.debian.org/debian-firewall/2005/03/msg00073.html
You have to really k
On Wed, Apr 18, 2007 at 05:39:40PM -0400, Faheem Mitha wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, 18 Apr 2007, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote:
>
> >On Wed, Apr 18, 2007 at 04:20:49PM -0400, Faheem Mitha wrote:
> >>
> >>Hi everyone,
> >>
> >>I've got a server on which there are two network cards. One of the network
> >>card
On Wed, 18 Apr 2007, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote:
On Wed, Apr 18, 2007 at 04:20:49PM -0400, Faheem Mitha wrote:
Hi everyone,
I've got a server on which there are two network cards. One of the network
cards has been configured, and has been running satisfactorily for a
while. I recently plugged
On Wed, Apr 18, 2007 at 04:20:49PM -0400, Faheem Mitha wrote:
>
> Hi everyone,
>
> I've got a server on which there are two network cards. One of the network
> cards has been configured, and has been running satisfactorily for a
> while. I recently plugged in the other network card and started
On 16.11.06 08:44, Chris Bannister wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 14, 2006 at 11:44:48AM +0100, Jarek Buczy?ski wrote:
> > PS.
> > My firewall logs me all messages to console, it's good idea to set
> > KLOGD="-c 4" In /etc/init.d/klogd?
>
> /etc/sysctl.conf
I think that the above (KLOGD="-c 4") is much be
On Thu, 2006-11-16 at 00:54 +0100, Jarek Buczyński wrote:
> Hello
>
> > /etc/sysctl.conf
>
> Could You give me some more information, please
>
man sysctl; man sysctl.conf? ;o)
I think the one you want is kernel.printk
info on what to set it to, here:
http://lists.samba.org/archive/linux/200
Hello
> /etc/sysctl.conf
Could You give me some more information, please
--
Best regards
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Tue, Nov 14, 2006 at 11:44:48AM +0100, Jarek Buczy?ski wrote:
> PS.
> My firewall logs me all messages to console, it's good idea to set
> KLOGD="-c 4" In /etc/init.d/klogd?
/etc/sysctl.conf
--
Chris.
==
" ... the official version cannot be abandoned because the implication of
rejecting
Hello
Thank You for replay
> First of all, you probably don't want to start your firewall prior to
> your interface being brought up (pre-up). This would causa ..
You're right, I've moved my script again to /etc/network/if-up.d. I've
thought it's better have script in if-pre-up.d (more secur
On Mon, 2006-11-13 at 22:50 +0100, Jarek Buczyński wrote:
> Hi All
>
> I have two network cards eth0 (public IP Internet) eth1 (private LAN).
> I have firewall script in "/etc/network/if-pre-up.d". Unfortunately
> when my system boots script runs three times.
>
> How change this (I'd like script
Mark Janssen, 2003-Mar-07 14:17 +0100:
> On Fri, 2003-03-07 at 13:26, Hugo van der Merwe wrote:
> > I am going to be installing two new network cards soon, most likely
> > I'll be getting that cheap junk that is the rtl8139. How do I choose
> > which one must be eth0? Module parameters to the 8139t
--sm4nu43k4a2Rpi4c
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Mark Janssen wrote:
> On Fri, 2003-03-07 at 13:26, Hugo van der Merwe wrote:
> > I am going to be installing two new network cards soon, most likely
> > I'll be ge
> > I am going to be installing two new network cards soon, most likely
> > I'll be getting that cheap junk that is the rtl8139. How do I choose
> > which one must be eth0? Module parameters to the 8139too module? (In
> > the past I simply loaded the correct module first.
>
> THey are detected in
On Fri, 2003-03-07 at 13:26, Hugo van der Merwe wrote:
> I am going to be installing two new network cards soon, most likely
> I'll be getting that cheap junk that is the rtl8139. How do I choose
> which one must be eth0? Module parameters to the 8139too module? (In
> the past I simply loaded the c
28 matches
Mail list logo
