It was annoying that dhclient would spend 60 second figuring out that
eth0 was not connected to a network. Some pre-up lines fixed that
problem:
auto eth0
iface eth0 inet dhcp
pre-up /home/jrennie/usr/bin/check-mac-address.sh eth0 00:50:8B:46:28:6F
auto eth1
iface eth1 inet dhcp
On Sat, Sep 18, 2004 at 05:14:41PM -0400, Jason Rennie wrote:
> Now, when the laptop is docked, PCMCIA comes up as eth0, but
I lied. PCMCIA still comes up as eth1 (dhclient and ifconfig confused
me by showing eth0 and 00:50:8B:46:28:6F together...)
I added another section to /etc/network/interfa
On Wed, May 29, 2002 at 11:40:46AM -0400, Jason Healy wrote:
Minor (or not-so-minor) correction :
| The short version is this: the kernel will not use two NICs if they
| are on the same physical network (or if the kernel *thinks* they're on
| the same physical network).
True.
| Basically, if et
On Tuesday 28 May 2002 23:44, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> eth0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:A0:CC:53:66:08
> inet addr:192.168.1.1 Bcast:192.168.1.255
>
> eth1 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:A0:CC:61:E9:65
> inet addr:192.168.1.20 Bcast:192.168.1.255
>
> No major pr
On Tuesday 28 May 2002 23:44, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I am trying to set up a firewall, however I have hit a
> snag that I cannot seem to get around. I am trying to
> run two ethernet cards, both of them are Netgear FA310TX
> cards, and both are supposed to run on the tulip
> driver. When I in
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> I am trying to set up a firewall, however I have hit a snag that I
> cannot seem to get around. I am trying to run two ethernet cards,
> both of them are Netgear FA310TX cards, and both are supposed to run
> on the tulip driver. When I install the OS, and I set up eth0
* [EMAIL PROTECTED] ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [020313 02:30]:
> Hi folk's:
>
> I've installed two ethernet cards to my debian server and they work fine.
> I want to give some services to one IP and other services to the other, so:
> How can I deactivate the routing option betwen cards?
>
> There have t
On Wed, 13 Mar 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi folk's:
>
> I've installed two ethernet cards to my debian server and they work fine.
> I want to give some services to one IP and other services to the other, so:
> How can I deactivate the routing option betwen cards?
>
> There have to be some
| I've installed two ethernet cards to my debian server and they work fine.
| I want to give some services to one IP and other services to the
| other, so:
| How can I deactivate the routing option betwen cards?
|
| There have to be some kind of routing now because I can connect
| to my apache
| ty
;
> Cc: debian-user@lists.debian.org
> Subject: RE: Two ethernet cards, one IP?!?
>
>
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > Thanks for the reply.
> >
> > I shall certainly try using ipchains for this, and will
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
> Hi,
>
> Thanks for the reply.
>
> I shall certainly try using ipchains for this, and will let you
> know if it works.
>
> Best regards,
>
> George Karaolides 8, Costakis Pantelides St.,
> tel: +35 79 68 08 86 Strovolos
Hi,
Thanks for the reply.
I shall certainly try using ipchains for this, and will let you know if it
works.
Best regards,
George Karaolides 8, Costakis Pantelides St.,
tel: +35 79 68 08 86 Strovolos,
email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Nicosia CY 2057,
web: www.karaoli
Well, although this is not really a solution to the problem, you can
easily get round the problem with a simple firewall.
I don't know the exact commands for a 2.2 kernel - I've only really
ever learnt the 2.4 netfilter stuff, but basically, you should be
able to specify both destination addresses
On Tue, 25 Sep 2001, Theo Zourzouvillys wrote:
> > I have an Intel Nightshade server motherboard installed in an Intel
> > server case, running Debian 2.2r3 (potato).
> >
> > Its on-board Intel EtherExpress Pro 100 ethernet card works fine on
> > its own.
> >
> > When I install an Intel EtherEx
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
> I have an Intel Nightshade server motherboard installed in an Intel
> server case, running Debian 2.2r3 (potato).
>
> Its on-board Intel EtherExpress Pro 100 ethernet card works fine on
> its own.
>
> When I install an Intel EtherExpress Pro 100
George Bonser wrote:-
>
> If both cards are PCI there really should not be a problem. Try swapping the
> order of the cards in the PCI bus and see if that helps.
Hmmm, yes they are both PCI - swapping the card order made no difference -
the same card gets recognised first, and the second one ign
On 12-Sep-99 Neil Booth wrote:
> Hi Peter,
>
> Literally all that came in the box was a manual, a cable for
> Wake-On-LAN, and the card itself.
>
> Could you elaborate?
>
> Neil.
If both cards are PCI there really should not be a problem. Try swapping the
order of the cards in the PCI bus and
Peter Iannarelli wrote:-
> Hello Neil:
>
> via the card configuration tool from the manufacturer,
> you should be able to change the IRQ and I/O mapping
> for the card(s) in question.
>
> Peter
Hi Peter,
Literally all that came in the box was a manual, a cable for
Wake-On-LAN, and the card itse
Hello Neil:
via the card configuration tool from the manufacturer,
you should be able to change the IRQ and I/O mapping
for the card(s) in question.
Peter
Neil Booth wrote:
> I have 2 PCI Planex ethernet cards in my machine, the first uses
> "tulip.c" as its driver, and the second uses "de4x5.c
19 matches
Mail list logo
