Hi, Thanks for the reply.
I shall certainly try using ipchains for this, and will let you know if it works. Best regards, George Karaolides 8, Costakis Pantelides St., tel: +35 79 68 08 86 Strovolos, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Nicosia CY 2057, web: www.karaolides.com Republic of Cyprus On Tue, 25 Sep 2001, Matthew Sackman wrote: > So you just block all traffic for on IP on one port, and for the other > IP on the other port. > > Please let me know if this works. > > Under 2.4, I'd do something like: > if eth0 is for 192.168.1.1 and eth1 is for 10.0.1.1 > iptables -A INPUT -i eth0 -d 10.0.1.1 -j DROP > iptables -A OUTPUT -o eth0 -s 10.0.1.1 -j DROP > iptables -A INPUT -i eth1 -d 192.168.1.1 -j DROP > iptables -A OUTPUT -o eth1 -s 192.168.1.1 -j DROP > > Should be able to be translated into ipchains somehow... > > Good luck, hope this helps. > > > Hi all, > > > > I have an Intel Nightshade server motherboard installed in an Intel server > > case, running Debian 2.2r3 (potato). > > > > Its on-board Intel EtherExpress Pro 100 ethernet card works fine on its > > own. > > > > When I install an Intel EtherExpress Pro 100 PCI card and configure two > > ethernet interfaces, the PCI card answers to both IP addresses! > > > > ifconfig returns separate hardware addresses for the two interfaces, yet > > when I disconnect the cable to the on-board card, both interfaces continue > > to function through the PCI card! > > > > -- > > Matthew Sackman > Nottingham, > ENGLAND > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > The contents of this email are intended for the indicated recipient(s) > only. This may or may not be indicated in the above email as it is > enormously easy to fake email addresses (see the relevant RFCs). > > For security reasons this email is likely to be gnupg signed. On the > other hand it may not be if I forgot to do so. In any case, if you > are reading this on a Windows based computer then there was no point > in me doing so (provided that I remembered) as your computer is most > likely being used by yourself and 2.8 other people at the same time > (normally without your consent). > > No responsibility will be accepted by anyone for any of the contents > of this email. So tough. If in doubt, go compile Mozilla. > -------------------------------------------------------------------- >
