Magnus Therning wrote:
On Sat, Aug 14, 2004 at 08:24:28AM -0400, Gregory Seidman wrote:
On Sat, Aug 14, 2004 at 08:14:58PM +0800, John Summerfield wrote:
} "Microsoft has long asked third party analysts for accurate assessments
} of the total cost of ownership of Microsoft Windows deployments,
I had loads of fun reading it, as did a few of my colleagues. I have to
admit I first dissmissed it due to its title, until I realised they
spell ownership with 0 (zero).
/M
I read the /. thread on this as well; I don't know which I found funnier -
the article itself, or the number of people who
On Sat, Aug 14, 2004 at 08:24:28AM -0400, Gregory Seidman wrote:
>On Sat, Aug 14, 2004 at 08:14:58PM +0800, John Summerfield wrote:
>} "Microsoft has long asked third party analysts for accurate assessments
>} of the total cost of ownership of Microsoft Windows deployments,
>} especially against
John Summerfield wrote:
> "Microsoft has long asked third party analysts for accurate assessments
> of the total cost of ownership of Microsoft Windows deployments,
> especially against the Linux deployments commonly going into all
> segments of the market. However, Immunity, Inc. as a third party
On Sat, Aug 14, 2004 at 08:24:28AM -0400, Gregory Seidman wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 14, 2004 at 08:14:58PM +0800, John Summerfield wrote:
> } "Microsoft has long asked third party analysts for accurate assessments
> } of the total cost of ownership of Microsoft Windows deployments,
> } especially agai
On Sat, Aug 14, 2004 at 08:14:58PM +0800, John Summerfield wrote:
} "Microsoft has long asked third party analysts for accurate assessments
} of the total cost of ownership of Microsoft Windows deployments,
} especially against the Linux deployments commonly going into all
} segments of the mark
6 matches
Mail list logo
