On Sat, Aug 14, 2004 at 08:24:28AM -0400, Gregory Seidman wrote: > On Sat, Aug 14, 2004 at 08:14:58PM +0800, John Summerfield wrote: > } "Microsoft has long asked third party analysts for accurate assessments > } of the total cost of ownership of Microsoft Windows deployments, > } especially against the Linux deployments commonly going into all > } segments of the market. However, Immunity, Inc. as a third party > } assessment provider has, until now, not done a thorough analysis, using > } Immunity proprietary data to tell the true story about the costs of Open > } Source... > } > } http://linuxtoday.com/security/2004081302226OPSWNT > } > } Comments? > > Did you read the actual paper? It's mostly a joke, though > well-researched and -supported. That's Total Cost of 0wnership, spelled > with a zero, as in 0\/\/|\|ing the box. > > } Cheers > } John > --Greg Hi folks, someone from my lug did that... hehe. -Kev > -- > To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
(__)
(oo)
/------\/
/ | ||
* /\---/\
~~ ~~
...."Have you mooed today?"...
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
