> From: "Karsten M. Self"
> ...
> Biggest browser beefs:
>
> - Stability. Quit with the fucking crashing already. Don't lose my
> stuff (this includes state). ***STABILITY IS NOT OPTIONAL***
>
> - Speed. Render. Quickly. Load. Quickly. Stop. Quickly. Ties
> strongl
On Mon, May 07, 2001 at 09:34:31AM -0500, John Hasler wrote:
> I've never used IE.
Really? So how would you support your previous statement,
> > I also would like to have a decent browser that doesn't attempt to
> > copy IE.
if you had no experience with it. How exactly would Mozilla be
imita
HS> Or, in my experience, and I stand behind saying this, I'd like a
HS> browser for linux that *works* as good as IE... I am *not* pro-MS
HS> either.
konqueror is very good. mozilla is good too if you have a lot of RAM
:). Actually I thing both of them have better rendering engine then
IE.
--
on Mon, May 07, 2001 at 09:25:56PM -0500, Hall Stevenson ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
wrote:
> * Karsten M. Self (kmself@ix.netcom.com) [010507 19:22]:
> > >
> > > If you're a gnome user, why not try galeon ?? It's site is here:
> > > http://galeon.sourceforge.net/. I've used it in the past and it's
> > >
* Karsten M. Self (kmself@ix.netcom.com) [010507 19:22]:
> >
> > If you're a gnome user, why not try galeon ?? It's site is here:
> > http://galeon.sourceforge.net/. I've used it in the past and it's
> > quite nice...
>
> A GNOME environment is not required for galeon, though some gnome libs
> ar
on Mon, May 07, 2001 at 06:16:19PM -0500, Rich Puhek ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> "Karsten M. Self" wrote:
> >
> > Biggest browser beefs:
> >
> > - Stability. Quit with the fucking crashing already. Don't lose my
> > stuff (this includes state). ***STABILITY IS NOT OPTIONAL***
> >
>
"Karsten M. Self" wrote:
>
> Biggest browser beefs:
>
> - Stability. Quit with the fucking crashing already. Don't lose my
> stuff (this includes state). ***STABILITY IS NOT OPTIONAL***
>
> - Speed. Render. Quickly. Load. Quickly. Stop. Quickly. Ties
> strongly to l
on Mon, May 07, 2001 at 07:54:39AM -0400, Hall Stevenson ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
wrote:
> >> Note, however, if you're shifting to the dailies, that the 0.9x
> >> series is rumored to be less stable than the 0.8x line.
> >
> > N
> >
> > /me sobs
> >
> >
> > why don't they just throw away that
> > Or, in my experience, and I stand behind saying this, I'd like a
> > browser for linux that *works* as good as IE... I am *not*
pro-MS
> > either.
>
> I've been running Opera 5.0b8 here and it works just fine.
> Netscape crashed all the time, even under Windows. Mozilla
> is getting close, but
> On Mon, May 07, 2001 at 09:36:53AM -0500, John Hasler wrote:
> > I tried it. I found it neither more stable nor faster than
Navigator
> > (though with a 28.8 connection browser speed is not a problem
> > anyway).
>
> I can't believe that. Opera loads about 5 times faster than
Navigator
> here, a
On Mon, May 07, 2001 at 09:36:53AM -0500, John Hasler wrote:
> I tried it. I found it neither more stable nor faster than Navigator
> (though with a 28.8 connection browser speed is not a problem anyway).
I can't believe that. Opera loads about 5 times faster than Navigator here,
and is very quic
On Mon, 07 May 2001 08:37:03 Hall Stevenson wrote:
> > Hall writes:
> > > If you're a gnome user, why not try galeon ??
> >
> > Because it depends on _all_ of Mozilla?
>
> I don't know exactly how it works, but the original complaint had
to
> do with the XUL interface and the add-ons (mail, news,
Martin writes:
> the i suggest trying opera. it's quite stable and very fast.
I tried it. I found it neither more stable nor faster than Navigator
(though with a 28.8 connection browser speed is not a problem anyway).
--
John Hasler
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (John Hasler)
Dancing Horse Hill
Elmwood, WI
Hall Stevenson writes:
> I don't know exactly how it works, but the original complaint had to do
> with the XUL interface and the add-ons (mail, news, irc, etc). Galeon
> doesn't have all this.
A complaint I share.
> It uses "gnome" for the interface and is only a web browser.
But I still have
On Mon, May 07, 2001 at 02:20:24PM +0200, Preben Randhol wrote:
> Hall Stevenson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 07/05/2001 (14:02) :
> > If you're a gnome user, why not try galeon ?? It's site is here:
> > http://galeon.sourceforge.net/. I've used it in the past and it's
> > quite nice...
I am using
On Mon, May 07, 2001 at 07:51:16AM -0500, John Hasler wrote:
> I found it less stable than Netscape 4.75, which crashes several times a
> day.
>
> I also would like to have a decent browser that doesn't attempt to copy IE.
the i suggest trying opera. it's quite stable and very fast. well, it's no
> Hall writes:
> > If you're a gnome user, why not try galeon ??
>
> Because it depends on _all_ of Mozilla?
I don't know exactly how it works, but the original complaint had to
do with the XUL interface and the add-ons (mail, news, irc, etc).
Galeon doesn't have all this. It uses "gnome" for the
On Mon, May 07, 2001 at 07:54:39AM -0400, Hall Stevenson wrote:
>
> If you're a gnome user, why not try galeon ?? It's site is here:
> http://galeon.sourceforge.net/. I've used it in the past and it's
> quite nice...
galeon indeed works very well. the problem is a mozilla bug is still
a galeon b
Hall writes:
> If you're a gnome user, why not try galeon ??
Because it depends on _all_ of Mozilla?
> I've used it in the past and it's quite nice...
I found it less stable than Netscape 4.75, which crashes several times a
day.
I also would like to have a decent browser that doesn't attempt to
Hall Stevenson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 07/05/2001 (14:02) :
> If you're a gnome user, why not try galeon ?? It's site is here:
> http://galeon.sourceforge.net/. I've used it in the past and it's
> quite nice...
Do you know where one can get the Debian pacakges? The download link on
that page
>> Note, however, if you're shifting to the dailies, that the 0.9x
>> series is rumored to be less stable than the 0.8x line.
>
> N
>
> /me sobs
>
>
> why don't they just throw away that entire XUL, irc, news, mail,
> whatever-other-useless-cruft and concentrate on the rendering
> engine,
On Sun, May 06, 2001 at 10:15:03PM -0700, Karsten M. Self wrote:
>
> Note, however, if you're shifting to the dailies, that the 0.9x series
> is rumored to be less stable than the 0.8x line.
N
/me sobs
why don't they just throw away that entire XUL, irc, news, mail,
whatever-other-usel
on Sun, May 06, 2001 at 09:00:57PM -0800, Ethan Benson ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
wrote:
> On Sun, May 06, 2001 at 06:03:10PM -0700, Ross Boylan wrote:
> > Is there a way to get mozilla on woody to do strong encryption? The
> > docs refer to the personal security manager, but the file no longer
> > exis
On Sun, May 06, 2001 at 06:03:10PM -0700, Ross Boylan wrote:
> Is there a way to get mozilla on woody to do strong encryption? The
> docs refer to the personal security manager, but the file no longer
> exists. Mozilla's site says the security is now incorporated into the
> nightly build.
>
> Si
24 matches
Mail list logo
