Re: Status of Virtualbox in debian

On Wed, 22 Jun 2022 17:25 +1000, Keith Bainbridge wrote: > On 21/6/22 20:53, Siard wrote: > > I should also note that right now there appear to be problems with the > > latest > > kernel, 5.18.0. The message in the terminal where VB was started from, says: > > "WARNING: The vboxdrv kernel module i

Re: Status of Virtualbox in debian

On Tue, 21 Jun 2022 13:28 -0400, Boyan Penkov wrote: > On Tue, Jun 21, 2022, 13:26 Siard wrote: > > On Tue, 21 Jun 2022 07:48 -0400, Boyan Penkov wrote: > > > ... ensuring linux-kernel-headers for 5.18 were installed, and then > > > reinstalling virtualbox and virtualbox-dkms resolved the issue fo

Re: Status of Virtualbox in debian

Le lundi 20 juin 2022 à 14:21 +0200, Anders Andersson a écrit : > I remember when Virtualbox was removed from debian, and I remember > the > reasons. That's why I was surprised when I saw a recent message to > the > list where a user tried to install it. Searching for "virtualbox" > indeed shows

Re: Status of Virtualbox in debian

On 21/6/22 20:53, Siard wrote: On Tue, 21 Jun 2022 00:05 +0100, Peter Hillier-Brook wrote: On 20/06/2022 14:55, Siard wrote: On Mon, 20 Jun 2022 14:21 +0200, Anders Andersson wrote: Has something changed that makes virtualbox workable again, I have the Virtualbox 6.1.34 package for Debian

Re: Status of Virtualbox in debian

On Tue, Jun 21, 2022 at 7:32 PM Peter Hillier-Brook wrote: > > On 21/06/2022 12:48, Boyan Penkov wrote: > > > > > > On 6/21/22 07:35, Peter Hillier-Brook wrote: > >> On 21/06/2022 11:53, Siard wrote: > >>> On Tue, 21 Jun 2022 00:05 +0100, Peter Hillier-Brook wrote: > On 20/06/2022 14:55, Siar

Re: Status of Virtualbox in debian

On 21/06/2022 12:48, Boyan Penkov wrote: On 6/21/22 07:35, Peter Hillier-Brook wrote: On 21/06/2022 11:53, Siard wrote: On Tue, 21 Jun 2022 00:05 +0100, Peter Hillier-Brook wrote: On 20/06/2022 14:55, Siard wrote: On Mon, 20 Jun 2022 14:21 +0200, Anders Andersson wrote: : www.virtualbox.or

Re: Status of Virtualbox in debian

On Tue, 21 Jun 2022 13:31:11 +0100 Joe wrote: > >Yes, I was using it a few years ago, and a new Debian kernel made the >guest additions unusable. I forget what I needed them for, but gave up >on VB then. I dare say a later version of the VB additions fixed the >problem, but there was no knowing h

Re: Status of Virtualbox in debian

On Tue, Jun 21, 2022, 13:26 Siard wrote: > On Tue, 21 Jun 2022 07:48 -0400, Boyan Penkov wrote: > > ... ensuring linux-kernel-headers for 5.18 were installed, and then > > reinstalling virtualbox and virtualbox-dkms resolved the issue for me. > > I can confirm this is working on 5.18.0-1-amd64 ri

Re: Status of Virtualbox in debian

On Tue, 21 Jun 2022 07:48 -0400, Boyan Penkov wrote: > ... ensuring linux-kernel-headers for 5.18 were installed, and then > reinstalling virtualbox and virtualbox-dkms resolved the issue for me. > I can confirm this is working on 5.18.0-1-amd64 right now. Is this in testing? Do you have a debian

Re: Status of Virtualbox in debian

On Tue, 21 Jun 2022 12:35:08 +0100 Peter Hillier-Brook wrote: > On 21/06/2022 11:53, Siard wrote: > > On Tue, 21 Jun 2022 00:05 +0100, Peter Hillier-Brook wrote: > >> On 20/06/2022 14:55, Siard wrote: > >>> On Mon, 20 Jun 2022 14:21 +0200, Anders Andersson wrote: > Has something change

Re: Status of Virtualbox in debian

On 6/21/22 07:35, Peter Hillier-Brook wrote: On 21/06/2022 11:53, Siard wrote: On Tue, 21 Jun 2022 00:05 +0100, Peter Hillier-Brook wrote: On 20/06/2022 14:55, Siard wrote: On Mon, 20 Jun 2022 14:21 +0200, Anders Andersson wrote: : www.virtualbox.org/manual/ch04.html#additions-linux I sho

Re: Status of Virtualbox in debian

On 21/06/2022 11:53, Siard wrote: On Tue, 21 Jun 2022 00:05 +0100, Peter Hillier-Brook wrote: On 20/06/2022 14:55, Siard wrote: On Mon, 20 Jun 2022 14:21 +0200, Anders Andersson wrote: Has something changed that makes virtualbox workable again, I have the Virtualbox 6.1.34 package for Debian

Re: Status of Virtualbox in debian

On Tue, 21 Jun 2022 00:05 +0100, Peter Hillier-Brook wrote: > On 20/06/2022 14:55, Siard wrote: > > On Mon, 20 Jun 2022 14:21 +0200, Anders Andersson wrote: > > > Has something changed that makes virtualbox workable again, > > > > I have the Virtualbox 6.1.34 package for Debian 11, downloaded from

Re: Status of Virtualbox in debian

On 20/06/2022 14:55, Siard wrote: On Mon, 20 Jun 2022 14:21 +0200, Anders Andersson wrote: Has something changed that makes virtualbox workable again, I have the Virtualbox 6.1.34 package for Debian 11, downloaded from www.virtualbox.org, working fine in Debian 12 (Bookworm). Have you succeed

Re: Status of Virtualbox in debian

On Mon, 20 Jun 2022 14:21 +0200, Anders Andersson wrote: > Has something changed that makes virtualbox workable again, I have the Virtualbox 6.1.34 package for Debian 11, downloaded from www.virtualbox.org, working fine in Debian 12 (Bookworm).

Re: Status of Virtualbox in debian

On Mon, 20 Jun 2022 14:21:53 +0200 Anders Andersson wrote: Hello Anders, >Has something changed that makes virtualbox workable again, or has it >*always* been available in sid? It's always(1) been available in sid. VB has still got the same issue WRT migrating to testing; Work may still be on

Re: Status of Virtualbox in debian

On Mon, Jun 20, 2022 at 02:21:53PM +0200, Anders Andersson wrote: > I remember when Virtualbox was removed from debian, and I remember the > reasons. That's why I was surprised when I saw a recent message to the > list where a user tried to install it. Searching for "virtualbox" > indeed shows me t

Re: Status of Bookworm

On 4/12/21 13:03, Greg Wooledge wrote: On Sat, Dec 04, 2021 at 12:30:52PM +1100, Keith Bainbridge wrote: netinst is cli only ... what? NO! try sudo tasksel and choose desktop options. xfce is listed The netinst image contains the same installer as the full DVD-1 image does. Good aftern

Re: Status of Bookworm

On Fri, Dec 3, 2021, 9:25 PM Kenneth Parker wrote: > > > On Fri, Dec 3, 2021, 9:33 PM Kenneth Parker wrote: > >> >> >> On Fri, Dec 3, 2021, 9:03 PM Greg Wooledge wrote: >> >>> On Sat, Dec 04, 2021 at 12:30:52PM +1100, Keith Bainbridge wrote: >>> > netinst is cli only >>> >>> ... what? NO! >>>

Re: Status of Bookworm

On Fri, Dec 3, 2021, 9:33 PM Kenneth Parker wrote: > > > On Fri, Dec 3, 2021, 9:03 PM Greg Wooledge wrote: > >> On Sat, Dec 04, 2021 at 12:30:52PM +1100, Keith Bainbridge wrote: >> > netinst is cli only >> >> ... what? NO! >> >> > try >> > >> > sudo tasksel >> > >> > and choose desktop options.

Re: Status of Bookworm

On Fri, Dec 3, 2021, 9:03 PM Greg Wooledge wrote: > On Sat, Dec 04, 2021 at 12:30:52PM +1100, Keith Bainbridge wrote: > > netinst is cli only > > ... what? NO! > > > try > > > > sudo tasksel > > > > and choose desktop options. xfce is listed > > The netinst image contains the same installer as

Re: Status of Bookworm

On Fri, Dec 3, 2021, 8:48 PM Keith Bainbridge wrote: > Good morning Kenneth > > netinst is cli only > > try > > sudo tasksel > > and choose desktop options. xfce is listed > Actually, I went in a different direction: Reformatted the qemu vm, downloaded the Bookworm DVD-1, and am installing now

Re: Status of Bookworm

On Sat, Dec 04, 2021 at 12:30:52PM +1100, Keith Bainbridge wrote: > netinst is cli only ... what? NO! > try > > sudo tasksel > > and choose desktop options. xfce is listed The netinst image contains the same installer as the full DVD-1 image does. The task selection menu that you get at the

Re: Status of Bookworm

Good morning Kenneth netinst is cli only try sudo tasksel and choose desktop options. xfce is listed All the best Keith Bainbridge keith.bainbridge.3...@gmail.com 0447 667 468 On 4/12/21 10:44, Kenneth Parker wrote: When reading about changes to Bookworm (i.e. Enforcement of usrmerge), I

Re: Status update {Re: PARTIAL DIAGNOSIS of Installation problems}

On Wed, Mar 10, 2021 at 04:26:06AM -0600, Richard Owlett wrote: > On 03/10/2021 03:45 AM, Andrei POPESCU wrote: > > On Ma, 09 mar 21, 14:35:54, Richard Owlett wrote: > > > On 03/09/2021 07:00 AM, Andrei POPESCU wrote: > > > > On Ma, 09 mar 21, 06:32:33, Richard Owlett wrote: > > > > > On 03/08/2021

Re: Status update {Re: PARTIAL DIAGNOSIS of Installation problems}

On Mi, 10 mar 21, 08:49:06, Richard Owlett wrote: > > Looking at /usr/share/doc/systemd/README.Debian prompts me to ask: > "What logs might be created when attempting to run a netinst.iso?" The Debian Installation Guide should have more information on the Installer's logs and where they are to

Re: Status update {Re: PARTIAL DIAGNOSIS of Installation problems}

On 03/10/2021 07:29 AM, Andrei POPESCU wrote: On Mi, 10 mar 21, 04:26:06, Richard Owlett wrote: On 03/10/2021 03:45 AM, Andrei POPESCU wrote: The boot process has three major stages. 1. POST: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Power-on_self-test 2. Bootloader (grub, etc.) 3. Operating System (in t

Re: Status update {Re: PARTIAL DIAGNOSIS of Installation problems}

On Mi, 10 mar 21, 04:26:06, Richard Owlett wrote: > On 03/10/2021 03:45 AM, Andrei POPESCU wrote: > > > > The boot process has three major stages. > > > > 1. POST: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Power-on_self-test > > 2. Bootloader (grub, etc.) > > 3. Operating System (in this case Debian) > > >

Re: Status update {Re: PARTIAL DIAGNOSIS of Installation problems}

On 03/10/2021 03:45 AM, Andrei POPESCU wrote: On Ma, 09 mar 21, 14:35:54, Richard Owlett wrote: On 03/09/2021 07:00 AM, Andrei POPESCU wrote: On Ma, 09 mar 21, 06:32:33, Richard Owlett wrote: On 03/08/2021 10:18 AM, songbird wrote: Richard Owlett wrote: ... before chasing down this rabbit ho

Re: Status update {Re: PARTIAL DIAGNOSIS of Installation problems}

On Ma, 09 mar 21, 14:35:54, Richard Owlett wrote: > On 03/09/2021 07:00 AM, Andrei POPESCU wrote: > > On Ma, 09 mar 21, 06:32:33, Richard Owlett wrote: > > > On 03/08/2021 10:18 AM, songbird wrote: > > > > Richard Owlett wrote: > > > > ... > > > > > > > > before chasing down this rabbit hole, see

Re: Status update {Re: PARTIAL DIAGNOSIS of Installation problems}

On 03/09/2021 07:00 AM, Andrei POPESCU wrote: On Ma, 09 mar 21, 06:32:33, Richard Owlett wrote: On 03/08/2021 10:18 AM, songbird wrote: Richard Owlett wrote: ... before chasing down this rabbit hole, see if there is an upgrade for your current kernel on the debian backports site (for your proc

Re: Status update {Re: PARTIAL DIAGNOSIS of Installation problems}

On Tue, 9 Mar 2021 15:00:07 +0200 Andrei POPESCU wrote: > On Ma, 09 mar 21, 06:32:33, Richard Owlett wrote: > > On 03/08/2021 10:18 AM, songbird wrote: > > > Richard Owlett wrote: > > > ... > > > > > > before chasing down this rabbit hole, see if there is an > > > upgrade for your current kern

Re: Status update {Re: PARTIAL DIAGNOSIS of Installation problems}

On Tue, 09 Mar 2021 14:57:47 +0200 Anssi Saari wrote: > Richard Owlett writes: > > > The more I think about my observed symptoms, it would seem logical > > to be kernel related. > > > > If the Linkzone is physically connected when PC is turned on, the > > boot process will hang until the Linkzo

Re: Status update {Re: PARTIAL DIAGNOSIS of Installation problems}

On Ma, 09 mar 21, 06:32:33, Richard Owlett wrote: > On 03/08/2021 10:18 AM, songbird wrote: > > Richard Owlett wrote: > > ... > > > > before chasing down this rabbit hole, see if there is an > > upgrade for your current kernel on the debian backports > > site (for your processor and distribution t

Re: Status update {Re: PARTIAL DIAGNOSIS of Installation problems}

Richard Owlett writes: > The more I think about my observed symptoms, it would seem logical to > be kernel related. > > If the Linkzone is physically connected when PC is turned on, the boot > process will hang until the Linkzone is disconnected. I have a guess then. Maybe the Linkzone comes up

Re: Status update {Re: PARTIAL DIAGNOSIS of Installation problems}

On 03/08/2021 10:18 AM, songbird wrote: Richard Owlett wrote: ... before chasing down this rabbit hole, see if there is an upgrade for your current kernel on the debian backports site (for your processor and distribution type). i just had an issue with a new device not being recognized and upda

Re: Status update {Re: PARTIAL DIAGNOSIS of Installation problems}

Richard Owlett wrote: ... > If it's a kernel issue, I'll just wait for Debian 11. I had essentially > tried the 10.8 netinst to get instant gratification of moving from 32 to > 64 bits in one day rather than one week. certainly understandable. :) hope it works well for you! songbird

Re: Status update {Re: PARTIAL DIAGNOSIS of Installation problems}

On 03/08/2021 10:18 AM, songbird wrote: Richard Owlett wrote: ... before chasing down this rabbit hole, see if there is an upgrade for your current kernel on the debian backports site (for your processor and distribution type). i just had an issue with a new device not being recognized and upda

Re: Status update {Re: PARTIAL DIAGNOSIS of Installation problems}

Richard Owlett wrote: ... before chasing down this rabbit hole, see if there is an upgrade for your current kernel on the debian backports site (for your processor and distribution type). i just had an issue with a new device not being recognized and updated my kernel (for stretch) and it worked

Re: Status update {Re: PARTIAL DIAGNOSIS of Installation problems}

On Mon, Mar 08, 2021 at 06:06:17AM -0600, Richard Owlett wrote: > On 03/03/2021 09:22 AM, Richard Owlett wrote: > > I've one fine machine running i386 flavor of Debian 9.13 . > > I've wish to install 64 bit flavor on a second machine. > > debian-10.8.0-amd64-netinst.iso was successfully downloaded

Re: Status of LXC in Stretch?

Hi, On Tue, Feb 19, 2019 at 08:50:01AM +0100, Claudio Kuenzler wrote: It seems that there hasn't been much going on concerning the LXC package(s) in Debian 9 Stretch. The version is stuck at 2.0.7 without any patches backported since Jan 2018. Yet there are known (important) bugs which break LXC

Re: Status of java-package

On Wed, Aug 22, 2018 at 07:34:59PM +0200, Erwan David wrote: I am surprised of the disapperance of javaws, since many mangement console use them... And I do not count on hardware (or SOC) vendors to upgrade them to whatever the new scheme will be. It's better in the long term to keep around a d

Re: Status of java-package

Le 08/22/18 à 18:32, Sven Hoexter a écrit : > On Wed, Aug 22, 2018 at 04:10:29PM +0200, Erwan David wrote: > > Hi, > >> Thanks. Alas I have some mangement console for (surprise ?) oracle SAN >> storage which only work with oracle Java. I'll keep an working one for >> this... > I hope it's not somet

Re: Status of java-package

Hi, I downloaded all 3 DVD images for Debian 9.5 I installed the first one, but I would like to know how can I check the other two DVDs to see if there is software I might want to use/install. Thanks, ⁣Sent from BlueMail ​ On Aug 22, 2018, 10:34 AM, at 10:34 AM, Sven Hoexter wrote: >On Wed,

Re: Status of java-package

On Wed, Aug 22, 2018 at 04:10:29PM +0200, Erwan David wrote: Hi, > Thanks. Alas I have some mangement console for (surprise ?) oracle SAN > storage which only work with oracle Java. I'll keep an working one for > this... I hope it's not something based on Webstart? Because Webstart will no longe

Re: Status of java-package

On Wed, Aug 22, 2018 at 11:55:49AM CEST, Sven Hoexter said: > On Tue, Aug 21, 2018 at 05:49:19PM +0200, Erwan David wrote: > > Hi, > > > > This package makes a .deb from oracle .tar.gz It does not package java > > 9 nor java 10. Is there a problem with those versions ? Is the > > packaged a

Re: Status of java-package

On Tue, Aug 21, 2018 at 12:30:49PM -0400, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote: Hi, > Incidentally, it has been a long time since I encountered any Java that > would run on the Oracle JVM but not on OpenJDK. Are you sure you need > to even bother with the Oracle JVM? The main point so far was to aid debugg

Re: Status of java-package

On Tue, Aug 21, 2018 at 05:49:19PM +0200, Erwan David wrote: > Hi, > > This package makes a .deb from oracle .tar.gz It does not package java > 9 nor java 10. Is there a problem with those versions ? Is the > packaged abandonned, and in this case is there anotehr method to uses > oracle JR

Re: Status of java-package

On Tue, Aug 21, 2018 at 05:49:19PM +0200, Erwan David wrote: > Hi, > > This package makes a .deb from oracle .tar.gz It does not package java > 9 nor java 10. Is there a problem with those versions ? Is the > packaged abandonned, and in this case is there anotehr method to uses > oracle JR

Re: Status of Intel-related vulnerabilities and bugs?

On Tue, 10 Apr 2018, Niclas Arndt wrote: > 1. Can the latest microcode updates still in stretch-backports be > trusted to run properly by now? > https://newsroom.intel.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/11/2018/04/microcode-update-guidance.pdf Yes, these microcode updates are stable. The same might or

Re: Status of repository debian/testing?

On Thu, Oct 29, 2015 at 02:57:48PM +0100, Francois Gouget wrote: > On Sun, 27 Sep 2015, David Wright wrote: > [...] > > So waiting could still be a sensible option at this time. Some of us > > have yet to finish sorting out jessie (in my case, as a production > > system, not as an upgrade target).

Re: Status of repository debian/testing?

On Sun, 27 Sep 2015, David Wright wrote: [...] > So waiting could still be a sensible option at this time. Some of us > have yet to finish sorting out jessie (in my case, as a production > system, not as an upgrade target). As far as I can tell waiting is unlikely to solve the upgrade issues. Tha

Re: Status of repository debian/testing?

On Wed, 30 Sep 2015 17:58:05 +0200 Hans wrote: Hello Hans, >for filezilla and digikam. Neither currently exist in testing. Like you, I hope for a swift return. Filezilla I can live without, but I don't relish the thought of having to do without digikam for too long. -- Regards _

Re: Status of repository debian/testing?

Hello folks, hi Joe! Thank you all for your response, especially Joe for his big answer. I now have new experiences, and I want to tell you, how I solved all this. First, I checked apt-get dist-upgrade. This wanted to install tons of software and also wanted to update tons of software. However,

Re: Status of repository debian/testing?

Going as what the official documentation shows,

Re: Status of repository debian/testing?

Quoting Joe (j...@jretrading.com): > I don't think your situation will get any better, the number of > upgrades needed will just increase. I don't think aptitude will ever > manage an upgrade of this size, and I don't think apt-get is clever > enough to do it cleanly. > > There was some discussio

Re: Status of repository debian/testing?

On Sun, 27 Sep 2015 13:28:51 +0200 Hans wrote: >Hi folks, > >since some months the debian repository of testing and unstable looks in a >strange state. AFAIK this is caused by the change to GCC5. > >Please understand, that I do not want to mourne. Instead I would like to know, >if I have to do

Re: Status of repository debian/testing?

On Sun, 27 Sep 2015 13:28:51 +0200 Hans wrote: > Hi folks, > > since some months the debian repository of testing and unstable looks > in a strange state. AFAIK this is caused by the change to GCC5. > > Please understand, that I do not want to mourne. Instead I would like > to know, if I have t

Re: Status of Intel GMA 500?

>>> I am currently trying to get a device with an Intel GMA 500 graphics >>> chip to run with Debian Wheezy. However, I don't seem to be able to >>> get anything other than a standard VGA console out of the hardware. >> With a stock Debian kernel and an empty xorg.conf file, it should just >> work

Re: Status of Intel GMA 500?

On 01/22/2014 03:49 AM, Stefan Monnier wrote: I am currently trying to get a device with an Intel GMA 500 graphics chip to run with Debian Wheezy. However, I don't seem to be able to get anything other than a standard VGA console out of the hardware. With a stock Debian kernel and an empty xorg

Re: Status of Intel GMA 500?

> I am currently trying to get a device with an Intel GMA 500 graphics chip to > run with Debian Wheezy. However, I don't seem to be able to get anything > other than a standard VGA console out of the hardware. With a stock Debian kernel and an empty xorg.conf file, it should just work (it does fo

Re: Status of Intel GMA 500?

On Mon, Jan 20, 2014 at 01:06:21PM +0100, Stefan Ott wrote: > Hi > Have you seen this: https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/poulsbo > Section "Screen" > Identifier "MainScreen" > DefaultDepth24 > SubSection "Display" > Depth 24 >

Re: status bar colour

On Mon, 20 Feb 2012 17:26:07 +, richard wrote: > The top horizontal bar in the gnome-shell, white on black ish, no > complaints except the calendar, is there anyway of changing to something > readable, grey on black is hard to read for me ? You can now use themes :-) Anyway, this has to be c

Re: status of LILO in upcoming Stable release

On Mon, 07 Feb 2011 09:56:30 -0500 (EST), Andrei Popescu wrote: > On Thu, 03 Feb 2011, 21:43:02, Stephen Powell wrote: >> >> I don't know for sure, but I've never seen a release upgrade >> replace a boot loader. And I have no reason to suspect it will >> this time. Install a newer version, yes.

Re: status of LILO in upcoming Stable release

On Jo, 03 feb 11, 21:43:02, Stephen Powell wrote: > > I don't know for sure, but I've never seen a release upgrade > replace a boot loader. And I have no reason to suspect it will > this time. Install a newer version, yes. But, say, change > lilo to grub2? I doubt it. This release will replac

Re: status of LILO in upcoming Stable release

On Thu 03 Feb 2011 at 21:43:02 -0500, Stephen Powell wrote: > I haven't done a new install of Squeeze in over six months; > but as far as I know, the Debian installer has not removed > lilo as a boot loader option. Somebody please correct me > if that is no longer the case. No need for a correct

Re: status of LILO in upcoming Stable release

On Thu, 03 Feb 2011 18:49:06 -0500 (EST), Stan Hoeppner wrote: > > What's the status of LILO with upgrades and new installs > WRT the upcoming Stable release? I am not the Debian package maintainer; so this is not an official answer. But I will tell you what I do know. The Debian lilo package

Re: Status of RAID (md)

also sprach Daniel Bareiro [2010.08.02.1510 +0200]: > When I tried to add sdb3 was because the disk for some reason did not > appear with "cat /proc/mdstat" (not even like it was failed), although > when using "mdadm --detail /dev/md2" appear as both sdd3 and sdb3 as > removed. To what it can be d

Re: Status of RAID (md)

Hi, Martin. On Monday, 02 August 2010 08:30:03 +0200, martin f krafft wrote: > also sprach Daniel Bareiro [2010.08.02.0420 +0200]: > > md2 : active raid5 sda3[0] sdd3[4](F) sdc3[2] > > 2136170880 blocks level 5, 64k chunk, algorithm 2 [4/2] [U_U_] > […] > > That is to say, the RAID has fou

Re: Status of RAID (md)

also sprach Daniel Bareiro [2010.08.02.0420 +0200]: > md2 : active raid5 sda3[0] sdd3[4](F) sdc3[2] > 2136170880 blocks level 5, 64k chunk, algorithm 2 [4/2] [U_U_] […] > That is to say, the RAID has four disks and failed both the spare > disk and other disk from array. What is unclear to me

Re: status of Snd soundfile-editor in squeeze???

* Alessio Treglia (ales...@debian.org) wrote: |> > can't play: open read /dev/dsp: No such file or directory |> > [audio.c[1825] linux_audio_open_with_error] |> |> This needs investigation too. Which snd packages have you installed now? I believe I understand now what th

Re: status of Snd soundfile-editor in squeeze???

* Fabian Greffrath (fab...@greffrath.com) wrote: |> Maybe you've got a wild mixture of old and new snd packages installed on |> your system. Please post the result of "dpkg -l snd\*". Sorry to be slow (work got in the way) and thank you very much for your help. Here is the output of dpkg

Re: status of Snd soundfile-editor in squeeze???

Hi Jim, On Mon, Jun 21, 2010 at 3:10 AM, Jim McCloskey wrote: > After installation of the basic infrastructure (the snd package itself) you > need > to install one of the user interface packages---snd-gtk-jack, snd-gtk-pulse, > or > snd-gtk. The first builds in Jack support, the second builds i

Re: Status of snapshot.debian.net|org ?

On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 10:27 AM, Andrei Popescu wrote: > On Tue,15.Sep.09, 08:46:17, Javier Barroso wrote: >> On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 3:26 AM, Memnon Anon > >> > With the whole 'Debian Money' Thread on Project, >> > I hope this will change ;). >> > Nobody mentioned snapshot explicitely, yet, if I

Re: Status of snapshot.debian.net|org ?

Andrei Popescu writes: >> On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 3:26 AM, Memnon Anon >> > With the whole 'Debian Money' Thread on Project, >> > I hope this will change ;). [...] > Memnon probably meant > http://lists.debian.org/debian-project/2009/09/msg00038.html > and the following thread. Right: ,---[ -htt

Re: Status of snapshot.debian.net|org ?

On Tue,15.Sep.09, 08:46:17, Javier Barroso wrote: > On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 3:26 AM, Memnon Anon > > With the whole 'Debian Money' Thread on Project, > > I hope this will change ;). > > Nobody mentioned snapshot explicitely, yet, if I am not totally > > mistaken, but equipment for DSA is on the li

Re: Status of snapshot.debian.net|org ?

On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 3:26 AM, Memnon Anon wrote: > Javier Barroso writes: >> I think all is like in May [1], debian is searching a sponsor ... > > Thats the kind of answer I expected. > With the whole 'Debian Money' Thread on Project, > I hope this will change ;). > Nobody mentioned snapshot e

Re: Status of snapshot.debian.net|org ?

Javier Barroso writes: > I think all is like in May [1], debian is searching a sponsor ... Thats the kind of answer I expected. With the whole 'Debian Money' Thread on Project, I hope this will change ;). Nobody mentioned snapshot explicitely, yet, if I am not totally mistaken, but equipment fo

Re: Status of snapshot.debian.net|org ?

On Mon, Sep 14, 2009 at 6:46 PM, Memnon Anon wrote: > Hi! > > Has anyone some information on the progress of making snapshot an > "official" debian service? > > I always found it an incredibly usefull service. > The last official announcements[1] I found > are pretty old. Last information was "(ET

Re: status of backports?

My apologies for the bad cut-and-paste work in my previous post. I didn't have X installed and removed the wrong parts from aptitude's output. Anyway, I can still update and install (tmw is just some random game) from backports. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.o

Re: status of backports?

Ian Zimmerman wrote: Jens> Did I miss something? Why would it be "in trouble"? i...@matica:~$ httping -t 5 -h 194.8.57.6 PING 194.8.57.6:80 (http://194.8.57.6:80/): timeout receiving reply from host timeout receiving reply from host timeout receiving reply from host timeout receiving reply from

Re: status of backports?

Jens> Did I miss something? Why would it be "in trouble"? i...@matica:~$ httping -t 5 -h 194.8.57.6 PING 194.8.57.6:80 (http://194.8.57.6:80/): timeout receiving reply from host timeout receiving reply from host timeout receiving reply from host timeout receiving reply from host timeout receivin

Re: status of backports?

Ian Zimmerman wrote: Is it just me, or is backports.org in trouble? Did I miss something? Why would it be "in trouble"? Their website seems to be down (atm) but it's all still working for me. Jens. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsub

Re: Status [#80031]

Dear CNBC Viewer, Thank you for your submission to CNBC Customer Care. We are committed to reviewing your submission and we will email you as quickly as possible with a response. Our viewers typically receive responses within 24 hours. Sincerely, CNBC Customer Care Team - debian-user@l

Re: Status of package ntaim.

On Friday 17 December 2004 11:10, Florian Ernst wrote: > It wasn't only orphaned, it was also completely removed from the > development distributions as it was considered obsolete and a better > replacement was available (see ). > You might want to try the pork packa

Re: Status of package ntaim.

Hello Adam, hello list! On Fri, Dec 17, 2004 at 10:00:36AM +, Adam Funk wrote: > I'd like to use ntaim but it was orphaned (in May 2003) with a serious It wasn't only orphaned, it was also completely removed from the development distributions as it was considered obsolete and a better replace

Re: Status of KDE in unstable?

On Wed, 2004-08-25 at 10:39 -0400, Ralph Crongeyer wrote: > I'm having the same problem since last week. > Upgrading isn't the problem, I also upgraded to it. The problem is it won't > install after a fresh install. I have three machines that upgraded to KDE 3.3 > Just fine. But I have a machine I

Re: Status of KDE in unstable?

I'm having the same problem since last week. Upgrading isn't the problem, I also upgraded to it. The problem is it won't install after a fresh install. I have three machines that upgraded to KDE 3.3 Just fine. But I have a machine I use to test the installer on, and KDE won't install, since las

RE: Status of KDE in unstable?

http://wiki.debian.net/?DebianKDE I upgraded today to 3.3. Keith. > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of stan > Sent: Tuesday, August 24, 2004 6:44 PM > To: Debian User List > Subject: Status of KDE in unstable? > > > I built a test s

Re: Status of new version?

On Sat, Jun 19, 2004 at 22:50:45 -0400, stan wrote: > but I was wondering how far away the next stable release might be? As usual, a release will be made when it is ready. Currently, there are three major factors in readiness: 1. Procedural/legal. In April, the Debian Social Contract was modified

Re: Status

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Chatmania - Le Chat a Cartoni Animati La ringraziamo per averci scritto. Purtroppo a causa di nuovi e continui VIRUS che arrivano ai nostri indirizzi email abbiamo deciso di dare assistenza soltanto telefonicamente al numero 328/1693604 dalle ore 9 alle ore 13 e d

Re: STATUS

This is an autoresponder. I'll never see your message. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Status of Galeon in testing?

Nitebirdz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said on Sat, 24 Jan 2004 15:19:55 -0600: > On Fri, Jan 23, 2004 at 08:34:30PM +1100, Tim Connors wrote: > > > > Is there a browser that is acceptable for slow computers? My AMD K6II > > 500MHz box takes forever to render a page, or even to switch tabs. > I know this d

Re: Status of Galeon in testing?

On Fri, Jan 23, 2004 at 08:34:30PM +1100, Tim Connors wrote: > > Is there a browser that is acceptable for slow computers? My AMD K6II > 500MHz box takes forever to render a page, or even to switch tabs. > Tim, I know this doesn't address your question directly, but I'd check into possible pe

Re: Status of Galeon in testing?

On Fri, 23 Jan 2004 20:34:30 +1100, Tim Connors <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Clive Menzies <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said on Thu, 22 Jan 2004 > 15:23:25 +: > > On (22/01/04 09:22), stan wrote: > > > > > > For several weeks now, I've had to freeze all my "testing" > >

Re: Status of Galeon in testing?

Tim Connors wrote: Clive Menzies <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said on Thu, 22 Jan 2004 15:23:25 +: On (22/01/04 09:22), stan wrote: For several weeks now, I've had to freeze all my "testing" systems, as an apt-get dist-upgrade wants to remove galeon, which is a critical requirement for these sy

Re: Status of Galeon in testing?

On Fri, 23 Jan 2004 20:34:30 +1100 Tim Connors <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Clive Menzies <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said on Thu, 22 Jan 2004 > 15:23:25 +: > > On (22/01/04 09:22), stan wrote: > > > > > > For several weeks now, I've had to freeze all my "testing" > > > systems, as an apt-get dist-up

Re: Status of Galeon in testing?

Clive Menzies <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said on Thu, 22 Jan 2004 15:23:25 +: > On (22/01/04 09:22), stan wrote: > > > > For several weeks now, I've had to freeze all my "testing" systems, as an > > apt-get dist-upgrade wants to remove galeon, which is a critical > > requirement for these systems. >

Re: Status of Galeon in testing?

On Thu, Jan 22, 2004 at 11:43:57AM -0500, stan wrote: > On Thu, Jan 22, 2004 at 02:49:14PM +, Colin Watson wrote: > > $ grep-excuses galeon > > galeon (- to 1.3.11a-2) > > Maintainer: Mark Howard > > 2 days old (needed 2 days) > > out of date on arm: galeon (from 1.3.3.200

Re: Status of Galeon in testing?

On Thu, Jan 22, 2004 at 02:49:14PM +, Colin Watson wrote: > On Thu, Jan 22, 2004 at 09:22:10AM -0500, stan wrote: > > For several weeks now, I've had to freeze all my "testing" systems, as an > > apt-get dist-upgrade wants to remove galeon, which is a critical > > requirement for these systems.

  1   2   >