Re: sgml-tools, LinuxDoc, and customization

2000-01-27 Thread Joseph A. Martin
Hello, Thanks for all of the replies. Last I check out the LDP ( about a week ago ) they said that all HOWTO's still needed to be in LinuxDoc format instead of DocBook. I have not found any information about customizing LinuxDoc though I have found plenty about DocBook. My intention now is

Re: sgml-tools, LinuxDoc, and customization

2000-01-24 Thread Colin Marquardt
* J Horacio MG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> README.Debian file for sgml-tools says that version 1 is orphaned >> upstream. I take that to mean that I might not get help from the >> upstream authors. > Not sure, but I think that even the sgmltools2 is orphaned by now. Indeed. Because of lack of

Re: sgml-tools, LinuxDoc, and customization

2000-01-22 Thread J Horacio MG
> Hello, > I am not sure exactly where to ask this question, but the > README.Debian file for sgml-tools says that version 1 is orphaned > upstream. I take that to mean that I might not get help from the > upstream authors. Not sure, but I think that even the sgmltools2 is orphaned by now.

Re: SGML-Tools

1998-03-04 Thread David S. Jackson
On Mon, 2 Mar 1998 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > However, I don't have latex (nor latex2e). I have tetex instead. I thought > tetex is a latex substition, at least when looking at basics functionality. > Indeed the sgml-tools package did not comment on this, even though latex is > one of its suges

TeTeX (was Re: SGML-Tools)

1998-03-03 Thread Gary L. Hennigan
In an article [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: |However, I don't have latex (nor latex2e). I have tetex instead. I |thought tetex is a latex substition, at least when looking at basics |functionality. Indeed the sgml-tools package did not comment on this, |even though latex is one of its sugestions. And in

Re: SGML-Tools

1998-03-03 Thread shaul
> $ sgml2latex -a example.sgml > SGML-Tools driver version 0.99.7 The filenames have not changed accidentally, I am running the command from the same directory where the sgml file is, I have tried it with the the sgml-tools pkg (which was not an upgrade, but a fresh installation) and it is the

Re: SGML-Tools

1998-03-01 Thread David S. Jackson
On Sat, 28 Feb 1998 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Am I using it in a wrong manner or is there a bug: > > $ sgml2latex -a example.sgml > SGML-Tools driver version 0.99.7 Hmmm. It works for me using this syntax. Here are some considerations: No filenames have changed accidentally? (No ~'s or spa