On 25/08/2024 17:01, Max Nikulin wrote:
On 25/08/2024 12:39, Joe B wrote:
On 25/08/2024 04:36, Joe B wrote:
IF i see a thread i want to jump into to help out how can i be part of
the conversation?
[...]
I gave up and now using K-9 mail and it seems to be working fine.
I use Thunderbird an
On 25/08/2024 12:39, Joe B wrote:
On 25/08/2024 04:36, Joe B wrote:
IF i see a thread i want to jump into to help out how can i be part of
the conversation?
[...]
I gave up and now using K-9 mail and it seems to be working fine.
I use Thunderbird and IMAP for gmail. Perhaps I stressed too m
On Sat, Aug 24, 2024 at 10:39:24PM -0700, Joe B wrote:
> On August 24, 2024 7:10:08 PM PDT, Max Nikulin wrote:
> >On 25/08/2024 04:36, Joe B wrote:
[...]
> >> I noticed on the list there is a message id. is it possible to copy
> >> the message id to the email so the chain just keeps going ?
> >
On August 24, 2024 7:10:08 PM PDT, Max Nikulin wrote:
>On 25/08/2024 04:36, Joe B wrote:
>>
>> IF i see a thread i want to jump into to help out how can i be part of
>> the conversation?
>
>If you are using gmail web UI and replying to a message from a mailbox then it
>should work, just use a pr
On 25/08/2024 04:36, Joe B wrote:
IF i see a thread i want to jump into to help out how can i be part of
the conversation?
If you are using gmail web UI and replying to a message from a mailbox
then it should work, just use a proper button so send response to the
mailing list, not a personal
Hi there Joe,
see my slight answer in context.
On Sat, 24 Aug 2024, Joe B wrote:
Hello,
HiJoe and welcome, this is a fine question.
IF i see a thread i want to jump into to help out how can i be part of
the conversation? as of right now i'm just putting the debian-user
list email and the
On Sat, Aug 24, 2024 at 4:31 PM DdB
wrote:
>
> Am 24.08.2024 um 23:36 schrieb Joe B:
> > Hello,
> >
> > IF i see a thread i want to jump into to help out how can i be part of
> > the conversation? as of right now i'm just putting the debian-user
> > list email and the RE with the subject and reply
On 8/24/24 17:36, Joe B wrote:
Hello,
IF i see a thread i want to jump into to help out how can i be part of
the conversation? as of right now i'm just putting the debian-user
list email and the RE with the subject and replying that way.
I noticed on the list there is a message id. is it possib
On Sunday, 25-08-2024 at 07:36 Joe B wrote:
> Hello,
>
> IF i see a thread i want to jump into to help out how can i be part of
> the conversation?
Joe,
Is this what you are looking for?
https://lists.debian.org/debian-user/
Debian Mailing Lists
debian-user
Community assistance and support
On Sat, Aug 24, 2024 at 14:36:09 -0700, Joe B wrote:
> IF i see a thread i want to jump into to help out how can i be part of
> the conversation? as of right now i'm just putting the debian-user
> list email and the RE with the subject and replying that way.
>
> I noticed on the list there is a me
Am 24.08.2024 um 23:36 schrieb Joe B:
> Hello,
>
> IF i see a thread i want to jump into to help out how can i be part of
> the conversation? as of right now i'm just putting the debian-user
> list email and the RE with the subject and replying that way.
>
> I noticed on the list there is a messa
On Fri, 11 Dec 2020 20:11:12 +
Guyenne Tsui wrote:
> Thank you Charles,
You're welcome.
>
> Anyway do you have idea you can help me in resolving the graphics
> issue?
It's outside my expertise, or I would have replied with something. The
only thing I can think of is to try the backports k
Thank you Charles,
Anyway do you have idea you can help me in resolving the graphics issue?
Should I post this again as a separate thread to gather more expertise?
Bests Regards,
Guyenne
On Wed, 9 Dec 2020 08:04:19 +
Brad Rogers wrote:
> On Tue, 8 Dec 2020 20:37:37 -0500
> Celejar wrote:
>
> Hello Celejar,
>
> >Under Preferences, I have a Compose tab, but no Writing one, and the
>
> Writing is under Compose; This is in Claws - Sylpheed may well differ.
Yes; as I said, I
On Tue, 8 Dec 2020 20:37:37 -0500
Celejar wrote:
Hello Celejar,
>Under Preferences, I have a Compose tab, but no Writing one, and the
Writing is under Compose; This is in Claws - Sylpheed may well differ.
--
Regards _
/ ) "The blindingly obvious is
/ _)rad
On Tue, 8 Dec 2020 17:51:13 -0700
Charles Curley wrote:
> On Tue, 8 Dec 2020 19:41:42 -0500
> Celejar wrote:
>
> > Ah, yes. Those are Sylpheed options ;) But there's no general way to
> > instruct these MUAs to automatically default to 'reply-to-list' for
> > any reply to a list mail (i.e., any
On Tue, 8 Dec 2020 19:41:42 -0500
Celejar wrote:
> Ah, yes. Those are Sylpheed options ;) But there's no general way to
> instruct these MUAs to automatically default to 'reply-to-list' for
> any reply to a list mail (i.e., any mail with a 'List-ID: ' header),
> correct?
Try Configuration -> Pre
On Tue, 8 Dec 2020 17:29:22 -0700
Charles Curley wrote:
> On Tue, 8 Dec 2020 15:10:13 -0500
> Celejar wrote:
>
> > On my Sylpheed, ordinary 'Reply' won't do reply-to-list, and I have to
> > specifically ask for that (-L by default). I couldn't find a
> > configuration option to change that, but
On Tue, 8 Dec 2020 15:10:13 -0500
Celejar wrote:
> On my Sylpheed, ordinary 'Reply' won't do reply-to-list, and I have to
> specifically ask for that (-L by default). I couldn't find a
> configuration option to change that, but I might have missed
> something.
In Claws-Mail, you can do it on a p
On Sat, 5 Dec 2020 23:08:14 +0200
Andrei POPESCU wrote:
...
> In general 'Reply' defaults to Sender, with a few exceptions:
>
> 1. A smart mailer that detects the message is from a mailing list, most
> likely configurable (e.g. Claws Mail already mentioned, probably
> Sylpheed as well)
On
On Sun, Dec 6, 2020 at 3:14 AM Teemu Likonen wrote:
> I guess we all know by now that mail user agent software don't agree
> with all the different semantics of replying. Widely supported features
> are "reply to sender" (Reply-To, From) and "reply to all". Debian
> mailing list policy (send only
* 2020-12-06 16:39:29Z, Brad Rogers wrote:
> I'm struggling to think of any use other than 'use the address in the
> Reply-To header to ensure you send your message to the correct place'.
That's easy. Reply-To may not have the address which some other person
thinks is the correct place for his or
On Sun, 06 Dec 2020 09:49:41 -0500
Stefan Monnier wrote:
Hello Stefan,
>The problem is that you intend your "Reply-To:" to mean one thing, but
>other people use "Reply-To:" to mean something else (many use it
I'm struggling to think of any use other than 'use the address in the
Reply-To header
> My mistake; I didn't mean broken in the non-RFC compliant sense, but
> broken in the sense of "Not what I want to take place". I set a
The problem is that you intend your "Reply-To:" to mean one thing, but
other people use "Reply-To:" to mean something else (many use it
without knowing what th
On Sun, 06 Dec 2020 15:42:49 +0200
Teemu Likonen wrote:
Hello Teemu,
>It's not broken; it's perfectly valid and allowed.
My mistake; I didn't mean broken in the non-RFC compliant sense, but
broken in the sense of "Not what I want to take place". I set a
Reply-To because that's where I want th
* 2020-12-06 11:23:06Z, Brad Rogers wrote:
> I set a Reply-To for mailing list mails because I *DO NOT WANT* a
> private reply. Your treatment of that is completely broken. Credit the
> sender with some intelligence, and do as they request.
It's not broken; it's perfectly valid and allowed. Reply
On Sun, 6 Dec 2020 07:01:46 -0500
rhkra...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello rhkra...@gmail.com,
>Hmm, I might send a public message and want a private reply
Certainly there are people that do that, but I don't;
It's inviting an accident to happen.
If I'm following up on a list mail privately (it's rare,
On Sunday, December 06, 2020 06:23:06 AM Brad Rogers wrote:
> If I wanted a private reply, I wouldn't have sent the message to the
> list in the first place.
Hmm, I might send a public message and want a private reply (or at least, not
be surprised if I got a private reply).
For instance, if I w
On Sun, 06 Dec 2020 11:14:25 +0200
Teemu Likonen wrote:
Hello Teemu,
>There is sense in this. Reply means "reply to sender". If Reply-To has
>the same address as in To/Cc then the Reply-To address probably is not
>sender's address. So don't honour Reply-To and use From instead. It is
>also a saf
* 2020-12-05 21:33:58Z, Brad Rogers wrote:
> On Sat, 5 Dec 2020 23:08:14 +0200
> Andrei POPESCU wrote:
>> 2. A Reply-To is set, either by the list[1] or by the Sender
>
> Even with one set, many ppl /still/ manage to not honour it.
My email application (Notmuch) normally honours Reply-To but the
On Sat, 5 Dec 2020 23:08:14 +0200
Andrei POPESCU wrote:
Hello Andrei,
> 2. A Reply-To is set, either by the list[1] or by the Sender
Even with one set, many ppl /still/ manage to not honour it.
I've lost count of the number of time replies have come to me only,
despite setting a list address f
On Saturday, December 05, 2020 04:08:14 PM Andrei POPESCU wrote:
> In general 'Reply' defaults to Sender, with a few exceptions:
>
> 1. A smart mailer that detects the message is from a mailing list, most
> likely configurable (e.g. Claws Mail already mentioned, probably
> Sylpheed as well)
an
On Sb, 05 dec 20, 12:20:02, Kenneth Parker wrote:
>
> I am also on Gmail. When I click (or tap) on Reply, it invariably wants me
> to send the Reply to the individual who sent the email, as opposed to the
> Debian Users List. So one additional task for me is to edit the "To"
> field, so that it
On Sat, 5 Dec 2020 12:20:02 -0500
Kenneth Parker wrote:
> I am also on Gmail. When I click (or tap) on Reply, it invariably
> wants me to send the Reply to the individual who sent the email, as
> opposed to the Debian Users List. So one additional task for me is
> to edit the "To" field, so tha
On Sat, 2020-12-05 at 12:20 -0500, Kenneth Parker wrote:
> I am also on Gmail. When I click (or tap) on Reply, it invariably wants me
> to send the Reply to the individual who sent the email, as opposed to the
> Debian Users List. So one additional task for me is to edit the "To"
> field, so that
On Sat, Dec 5, 2020, 12:05 PM Charles Curley <
charlescur...@charlescurley.com> wrote:
> On Sat, 5 Dec 2020 14:11:02 +
> Guyenne Tsui wrote:
>
> > Also, I have no idea how to reply to a thread on a mailing list so it
> > would be practical if you teach me how. I use Gmail. I even installed
>
On Tue, 2012-07-24 at 23:32 -0400, Nick Lidakis wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 24, 2012 at 11:22:50PM -0400, Celejar wrote:
> > On Tue, 24 Jul 2012 23:03:52 -0400
> > Nick Lidakis wrote:
> >
> > > How does one reply to a thread on this list if I accidentally erased the
> > > threads or the thread was never
On Tue, Jul 24, 2012 at 11:32:53PM -0400, Nick Lidakis wrote:
> Thanks. It will bring up Icedove. How do I get that header info to Mutt?
Set mutt up to handle mailto: urls with something like
http://mailtomutt.sourceforge.net/
or http://madduck.net/blog/2007.01.14:firefox-handing-mailto-links-to-
Nick Lidakis wrote:
> Celejar wrote:
> > Nick Lidakis wrote:
> > > How does one reply to a thread on this list if I accidentally erased the
> > > threads or the thread was never in your inbox to begin with? I want to
> > > reply
> > > to this: http://lists.debian.org/debian-user/2012/07/msg01613.h
On Tue, Jul 24, 2012 at 11:22:50PM -0400, Celejar wrote:
> On Tue, 24 Jul 2012 23:03:52 -0400
> Nick Lidakis wrote:
>
> > How does one reply to a thread on this list if I accidentally erased the
> > threads or the thread was never in your inbox to begin with? I want to reply
> > to this: http://l
On Tue, 24 Jul 2012 23:03:52 -0400
Nick Lidakis wrote:
> How does one reply to a thread on this list if I accidentally erased the
> threads or the thread was never in your inbox to begin with? I want to reply
> to this: http://lists.debian.org/debian-user/2012/07/msg01613.html
Just click on the
Thank You for Your time and answer, Camaleón:
> Glad to help. I also learn a lot from this list :-)
Me too. Hope I will be helpful to other Debian users too, one day. :)
> > It does not work for me, nor I want it, actually. But it should be
> > so - it is true.
>
> Does not work? :-?
Yea, th
Ken Heard wrote:
> Sthu Deus wrote:
> > Good day.
> >
> > I want to continue an old talk that once was on the list. How I can do
> > it? - How I can direct my reply to that very thread?
>
> I seem to remember that sometime in the past people objected to an "old"
> thread being "reopened" by a new
On Mon, 06 Dec 2010 09:21:10 -0500, Ken Heard wrote:
> Sthu Deus wrote:
>> Good day.
>>
>> I want to continue an old talk that once was on the list. How I can do
>> it? - How I can direct my reply to that very thread?
>
> I seem to remember that sometime in the past people objected to an "old"
>
On Mon, 06 Dec 2010 20:12:38 +0700, Sthu Deus wrote:
> Thank You for Your time and answer, Camaleón - You are doing great job
> answering here! Thanks to You for Your work, again:
Glad to help. I also learn a lot from this list :-)
>> When you hit "reply to → list" your e-mail client gets opened
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Sthu Deus wrote:
> Good day.
>
> I want to continue an old talk that once was on the list. How I can do
> it? - How I can direct my reply to that very thread?
I seem to remember that sometime in the past people objected to an "old"
thread being "reop
Thank You for Your time and answer, Camaleón - You are doing great job
answering here! Thanks to You for Your work, again:
> When you hit "reply to → list" your e-mail client gets opened and is
> automatically set the address of this mailing list in "To:" field ;-)
It does not work for me, nor I
On Mon, 06 Dec 2010 15:42:56 +0700, Sthu Deus wrote:
> I want to continue an old talk that once was on the list. How I can do
> it? - How I can direct my reply to that very thread?
>
> In the list archives I see 3 links: reply to: list, user-online/offline.
>
> But I use a mail client - what sho
From: PETER EASTHOPE <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Andrei, Mumia & others,
At Wed, 12 Sep 2007 11:57:52 -0500 Mumia Paduille wrote,
"I'm assuming you're subscribed, ..."
Not subscribed. The volume is overwhelming.
I read the Web based archive.
At Mon, 20 Aug 2007 22:40:14 +0300 Andrei Popescu wrote,
"
On 10/10/2007 07:03 PM, PETER EASTHOPE wrote:
Andrei, Mumia & others,
At Wed, 12 Sep 2007 11:57:52 -0500 Mumia Paduille wrote,
"I'm assuming you're subscribed, ..."
Not subscribed. The volume is overwhelming.
I read the Web based archive.
Normal replying is difficult through the web based a
> On Thursday 25 January 2007 10:26, Easthope wrote:
> > When I work at home, thunderbird can send a
> > reply to a message posted on this list.
> >
> > Presumeably it sends the Message-id of the
> > preceeding message, or a thread identifier
> > to the list maintenance program to allow
> > connect
On Fri, Jan 26, 2007 at 05:10:25AM +, s. keeling wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > On Thu, Jan 25, 2007 at 11:00:44AM -0800, Easthope wrote:
> > >
> > > Thanks for replying and copying to me.
> > >
> > > wl> Well, if your web-based MUA supports it, it can and should
> > > w
[EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Thu, Jan 25, 2007 at 11:00:44AM -0800, Easthope wrote:
> >
> > Thanks for replying and copying to me.
> >
> > wl> Well, if your web-based MUA supports it, it can and should
> > wl> do threading correctly.
> >
> > No evidence that this MUA supports th
Wesley,
Thanks for replying and copying to me.
wl> Well, if your web-based MUA supports it, it can and should
do threading correctly.
No evidence that this MUA supports threading,
that I have seen.
wl> Barring that, as long as the subject stays intact, often other
people's MUA will do pseudo
On Thu, Jan 25, 2007 at 11:00:44AM -0800, Easthope wrote:
> Wesley,
>
> Thanks for replying and copying to me.
>
> wl> Well, if your web-based MUA supports it, it can and should
> do threading correctly.
>
> No evidence that this MUA supports threading,
> that I have seen.
>
> wl> Barring th
On Thursday 25 January 2007 12:00, Easthope wrote:
> wl> Barring that, as long as the subject stays intact, often other
> people's MUA will do pseudo-threading by subject line if there is no
> other
> threading information in the headers.
>
> Not clear about this. Are you saying I should
> try to
On Thursday 25 January 2007 10:26, Easthope wrote:
> When I work at home, thunderbird can send a
> reply to a message posted on this list.
>
> Presumeably it sends the Message-id of the
> preceeding message, or a thread identifier
> to the list maintenance program to allow
> connecting the new mess
On Thu, Jan 25, 2007 at 09:26:12AM -0800, Easthope wrote:
>
> Thunderbird is not available when I am away
> from home. Then I must use a Web based MUA,
> MailSite Express version 7.0.3, Rockliffe
> Email Server.
>
> In this circumstance, is there any way to
> reply to a message so that the
Am 2006-06-21 17:03:23, schrieb Johannes Wiedersich:
> For users of virus-ridden OSes that also means that e-mail viruses
> remain on the system until they are deleted, expunged and compacted
> (yes, three individual manual steps!)
...and if you have had no Virus-Scanner installed, a new AV-Sof
On 24.06.06 14:05, David E. Fox wrote:
> But at this job, everything was top post. The emailer pretty much
> forced you to edit that way - I recall spending time tryiing to
> reformat the emails to look like what I'm used to, but eventually gave
> up. After all, it's a different environment, and ju
On Sun, 2006-06-25 at 07:42 +0200, Thibaut Paumard wrote:
> Le samedi 24 juin 2006 à 21:18 -0500, Default User a écrit :
> > Gee, I almst hate to ask, but:
> >
> > I use the defult Evolution email client in Debian stable. When I choose
> > "reply to list" when replying to a post on debian-user@li
Le samedi 24 juin 2006 à 21:18 -0500, Default User a écrit :
> Gee, I almst hate to ask, but:
>
> I use the defult Evolution email client in Debian stable. When I choose
> "reply to list" when replying to a post on debian-user@lists.debian.org
> instead of putting that in the to: field, it puts t
* Ron Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-06-24 05:00:28 -0500]:
> What problem do you see with Tbird?
Nothing, really, for quick basic setup, it's terrific, and using imap mailboxes
does indeed let you switch between mua's at will..
Tbird out of the box, though, does not let me sort mailboxes t
On Thu, 22 Jun 2006 09:36:15 +
"Lynn Kilroy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I use MSN Hotmail. Seems MSN Hotmail doesn't work quite the same way your
> cludgy e-mail clients {oft mentioned in your article} do.
I've never liked web-based email. Enough said. :)
> Furthermore, most common user
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Dave Patterson wrote:
> * Andrew Sackville-West <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-06-23
> 13:13:50 -0700]:
>
>> On Fri, Jun 23, 2006 at 01:30:49PM -0500, Ron Johnson wrote:
>>> Andrew Sackville-West wrote:
>>>
>
>> yes. bring on the brick-bats!
>>
> Hear,
On Sat, Jun 24, 2006 at 08:19:55AM +0700, Dave Patterson wrote:
> * Andrew Sackville-West <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-06-23 13:13:50 -0700]:
>
> > On Fri, Jun 23, 2006 at 01:30:49PM -0500, Ron Johnson wrote:
> > > Andrew Sackville-West wrote:
> > >
>
> > yes. bring on the brick-bats!
> >
> Hear,
* Andrew Sackville-West <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-06-23 13:13:50 -0700]:
> On Fri, Jun 23, 2006 at 01:30:49PM -0500, Ron Johnson wrote:
> > Andrew Sackville-West wrote:
> >
> yes. bring on the brick-bats!
>
Hear, here.
I've used Mutt/Getmail/Exim/Procmail for a long time. Tried T-bird about
t
On Fri, Jun 23, 2006 at 01:30:49PM -0500, Ron Johnson wrote:
> Andrew Sackville-West wrote:
>
> > There seem to be two ways to handle it, bludgeon them for their
> > lack of knowledge and drive them away, or be a gentle persuader
> > and convert them over time.
>
> But it's so much more satisfyin
Derek Martin wrote:
> I have about two dozen e-mail addresses, and I find Mutt does an excellent
> job of dealing with them. Perhaps you are just not yet familiar enough
> with Mutt's features to know how powerful it can be for managing
> this...
I am quite familiar with mutt's lack of feat
martin f krafft wrote:
> Anyway, for multiple personalities, check out hooks and muttprofile.
> Works fine for me and many others.
I am well aware of those and they are not nearly enough.
--
Steve C. Lamb | But who decides what they dream?
PGP Key: 8B6E99C5 |
Thibaut Paumard wrote:
> You will of course note that the "Debianistas" can point the Reply-To
> header to the list themselves if they feel so inclined.
Actually I got myself in trouble on another list when they told me that if
I wanted a sane list policy when it came to posting to the list (n
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Andrew Sackville-West wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 22, 2006 at 04:04:40PM -0500, Seth Goodman wrote:
> [...]
>> So getting back to the topic of this thread, insisting that
>> "all competent mailers" have a 'Reply to List' function, when
>> none of the most co
There is nothing wrong with telling people that their is [broken|not-standards-compliant|...] but the
reality is that we can only do that gently as a way to begin educating
others. Case in point: my sister uses hotmail and insists on
top-posting. I pointed out once how this didn't work so well,
On Thu, Jun 22, 2006 at 04:04:40PM -0500, Seth Goodman wrote:
[...]
> So getting back to the topic of this thread, insisting that "all
> competent mailers" have a 'Reply to List' function, when none of the
> most common mailers for people trapped in the most widely used operating
> system have the
Le vendredi 23 juin 2006 à 09:48 -0500, Seth Goodman a écrit :
> > > I'd say it's quite a stretch to say that Elm is at the forefront
> > > of MUA technology.
> >
> > But who was talking elm? Last I checked we had references to
> > mutt and Thunderbird. Both of which do innovative things with
Thibaut Paumard wrote:
Le jeudi 22 juin 2006 à 11:50 -0500, Mike McCarty a écrit :
Peter Hillier-Brook wrote:
If it's not an FAQ, why doesn't this list use the "Reply-to" field in
the address headers?
It's not a FAQ, it's a FFF (Frequent Flame Fest) around here.[...]
Well, an argument get
On Thursday, June 22, 2006 5:53 PM -0500, Steve Lamb wrote:
> Seth Goodman wrote:
> > I'd say it's quite a stretch to say that Elm is at the forefront
> > of MUA technology.
>
> But who was talking elm? Last I checked we had references to
> mutt and Thunderbird. Both of which do innovative t
Ron Johnson wrote:
Peter Hillier-Brook wrote:
Ron Johnson wrote:
[snip]
A final question: as I need to share the printers, both USB
connected to my Etch machine, with a Sarge system, is the right
way forward to use lpd, or is CUPS viable?
CUPS is good at this. You've got to fiddle with the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Peter Hillier-Brook wrote:
> Ron Johnson wrote:
[snip]
>
> A final question: as I need to share the printers, both USB
> connected to my Etch machine, with a Sarge system, is the right
> way forward to use lpd, or is CUPS viable?
CUPS is good at th
On Thu, Jun 22, 2006 at 11:07:13PM -0700, Steve Lamb wrote:
> Derek Martin wrote:
> > It is probably the most configurable and most powerful MUA in
> > existence today, making easy many things which should be and making
> > possible many things which are hard or impossible using other clients.
>
>
also sprach Steve Lamb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006.06.23.0807 +0200]:
> > It is probably the most configurable and most powerful MUA in
> > existence today, making easy many things which should be and making
> > possible many things which are hard or impossible using other clients.
>
> While mak
Ron Johnson wrote:
What printer(s) do you use?
HP DeskJet 970Cxi and Canon PIXMA MP780
You probably already found these links in Google.
Too bad it's not the 970Cxi ...
http://www.linuxprinting.org/show_printer.cgi?recnum=HP-DeskJet_970C
http://www.turboprint.info/printers.html
http://www.li
Le jeudi 22 juin 2006 à 11:50 -0500, Mike McCarty a écrit :
> Peter Hillier-Brook wrote:
> > If it's not an FAQ, why doesn't this list use the "Reply-to" field in
> > the address headers?
>
> It's not a FAQ, it's a FFF (Frequent Flame Fest) around here.[...]
Well, an argument gets faster when yo
Let's kick it up a notch.
cmr
Peter Hillier-Brook wrote:
Juha Tuuna wrote:
On Wednesday, 21. June 2006 15:55, Peter Hillier-Brook wrote:
If it's not an FAQ, why doesn't this list use the "Reply-to" field in
the address headers?
A couple of times recently I've hit Reply and sent a response t
On Wed, Jun 21, 2006 at 03:34:24PM +0100, Peter Hillier-Brook wrote:
> I wouldn't call Thunderbird incompetent, but your point is well taken.
I would.
--
Marc Wilson | All of the animals except man know that the principal
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | business of life is to enjoy it.
--
To UN
On Thu, Jun 22, 2006 at 12:32:18PM -0400, Carl Fink wrote:
> Not real relevant until CUPS gets fixed.
Have you tried tonight's CUPS packages yet? Apparently the maintainer has
decided after all that multiple configuration files is a bad idea.
Myself, I decided not to bother just yet.
--
Marc
Derek Martin wrote:
> It is probably the most configurable and most powerful MUA in
> existence today, making easy many things which should be and making
> possible many things which are hard or impossible using other clients.
While making hard what other clients make trivial and makes it an
e
On Thu, Jun 22, 2006 at 04:04:40PM -0500, Seth Goodman wrote:
> So getting back to the topic of this thread, insisting that "all
> competent mailers" have a 'Reply to List' function, when none of the
> most common mailers for people trapped in the most widely used operating
> system have the requir
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Peter Hillier-Brook wrote:
> Ron Johnson wrote:
> [cut]
>
>>> NB The headers in my original post show that I'm still a prisoner
>>> of Windows and rc scripts are not an option. If I ever get my
>>> printers working under Debian then I'll consider the
On (22/06/06 23:20), Peter Hillier-Brook wrote:
> Ron Johnson wrote:
> [cut]
>
> >>NB The headers in my original post show that I'm still a prisoner
> >>of Windows and rc scripts are not an option. If I ever get my
> >>printers working under Debian then I'll consider the final
> >>switch.
> >
> >W
Seth Goodman wrote:
> I'd say it's quite a stretch to say that Elm is at the forefront of MUA
> technology.
But who was talking elm? Last I checked we had references to mutt and
Thunderbird. Both of which do innovative things with mail and both of which,
admittedly, have serious warts.
--
Ron Johnson wrote:
[cut]
NB The headers in my original post show that I'm still a prisoner
of Windows and rc scripts are not an option. If I ever get my
printers working under Debian then I'll consider the final
switch.
What printer(s) do you use?
HP DeskJet 970Cxi and Canon PIXMA MP780
Pet
On Thursday, June 22, 2006 2:02 PM -0500, Steve Lamb wrote:
> Lynn Kilroy wrote:
> > I use MSN Hotmail. Seems MSN Hotmail doesn't work quite the same
> > way your cludgy e-mail clients {oft mentioned in your article} do.
>
> Cludgy? Actually these are quite on the forefront.
I'd say it's qu
Lynn Kilroy wrote:
> I use MSN Hotmail. Seems MSN Hotmail doesn't work quite the same way
> your cludgy e-mail clients {oft mentioned in your article} do.
Cludgy? Actually these are quite on the forefront. Cludgy would be
Hotmail, Y!Mail, Outlook. Most of which are stuck in the stone age w
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Carl Fink wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 22, 2006 at 11:10:51AM -0500, Ron Johnson wrote:
>
>> Peter Hillier-Brook wrote:
>
>>> NB The headers in my original post show that I'm still a prisoner
>>> of Windows and rc scripts are not an option. If I ever get my
On Thu, Jun 22, 2006 at 05:09:06 -0500, Ron Johnson wrote:
> Lynn Kilroy wrote:
> > I am going to be a little nasty on this one, fellas, by breaking
> > all your perfectly held and highly valued netiquette.
> >
> [snip vituperation]
> > with consumer model clients must do} I'm sure your opinions w
Peter Hillier-Brook wrote:
If it's not an FAQ, why doesn't this list use the "Reply-to" field in
the address headers?
It's not a FAQ, it's a FFF (Frequent Flame Fest) around here. There
are three ways of doing things in this world: the Right Way, the Wrong
Way, and the Debian Way. Welcome to th
On Thu, Jun 22, 2006 at 11:10:51AM -0500, Ron Johnson wrote:
> Peter Hillier-Brook wrote:
> > NB The headers in my original post show that I'm still a prisoner
> > of Windows and rc scripts are not an option. If I ever get my
> > printers working under Debian then I'll consider the final
> > swit
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Peter Hillier-Brook wrote:
> Juha Tuuna wrote:
>> On Wednesday, 21. June 2006 15:55, Peter Hillier-Brook wrote:
[snip]
> I didn't wish for it: I asked a question and seem to have started
> WW3:-)
Hah! This isn't even a minor border skirmish...
> NB
Juha Tuuna wrote:
On Wednesday, 21. June 2006 15:55, Peter Hillier-Brook wrote:
If it's not an FAQ, why doesn't this list use the "Reply-to" field in
the address headers?
A couple of times recently I've hit Reply and sent a response to the
originator, rather than the list - for which I apologis
1 - 100 of 141 matches
Mail list logo
