Uwe Dippel wrote:
> IMHO someone in here was right: module - IP - routing. We haven't had it
> on routing yet.
I simply have no idea how to do this. But I just found this very
interesting post, which leads me to believe that the problem is
unrelated to the particular device:
From
http://cert.uni
On Mon, 29 Dec 2003 01:16:01 +0900, Charles Muller wrote:
> I rebuilt the kernel with 8139too as a module, and now it is there where
> it should be, and it has an address under its IRQ listing. But it still
> won't connect.
Meaning what ?? Ping ? Its own address ? Connect you to your ISP ?
IMHO
On Sunday 28 December 2003 12:30 pm, Charles Muller wrote:
>I have one more thought on the matter of trying to get my rtl8139 NIC
>going on the 2.4 kernel (which may have been painfully obvious to most
>of you...).
I'm using the 8139too module w/o problems under 2.4.23 and 2.6.0. I don't have
any
I have one more thought on the matter of trying to get my rtl8139 NIC
going on the 2.4 kernel (which may have been painfully obvious to most
of you...).
Whenever I have tried to configure the card in 2.4 using modconf or
pppoeconf, the message I always get is not a "not found" but instead "device
Uwe Dippel wrote:
> > But thanks for offering your solution. I appreciate it.
>
> With pleasure, from my side. I'm still curious, though, what the outcome
> of removing the modules with modconf, reboot, and re-insert of the rtl8139
> module would be.
> >From what you wrote, it seems a Debian-only
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Saturday 27 December 2003 9:53 pm, Uwe Dippel wrote:
> On Sun, 28 Dec 2003 00:23:29 +0900, Charles Muller wrote:
> > I've done installations in the meantime with RH & 9, Mandrake
> > 9.2, and Suse with 2.4 kernels, and they all run both the USB
> >
On Sun, 28 Dec 2003 14:35:15 +0900, Charles Muller wrote:
> When I run modconf from the command line, I get a small graphic interface,
> which gives me the option of installing any modules contained in a given
> directory (referred to in my prior message), but no options such as
> removing.
Not b
On 12/28/2003, "Uwe Dippel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>With pleasure, from my side. I'm still curious, though, what the outcome
>of removing the modules with modconf, reboot, and re-insert of the
rtl8139
>module would be.
When I run modconf from the command line, I get a small graphic interfa
Two other things that I noticed, which can be seen in the output data I
posted in my prior message, but which I did not really stress:
1)
a) When I do a search for 8139too, the actual module file, which is
8139too.o, was found in the directory for the 2.2 kernel.
b) Since I selected the 81
On Sun, 28 Dec 2003 00:23:29 +0900, Charles Muller wrote:
> I've done installations in the meantime with RH & 9, Mandrake 9.2, and
> Suse with 2.4 kernels, and they all run both the USB mass storage and
> the Realek NIC without any problem, which makes me believe that there
> must be a solution to
s. keeling wrote:
> Incoming from Charles Muller:
> > inet addr:192.168.1.3 Bcast:192.168.1.255 Mask:255.255.255.0
> ^^
> > Interrupt:11 Base address:0x2000
> .^^^
Incoming from Charles Muller:
> Uwe Dippel wrote:
>
> (with 2.2.20 kernel: network connection functioning)
>
> debian:/home/chuck# ifconfig eth0
> eth0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:90:F5:1F:3B:BA
> inet addr:192.168.1.3 Bcast:192.168.1.255 Mask:255.255.255.0
^
On Sat, 27 Dec 2003 15:12:32 +0900, Charles Muller wrote:
> debian:/home/chuck# ifconfig eth0 192.168.1.3 {nothing happens}
> debian:/home/chuck# ifconfig eth0 192.168.1.255 {nothing happens}
>
> debian:/home/chuck# ping 192.168.1.3
> PING 192.168.1.3 (192.168.1.3): 56 data bytes {stops here}
W
Bill Kalebaugh
> If I go to to the BIOS on start-up (DELETE Button) and "Load Fail-Safe
> Defaults" Debian with 2.4.xx
> will ping all other boxes OK and I can go to the Internet OK.
Hmmm. My BIOS setup utility doesn't seem to have these options. Is there
more than one way of setting the BIOS?
SOLVED
If I go to to the BIOS on start-up (DELETE Button) and "Load Fail-Safe
Defaults" Debian with 2.4.xx
will ping all other boxes OK and I can go to the Internet OK. All though
I noticed that W2K will not
start up but W-98 will.
If I "Load Optimized Defaults" in BIOS than Debian 2.4.xx will
I have the exact same problem and I have tried ever thing I can think of.
If you ever find an answer let me know. I am beginning to think that
2.4.xx is
unable to understand all of the mother board devices I have on this board.
You never said what mother board and bios you have.
I have a SOYO KT40
Uwe Dippel wrote:
> > unix
> > af_packet
> > 8139too
>
> module is here, good ! (Does it need mii, maybe someone could help if
> necessary !?)
[...]
> eth0 doesn't have an address, just as I thought. And hasn't passed a
> single packet so far.
>
> Let's try giving it an address: ifconfig eth0
On Sat, 27 Dec 2003 01:15:05 +0900, Charles Muller wrote:
> debian:/home/chuck# cat /etc/modules
> # /etc/modules: kernel modules to load at boot time.
> #
> # This file should contain the names of kernel modules that are
> # to be loaded at boot time, one per line. Comments begin with
> # a "#",
Uwe Dippel wrote:
> How about showing us your cat /etc/modules and ifconfig for a change
> to the better ?
These are as follows:
debian:/home/chuck# cat /etc/modules
# /etc/modules: kernel modules to load at boot time.
#
# This file should contain the names of kernel modules that are
# to be lo
On Fri, 26 Dec 2003 19:36:17 +0900, Charles Muller wrote:
> and now I see this
>
> debian:/home/chuck# cat /proc/interrupts
>CPU0
> 0: 37205 XT-PIC timer
> 1:661 XT-PIC keyboard
> 2: 0 XT-PIC cascade
> 9: 24
s. keeling wrote:
Incoming from Charles Muller:
Wayne Topa wrote:
Charles Muller([EMAIL PROTECTED]) is reported to have said:
I upgraded my 2.2* Woody kernel to 2.4.20 to get support for my external
USB drive. I succeeded, but in the process lost my network connection
via my rtl813
Wayne Topa wrote:
> Charles Muller([EMAIL PROTECTED]) is reported to have said:
> > I upgraded my 2.2* Woody kernel to 2.4.20 to get support for my external
> > USB drive. I succeeded, but in the process lost my network connection
> > via my rtl8139 nic. The driver (8139too) was compiled, but it
s. keeling wrote:
> Ummm, what? What seems to indicate they are not using the same IRQ?
> The fact that they're both recognized? I believe this says nothing
> other than they're both there; it's up to you to say what to do with
> what was found.
>
> Barring *really* strange circumstances, 2.4.x
Incoming from Charles Muller:
> Wayne Topa wrote:
>
> > Charles Muller([EMAIL PROTECTED]) is reported to have said:
> > > I upgraded my 2.2* Woody kernel to 2.4.20 to get support for my external
> > > USB drive. I succeeded, but in the process lost my network connection
> > > via my rtl8139 nic. T
Charles Muller([EMAIL PROTECTED]) is reported to have said:
> Wayne Topa wrote:
>
> > Charles Muller([EMAIL PROTECTED]) is reported to have said:
> > > I upgraded my 2.2* Woody kernel to 2.4.20 to get support for my external
> > > USB drive. I succeeded, but in the process lost my network connecti
Wayne Topa wrote:
> Charles Muller([EMAIL PROTECTED]) is reported to have said:
> > I upgraded my 2.2* Woody kernel to 2.4.20 to get support for my external
> > USB drive. I succeeded, but in the process lost my network connection
> > via my rtl8139 nic. The driver (8139too) was compiled, but it w
Charles Muller([EMAIL PROTECTED]) is reported to have said:
> I upgraded my 2.2* Woody kernel to 2.4.20 to get support for my external
> USB drive. I succeeded, but in the process lost my network connection
> via my rtl8139 nic. The driver (8139too) was compiled, but it won't
> connect.
>
> Googli
27 matches
Mail list logo
