Re: printer problem

2024-10-30 Thread Semih Ozlem
Dear Tomas, Thanks a lot for your reply. That did get me one step further, but the printer is still giving an error. I was able to login though through the website. adresine sahip kullanıcı 31 Eki 2024 Per, 08:35 tarihinde şunu yazdı: > On Wed, Oct 30, 2024 at 11:19:20PM +0300, Semih Ozlem wrot

Re: printer problem

2024-10-30 Thread tomas
On Wed, Oct 30, 2024 at 11:19:20PM +0300, Semih Ozlem wrote: > Thank you for your reply, Eduardo. However it appears that there is another > problem. The printer requires entry of a password. An the menu for that is > available in windows, but I have no idea where in linux I would get > properties

Re: printer problem

2024-10-30 Thread Stefan Monnier
> You could try asking Kyocera for support (if they offer such an option), or > perhaps someone from the IT department of your university (some other linux > user might have had the same problem). Unfortunately your options are > not great. Maybe it's worth looking into how it works for people pri

Re: printer problem

2024-10-30 Thread Eduardo M KALINOWSKI
On 30/10/2024 17:19, Semih Ozlem wrote: Thank you for your reply, Eduardo. However it appears that there is another problem. The printer requires entry of a password. An the menu for that is available in windows, but I have no idea where in linux I would get properties about printer and printin

Re: printer problem

2024-10-30 Thread Semih Ozlem
Thank you for your reply, Eduardo. However it appears that there is another problem. The printer requires entry of a password. An the menu for that is available in windows, but I have no idea where in linux I would get properties about printer and printing permissions. This is at a university, and

Re: printer problem

2024-10-30 Thread eduardo
Em 2024-10-30 09:25, Semih Ozlem escreveu: I am using debian 12. I am on a network with printer Kyocera ECOSYS MA4500ix. I installed the printer's driver from Kyocera's website. But I am unable to print. On Printer Properties Under Printer State I am getting the message: Processing - Illegal acco

Re: Printer problem

2013-12-14 Thread Brian
On Sat 14 Dec 2013 at 20:37:09 +0100, Siard wrote: > Gábor Hársfalvi wrote off-list: If his reply to my post was off-list it will never be seen by me (I only receive and respond to on-list mail) or (obviously) anyone else. If Gábor is looking for a response he should check whether any mail was se

Re: Printer problem

2013-12-14 Thread Siard
Gábor Hársfalvi wrote off-list: > Thanks. > > So we could tell the driver to use only the black ink for black > texts/images? No. A document containing composite black text is simply not suitable for printing. You should try to get a better document. Of course, you can tell the driver to print

Re: Printer problem

2013-12-14 Thread Siard
Gábor Hársfalvi wrote: > We have got a HP Inkjet f2180 printer and we need use pure black ink > instead of composite black every time. > > How to do this? The document to be printed should contain pure black, that is, CMYK values C=0% M=0% Y=0% K=100%. Printing offices also require this if you ha

Re: Printer problem

2013-12-14 Thread Brian
On Sat 14 Dec 2013 at 11:22:08 +0100, Gábor Hársfalvi wrote: > We have got a HP Inkjet f2180 printer and we need use pure black ink > instead of composite black every time. > > How to do this? What driver package and PPD are you using? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.deb

Re: Printer Problem - An Insane Solution

2003-02-10 Thread Gary Turner
Glenn English wrote: >On Mon, 2003-02-10 at 10:03, Thomas H. George,,, wrote: > >> PS. I was going to call this a cock-a-manie (sp?) solution but I can't >> find the word in any of our dictionaries. Anyone know a correct >> spelling and dictionary entry? > >Not at all sure, but I think it's "c

Re: Printer Problem - An Insane Solution

2003-02-10 Thread Glenn English
On Mon, 2003-02-10 at 10:03, Thomas H. George,,, wrote: > PS. I was going to call this a cock-a-manie (sp?) solution but I can't > find the word in any of our dictionaries. Anyone know a correct > spelling and dictionary entry? Not at all sure, but I think it's "cockamamie" - it's a term my g

re: printer problem

2001-05-24 Thread Thomas H. George
I have discovered that apsfilterconfig writes three filters for my Brother HL-730 laser printer (which can simulate an HP LJIIP). In the printcap file it generates I find ascii|jet2p-letter-ascii-mono|jet2p lp|jet2p-letter-auto-mono|jet2p raw|jet2p-letter-raw|jet2p.

Re: printer problem

2001-05-24 Thread Steve Gran
On Wed, 23 May 2001, Wayne Topa wrote: > > > Subject: printer problem > Date: Tue, May 22, 2001 at 07:23:54PM -0500 > > In reply to:Thomas H. George > > Quoting Thomas H. George([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > > Trying to make printer (brother HL-730 on parallel port) work from > > debian linux

Re: printer problem

2001-05-23 Thread Wayne Topa
Subject: printer problem Date: Tue, May 22, 2001 at 07:23:54PM -0500 In reply to:Thomas H. George Quoting Thomas H. George([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > Trying to make printer (brother HL-730 on parallel port) work from > debian linux 2.2.19: > > lp testtxt > > and from Abiword in xim

Re: Printer Problem Solved..sorta..

2001-04-01 Thread Dale Morris
Doing some investigation, I find the problem lies more with StarOffice 5.2 than it does with my printer configuration. I changed lpd to lprng and have configured it. ABI word prints fine, I can print from mutt, netscape, lyx, etc.. but nothing happens with StarOffice, the printer just keeps spittin

Re: Printer Problem

2001-03-19 Thread kmself
on Sun, Mar 18, 2001 at 07:59:35PM +0100, Stephan Kulka ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > When I try to print out a file , I get the following message: > > >[EMAIL PROTECTED] - cannot open connection Connection refused > >Make sure LPD server is running on the system. > > I am quite confused, because

Re: Printer Problem

2001-02-02 Thread ktb
On Fri, Feb 02, 2001 at 03:03:31PM -0500, Thomas H. George,,,610-444-2626 wrote: > I was surprised! After running dmesg I found my printer working again. > I don't understand why this is so but, as I had done nothing else (I > send these messages from another computer), dmseg must have correcte

Re: Printer Problem

2001-02-02 Thread Thomas H. George,,,610-444-2626
I was surprised! After running dmesg I found my printer working again. I don't understand why this is so but, as I had done nothing else (I send these messages from another computer), dmseg must have corrected the problem. Thanks again for the help. Tom George Thomas H. George,,,610-444-26

Re: Printer Problem

2001-02-02 Thread Thomas H. George,,,610-444-2626
Thanks for the suggestion; I had not yet learned about dmesg. Unfortunately, dmesg reported all in order with parport - i.e. using 0378 and irq 7. I must look elsewhere for my problem. Tom George ktb wrote: On Fri, Feb 02, 2001 at 11:01:26AM -0500, Thomas H. George,,,610-444-2626 wrote: M

Re: Printer Problem

2001-02-02 Thread Thomas H. George,,,610-444-2626
Thanks for the suggestion.  I had not learned about dmesg.  Unfortunately it reported everything in order - i.e. parport0 using 0378 and irq 7.  I must look elsewhere for the problem. Tom George ktb wrote: On Fri, Feb 02, 2001 at 11:01:26AM -0500, Thomas H. George,,,610-444-2626 wrote: My print

Re: Printer Problem

2001-02-02 Thread ktb
On Fri, Feb 02, 2001 at 11:01:26AM -0500, Thomas H. George,,,610-444-2626 wrote: > My printer was working perfectly. I rebuilt the kernel allowing > autoprobe. Printer no longer responds even to > >cat lptest > /dev/lp0 where lptest is a small text file > > and > >lp

Re: Printer problem

1999-11-04 Thread Alisdair McDiarmid
On Thu, Nov 04, 1999 at 09:55:30AM +1030, John Pearson wrote: > On Tue, Nov 02, 1999 at 10:57:59PM +, Alisdair McDiarmid wrote > > > > i've got a printer set up on skinny, which prints locally fine. > > the printcap on letdown is: > > > > lp|hplj|HP Laserjet 1100:\ > > :lp=/dev/null:sd=/v

Re: Printer problem

1999-11-04 Thread John Pearson
On Wed, Nov 03, 1999 at 12:23:06AM +, Brian Schramm wrote > I am sorry. I did not give a good explanation for the problem. I am > talking security. I have the printer setup in the printcap file but > it is not working because it cannot connect to it. The machine at the > other end says i

Re: Printer problem

1999-11-04 Thread John Pearson
On Tue, Nov 02, 1999 at 10:57:59PM +, Alisdair McDiarmid wrote > On Tue, Nov 02, 1999 at 06:43:00PM +0100, SGaerner wrote: > > You have to edit your local /etc/printcap. > > Add a line > > rm=YOUR_SERVER_IP:\ > > rp=lp:\ > > > > But I think that you only have to uncomment und modify so

Re: Printer problem

1999-11-03 Thread Brian Schramm
that would work but I know that this version has some other file to edit. Brian >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Original Message <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<< On 11/2/99, 10:07:03 AM, Ethan Benson <[EMAIL PR

Re: Printer problem

1999-11-02 Thread Alisdair McDiarmid
On Tue, Nov 02, 1999 at 06:43:00PM +0100, SGaerner wrote: > You have to edit your local /etc/printcap. > Add a line > rm=YOUR_SERVER_IP:\ > rp=lp:\ > > But I think that you only have to uncomment und modify some lines in your > standard > Debian /etc/printcap. i'm currently having the sa

Re: Printer problem

1999-11-02 Thread SGaerner
You have to edit your local /etc/printcap. Add a line rm=YOUR_SERVER_IP:\ rp=lp:\ But I think that you only have to uncomment und modify some lines in your standard Debian /etc/printcap. Brian Schramm wrote: > I hope this gets to the list. I never saw my question post the last > time.

Re: printer problem not solved anymore {SOLVED]

1999-04-19 Thread Mans Joling

Re: printer problem not solved anymore

1999-04-17 Thread Richard Harran
The error indicates that lpd is not running. Have you tried doing the lpr filename !after! having done as root: lpd It looks like lpd has not been started properly. I guess you could try installing lpr again. You could also try looking at the output of kmesg to see if there is a

Re: printer problem

1999-04-16 Thread Mark Phillips
> I sent this a few days ago but have gotten no response, so I'll try again. > > I have a Hamm system. > I've been trying about setting up a Tek printer and have lpd > confused. If I go into lpc and ask for status lp2 I get > > > lpc> status lp2 > lp2: > queuing is enabled > pr