Re: Primary and Secondary DNS one 1 server...

2000-02-14 Thread Nate Duehr
On Thu, Jan 27, 2000 at 09:03:16AM +0100, Onno Ebbinge wrote: > Because of an upgrade of our computer network I must > run the primary and secondary DNS one 1 server with > two NIC's for a while... > > Has anyone experiance with this? > > My guess would be to run named twice and > point to two c

Re: Primary and Secondary DNS one 1 server...

2000-01-27 Thread Miquel van Smoorenburg
According to aphro: > On 27 Jan 2000, Miquel van Smoorenburg wrote: > > miquel >That means that 50% of the people trying to reach one of those > miquel >sites saw an initial timeout of one minute when trying to resolve > miquel >a host in one of those domains when they tried to talk to the > mique

Re: Primary and Secondary DNS one 1 server...

2000-01-27 Thread aphro
On 27 Jan 2000, Miquel van Smoorenburg wrote: miquel >That means that 50% of the people trying to reach one of those miquel >sites saw an initial timeout of one minute when trying to resolve miquel >a host in one of those domains when they tried to talk to the miquel >non-existant name server. i

Re: Primary and Secondary DNS one 1 server...

2000-01-27 Thread Robert Varga
On Thu, 27 Jan 2000, Robert Waldner wrote: > > this is probably the best solution because you can take > all the zones and configuration and simply move it to/fro > your (then) only server. > This is refused by some registries. In Hungary, for example, the registries only register domains

Re: Primary and Secondary DNS one 1 server...

2000-01-27 Thread Robert Waldner
On Thu, 27 Jan 2000 00:02:01 PST, aphro writes: >is there a point to this ? just because you have a secondary DNS >registered with internic doesnt mean you have to have one, i ran w/o a >secondary DNS for 40+ domains for well over a year. there can be some reasons for this: - some customers are

Re: Primary and Secondary DNS one 1 server...

2000-01-27 Thread Miquel van Smoorenburg
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, aphro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >is there a point to this ? Yes >just because you have a secondary DNS >registered with internic doesnt mean you have to have one, i ran w/o a >secondary DNS for 40+ domains for well over a year. That means that 50% of the people

Re: Primary and Secondary DNS one 1 server...

2000-01-27 Thread aphro
is there a point to this ? just because you have a secondary DNS registered with internic doesnt mean you have to have one, i ran w/o a secondary DNS for 40+ domains for well over a year. the only reason i can see for 2 name servers is incase 1 goes out the other is still there, if they are on th