Re: PPP-pam - problem

1999-04-09 Thread John Hasler
John Galt writes: > You have a rudimentary version of PPP with the base installation Nothing rudimentary about it. The base package includes the complete ppp package. The pppd binary in it was compiled without pam to save space. > So the short answer is no, you don't NEED it--you can dial out j

Re: PPP-pam - problem

1999-04-09 Thread John Galt
You have a rudimentary version of PPP with the base installation--PPP-pam just adds a little bit to it so that it's a little easier to use in some cases, and a lot more secure in others. So the short answer is no, you don't NEED it--you can dial out just fine without it. However IIWY I'd try to

Re: PPP-pam - problem

1999-04-08 Thread John Hasler
Christian Dysthe writes: > I can not seem to get PPP-pam to install right. Do I need it? No. > I have tried to remove it also, but dependency problems prevents me since > general PPP seems to be dependant on it. I show ppp as suggesting ppp-pam. What is the error message? -- John Hasler [EMAIL