Howdy,
On Mon, Jul 23, 2012 at 01:21:55PM -0500, Charles Kroeger wrote:
> I'm thinking my firewall 'Shorewall' encompasses an extensive enough design to
> cover any attempts of intrusion that may occur, I do notice notwithstanding,
> that
> although ports 0 and 1 are closed, they still show up on
Charles Kroeger wrote:
> PORT STATE SERVICE
> 25/tcp open smtp
> 53/tcp open domain
> 111/tcp open rpcbind
> 631/tcp open ipp
> 6566/tcp open sane-port
That seems pretty reasonable. Except if you aren't using NFS and
don't need the portmapper (rpcbind) then I would uninstall it.
>
>Try probing your system with nmap and see what it
> says.
> nmap localhost
Thanks for this information, I didn't have nmap installed..however after I did
install nmap I received this:
/charles# nmap localhost
Starting Nmap 6.00 ( http://nmap.org ) at 2012-07-23 22:30 CDT
Nmap scan report for
Charles Kroeger wrote:
> I'm thinking my firewall 'Shorewall' encompasses an extensive enough design to
> cover any attempts of intrusion that may occur, I do notice notwithstanding,
> that
> although ports 0 and 1 are closed, they still show up on test like grc.com's
> 'shields-up' port scanner.
4 matches
Mail list logo
