Charles Kroeger wrote: > I'm thinking my firewall 'Shorewall' encompasses an extensive enough design to > cover any attempts of intrusion that may occur, I do notice notwithstanding, > that > although ports 0 and 1 are closed, they still show up on test like grc.com's > 'shields-up' port scanner.
I don't know about about the grc.com scanner but I would trust what nmap tells you. Try probing your system with nmap and see what it says. nmap localhost > I know that 0 <nil> is not a port and yet it is a port as 0 is a number in our > world and port 1 has its function described, so why would these two ports > even show up? I am skeptical. Probe them explicitly. nmap -p 0-10 localhost > On Debian it seems whatever firewall one uses these two ports are > always visible and closed, so if port 0 is not a port and and port 1 > is always closed, why do they announce themselves if pinged? What does nmap say? :-) Bob
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature