Thus spake Paul Scott ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> Shawn Lamson wrote:
>
> >I believe the package is actually titled
> >openoffice.org
> >so apt-get install openoffice.org should do it.
> >if it doesnt please write back with your sources.list
> >
> For some reason I think you need to do:
>
> apt-get i
Shawn Lamson wrote:
I believe the package is actually titled
openoffice.org
so apt-get install openoffice.org should do it.
if it doesnt please write back with your sources.list
For some reason I think you need to do:
apt-get install openoffice.org openoffice.org-bin
And depending on your set
On Sun, 22 Dec 2002 12:20:31 -0800
Deryk Barker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Thus spake Mark Janssen ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
>
> > On Sun, 2002-12-22 at 20:11, Deryk Barker wrote:
> > > AS I am building a new system, it seemed a good idea to download
> > > the latest Open Office (1.0.1) rather than
On Sun, Dec 22, 2002 at 12:20:31PM -0800, Deryk Barker wrote:
> Thus spake Mark Janssen ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> > On Sun, 2002-12-22 at 20:11, Deryk Barker wrote:
> > > AS I am building a new system, it seemed a good idea to download the
> > > latest Open Office (1.0.1) rather than simply copy 1.0 a
Thus spake Mark Janssen ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> On Sun, 2002-12-22 at 20:11, Deryk Barker wrote:
> > AS I am building a new system, it seemed a good idea to download the
> > latest Open Office (1.0.1) rather than simply copy 1.0 across from
> > my old system.
> >
> > I am running (new system) test
On Sun, 2002-12-22 at 20:11, Deryk Barker wrote:
> AS I am building a new system, it seemed a good idea to download the
> latest Open Office (1.0.1) rather than simply copy 1.0 across from
> my old system.
>
> I am running (new system) testing, BTW.
Just install the openoffice package that is in
6 matches
Mail list logo
