On Thu, Nov 10, 2011 at 8:24 AM, Raf Czlonka wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 10, 2011 at 12:29:03PM GMT, Tom H wrote:
>> On Thu, Nov 10, 2011 at 5:12 AM, Raf Czlonka wrote:
>> > On Wed, Nov 09, 2011 at 11:12:01PM GMT, Ismael Scalcon wrote:
>> >> To clarify things up (ok, a bit off topic):
>> >>
>> >> Red
On Thu, Nov 10, 2011 at 6:09 AM, Harry Putnam wrote:
> Walter Hurry writes:
>> On Wed, 09 Nov 2011 21:12:01 -0200, Ismael Scalcon wrote:
>>
>>> But it's still opensource, so the source code is free to download and
>>> compile. The guys at CentOS do it, they get all the source code for RHL,
>>> re
O right, sorry, I was talking about RHEL, just didn't notticed the talk was
about RHL, as RHL doesn't exist anymore.
@Walter
And I'm having the same doubt, why CentOS is so despicable? Just to know.
Or is Scientific Linux technically better than CentOS, and that's why you
choose it instead?
Rega
On Thu, Nov 10, 2011 at 12:29:03PM GMT, Tom H wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 10, 2011 at 5:12 AM, Raf Czlonka wrote:
> > On Wed, Nov 09, 2011 at 11:12:01PM GMT, Ismael Scalcon wrote:
> >>
> >> To clarify things up (ok, a bit off topic):
> >>
> >> Red Hat Linux is a commercial distro, but what they sell is t
On Thu, Nov 10, 2011 at 5:12 AM, Raf Czlonka wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 09, 2011 at 11:12:01PM GMT, Ismael Scalcon wrote:
>>
>> To clarify things up (ok, a bit off topic):
>>
>> Red Hat Linux is a commercial distro, but what they sell is the supporte
>
> To clarify things, Red Hat Linux _was_ a distro a
Walter Hurry writes:
> On Wed, 09 Nov 2011 21:12:01 -0200, Ismael Scalcon wrote:
>
>> But it's still opensource, so the source code is free to download and
>> compile. The guys at CentOS do it, they get all the source code for RHL,
>> remove the Red Hat branding and distribute it.
>
> And the guy
On Wed, Nov 09, 2011 at 11:12:01PM GMT, Ismael Scalcon wrote:
> To clarify things up (ok, a bit off topic):
>
> Red Hat Linux is a commercial distro, but what they sell is the supporte
To clarify things, Red Hat Linux _was_ a distro available as a free
download with or without commercial support.
On Wed, 09 Nov 2011 21:12:01 -0200, Ismael Scalcon wrote:
> But it's still opensource, so the source code is free to download and
> compile. The guys at CentOS do it, they get all the source code for RHL,
> remove the Red Hat branding and distribute it.
And the guys at Scientific Linux (Fermilab
To clarify things up (ok, a bit off topic):
Red Hat Linux is a commercial distro, but what they sell is the supporte
services. The thing is, you cannot get RHL without paying for the support.
But it's still opensource, so the source code is free to download and
compile. The guys at CentOS do it, t
On Wed, 09 Nov 2011 13:34:59 -0500, Doug wrote:
> Out of curiosity I downloaded the LIVE Fedora 16. The user interface is
> like nothing I ever saw. If this is the future of computing, I think
> I'll go back to pocket calculator and typewriter!
Fedora is my main distribution, though I use Debian
On 11/09/2011 12:34 PM, Tom H wrote:
On Tue, Nov 8, 2011 at 6:30 PM, Miles Fidelman
wrote:
Red Hat Linux = Red Hat's original commercial product
Commercial?! You could get it for free like Fedora as well as get it
for free and then enter into a service contract with RH.
Out of curiosity I
On Tue, Nov 8, 2011 at 6:30 PM, Miles Fidelman
wrote:
>
> Red Hat Linux = Red Hat's original commercial product
Commercial?! You could get it for free like Fedora as well as get it
for free and then enter into a service contract with RH.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.de
Andrei Popescu wrote:
On Du, 30 oct 11, 00:56:55, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
Btw. instead of Red Hat I tested Fedora on a virtual machine, set up on
Suse. Fedora might be a very good choice for beginners and experienced
users too. Is there still a Red Hat distro? Regarding to the German Wiki
Red Hat be
On Du, 30 oct 11, 00:56:55, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
>
> Btw. instead of Red Hat I tested Fedora on a virtual machine, set up on
> Suse. Fedora might be a very good choice for beginners and experienced
> users too. Is there still a Red Hat distro? Regarding to the German Wiki
> Red Hat became Fedora.
On Sun, 2011-10-30 at 00:24 +0200, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> On Sat, 2011-10-29 at 09:58 -0400, Miles Fidelman wrote:
> > - need for current versions of specific software packages (at least for
> > some of the packages I rely on, the packaged versions tend to lag well
> > behind the upstream versions
15 matches
Mail list logo
