O right, sorry, I was talking about RHEL, just didn't notticed the talk was about RHL, as RHL doesn't exist anymore.
@Walter And I'm having the same doubt, why CentOS is so despicable? Just to know. Or is Scientific Linux technically better than CentOS, and that's why you choose it instead? Regards 2011/11/10 Raf Czlonka <r...@linuxstuff.pl> > On Thu, Nov 10, 2011 at 12:29:03PM GMT, Tom H wrote: > > On Thu, Nov 10, 2011 at 5:12 AM, Raf Czlonka <r...@linuxstuff.pl> wrote: > > > On Wed, Nov 09, 2011 at 11:12:01PM GMT, Ismael Scalcon wrote: > > >> > > >> To clarify things up (ok, a bit off topic): > > >> > > >> Red Hat Linux is a commercial distro, but what they sell is the > supporte > > > > > > To clarify things, Red Hat Linux _was_ a distro available as a free > > > download with or without commercial support. > > > > > > What you are talking about is Red Hat _Enterprise_ Linux. > > > > Very true; "_was_" is the correct tense. But I was talking about RHL, > > the distribution that RH published before moving to a RHEL/Fedora > > model. > > I know you were talking about RHL, I was replying to Ismael. > > > You can't get RHEL for free, even the "self-support" option has a yearly > cost... > > Yes, I'm aware of that. Rule of thumb: if it's free it's not RHEL. > If free is what you're after: CentoOS, Fedora, etc. > Hint: registered trademarks. > > Regards, > -- > Raf > > > -- > To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org > with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact > listmas...@lists.debian.org > Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20111110132440.ga2...@linuxstuff.pl > >
