Kamaraju S Kusumanchi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Darko wrote:
>
> > I'snt better to convince some one from debian.org to make news grop
> > debian.user on server debian.public.org rather then this overcapacity's
> > mailing list
>
> debian-user mailing list can be accessed as a news group. You can
On Nov 10, 10:30 am, Kamaraju S Kusumanchi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Darko wrote:
> > I'snt better to convince some one from debian.org to make news grop
> > debian.user on server debian.public.org rather then this overcapacity's
> > mailing list
>
> debian-user mailing list can be accessed as a
Sun, 11 Nov 2007 09:48:50 +0100 keltezéssel
Pál Csányi azt írta:
> 2007/11/10, Ralph Katz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>> On 11/10/2007 03:22 PM, Pál Csányi wrote:
>> > 2007/11/10, Kamaraju S Kusumanchi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>> >
>> >> Using linux.debian.user is possible only if you have access to a news
>
2007/11/10, Ralph Katz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On 11/10/2007 03:22 PM, Pál Csányi wrote:
> > 2007/11/10, Kamaraju S Kusumanchi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> >
> >> Using linux.debian.user is possible only if you have access to a news
> >> server. For me that is not the case. So I use the free http://gmane.
On 11/10/2007 03:22 PM, Pál Csányi wrote:
> 2007/11/10, Kamaraju S Kusumanchi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
>> Using linux.debian.user is possible only if you have access to a news
>> server. For me that is not the case. So I use the free http://gmane.org 's
>> server using which almost all the debian ma
On 11/10/07, Darko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'snt better to convince some one from debian.org to make news grop
> debian.user on server debian.public.org rather then this overcapacity's
> mailing list
Look at linux.debian.user or news.gmane.org
--
Paul Johnson
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To
2007/11/10, Kamaraju S Kusumanchi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Using linux.debian.user is possible only if you have access to a news
> server. For me that is not the case. So I use the free http://gmane.org 's
> server using which almost all the debian mailing lists can be read as news
> groups.
I try
Darko wrote:
> I'snt better to convince some one from debian.org to make news grop
> debian.user on server debian.public.org rather then this overcapacity's
> mailing list
debian-user mailing list can be accessed as a news group. You can read/post
on this news group just like debian-user mailing
On 11/10/2007 12:02 PM, Darko wrote:
> I'snt better to convince some one from debian.org to make news grop
> debian.user on server debian.public.org rather then this overcapacity's
> mailing list
>
debian-user is available on several newsgroups. I read this on
gmane.org, newsgroup gmane.linux.de
Darko wrote the following on 10.11.2007 18:02
> I'snt better to convince some one from debian.org to make news grop
> debian.user on server debian.public.org rather then this overcapacity's
> mailing list
you mean s.th. like:
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.linux.debian.user ?
bye
--
Thilo
key:
On Mon, 29 Sep 2003 20:09:31 -0500, Scott C. Linnenbringer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> penned:
> --Signature=_Mon__29_Sep_2003_20_09_31_-0500_pe/V4DcYATcxTKe7
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
> Content-Disposition: inline
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
>
> On Sun, 28 Sep 2003 10:29:07 -0500
On Sun, 28 Sep 2003 10:29:07 -0500, "debian.1" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Hello:
>
> I'm having trouble posting a question to the lists. I tried to do it
> via the newsgroup, dosent' appear. I used my subscribed address. Can
> one post via the newsgroup? What settings are required?
>
> I
Derrick 'dman' Hudson wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 28, 2003 at 10:29:07AM -0500, debian.1 wrote:
>
> | Can one post via the newsgroup?
>
> Nope. It's a one-way gateway. Posts via the newsgroup only show up
> in the newsgroup, or so I've been told. The rest of us use the
> mailling list (SMTP; aka ema
On Sun, 28 Sep 2003 22:44:25 -0400, Derrick 'dman' Hudson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> penned:
>
> --TRYliJ5NKNqkz5bu
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
> Content-Disposition: inline
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
>
> On Sun, Sep 28, 2003 at 10:29:07AM -0500, debian.1 wrote:
>
>|
On Sun, Sep 28, 2003 at 10:29:07AM -0500, debian.1 wrote:
| Can one post via the newsgroup?
Nope. It's a one-way gateway. Posts via the newsgroup only show up
in the newsgroup, or so I've been told. The rest of us use the
mailling list (SMTP; aka email). (btw, subscription doesn't matter)
-D
On Sun, 28 Sep 2003 10:29:07 -0500, debian.1 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> penned:
> This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
>
> --=_NextPart_000_00BE_01C385AB.592B7D30
> Content-Type: text/plain;
> charset="iso-8859-1"
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
>
> Hello:
>
> I'm having
Thankyou to all who responded.
Seems to be no consensus - which ain't a bad thing
BTW. I suppose that all that remains for me to do
is to fire up apt-get and start trying out the
newsreaders.
Thanks again.
t.irvine
--
Whoever thinks a faultless piece to see,
Thinks what ne'er was, nor is
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mon, Sep 02, 2002 at 08:51:20PM +0300, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I have only ever accessed newsgroups using netscape under windows.
> I was wondering whether anyone would be so kind as to give a novice
> some advice on what clients are worth looki
* [EMAIL PROTECTED] ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [020902 10:56]:
> Hei
>
> I have only ever accessed newsgroups using netscape under windows.
> I was wondering whether anyone would be so kind as to give a novice
> some advice on what clients are worth looking trying under linux.
If you're familiar and co
On Mon, 2 Sep 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hei
>
> I have only ever accessed newsgroups using netscape under windows.
> I was wondering whether anyone would be so kind as to give a novice
> some advice on what clients are worth looking trying under linux.
>
> I here that gnus is very powerfu
On Mon, Sep 02, 2002 at 08:51:20PM +0300, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hei
>
> I have only ever accessed newsgroups using netscape under windows.
> I was wondering whether anyone would be so kind as to give a novice
> some advice on what clients are worth looking trying under linux.
slrn is a text
On 19 Oct 2001, Jens Müller wrote:
> This is not a real newsgroup, it is a mirrored mailing list. Please
> send your posts and replies to debian-user@lists.debian.org, otherwise
> they won't reach those who are not reading the list via this
> particular newsgroup.
What would be handy is if someon
On Sat, Dec 12, 1998 at 03:01:17PM +1100, Shao Zhang wrote:
>
> Hi all,
> How do I set up a newsgroup in pine??
>
> I put in the proper news server name. when I subscribe the
> newsgroup, it says I don't have the permission!!
>
> Could anyone help??
>
> Thx
> Shao.
Some
Hi,
>>"Rev" == Rev Joseph Carter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Rev> [1 ]
Rev> On Fri, May 22, 1998 at 03:37:44PM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
George> It is a lot easier to follow a high-traffic list with a
George> newsreader than it is a mail reader.
>>
>> Yes. I agree. What does this have
> The best solution is a unified mail/news reader application ofcourse
> that can let you read mailing lists as newsgroups. Only emacs (with GNUs)
> can do that now AFAIK and I do not want to learn emacs..
have you ever looked at mutt?
pgpnlxg0Jihrj.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Of course newsgroups are fine provided you have access to a good news
feed. The one I have access to is rather unreliable. It seems that many
messages simply don't get through, and there are often periods when news
groups have no messages at all in them for a day or two. (Not that I have
tried
On Fri, May 22, 1998 at 03:37:44PM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> George> It is a lot easier to follow a high-traffic list with a
> George> newsreader than it is a mail reader.
>
> Yes. I agree. What does this have to do with gateways, though?
> Why *don't* people just read mailing list
> SL> Uhm, I beg to differ. On a newsgroup with moderate traffic (50-60
> SL> messages/day) the amount of data transfered to read what I want to
> SL> read is less than if it were a mailing list. The difference is, a
> SL> mailing list, all message bodies are transfered. With a newsgroup
> SL
> "SL" == Steve Lamb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
SL> Uhm, I beg to differ. On a newsgroup with moderate traffic (50-60
SL> messages/day) the amount of data transfered to read what I want to
SL> read is less than if it were a mailing list. The difference is, a
SL> mailing list, all message b
> new to Debian and probably Linux as well. A 'real' newsgroup would be better
> than a simulated one for those of us who can't/won't use something like emacs
> with gnus.
I used to run gnus on a 486 with 8MB, so I can sympathize. And it's
understandable for those you just don't like emacs. I hav
On Sat, 23 May 1998 12:05:09 +0200 (CEST), Orn E. Hansen wrote:
> The problem with news servers, and reading threads like this one there, is
>for the home user. If you have a 28.8 link, or 14.4 link, and start reading
>the news, you will be downloading a far greater amount than if you just
>subs
Þann 23-May-98 skrifar Ed Cogburn:
>
> I have to agree here. Remember, this mailing list is being used by
> people
> new to Debian and probably Linux as well. A 'real' newsgroup would be better
> than a simulated one for those of us who can't/won't use something like emacs
> with gnus.
Th
On Fri, May 22, 1998 at 07:21:24PM -0500, Ed Cogburn wrote:
> I have to agree here. Remember, this mailing list is being used by people
> new to Debian and probably Linux as well. A 'real' newsgroup would be better
> than a simulated one for those of us who can't/won't use something like emac
personall i prefere the mailing list, i dont read news grps very often, and
what a few mins on the phone ??
Rick
-Original Message-
From: Gregory Guthrie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Date: 22 May 1998 04:16
Subject: newsgroup, instead of mail list?
>Given the vol
George Bonser wrote:
>
> Think of a mailing list to Unsenet as a "resource multiplier". If one
> single email is read by hundreds or thousands of people, the mail servers
> at both ends are given a break, only one copy needs to exist on the news
> server for many to read it, the message auto-expir
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>>>"Gregory" == Gregory Guthrie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Gregory> Given the volume of traffic on this list, I would certainly find a
> Gregory> newsgroup more convenient.
Maybe for some, but I avoid news groups. I don't have the time it takes to
fire
Hi,
>>"Gregory" == Gregory Guthrie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Gregory> Given the volume of traffic on this list, I would certainly find a
Gregory> newsgroup more convenient.
I think a newsgroup has nothing to do with this. What it does
have to do with is your choice of software. I ha
On Fri, 22 May 1998 13:29:36 -0700 (PDT), George Bonser wrote:
>I also never use a forged address but I have Exim with a rather impressive
>list of sites, domain names, networks, and individuals that may not send
>me email that I have built up over time. I get maybe a half-dozen spams
>a week.
Hi,
>>"George" == George Bonser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
George> It is a lot easier to follow a high-traffic list with a
George> newsreader than it is a mail reader.
Yes. I agree. What does this have to do with gateways, though?
Why *don't* people just read mailing lists with news r
> "RJC" == Rev Joseph Carter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
RJC> On Fri, May 22, 1998 at 12:14:21PM -0700, Steve Lamb wrote:
>> >I'm down to < 10 spam a day now. I don't want 30 again.
>>
>> Get some real filters in place, then.
RJC> Excuse me, but I have filters. The < 10 spam I get sli[p b
On Fri, 22 May 1998 19:32:52 +, Rev. Joseph Carter wrote:
>> Get some real filters in place, then.
>Excuse me, but I have filters. The < 10 spam I get sli[p by the filters
>because of forged headers manipulated to get by filters.
I get 1 per month that slip by my filters... if that.
On Fri, May 22, 1998 at 12:14:21PM -0700, Steve Lamb wrote:
> >I'm down to < 10 spam a day now. I don't want 30 again.
>
> Get some real filters in place, then.
Excuse me, but I have filters. The < 10 spam I get sli[p by the filters
because of forged headers manipulated to get by filters.
On Fri, 22 May 1998 19:12:46 +, Rev. Joseph Carter wrote:
>I'm down to < 10 spam a day now. I don't want 30 again.
Get some real filters in place, then.
--
Steve C. Lamb | Opinions expressed by me are not my
http://www.calweb.com/~morpheus| employer's.
On Fri, May 22, 1998 at 08:35:53AM -0500, Goetzke, Christopher L wrote:
> My local news server does indeed have linux.debian.user; I'm headed that
> way now. Those of you staying email can argue about whether you want
> posts gatewayed back to the list. ;-)
I don't want news posts gateway'd back
On Thu, May 21, 1998 at 10:15:54PM -0500, Gregory Guthrie wrote:
> Given the volume of traffic on this list, I would certainly find a
> newsgroup more convenient.
>
> 1) it maintains threads, and thus has MUCH better organization and access.
Mutt does this with mail.
> 2) the linear, header and
> "MvS" == Miquel van Smoorenburg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
MvS> Gating mail to news is NOT a good idea. Why? Because a lot of people
MvS> do it.
But it does work well, if it is centralised. de.alt.comm.isdn4linux is a
(both-sided) gateway to a mailinglist.
For me, it doesn't matter (I u
>I don't know about you folks, but my newserver (news.vt.edu) has the
>group, but I've never seen a single message in it
>
>Am I broken?
>
-- Mine has 6 messages total;
I get 10x that each day in the mail list!
Situation?
Greg
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
George Bonser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Many people DO read debian-user by newsreader. As a matter of fact, there
>is more traffic in the Usenet version because posts are not gatewayed back
>to the mailing list.
Oh that's great. Not.
>Look for linux.debian.user o
Gregory Guthrie wrote:
> Given the volume of traffic on this list, I would certainly find a
> newsgroup more convenient.
>
> 1) it maintains threads, and thus has MUCH better organization and access.
Not so. News servers no nothing about threads. News clients do. What's more, I
believe they use t
Thursday, May 21, 1998 10:24 PM
> > To: Gregory Guthrie
> > Cc: recipient list not shown
> > Subject: Re: newsgroup, instead of mail list?
> >
> > Many people DO read debian-user by newsreader. As a matter of
> > fact, there
> > is more traffic in the Usenet
> -Original Message-
> From: George Bonser [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, May 21, 1998 10:24 PM
> To: Gregory Guthrie
> Cc: recipient list not shown
> Subject: Re: newsgroup, instead of mail list?
>
> Many people DO read debian-user by newsreader
> -Original Message-
> From: Gregory Guthrie [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, May 21, 1998 10:16 PM
> To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
> Cc: recipient list not shown
> Subject: newsgroup, instead of mail list?
>
>
> Given the volume of traffic on this list, I would certainly fi
>Given the volume of traffic on this list, I would certainly find a
>newsgroup more convenient.
>
>1) it maintains threads, and thus has MUCH better organization and access.
Try a threading mail reader: mutt or gnus. I use gnus and I cannot
imagine anything better.
Bake
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, emai
In your email to me, Kendrick Myatt, you wrote:
>
> Someone mentioned to me once about there being a newsgroup version of this
> list. I can't see it from my server, so I assume it's not propagated. What
> server do I point my newsreader at to see it. Thanks! :)
>
llug.sep.bnl.gov
Tim
--
> Someone mentioned to me once about there being a newsgroup version of this
> list. I can't see it from my server, so I assume it's not propagated. What
> server do I point my newsreader at to see it. Thanks! :)
>
> Regards,
>
> Kendrick
>
When I have trouble I turn to
http://www.dejanews.c
If you think about it, c.o.l is really a misnomer. Linux is not really
the operating system. Debian is the operating system. Linux is just a
kernel, that many operating systems have based themselves on because it's
freely available and it has a lot of support on the net.
In that light, pu
> "DG" == David Gaudine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
DG> On 6 Sep 1996, Juri Pakaste wrote:
>> Wouldn't comp.os.linux.distrib.debian.* or something similar be
>> better? If users of other distributions decide that they'd like to
>> have newsgroups too, things would be pretty confusing with
On 6 Sep 1996, Juri Pakaste wrote:
> Wouldn't comp.os.linux.distrib.debian.* or something similar be
> better? If users of other distributions decide that they'd like to
> have newsgroups too, things would be pretty confusing with
> c.o.l.{debian,redhat,caldera,slackware,craftworks,yggdrasil,wgs
> "BCW" == Brian C White <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> REQUEST FOR DISCUSSION (RFD)
>>
>> moderated group comp.os.linux.debian.announce moderated group
>> comp.os.linux.debian.install moderated group
>> comp.os.linux.debian.nontech moderated group
>> comp.os.linux.debian.tech moderated
If there are 500 posts a day to comp.lang.c++, it strikes me that this
group is *begging* to be split up. Besides the
wading-through-heaps-of-stuff-you-'re-not-interested-in factor, some of
us have to pay to receive news articles and suchlike, and a better
targeted audience would save us lots of ti
> REQUEST FOR DISCUSSION (RFD)
>
> moderated group comp.os.linux.debian.announce
> moderated group comp.os.linux.debian.install
> moderated group comp.os.linux.debian.nontech
> moderated group comp.os.linux.debian.tech
> moderated group comp.
61 matches
Mail list logo
