Thanks Dan,
I disabled Secure Boot and sure enough, the driver was loaded.
I actually decided to make a clean install of Debian on this machine
and left Secure boot disabled.
I tried multiple times and was unable to get the driver to load. This
is strange however because it did work before.
I w
On Jan 15, 2025, Anil F Duggirala wrote:
> I am trying to install the Nvidia driver on my Dell XPS 9550 fresh
> Debian 12 machine.
>
> [ 16.905450] Loading of module with unavailable key is rejected
> ...
>
> Can anyone please help me out. Getting Debian to work in this laptop
> has been a big
David writes:
> Hi, for your information, this wiki page:
> https://wiki.debian.org/DontBreakDebian
> has some information related to your question,
I sometimes wonder if the deb-multimedia repo counts as a Frankendebian
making thingy since the wiki page is ambiguous in my opinion. I
sometimes
On 16/08/2024 06:15, George at Clug wrote:
usermod -a -G video,audio [myusername]
It should not be necessary. Udev and systemd-logind "uaccess" feature
grants permissions to the current active user through ACLs.
On 8/15/24 13:47, Hans wrote:
Hi Ebon,
you said, it is flashing? Or do you have a blamk screen?
It's all black, but the backlight flashes.
I'll see if making the fixmonitors script correct works. I wrote that
script and it uses xrandr to reset the monitors to the way they should be.
Now thei
On Thu, 15 Aug 2024 at 15:46, George at Clug wrote:
> On Thursday, 15-08-2024 at 19:05 Hans wrote:
> > FYI I am running a backport kernel, it is 6.9.7+bpo-amd64.
>
> Is this what is called a "Frankendebian" ?
Hi, for your information, this wiki page:
https://wiki.debian.org/DontBreakDebian
has
On Friday, 16-08-2024 at 03:30 Hans wrote:
> > What Steam games do you have working under Nvidia? I have watched
people on
> > YouTube play some interesting and modern games using Nvidia +
Linux and
> > with ray-tracing, but they have to do a lot of customisation from
what I
> > could tell. From my
On Friday, 16-08-2024 at 03:57 Greg Wooledge wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 16, 2024 at 00:48:20 +1000, George at Clug wrote:
> > On Thursday, 15-08-2024 at 19:05 Hans wrote:
> > > FYI I am running a backport kernel, it is 6.9.7+bpo-amd64.
> >
> > Is this what is called a "Frankendebian" ?
>
> No. Back
Le 15/08/2024 à 19:17, e...@gmx.us a écrit :
[...]
> Aug 15 12:57:24 cerberus lightdm[1085]: Error getting user list from
> org.freedesktop.Accounts:
> GDBus.Error:org.freedesktop.DBus.Error.ServiceUnknown: The name
> org.freedesktop.Accounts was not provided by any .service files
[...]
didier@hp-
>
> You don't get security updates for backport kernels, so I'd strongly
> oppose it if you're running an exposed server. But for a desktop system
> in a normal kind of setup (behind a firewall, or on a private network)
> it should be within reasonable expectations of security.
Huh, this is an
On Fri, Aug 16, 2024 at 00:48:20 +1000, George at Clug wrote:
> On Thursday, 15-08-2024 at 19:05 Hans wrote:
> > FYI I am running a backport kernel, it is 6.9.7+bpo-amd64.
>
> Is this what is called a "Frankendebian" ?
No. Backports are reasonably safe. Installing one doesn't break all
your dep
Hi Ebon,
you said, it is flashing? Or do you have a blamk screen?
This can happen, when the resolutionb of the monitor is out of sync.
You can try to create an /etc/xorg.conf file, where you can set the
resolution. Xorg.conf is not needed any more, as the monitor is telling the
resolution and
> What Steam games do you have working under Nvidia? I have watched people on
> YouTube play some interesting and modern games using Nvidia + Linux and
> with ray-tracing, but they have to do a lot of customisation from what I
> could tell. From my experience basic distribution installations do not
On 8/15/24 12:54, e...@gmx.us wrote:
On 8/15/24 05:05, Hans wrote:
If it is now starting well, you are good and can move your
loginmanagers back. After reboot, it should automatically starting the
-Server witrh a login greeter.
OK, I'll try that. I haven't changed anything but we'll see wh
I am currently running in X with the GTX. Only two of three monitors are
connected. The right one currently has a VGA cable which doesn't work with
this card. In the console, the left (sideways, DVI) worked but the center
(HDMI) didn't until "startx". How can I fix that, or is the DVI one the
On 8/15/24 05:05, Hans wrote:
Hi Ebon,
I am running a NVidia GTX-960 iin Debianbookworm and it is working lie a charme.
No problems with any of the apps, Greg mentioned. KDE, Steam games and
everything elese is
working great.
FYI I am running a backport kernel, it is 6.9.7+bpo-amd64.
Proba
On Thursday, 15-08-2024 at 19:05 Hans wrote:
> Hi Ebon,
>
> I am running a NVidia GTX-960 iin Debianbookworm and it is working lie a
> charme.
>
> No problems with any of the apps, Greg mentioned. KDE, Steam games and
> everything elese is
> working great.
What Steam games do you have wo
Hi Ebon,
I am running a NVidia GTX-960 iin Debianbookworm and it is working lie a charme.
No problems with any of the apps, Greg mentioned. KDE, Steam games and
everything elese is
working great.
FYI I am running a backport kernel, it is 6.9.7+bpo-amd64.
If your card i
Ebon,
I have used GTX 970 and GTX 960 video cards for several years. I
have used them with Bookworm since Bookworm was released, using the
Bookworm packaged Nvidia proprietary drivers.
As long as the GTX 970 is not faulty, you should have an excellent
experience with the GTX 970, ... unless yo
On 03/01/24 at 19:28, Thomas Anderson wrote:
Thanks a lot, Macro!
it worked. Sorry for delay, I got side tracked with "my day" =)
On 03/01/2024 12:03, Marco Moock wrote:
Am 03.01.2024 um 11:52:59 Uhr schrieb Thomas Anderson:
Here is the output. Wow, a lot.
All those lines with ii at the beg
On 3/1/24 18:36, Thomas Anderson wrote:
I will upgrade Debian to 12 within the next month or so...but before I
do, want to clean up my current system.
I am running Debian 12 with the nvidia driver. It's mostly OK but I
recently had to reboot as the Xorg process had taken around 70% of my
3
Thanks a lot, Macro!
it worked. Sorry for delay, I got side tracked with "my day" =)
On 03/01/2024 12:03, Marco Moock wrote:
Am 03.01.2024 um 11:52:59 Uhr schrieb Thomas Anderson:
Here is the output. Wow, a lot.
All those lines with ii at the beginning mean the package is installed.
apt rem
> dpkg-reconfigure nvidia-kernel-dkms
>
Hi all,
I am using a NVidia card, which is using the Tesla-driver version (525.147.XX)
and used the
470.XXX version before.
Both could not be installed by using the above package.
But it got installed using package module-assistant.
Suggestion, how to
Marco Moock writes:
> Am 03.01.2024 um 11:52:59 Uhr schrieb Thomas Anderson:
>
>> Here is the output. Wow, a lot.
>
> All those lines with ii at the beginning mean the package is installed.
>
> apt remove *nvidia* -s
>
> Check if the result is ok and then run it without -s (-s only
> simulates).
Am 03.01.2024 um 11:52:59 Uhr schrieb Thomas Anderson:
> Here is the output. Wow, a lot.
All those lines with ii at the beginning mean the package is installed.
apt remove *nvidia* -s
Check if the result is ok and then run it without -s (-s only
simulates).
Here is the output. Wow, a lot.
Desired=Unknown/Install/Remove/Purge/Hold
|
Status=Not/Inst/Conf-files/Unpacked/halF-conf/Half-inst/trig-aWait/Trig-pend
|/ Err?=(none)/Reinst-required (Status,Err: uppercase=bad)
||/ Name Version Architecture Description
+++-===
Am 03.01.2024 um 11:36:03 Uhr schrieb Thomas Anderson:
> Key information:
> I am aware that there are two different installation paths for the
> nvidia driver, either through the repos or from nvidia downloads.
> I think I did the later, but I have misplaced, lost, and cannot
> download the drive
On vrijdag 10 maart 2023 08:00:36 (+01:00), Charles Kroeger wrote:
> deb https://deb.debian.org/debian bookworm main non-free
non-free-firmware
>
> not
>
> deb https://deb.debian.org/debian bookworm main contrib non-free
> non-free-firmware
>
> ?
>
Of course, you can also add 'contrib' se
deb https://deb.debian.org/debian bookworm main non-free non-free-firmware
not
deb https://deb.debian.org/debian bookworm main contrib non-free
non-free-firmware
?
--
CK
Ah so a typo. A small thing causing big problems. Once that was corrected
the necessary files from firmware were included in an apt update and
eventually the full-upgrade without nvidia-kernel-dkms being held back.
Everything resolved after that.
Thanks
--
CK
On donderdag 09 maart 2023 23:59:03 (+01:00), Greg Wooledge wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 09, 2023 at 04:18:21PM -0500, Charles Kroeger wrote:
> > W: Failed to fetch
https://deb/debian.org/debian/dists/bookworm/InRelease
> > Could not resolve 'deb'
>
> You have a typo. deb/debian.org should be deb.d
On Thu, Mar 09, 2023 at 04:18:21PM -0500, Charles Kroeger wrote:
> W: Failed to fetch https://deb/debian.org/debian/dists/bookworm/InRelease
> Could not resolve 'deb'
You have a typo. deb/debian.org should be deb.debian.org
Anssi, thanks for your reply.
When Andreas Beckmann added this URL to his apt disclosure:
https://www.debian.org/releases/bookworm/amd64/release-notes/ch-information.en.html#non-free-split
He does give a useful example of how the entry should look in
/etc/apt/sources/list like this:
deb https:
Charles Kroeger writes:
> Where is this nvidia-open-kernel-525.89.02 ?
Seems like it's lost to history. Bookworm non-free has
nvidia-open-kernel-525.85.12.
So maybe you just need to run apt update to have up to date package
lists and then run apt upgrade?
> There was an advisory by Andreas Bec
Op Tue, 05 Dec 2017 21:03:46 +0100 schreef Benny Simonsen
:
Hi,
System: Fresh Debian 9
I have a Nvidia GT 1030, that needs 384 (or newer), and I have followed
the guide listed here:
https://wiki.debian.org/NvidiaGraphicsDrivers#Building_newer_releases_from_SVN
Last step: svn-buildpackage -
Ramon Hofer wrote:
> Is there anything I can do to rsolve the dependencies?
You need to use the nvidia-drivers from Experimental for the time
beeing.
S°
--
Sigmentation fault. Core dumped.
Hi Liu,
if your system is Optimus you need install bumblebee and configure it, I
had same problem recently.
Steps:
kill lightdm
install nvidia-driver
install nvidia-xconf
run nvidia-xconf
reboot
install bumblebee
configure bumblebee
restart service of bumblebee
I also archieve this steps using nvi
Op Mon, 28 Sep 2015 07:12:40 +0200 schreef Liu Gengdai
:
Hi
I'm a debian newbie. I installed latest Debian with xfce on my laptop. I
used official DVD-ROM. My graphics card is NV Geforce GT 640M LE. I
installed 360.65 driver for my graphics card following the instructions
on wiki:
http
On 07/17/2014 10:12 AM, John Bleichert wrote:
The Nvidia drivers have been removed from testing since they are not
compatible with xorg-server 1.16[1,2,3]. Stick to your current 1.15 X
server or switch to nouveau.
Were you talking about the release clients with the [1,2,3] - sorry,
didn't
On 07/17/2014 01:49 AM, Sven Joachim wrote:
On 2014-07-17 01:53 +0200, Jonas Lippuner wrote:
It looks like the nvidia-driver package disappeared from
testing/jessie. When I try to install it from sid, it complains about
broken dependencies. Anybody else seeing this? Anybody know how to fix it
Op Thu, 17 Jul 2014 07:49:51 +0200 schreef Sven Joachim :
On 2014-07-17 01:53 +0200, Jonas Lippuner wrote:
It looks like the nvidia-driver package disappeared from
testing/jessie. When I try to install it from sid, it complains about
broken dependencies. Anybody else seeing this? Anybody know
On 2014-07-17 01:53 +0200, Jonas Lippuner wrote:
> It looks like the nvidia-driver package disappeared from
> testing/jessie. When I try to install it from sid, it complains about
> broken dependencies. Anybody else seeing this? Anybody know how to fix it?
The Nvidia drivers have been removed fro
- Original Message -
> From: Andrei POPESCU
> To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
> Cc:
> Sent: Sunday, April 7, 2013 10:39 AM
> Subject: Re: Nvidia Driver Working [Was: Running Nvidia Driver Without an
> xorg.conf]
>
> On Mi, 27 mar 13, 09:14:20, Patrick B
On Mi, 27 mar 13, 09:14:20, Patrick Bartek wrote:
>
> The above is true only if you're using Xorg--any version, I assume--or
> XFree86 version 4.4.0 or greater.
As far as I recall sarge was the last release with XFree86, no need to
worry about that in Debian.
Kind regards,
Andrei
--
http://
- Original Message -
> From: Andrei POPESCU
> To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
> Cc:
> Sent: Wednesday, March 27, 2013 1:47 AM
> Subject: Re: Nvidia Driver Working [Was: Running Nvidia Driver Without an
> xorg.conf]
>
> On Ma, 26 mar 13, 09:48:26, Patrick
- Original Message -
> From: Jonathan Dowland
> To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
> Cc:
> Sent: Wednesday, March 27, 2013 2:03 AM
> Subject: Re: Nvidia Driver Working [Was: Running Nvidia Driver Without an
> xorg.conf]
>
> On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 08:55:01
On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 08:55:01AM +0200, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
> > ==
> > Section "Module"
> > Load "glx"
> > EndSection
>
> Not needed.
Thanks - I've updated http://wiki.debian.org/NvidiaGraphicsDrivers to reflect
that
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debia
On Ma, 26 mar 13, 09:48:26, Patrick Bartek wrote:
>
> I commented it out, and everything still works. Thanks. So, at one
> time, this was needed, why not now?
Wild guess: gfx is now loaded by default, irrespective of driver.
Kind regards,
Andrei
--
http://wiki.debian.org/FAQsFromDebianUser
O
On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 2:44 AM, Alan Ianson wrote:
>
> I use vga=791 on my kernel command line. I think that is, or soon will
> be depreciated but I find that method gives me what I want as far as
> the terminal goes.
>
> GRUB_GFXMODE=x in grub.cfg is the way to configure it now but I
> h
On Tue, 26 Mar 2013 07:50:02 +0100
Alan Ianson wrote:
> GRUB_GFXMODE=x in grub.cfg is the way to configure it now but I
> haven't found a setting that suits me, yet.
I believe you'd be talking about /etc/default/grub
try 1024x768
that's a civilized looking resolution.
--
CK
--
To
- Original Message -
> From: Andrei POPESCU
> To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
> Cc:
> Sent: Monday, March 25, 2013 11:55 PM
> Subject: Re: Nvidia Driver Working [Was: Running Nvidia Driver Without an
> xorg.conf]
>
> On Lu, 25 mar 13, 21:13:58, Patrick Bart
- Original Message -
> From: Alan Ianson
> To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
> Cc:
> Sent: Monday, March 25, 2013 11:44 PM
> Subject: Re: Nvidia Driver Working [Was: Running Nvidia Driver Without an
> xorg.conf]
>
> On Mon, 25 Mar 2013 21:13:58 -0700 (PDT)
On Lu, 25 mar 13, 21:13:58, Patrick Bartek wrote:
> Well, that was easy: Just created, since there wasn't one by default, an
> xorg.conf per instructions in the Debian Nvidia wiki
>
> ==
> Section "Module"
> Load "glx"
> EndSection
Not needed.
Kind regar
On Mon, 25 Mar 2013 21:13:58 -0700 (PDT)
Patrick Bartek wrote:
> Well, that was easy: Just created, since there wasn't one by
> default, an xorg.conf per instructions in the Debian Nvidia wiki
>
> ==
> Section "Module"
> Load "glx"
> EndSection
>
> Sectio
On Fri, 2011-11-25 at 17:15 -0800, Go Linux wrote:
> --- On Fri, 11/25/11, Hugo Vanwoerkom wrote:
> >
> > Model: "nVidia GeForce 8400 GS"
> > I use 'nouveau.modeset=0' on the kernel cmdline and also
> > blacklist nouveau.
> > But note that the latest udev (175-2) removes
> > blacklist.conf, I put
--- On Fri, 11/25/11, Hugo Vanwoerkom wrote:
>
> Model: "nVidia GeForce 8400 GS"
> I use 'nouveau.modeset=0' on the kernel cmdline and also
> blacklist nouveau.
> But note that the latest udev (175-2) removes
> blacklist.conf, I put it back again.
> What I find if I don't blacklist nouveau is tha
Ralf Mardorf wrote:
On Fri, 2011-11-25 at 12:16 +, Richard wrote
the FLOSS nouveau driver doesn't work
with old Nvidia cards, even if it's claimed that it should work.
I've come to the conclusion the nouveau driver doesn't work with new nvidia
cards as well, as I had to
black list it.
Forwarded Message
From: Richard
Date: Fri, 25 Nov 2011 13:01:45 +
On Fri, 25 Nov 2011 13:58:00 +0100
Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> On Fri, 2011-11-25 at 12:16 +, Richard wrote
> > > the FLOSS nouveau driver doesn't work
> > > with old Nvidia cards, even if it's claimed that it
On Fri, 2011-11-25 at 12:16 +, Richard wrote
> > the FLOSS nouveau driver doesn't work
> > with old Nvidia cards, even if it's claimed that it should work.
> I've come to the conclusion the nouveau driver doesn't work with new nvidia
> cards as well, as I had to
> black list it.
Perhaps we c
On Fri, 2011-11-25 at 12:16 +, Richard wrote
> > the FLOSS nouveau driver doesn't work
> > with old Nvidia cards, even if it's claimed that it should work.
> I've come to the conclusion the nouveau driver doesn't work with new nvidia
> cards as well, as I had to
> black list it.
Perhaps we c
On Fri, 25 Nov 2011 11:46:16 +0100
Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> On Thu, 2011-11-24 at 19:01 +, Richard wrote:
> > [snip] It wont build from the /usr/src/nvidia direcory, as it wants
> > the kernel config file. [snip]
>
> Please post the output of the log file. Are the linux-headers installed?
>
>
On Thu, 2011-11-24 at 19:01 +, Richard wrote:
> [snip] It wont build from the /usr/src/nvidia direcory, as it wants
> the kernel config file. [snip]
Please post the output of the log file. Are the linux-headers installed?
Half OT:
Since Nov 5 I kick installing the driver to 3.0.7-rt20. Perhap
I got my performance back, thanks to the links Sven provided. I ended up
having to roll back
xserver-xorg-core
xserver-xorg-input-evdev
xserver-xorg-input-kbd
xserver-xorg-input-mouse
from backports.d.o. I put these packages on hold. However, I found that
apticron gives me the message
"E: Unmet
Am Mittwoch, 12. Oktober 2011 schrieb Brad Rogers:
> On Tue, 11 Oct 2011 15:02:39 -0500
> Harry Putnam wrote:
>
> Hello Harry,
>
> > Oh boy, I guess there is not much doubt that I need new glasses.
>
> Nah, just set the font a couple of point sizes bigger. :-)
Bah, forget about this. I bette
Am Mittwoch, 12. Oktober 2011 schrieb Brad Rogers:
> On Tue, 11 Oct 2011 15:02:39 -0500
> Harry Putnam wrote:
>
> Hello Harry,
>
> > Oh boy, I guess there is not much doubt that I need new glasses.
>
> Nah, just set the font a couple of point sizes bigger. :-)
When you use Konsole Ctrl and +
On Tue, 11 Oct 2011 15:02:39 -0500
Harry Putnam wrote:
Hello Harry,
> Oh boy, I guess there is not much doubt that I need new glasses.
Nah, just set the font a couple of point sizes bigger. :-)
--
Regards _
/ ) "The blindingly obvious is
/ _)radnever imm
Sven Joachim writes:
[...]
>
> That's because you need to look for gl1, not gll.
[...]
Brad Rogers writes:
[...]
> Still wrong, it's gl1 (gee ell one).
Oh boy, I guess there is not much doubt that I need new glasses.
I'm so sorry for wasting your and the lists time.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE,
On Tue, 11 Oct 2011 13:56:40 -0500
Harry Putnam wrote:
Hello Harry,
> But still the right search turns up nothing either.
> aptitude search gll
>
Still wrong, it's gl1 (gee ell one).
--
Regards _
/ ) "The blindingly obvious is
/ _)radnever immediatel
On 2011-10-11 20:56 +0200, Harry Putnam wrote:
> Sven Joachim writes:
>
>>> an `aptitude search g11' finds nothing.
>>^
>> Hint: Use copy & paste. Or choose a font that better distinguishes the
>> letter 'l' from the digit '1'.
>
> Gack, yup what a looser I am.
>
> But s
Sven Joachim writes:
> On 2011-10-11 16:56 +0200, Harry Putnam wrote:
>
>> Sven Joachim writes:
>>
>>> Get xserver 1.10 from snapshot.debian.org, try a patch against 1.11.1
>>> from the nvidia forum², or use nouveau (you probably want to install the
>>> libgl1-mesa-dri-experimental package in th
Sven Joachim writes:
>> an `aptitude search g11' finds nothing.
>^
> Hint: Use copy & paste. Or choose a font that better distinguishes the
> letter 'l' from the digit '1'.
Gack, yup what a looser I am.
But still the right search turns up nothing either.
aptitude sea
On 2011-10-11 16:56 +0200, Harry Putnam wrote:
> Sven Joachim writes:
>
>> Get xserver 1.10 from snapshot.debian.org, try a patch against 1.11.1
>> from the nvidia forum², or use nouveau (you probably want to install the
>> libgl1-mesa-dri-experimental package in the latter case).
^
>
> Wh
Sven Joachim writes:
> Get xserver 1.10 from snapshot.debian.org, try a patch against 1.11.1
> from the nvidia forum², or use nouveau (you probably want to install the
> libgl1-mesa-dri-experimental package in the latter case).
Where does one get that dri pkg. With sources.list like so:
deb ht
Hi Sven,
On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 7:59 AM, Sven Joachim wrote:
> On 2011-10-11 13:25 +0200, Brad Alexander wrote:
>
> > I was just wondering if anyone else has run into performance issues on
> the
> > nvidia driver?
>
> Not too many people, since the relevant bug¹ has so far "only" 13
> duplicate
On 2011-10-11 13:25 +0200, Brad Alexander wrote:
> I was just wondering if anyone else has run into performance issues on the
> nvidia driver?
Not too many people, since the relevant bug¹ has so far "only" 13
duplicates. ;-)
> Does anyone know of a fix? I tried rolling back the nvidia version, b
On Sat, 08 Oct 2011 15:29:06 +0200, Hans-J. Ullrich wrote:
>> Well, AFAIK nvidia never stopped supporting their old cards. I know ATI
>> did (I mean, the closed source driver), but that's another story...
>>
> No, they did indeed! It is now a long time, older cards (below 8XXX)
> were nor
> sup
> Well, AFAIK nvidia never stopped supporting their old cards. I know ATI
> did (I mean, the closed source driver), but that's another story...
>
No, they did indeed! It is now a long time, older cards (below 8XXX) were nor
supported nby the nvidia-glx driver. So the kernel module could not be
On Sat, 08 Oct 2011 14:16:11 +0200, Hans-J. Ullrich wrote:
> Am Samstag, 8. Oktober 2011 schrieb Camaleón:
>> On Sat, 08 Oct 2011 13:59:45 +0200, Hans-J. Ullrich wrote:
>
>> I must have missed something, but:
>>
>> http://www.nvidia.com/object/linux-display-amd64-285.05.09-driver.html
>>
>> Isn
Me again!
Now I went back to the latest nvidia driver. Building went fine (I am using
dkms), but it inhibits to load.
See the last strace output from "strace modprobe nvidia":
stat64("/sys/module", {st_mode=S_IFDIR|0755, st_size=0, ...}) = 0
stat64("/sys/module/i2c_core", {st_mode=S_IFDIR|0755
Am Samstag, 8. Oktober 2011 schrieb Camaleón:
> On Sat, 08 Oct 2011 13:59:45 +0200, Hans-J. Ullrich wrote:
> I must have missed something, but:
>
> http://www.nvidia.com/object/linux-display-amd64-285.05.09-driver.html
>
> Isnt' your card listed there ("supported products" tab)? Mine is (7600
>
On Sat, 08 Oct 2011 13:59:45 +0200, Hans-J. Ullrich wrote:
>> Nope, that cannot be possible. Can you point me to some oficial
>> document? I'm interested in this because I also have a 7600GS card and
>> wouldn't like to have any problem in the upcoming wheezy.
>>
>
> Well, I just do niot find it
> Nope, that cannot be possible. Can you point me to some oficial document?
> I'm interested in this because I also have a 7600GS card and wouldn't
> like to have any problem in the upcoming wheezy.
>
> Greetings,
Well, I just do niot find it at the moment, but the drivers from Nvidia are
suppo
On Sat, 08 Oct 2011 06:15:56 -0500, Hugo Vanwoerkom wrote:
> Yes, that's what happened with that 3.0.0 nomenclature. You may not want
> to hear this but the fastest solution is a new card.
> http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16814139150 as
> little as US$34.-
Are you saying that
Hans-J. Ullrich wrote:
Hello all,
I am using debian/testing on my desktop pc. This computer is using a Nvidia
card 7300 GT ultra. As this is an older card, I got into a little problems. My
problems:
1. I want to use 3d-accceleration, so I need to use the proprietrary driver
from Nvidia.
2
On Sat, 08 Oct 2011 13:05:46 +0200, Hans-J. Ullrich wrote:
>> driver from Nvidia.
>> >
>> > 2. This card is not supported by the newest driver, but with
>> > nvidia-kernel- legacy-173xx and nvidia-glx-173xx.
>>
>> (...)
>>
>> Wait, wait... That's not possible.
>>
>> Branch "280.xx" should be f
> driver from Nvidia.
> >
> > 2. This card is not supported by the newest driver, but with
> > nvidia-kernel- legacy-173xx and nvidia-glx-173xx.
>
> (...)
>
> Wait, wait... That's not possible.
>
> Branch "280.xx" should be fine for your card. What problem are you facing
> with the newer driver
On 08/10/11 21:28, Hans-J. Ullrich wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> I am using debian/testing on my desktop pc. This computer is using a Nvidia
> card 7300 GT ultra. As this is an older card, I got into a little problems.
> My
> problems:
>
> 1. I want to use 3d-accceleration, so I need to use the pro
On Sat, 08 Oct 2011 12:28:13 +0200, Hans-J. Ullrich wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> I am using debian/testing on my desktop pc. This computer is using a
> Nvidia card 7300 GT ultra. As this is an older card, I got into a little
> problems. My problems:
>
> 1. I want to use 3d-accceleration, so I need to
Hi Bob,
It does sound like my problem. As I said, I rolled back to the earlier
version, and the only thing not working is wine. When starting an app in
wine (either playonlinux or straight wine), I get:
[POL_Wine] Message: Running wine-
/home/storm/.PlayOnLinux/wineprefix/starcraft2/drive_c/Progr
Brad Alexander wrote:
> Has anyone seen any odd behavior out of the nvidia drivers of late?
> ...
> I guess my questions are 1) Has anyone encountered this? and 2) should I
> roll back to the nvidia drivers 280.13-5 or even -4?
Read through this bug and see if it is your problem:
http://bugs.de
Thanks, Dave.
I wound up rolling back to 280.13-4, which meant that I had to end up
downloading xserver-xorg-core_1.10.4-1 from wheezy. (The current version of
xserver-xorg-core ships with xorg-video-abi-11, and 13-4 requires abi-10.)
So I downgraded the following packages:
xserver-xorg-video-nv
On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 07:37:58PM -0400, Brad Alexander wrote:
> Has anyone seen any odd behavior out of the nvidia drivers of late? I
> upgraded my sid workstation tonight, and got the following updates:
>
I'm getting similar wierdness with my sid, additionaly I can crash X
by running libreoffi
Sjoerd Hardeman wrote:
> Hi list,
>
> I found out that second displays are no longer detected with the closed
> source nvidia driver. Neither nvidia's nvidia-settings tool, nor xrandr
> shows the second display. Also entering some monitor info directly into
> xorg.conf hasn't solved my issues. Usi
On Fri, May 01, 2009 at 06:54:49PM +0300, Andrei Popescu wrote:
> On Fri,01.May.09, 15:43:39, Sjoerd Hardeman wrote:
> > Andrei Popescu schreef:
> > > On Fri,01.May.09, 16:19:01, Alex Samad wrote:
> > >
[snip]
> My reply was to Alex Samad, to point out that the 173xx driver has been
> updated
On Fri,01.May.09, 15:43:39, Sjoerd Hardeman wrote:
> Andrei Popescu schreef:
> > On Fri,01.May.09, 16:19:01, Alex Samad wrote:
> >
> >> the 173.x drivers are okay, but they stop at around 2.6.28 (or .26 I
> >> think)
> >
> > ,[ /usr/share/doc/nvidia-kernel-legacy-173xx-source/changelog.Debia
* Sjoerd Hardeman [2009-05-01 15:40:22 +0200]:
> Probably no Nvidia for me next time.
I'm going crazy with fglrx over here, so I don't know if you'd have
better luck on ATI.
--
Dave
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Andrei Popescu schreef:
> On Fri,01.May.09, 16:19:01, Alex Samad wrote:
>
>> the 173.x drivers are okay, but they stop at around 2.6.28 (or .26 I
>> think)
>
> ,[ /usr/share/doc/nvidia-kernel-legacy-173xx-source/changelog.Debian.gz ]
> | nvidia-graphics-drivers-legacy-173xx (173.14.18-1) uns
Alex Samad schreef:
> > On Wed, Apr 29, 2009 at 11:01:18PM +0200, Sjoerd Hardeman wrote:
>> >> Hi list,
> > I have seen this on a hp laptop 8510w and with the second deisplay.
> >
> > the 173.x drivers are okay, but they stop at around 2.6.28 (or .26 I
> > think)
I am currently using the 180.44 dri
On Fri,01.May.09, 16:19:01, Alex Samad wrote:
> the 173.x drivers are okay, but they stop at around 2.6.28 (or .26 I
> think)
,[ /usr/share/doc/nvidia-kernel-legacy-173xx-source/changelog.Debian.gz ]
| nvidia-graphics-drivers-legacy-173xx (173.14.18-1) unstable; urgency=low
|
| * New upstr
On Wed, Apr 29, 2009 at 11:01:18PM +0200, Sjoerd Hardeman wrote:
> Hi list,
>
> I found out that second displays are no longer detected with the closed
> source nvidia driver. Neither nvidia's nvidia-settings tool, nor xrandr
> shows the second display. Also entering some monitor info directly int
1 - 100 of 231 matches
Mail list logo
