On Thu,03.Dec.09, 16:01:43, deb...@toursbymexico.com wrote:
> Now I know that not all of the DVDs are necessary. Respect the
> 'expert' mode installation, when booted the DVD #1 it showed only
> "Install" and "Graphic Install" (I have tried both of them), but at
> any moment saw the expert or a
On Sun, Dec 31, 2006 at 06:01:39PM +, Digby Tarvin wrote:
> Further to the loss of 'xv', 'xearth' and 'xlock' after my recent
> 'apt-get dist-upgrade' of my etch system
>
> I tried adding
> deb http://ftp.debian-unofficial.org/debian etch main contrib non-free
> restricted
>
> To my '/et
On Thu, Jan 26, 2006 at 09:48:34PM +, Andrew M.A. Cater wrote:
> > Can anyone tell me why 'apt-cache search' doesn't find the
> > likes of the following:
> >
> > 1. xv - John Bradley's X image viewer/manipulator..
>
> Non-free shareware. I've actually emailed John and received
> clarification
On Thu, Jan 26, 2006 at 07:28:21PM +, Digby Tarvin wrote:
> Still finishing off my first Debian install, and am puzzling
> over the apparent absence of some very basic programs which
> I thought were pretty much universally available on *nix
> systems...
>
> Can anyone tell me why 'apt-cache
Digby Tarvin wrote:
Still finishing off my first Debian install, and am puzzling
over the apparent absence of some very basic programs which
I thought were pretty much universally available on *nix
systems...
Can anyone tell me why 'apt-cache search' doesn't find the
likes of the following:
1
On Thu, Jan 26, 2006 at 12:06:48PM -0800, Andrew Sackville-West wrote:
> > 1. xv - John Bradley's X image viewer/manipulator..
>
> google found this:
>
> http://ftp.fifi.org/debian-local/stable/unofficial/
Ah, ok. So it is not assumed that anyone who creates a debian
package will make it availa
On Thu, 26 Jan 2006 19:28:21 +
Digby Tarvin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Still finishing off my first Debian install, and am puzzling
> over the apparent absence of some very basic programs which
> I thought were pretty much universally available on *nix
> systems...
>
> Can anyone tell me w
<>Hi,
> Did you tell grub to use an initrd? Do you see modules in
> /lib/modules/2.6.6/ or so?
I did not and I do think this was the problem.
I thought the initrd was "built-into" 2.6 somehow but once
you pointed this out it became clear what I was doing wrong.
Thanks,
Charlie
--
Charlie Zender, [E
On Thu, 24 Jun 2004 12:27:27 -0700, Paul Scott wrote:
> Charlie Zender wrote:
>>
>>apt-get install kernel-image-2.6.6-1-686 kernel-headers-2.6.6-1-686
>>
>>and then try to boot into 2.6.6, I get kernel panic because,
>>apparently, none of the kernel modules were installed and the kernel
>>does not
Charlie Zender wrote:
Hi,
I use Debian Sid pre-packaged kernels on my Dell laptop.
When a new binary kernel package comes out I do a
apt-get install kernel-image-2.4.26-1-686 kernel-headers-2.4.26-1-686 \
kernel-pcmcia-modules-2.4.26-1-686 lm-sensors-2.4.26-1-686 \
nvidia-kernel-2.4.26-1-686
and
On Mon, Jun 21, 2004 at 01:31:06PM -0700, Charlie Zender said
> Hi,
>
> I use Debian Sid pre-packaged kernels on my Dell laptop.
> When a new binary kernel package comes out I do a
>
> apt-get install kernel-image-2.4.26-1-686 kernel-headers-2.4.26-1-686 \
> kernel-pcmcia-modules-2.4.26-1-686 l
On Mon, Oct 21, 2002 at 11:37:13AM -0300, Victor Munoz wrote:
>Hi. I downloaded CD images of woody last month, to take them home and
> install new packages as needed. I used jigdo. I also use woody at my
> office, where I install via internet connection. This weekend I noticed
> there are three
Rob Weir wrote:
On Mon, Oct 21, 2002 at 11:37:13AM -0300, Victor Munoz wrote:
I'm not
sure where they fit on the CDs tho. Do you have 7 CDs?
-rob
Non-free isn't on the cds at all.
You couldn't distribute the cds if non-free was there (well at least
probably not for money)...
...Non-free
>
> Those three packages are in non-Free which is Not Part Of Debian(tm),
> tho Debian does package them and put them up on it's mirrors. I'm not
> sure where they fit on the CDs tho. Do you have 7 CDs?
>
I have 7 CDs, taking care of downloading the non-US
version of the first one. But of c
Rob writes:
> I'm not sure where they fit on the CDs tho.
Non-free and contrib are not included in the official Debian CD images.
Any vendor could add packages from them if he wanted to, but he'd have to
read all the licenses to find out which non-free packages he could legally
distribute. So far
On 9 Aug 2001, dave wrote:
> Another package that appears to have just disappeared is j2sdk (the
> blackdown java plugin). This was in testing and I have it installed on
> my machine at home. However, when I switched over to Debian on my
> machine at work and tried to install it, I discovered th
"Marlon R. Schmitz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I try install Debian GNU/Linux 2.2r2(potato?) in my Linux Server, but
>dselect report an error: gnuserv and hdparm missing.
>
> I search in the trees of distribution, but there is no hdparm and/or
>gnuserv in any tree.
If you're installi
KDE 2.1 is not in woody yet because of problems with qt on alpha. You can get
.debs for potato from http://kde.tdyc.com or you can use .debs from sid. I
have used both succesfully with woody.
On Thursday 01 March 2001 5:20 pm, John May wrote:
> I must be either blind or stupid, but I can't fi
It must have been a temporary glitch, the files are now available.
Bob
On Wed, 20 Jan 1999, Bob Nielsen wrote:
> It seems that all the hamm and slink packages files, as well as those for
> contrib and non-free (but not main) in potato are currently missing on
> three mirrors I have checked today
Well, I have ldd also, but don't see the connection.
???
Bob
On Wed, 20 Jan 1999, Paul McDermott wrote:
> here is what i get when doing a dpkg -S ldd
> [paul:~]$ dpkg -S ldd
> ldso: /usr/man/man1/ldd.1.gz
> ldso: /usr/bin/ldd
> tetex-base: /usr/lib/texmf/fonts/source/public/cm/olddig.mf
> ldso:
here is what i get when doing a dpkg -S ldd
[paul:~]$ dpkg -S ldd
ldso: /usr/man/man1/ldd.1.gz
ldso: /usr/bin/ldd
tetex-base: /usr/lib/texmf/fonts/source/public/cm/olddig.mf
ldso: /usr/lib/lddstub
php3-doc: /usr/doc/php3-doc/html/function.hw-getchilddoccollobj.html
debhelper: /usr/man/man1/dh_build
>> What missing package causes the following in source configure
>> scripts?: 'checking for working makeinfo.. missing'
The makeinfo comes in tetex-bin, part of the tetex suite.
- PGP E4 70 6E 59 80 6A F5 78 63 32 BC FB 7A 08 53 4C
__ _Debian GNU Johni
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> What missing package causes the following in source configure scripts?:
> 'checking for working makeinfo.. missing'
>
> Thanks,
> Timothy
I checked a couple of configure scripts I had on hand, but they didn't
have
a reference to 'makeinfo'. This appare
On Wed, 25 Mar 1998, Bill Leach wrote:
> Humm, I don't see xlib6_ at all.
> Many of the packages that are 'missing' can be found in:
> debian/project/orphaned
Thanks for pointing this out, Bill. Unfortunately none of the packages I
was looking for are there :-)
I see that there is a new link
Humm, I don't see xlib6_ at all.
Many of the packages that are 'missing' can be found in:
debian/project/orphaned
--
best,
-bill
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
from a 1996 Micro$loth ad campaign:
"The less you know about computers the mo
Matt writes:
> I just did a clean 1.3.1 install, ran the autoup.sh, and then upgraded
> to hamm fully using dselect. The following packages are missing:
The crash of master seems to have caused a number of packages to vanish
from unstable. Master is back up, but everything isn't repaired yet. I
On Sat, 14 Mar 1998, Matt Thompson wrote:
:I just did a clean 1.3.1 install, ran the autoup.sh, and then upgraded
:to hamm fully using dselect. The following packages are missing:
:
:Constructing list of files to get...
:want: dists/unstable/main/binary-i386/base/sysvinit_2.73-2.deb (69k)
:want:
Bao C. Ha wrote:
:I am trying to install hamm. And I am missing some of the following
:packages: jdk-common, elf-x11r6lib, ...
:
:Are they not ready yet? Or are they located somewhere else not obvious?
At least elf-x11r6lib is an obsolete virtual package - so any dependency
on it should be consi
On Tue, 28 Oct 1997, Bao C. Ha wrote:
> I am trying to install hamm. And I am missing some of the following
> packages: jdk-common, elf-x11r6lib, ...
elf-x11r6lib is an obsolete virtual package. The few packages that still
claim a depends on it are broken. It will still work if you install
anywa
On Tue, 28 Oct 1997, Bao C. Ha wrote:
> I am trying to install hamm. And I am missing some of the following
> packages: jdk-common, elf-x11r6lib, ...
elf-x11r6lib is an obsolete virtual package that used to be provided by
xlib6 and isn't anylonger (over a year after being announced obsolete).
An
-- Start of PGP signed section.
> Hi,
>
> I'm using the hamm-branch of this great distribution and everything
> has worked generally very well for a development distribution. However,
> I'm missing at least packages ncurses3.4, libreadlineg2, libkde0 and
> slang0.99.38. Most programs work when ins
On Tue, 29 Apr 1997, Rick Jones wrote:
> I've noticed that many files are reported missing by deselect. The
> problem is they're named wrong. In that case you have to manually ftp to
> ftp.debian.org or wherever and get the file. Most of the time the file
> version number is 1 or 2 off.
Hmmm.
I've noticed that many files are reported missing by deselect. The
problem is they're named wrong. In that case you have to manually ftp to
ftp.debian.org or wherever and get the file. Most of the time the file
version number is 1 or 2 off.
On Mon, 28 Apr 1997, David S. Jackson wrote:
> I'm
On Mon, 31 Mar 1997, Christian Hudon wrote:
> On Apr 1, Joseph Skinner wrote
> > Hi
> >
> > I just had a look through the list of updated packages and have found
> > after looking at ftp.debian.org that the new packages are not there.
> >
> > The missing packages include
> >
> > libc6*
> >
On Apr 1, Joseph Skinner wrote
> Hi
>
> I just had a look through the list of updated packages and have found
> after looking at ftp.debian.org that the new packages are not there.
>
> The missing packages include
>
> libc6*
> gcc_2.7.2.2-2
These packages are in the experimental sec
Joseph Skinner wrote:
> I just had a look through the list of updated packages and have found
> after looking at ftp.debian.org that the new packages are not there.
> The strange thing is that for the cases that I looked at the packages that
> they replaced are not there either.
>
> Is there soe
36 matches
Mail list logo
